Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Spent much of the weekend sorting my charts... had a lot more than I
thought. Some go back to the 1960s & '70s and have courses & fixes & notes from ancient voyages (one has 'Beware! Here Be Ye Edge O' Ye Worlde'). Old charts are cool but not very useful. Normally I roll up my charts, keeping them grouped by area, and store them in large diameter tubes w/ caps. Every couple months, I used to re-roll them the other way so they would take too much of a "set." Well of course this system worked great when applied rigorously, but as years go by things get disorganized & you slack up... some of the charts were like a coiled piece of spring steel and took 4 heavy books on each corner to hold open... no way you could use that for navigation. How do you all keep your charts? How old a chart would you consider using when visiting a relatively unfmiliar... or completely unfamiliar... area? -signed- Injun Ear (formerly known as Eagle Eye) |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... How do you all keep your charts? How old a chart would you consider using when visiting a relatively unfmiliar... or completely unfamiliar... area? I would not use an old chart at all in an unfamiliar area. Sandbanks move, buoys are shifted, wrecks appear, lights change characteristics, etc etc. Forget old charts for navigation. Frame them and hang them on the wall if you like. But on your boat have new charts or ones that have been regularly updated from 'Notices to Mariners' (or your local equivlent) either by yourself or by returning your charts to a chart agent for correction up to date. Apart from being a danger to yourself and others your insurance may be deemed invalid on grounds that you were negligent if you knowingly go to sea with out-of-date charts. |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Edgar wrote: wrote in message oups.com... How do you all keep your charts? How old a chart would you consider using when visiting a relatively unfmiliar... or completely unfamiliar... area? I would not use an old chart at all in an unfamiliar area. Sandbanks move, buoys are shifted, wrecks appear, lights change characteristics, etc etc. Forget old charts for navigation. Frame them and hang them on the wall if you like. But on your boat have new charts or ones that have been regularly updated from 'Notices to Mariners' (or your local equivlent) either by yourself or by returning your charts to a chart agent for correction up to date. Apart from being a danger to yourself and others your insurance may be deemed invalid on grounds that you were negligent if you knowingly go to sea with out-of-date charts. Greetings Edgar; What about charts of islands like King's or Palymyra that have not been updated in over 100 years? They would be better then nothing right? I have over 100 charts aboard my boat and some date back to the mid 40's. Also for ocean passages I do not see much changing in mid Pacific or Atlantic. I would agree in a port with major traffic, an up to date chart is the one to use. I'd never ask a sailor to turn his charts into wall paper. Capt. American |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Apart from being a danger to yourself and others your insurance may be
deemed invalid on grounds that you were negligent if you knowingly go to sea with out-of-date charts. Depends on how bad you screw up & if you're stupid enough to say "This wouldn't have happened if I'd had up to date charts." Capt.American wrote: What about charts of islands like King's or Palymyra that have not been updated in over 100 years? Read Edgar's reply again and check for any N2Ms that have come out for the area. They would be better then nothing right? I have over 100 charts aboard my boat and some date back to the mid 40's. Also for ocean passages I do not see much changing in mid Pacific or Atlantic. You have a chart of the mid Atlantic? What a coincidence, so do I.... a blank piece of paper. Ever heard the phrase "off soundings"? I would agree in a port with major traffic, an up to date chart is the one to use. What does traffic have to do with the chart? -signed- Injun Ear (formerly known as Eagle Eye) |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Capt.American wrote:
Edgar wrote: wrote in message oups.com... How do you all keep your charts? How old a chart would you consider using when visiting a relatively unfmiliar... or completely unfamiliar... area? I would not use an old chart at all in an unfamiliar area. Sandbanks move, buoys are shifted, wrecks appear, lights change characteristics, etc etc. Forget old charts for navigation. Frame them and hang them on the wall if you like. But on your boat have new charts or ones that have been regularly updated from 'Notices to Mariners' (or your local equivlent) either by yourself or by returning your charts to a chart agent for correction up to date. Apart from being a danger to yourself and others your insurance may be deemed invalid on grounds that you were negligent if you knowingly go to sea with out-of-date charts. Greetings Edgar; What about charts of islands like King's or Palymyra that have not been updated in over 100 years? They would be better then nothing right? I have over 100 charts aboard my boat and some date back to the mid 40's. Also for ocean passages I do not see much changing in mid Pacific or Atlantic. I would agree in a port with major traffic, an up to date chart is the one to use. I'd never ask a sailor to turn his charts into wall paper. I have a 1867 Boston Harbor chart framed on the wall - there are more than a few differences. In particular, we now have a major airport in the middle of the harbor! There are lots of details I find fascinating. For instance, the major hazard in the harbor is a bar, actually a set of rocks, called "Lower Middle," but there is no "upper middle." In fact, the old chart shows "Upper Middle" in an area that has long been filled in. On the other hand, its interesting that numerous navaids are still in the same location that there were in 140 years ago. |
#6
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: Apart from being a danger to yourself and others your insurance may be deemed invalid on grounds that you were negligent if you knowingly go to sea with out-of-date charts. Depends on how bad you screw up & if you're stupid enough to say "This wouldn't have happened if I'd had up to date charts." Capt.American wrote: What about charts of islands like King's or Palymyra that have not been updated in over 100 years? Read Edgar's reply again and check for any N2Ms that have come out for the area. Just who is updating the LNM on King's island or palmyra? They would be better then nothing right? I have over 100 charts aboard my boat and some date back to the mid 40's. Also for ocean passages I do not see much changing in mid Pacific or Atlantic. You have a chart of the mid Atlantic? What a coincidence, so do I.... a blank piece of paper. Sounds good for whiping your ass Tonto. My charts have lat and lon in hours, min and seconds, shipping lanes, currents, soundings in fathoms, loran lines, lease blocks, compass rose, loran linear interpolator, variation factors, pollution reports, ship wrecks, conversion tables, explosive dumping areas, submarine operation areas, radio range info, reefs, islands, atolls, bottom info, ect..ect..ect and thats the simple charts, not the pilot chart which have average currents, wind, and information beyond your simple understanding of charts. After reading the responce you provided I suggest you hang your charts on the wall and marvel at all the information you have no clue existed. What a putz you are you deserve a chart that rolls up when you try to use it. Go buy software with a chart plotter GPS interface. Surely you can push a few buttons right? Ever heard the phrase "off soundings"? I would agree in a port with major traffic, an up to date chart is the one to use. What does traffic have to do with the chart? High traffic areas have marked channels, dredging, bouys dragged off location, ranges, light list, designated anchorage areas, ect.. and lots of mariners that submit reports for an up to date Local Notice to Mariners. Charts in high traffic areas are in general more up to date and critical to safe navigation. In an area like a secluded cove or harbor with no traffic and no aids to navigation and older chart showing depths, currents, bottom info is all that is needed to safely navigate. Hope this helps. Capt. American -signed- Injun Ear (formerly known as Eagle Eye) |
#7
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Capt.American wrote:
Sounds good for whiping your ass Tonto. You couldn't whip a bowl of milk My charts have lat and lon in hours, min and seconds, Wow! Lines on paper! soundings in fathoms, Why do you need to know how deep the water in the middle of th eocean is? Are you really at risk of running aground there? Gonna drop anchor? ..... loran lines, lease blocks, compass rose, loran linear interpolator, variation factors, pollution reports, Anywhere your boat is ship wrecks, conversion tables, explosive dumping areas, submarine operation areas The whole ocean is a "submarine operating area." .... reefs, islands, atolls Now there you have something... OTOH if it has a shoreline, it's not the "middle of the ocean" any more, is it? -signed- Injun Ear (formerly known as Eagle Eye) |
#8
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt.American" wrote in message ups.com... After reading the responce you provided I suggest you hang your charts on the wall and marvel at all the information you have no clue existed. What a putz you are you deserve a chart that rolls up when you try to use it. Go buy software with a chart plotter GPS interface. Surely you can push a few buttons right? Capt. American's reply does raise another interesting issue. Like I implied in my last post, I do have paper charts for everywhere I go but I also have a chart plotter aboard and the memory chip for this cost me the equivalent of $330. Now where I sail in Oslo fjord this remains useful because there are hundreds, if not thousands, of islands and small rocks which do not change and there are hardly any navigational buoys and no sandbanks at all so the chip on the plotter is still a useful guide and I only bought it last year anyway. But how often is someone who has bought one of these expensive chips going to get an updated one? Paper charts are not cheap but you can afford to update/replace them as necessary, so IMO they are not outdated technology until chart plotter chips come down to reasonable figures. |
#9
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote How do you all keep your charts? How old a chart would you consider using when visiting a relatively unfmiliar... or completely unfamiliar... area? Get with the program Injun Ear! Any competent sailor who stores charts stores them flat. Any real voyaging or cruising sailboat has a chart locker where you can store about a foot deep of charts flat and unfolded. Rolling them up is stupid. It makes them about impossible to use. Actually, paper charts are stupid anymore. You can get free electronic charts from the WEB and they are the most up to datest you can get at the time. If you really demand paper charts then print them on your printer from the e-chart. Cheers, Ellen |
#10
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Edgar wrote:
"Capt.American" wrote in message ups.com... After reading the responce you provided I suggest you hang your charts on the wall and marvel at all the information you have no clue existed. What a putz you are you deserve a chart that rolls up when you try to use it. Go buy software with a chart plotter GPS interface. Surely you can push a few buttons right? Capt. American's reply does raise another interesting issue. Like I implied in my last post, I do have paper charts for everywhere I go but I also have a chart plotter aboard and the memory chip for this cost me the equivalent of $330. Now where I sail in Oslo fjord this remains useful because there are hundreds, if not thousands, of islands and small rocks which do not change and there are hardly any navigational buoys and no sandbanks at all so the chip on the plotter is still a useful guide and I only bought it last year anyway. But how often is someone who has bought one of these expensive chips going to get an updated one? A really good point. I use a Garmin GPSMap 175, given to me in 1997. The chart I use most often, Portland to Cape Cod, will be 10 years old next summer and the format is now obsolete. I have a number of slightly newer chips for the East Coast, but nothing more recent then 2000. Fortunately, this is not my primary tool, I use the GPS to verify my position on a paper chart, which is up to date. I'm glad you brought this up because I'm planning to head Down East this coming summer and don't have the chip, so I have to start looking on ebay! Paper charts are not cheap but you can afford to update/replace them as necessary, so IMO they are not outdated technology until chart plotter chips come down to reasonable figures. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Copying computer CD Charts into a chartplotter | Electronics | |||
Nautical Charts | Cruising | |||
Free downloads of official NOAA raster charts | General | |||
Bill Moyers on environment, politics and Christian fundamentalists | General | |||
What?! Charts, again!? | Cruising |