"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...
It's almost impossible to turn on the radio, surf the net, open a
newspaper or watch TV without hearing about John Kerry's "joke." But
it's just as impossible to hear what John Kerry actually said, in
context. All you can find is the part that Karl Rove wants you to
hear.

All right, Karl Rove !!! Keep up the good work.

Isn't it interesting how so many prominent Democrats demanded Kerry's
apology.
Personally I don't see why he apologized, if he meant what he said.

Max

Charlie Morgan wrote:
On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 05:16:08 GMT, "Maxprop" wrote:


"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
.. .
It's almost impossible to turn on the radio, surf the net, open a
newspaper or watch TV without hearing about John Kerry's "joke." But
it's just as impossible to hear what John Kerry actually said, in
context. All you can find is the part that Karl Rove wants you to
hear.

All right, Karl Rove !!! Keep up the good work.

Isn't it interesting how so many prominent Democrats demanded Kerry's
apology.

No. The Democratic party is made up of people who think for themselves. They are
not a mindless herd like the Republicans.

Personally I don't see why he apologized, if he meant what he said.


He didn't apologoze for what he said. He apologized to anyone who was stupid
enough to misstake what he said as an affront to the troops. In other words,
"I'm sorry you are an idiot".

Max


CWM

If anybody else had said this, we would believe him about his botched
joke. However, Kerry has made a habit of insulting US troops so
anybody who has followed what he has said in the past realizes he
really meant to be insulting to the troops. C. Morgan can try to spin
this any way he likes but Kerry's past has caught up with him.
The Democrats, true to form think everybody else is too stupid to make
the connections with what Kerry said in the past with what he says
today. Perhaps it is because Dems do not learn from the past. If that
is the case, who is stupid? The Dems lose due to their arrogance and
they seem to not be able to figure this out. Many Dems actually say
that they are glad that soldiers get killed because the soldiers are
stupid and then they blame us for regarding what they say as relevant.
Making the same mistakes over and over surely isnt a sign of
intelligence but the Dems have embraced the same failed ideas for
decades and seem to have no new ideas. lacking neew ideas they now
embrace dictatorships and ant-semitism as marks of their intelligence.

This election really isnt about the individual running for election, it
is about the failed philosophy of the Dem lefties vs the attempts of
the Bush admin to do the difficult task of trying to spread democracy.
Sometimes you fail when trying to do the right thing, however, that is
better than the Dem tactic of doing nothing or doing the wrong thing.

wrote in message
ups.com...


This election really isnt about the individual running for election, it
is about the failed philosophy of the Dem lefties

" wrote:
Many Dems actually say
that they are glad that soldiers get killed because the soldiers are
stupid and then they blame us for regarding what they say as relevant.


You can of course substantiate this claim? Hmm, didn't think so. How
much of the rest of what you write is pure fabrication, %100?

Cheers
Marty

wrote:

Many Dems actually say
that they are glad that soldiers get killed because the soldiers are
stupid and then they blame us for regarding what they say as relevant.

Dude, you like really whacked the bejesus out of that strawman there.

I mean, I've got staw all over me now.

Hope you're happy.

//Walt

Actually some Democrats want the killing in war as a means to decrease human
population and make the world more sustainable. They view it as a delayed
abortion.

He didn't apologoze for what he said. He apologized to anyone who was
stupid
enough to misstake what he said as an affront to the troops. In other
words,
"I'm sorry you are an idiot".

So if I write: "You know, education, if you make the most of it, if
you study hard and you do your homework, and you make an effort to be
smart, uh, you, you can do well. If you don't, you get stuck as a
Democrat," it shouldn't offend dems at all because I was insulting the
fact they ask you to register under a party in order to vote. -- And
according to the statement above, if a dem is offended, he could be an
idiot!

SMACK-DOWN!!!!!


"Dak" wrote in message
oups.com...
He didn't apologoze for what he said. He apologized to anyone who was
stupid
enough to misstake what he said as an affront to the troops. In other
words,
"I'm sorry you are an idiot".

So if I write: "You know, education, if you make the most of it, if
you study hard and you do your homework, and you make an effort to be
smart, uh, you, you can do well. If you don't, you get stuck as a
Democrat," it shouldn't offend dems at all because I was insulting the
fact they ask you to register under a party in order to vote. -- And
according to the statement above, if a dem is offended, he could be an
idiot!

On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 11:33:57 -0500, Martin Baxter wrote:

" wrote:
Many Dems actually say
that they are glad that soldiers get killed because the soldiers are
stupid and then they blame us for regarding what they say as relevant.


You can of course substantiate this claim? Hmm, didn't think so. How
much of the rest of what you write is pure fabrication, %100?

Let it go, he's on a roll, damn the facts. dbohara probably wouldn't be
interested our leadership that actually served in the military, but you
might be. Republicans *talk* a good line.

http://www.awolbush.com/whoserved.html

Hitler saw more combat than Bush!


"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 11:33:57 -0500, Martin Baxter wrote:

" wrote:
Many Dems actually say
that they are glad that soldiers get killed because the soldiers are
stupid and then they blame us for regarding what they say as relevant.


You can of course substantiate this claim? Hmm, didn't think so. How
much of the rest of what you write is pure fabrication, %100?

Let it go, he's on a roll, damn the facts. dbohara probably wouldn't be
interested our leadership that actually served in the military, but you
might be. Republicans *talk* a good line.

http://www.awolbush.com/whoserved.html