"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:51:12 -0800, "Capt. JG"
said:

You're missing it.. worth a listen despite their leftish politics... g

Has nothing to do with politics. It's just that with a very few exceptions
I
don't enjoy listening to much music composed after about 1900.

You don't enjoy Aaron Copeland? Or Samuel Barber??

Max

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:51:12 -0800, "Capt. JG"
said:

You're missing it.. worth a listen despite their leftish politics... g

Has nothing to do with politics. It's just that with a very few
exceptions I
don't enjoy listening to much music composed after about 1900.


Sure thing... I have a friend who's the same way... only listens to Haydn.

That's pretty damned narrow, even for someone whose tastes are to better
music than today's country.

Max

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:53:43 -0800, "Capt. JG"
said:

Yeats?

You got it. I've probably written more blank verse than Charlie has read.

If you've signed a birthday card or two, you've written more *words* than BB
has read.

Max

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...
On 15 Feb 2007 16:17:01 -0600, Dave wrote:

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:06:28 -0500, Charlie Morgan said:

So now you are claiming to be Yeats?

Nope. Just someone who knows a bit more about rhyming and non-rhyming
poetry
than you're ever likely to.

That seems highly unlikely.

Good comeback, BB. That nailed him.

Max

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:53:43 -0800, "Capt. JG"
said:

Yeats?

You got it. I've probably written more blank verse than Charlie has read.


I'm betting Charlie has written his share of nothing. g

This presumes, of course, that BB knows how to write.

Max

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:16:07 -0800, "Capt. JG"
said:

Which Hitler is that? Saddam or the president of Iran, who is a slimeball,
but apparently not in charge of the people supplying the weapons in Iraq.

You should communicate with the folks at CIA immediately, as they
apparently
don't know whether he is or is not "in charge of" the people supplying the
weapons. Your evidence on the point would, I'm sure, be most welcome.


I'm just quoting the Pentagon. Sorry if you don't believe them.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Joe" wrote in message
ups.com...
Joe, hate to burst your bubble, but Saddam did destroy and not attempt to
rebuild his WMDs.

Maybe...but he failed to allow inspetor to inspect, he fired weapons
at our planes in the no fly zones, he basically failed to live up to
his surrender for invading Kuwait. Remember thats the place were he
torched 100's of oil wells.

Actually he did allow them back in and we pulled them out. Check it out. I'm
not making it up.


This was a combination of Saddam misreading Bush and of
Bush LYING about why we should invade. If Bush didn't know the facts, he
should have searched them out. He didn't.

Yeah maybe he should of sucked Saddams dick too huh Jon?
IIRC every member of congress voted to take out Saddam except one
coward.

Maybe you should have volunteered to do that.

You mean one person who stood up for what was right, which according to the
right-wingnuts was a coward (and coincidently right).

Which Hitler is that? Saddam or the president of Iran, who is a
slimeball,
but apparently not in charge of the people supplying the weapons in Iraq.

Well Saddams dead and in Hell, so it must be the other one huh? If
that clown can not stem the flow of weapons used to murder American
establishing freedom for the Iraqi people then maybe we need to
encourage him and let him know it's better for him to deal with the
criminals than have us do it with B-52's. After all he is the elected
leader.

Which one? The president of Iran or the religious leader? We wouldn't want
to nuke the wrong Hitler.

Yup... another useless war... one we can't win and will just make the
situation worse.

You make think 160 of our guys getting murdered is a usless reason to
fight back... I do not.

So, nuke millions of people because of the death of 160. Sounds quite
hitler-like to me.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:51:12 -0800, "Capt. JG"
said:

You're missing it.. worth a listen despite their leftish politics... g

Has nothing to do with politics. It's just that with a very few
exceptions I
don't enjoy listening to much music composed after about 1900.


Sure thing... I have a friend who's the same way... only listens to
Haydn.

That's pretty damned narrow, even for someone whose tastes are to better
music than today's country.

Max

It is pretty narrow, but I don't understand the second phrase...

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Maxprop" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Maxprop" wrote in message
nk.net...

"katy" wrote in message
...



essential government employees?

Wouldn't that be an oxymoron?

Max



Hmmm... you're not putting down the military are you? We might have to
Dixie Chick you.

Fine. I'll gladly take five unearned Grammys.

Max

Unearned? Hahaha.... basically, it's a screw you to all the rednecks. I
loved it.

Right. And considering that rednecks are some of the primary buyers of
country music, that should really 'help' the Dixie Chicks' career.

Max



They're not being hurt by it if 1000s of critics voted them best in show.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:53:43 -0800, "Capt. JG"
said:

Yeats?

You got it. I've probably written more blank verse than Charlie has
read.


I'm betting Charlie has written his share of nothing. g

This presumes, of course, that BB knows how to write.

Max



Do you have to know how to write to write nothing?


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com