miguel wrote in
:

Kali wrote:
miguel said:
: Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote:

: Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking usenet
: to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying to
: accomplish.

: Good job there kOOk.

: miguel

So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney?

If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^

This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence. This
is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or from
Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or from
someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar.

This snippet of evidence not only justifies the open KotM nomination of
Michael Cranston attorney, but it also qualifies him for the Bolo Bullis
Foam Duck - AUK's highest lifetime-achievement award for stupidity.

From - http://www.caballista.org/auk/awards.html

"Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - The spoonerism for "dumb ****", for those
who've lost more marbles than a Chinese Checker factory will ever
make."

I hereby nominate "Michael Cranston attorney"/Miguel to become Bolo
Bullis Foam Duck #27.

Seconds, anyone?


Note - To those who will want to make the k'laim that this nomination is
based on 'revenge' due to some coincidental flamewar in which I've never
participated, let it be known that there have been many flamewars in
which individual AUKers have participated where not a single nomination
was ever made. Such k'laims are ludicrous, unfounded, and based on
ignorance (and quite possibly, based on cluelessness) as opposed to
being based on rational thought.

Let's see if you have a sufficient number of neurons firing today to
comprehend a fairly simple argument.

First (not firstly, that's semi-literate), you kookologists
universally disdain taking usenet to real life. "Real life" is fairly
understood to mean consequences in meatspace.

I think that standard of behavior is stupid and cowardly. I think if
somebody types some nasty **** safely from under his bed in momma's
basement he ought to possess enough character or courage to say it to
somebody's face. If said nasty **** has real world consequences, even
moreso. Perhaps there is one or two of you kookologists who possess
the character and courage to abide that standard. I think I've read
about one of you who does MMA training at one point or another. The
rest of you hide behind your self-serving rule of conduct that serves
only to insulate you from any consequences for your bad behavior.

Second, since you kookologists hold universal disdain for taking
usenet to real life, one might expect you to refrain from doing so,
and that when one of your number elects out of desperation to do so,
others of you might be intellectually honest enough to point out the
hypocrisy.

I expect I'll be waiting a long time to see any display of that.

It's the same sort of hypocrisy I pointed out to you about your
netkopping post. Are you too emotionally overwrought to be objective
about this?

miguel


--
Official FAQ for Alt.Usenet.Kooks: http://www.caballista.org/auk

COOSN-266-06-58907

Hammer of Thor - August 2005

Pierre Salinger Memorial "Hook, Line & Sinker" awards -
March 2005, July 2005, August 2005, August 2006, February 2007

[Co]Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler

"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message

miguel wrote in
:

Kali wrote:
miguel said:
Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote:

Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking usenet
to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying to
accomplish.

Good job there kOOk.

miguel

So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney?

If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^

This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence.
This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or
from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or
from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar.
This snippet of evidence not only justifies the open KotM nomination
of Michael Cranston attorney, but it also qualifies him for the Bolo
Bullis Foam Duck - AUK's highest lifetime-achievement award for
stupidity.

From - http://www.caballista.org/auk/awards.html

"Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - The spoonerism for "dumb ****", for those
who've lost more marbles than a Chinese Checker factory will ever
make."

I hereby nominate "Michael Cranston attorney"/Miguel to become Bolo
Bullis Foam Duck #27.

Seconds, anyone?

The nomination is ridiculous.

Note - To those

That would be my cue.

who will want to make the k'laim that this nomination
is based on 'revenge' due to some coincidental flamewar in which I've
never participated, let it be known that there have been many
flamewars in which individual AUKers have participated where not a
single nomination was ever made. Such k'laims are ludicrous,
unfounded, and based on ignorance (and quite possibly, based on
cluelessness)

Precisely the opposite. Unfortunately, I'm still working with the very
same hand tied behind my back.

as opposed to being based on rational thought.

Honor is rational. Without it, civilization would not survive. If I had
no honor, this would be a different argument entirely.

Let's see if you have a sufficient number of neurons firing today to
comprehend a fairly simple argument.

First (not firstly, that's semi-literate), you kookologists
universally disdain taking usenet to real life. "Real life" is fairly
understood to mean consequences in meatspace.

I think that standard of behavior is stupid and cowardly. I think if
somebody types some nasty **** safely from under his bed in momma's
basement he ought to possess enough character or courage to say it to
somebody's face. If said nasty **** has real world consequences, even
moreso. Perhaps there is one or two of you kookologists who possess
the character and courage to abide that standard. I think I've read
about one of you who does MMA training at one point or another. The
rest of you hide behind your self-serving rule of conduct that serves
only to insulate you from any consequences for your bad behavior.

Second, since you kookologists hold universal disdain for taking
usenet to real life, one might expect you to refrain from doing so,
and that when one of your number elects out of desperation to do so,
others of you might be intellectually honest enough to point out the
hypocrisy.

I expect I'll be waiting a long time to see any display of that.

It's the same sort of hypocrisy I pointed out to you about your
netkopping post. Are you too emotionally overwrought to be objective
about this?

miguel

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote in
:

"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message

miguel wrote in
:

Kali wrote:
miguel said:
Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote:

Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking usenet
to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying to
accomplish.

Good job there kOOk.

miguel

So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney?

If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^

This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence.
This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or
from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or
from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar.
This snippet of evidence not only justifies the open KotM nomination
of Michael Cranston attorney, but it also qualifies him for the Bolo
Bullis Foam Duck - AUK's highest lifetime-achievement award for
stupidity.

From - http://www.caballista.org/auk/awards.html

"Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - The spoonerism for "dumb ****", for those
who've lost more marbles than a Chinese Checker factory will ever
make."

I hereby nominate "Michael Cranston attorney"/Miguel to become Bolo
Bullis Foam Duck #27.

Seconds, anyone?

The nomination is ridiculous.

It's interesting how say that this *nomination* is ridiculous - not
Cranston's threat.

Note - To those

That would be my cue.

Paranoid much? I was referring to the nominee.

who will want to make the k'laim that this nomination
is based on 'revenge' due to some coincidental flamewar in which I've
never participated, let it be known that there have been many
flamewars in which individual AUKers have participated where not a
single nomination was ever made. Such k'laims are ludicrous,
unfounded, and based on ignorance (and quite possibly, based on
cluelessness)

Precisely the opposite. Unfortunately, I'm still working with the very
same hand tied behind my back.

as opposed to being based on rational thought.

Honor is rational. Without it, civilization would not survive. If I
had no honor, this would be a different argument entirely.

You take the awards' programme *far* too seriously.

*whoosh*

Let's see if you have a sufficient number of neurons firing today to
comprehend a fairly simple argument.

First (not firstly, that's semi-literate), you kookologists
universally disdain taking usenet to real life. "Real life" is
fairly understood to mean consequences in meatspace.

I think that standard of behavior is stupid and cowardly. I think if
somebody types some nasty **** safely from under his bed in momma's
basement he ought to possess enough character or courage to say it
to somebody's face. If said nasty **** has real world consequences,
even moreso. Perhaps there is one or two of you kookologists who
possess the character and courage to abide that standard. I think
I've read about one of you who does MMA training at one point or
another. The rest of you hide behind your self-serving rule of
conduct that serves only to insulate you from any consequences for
your bad behavior.

Second, since you kookologists hold universal disdain for taking
usenet to real life, one might expect you to refrain from doing so,
and that when one of your number elects out of desperation to do so,
others of you might be intellectually honest enough to point out the
hypocrisy.

I expect I'll be waiting a long time to see any display of that.

It's the same sort of hypocrisy I pointed out to you about your
netkopping post. Are you too emotionally overwrought to be objective
about this?

miguel


--
Official FAQ for Alt.Usenet.Kooks: http://www.caballista.org/auk

COOSN-266-06-58907

Hammer of Thor - August 2005

Pierre Salinger Memorial "Hook, Line & Sinker" awards -
March 2005, July 2005, August 2005, August 2006, February 2007

[Co]Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler

Sean Monaghan wrote:
miguel wrote in
:

Kali wrote:
miguel said:
: Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote:
: Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking usenet
: to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying to
: accomplish.
: Good job there kOOk.
: miguel
So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney?
If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^

This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence. This
is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or from
Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or from
someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar.

Sean, Kali recently stated that she was considered the most reasonable
and judicious of the kookologists. If by that she is contrasting herself
with you, K-Bitch and ****stain, you can imagine the difficulty I or
anybody else might have in giving her any points for that claim.

You have no idea of the extent to which Steve Chaney has taken matters
to RL over the past 12 years wrt me, and you have no idea of the extent
to which his raging insanity has caused him to make unspeakably nasty
claims about my children and my grandchild.

Charlotte, on the other hand, does. If you have any questions about
whether Chaney deserves to have his ass kicked, feel free to direct them
to her.

Now, onto the unarticulated premise of your post, viz: there is never
any cause for threatening violence over a usenet post. Suppose Chaney
says to your face about your 13 year old daughter, "Sean, are you
bringing your 13 year old daughter in for the 1000 man **** tonight?" Do
you put him on the ground and kick him, or do you play your usenet tard
games? You do the latter if you're a coward.

Why should the result be any different if he says it on usenet instead
of to your face, particularly when part of his game is to say it often
enough, and to use your daughter's actual name, so that she gets google
stacked?

miguel

Sean Monaghan wrote:
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote in
:

"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message

miguel wrote in
:

Kali wrote:
miguel said:
Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote:
Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking usenet
to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying to
accomplish.
Good job there kOOk.
miguel
So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney?
If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^

This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence.
This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or
from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or
from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar.
This snippet of evidence not only justifies the open KotM nomination
of Michael Cranston attorney, but it also qualifies him for the Bolo
Bullis Foam Duck - AUK's highest lifetime-achievement award for
stupidity.

From - http://www.caballista.org/auk/awards.html

"Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - The spoonerism for "dumb ****", for those
who've lost more marbles than a Chinese Checker factory will ever
make."

I hereby nominate "Michael Cranston attorney"/Miguel to become Bolo
Bullis Foam Duck #27.

Seconds, anyone?
The nomination is ridiculous.

It's interesting how say that this *nomination* is ridiculous - not
Cranston's threat.

How can you know whether the threat is ridiculous without knowing what
predicated it?

miguel wrote in
:

Sean Monaghan wrote:
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote in
:

"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message

miguel wrote in
:

Kali wrote:
miguel said:
Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote:
Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking
usenet to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying to
accomplish.
Good job there kOOk.
miguel
So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney?
If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^

This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence.
This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or
from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or
from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar.
This snippet of evidence not only justifies the open KotM
nomination of Michael Cranston attorney, but it also qualifies him
for the Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - AUK's highest lifetime-achievement
award for stupidity.

From - http://www.caballista.org/auk/awards.html

"Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - The spoonerism for "dumb ****", for those
who've lost more marbles than a Chinese Checker factory will ever
make."

I hereby nominate "Michael Cranston attorney"/Miguel to become Bolo
Bullis Foam Duck #27.

Seconds, anyone?
The nomination is ridiculous.

It's interesting how say that this *nomination* is ridiculous - not
Cranston's threat.

How can you know whether the threat is ridiculous without knowing what
predicated it?

Irrelevant. The actions of one net.kook never make it okay for another
to make (utterly stupid) life-threatening statements on Usenet.


--
Official FAQ for Alt.Usenet.Kooks: http://www.caballista.org/auk

COOSN-266-06-58907

Hammer of Thor - August 2005

Pierre Salinger Memorial "Hook, Line & Sinker" awards -
March 2005, July 2005, August 2005, August 2006, February 2007

[Co]Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler

"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote in
:

"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message

miguel wrote in
:

Kali wrote:
miguel said:
Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote:

Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking
usenet to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying to
accomplish.

Good job there kOOk.

miguel

So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney?

If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^

This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence.
This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or
from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or
from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar.
This snippet of evidence not only justifies the open KotM nomination
of Michael Cranston attorney, but it also qualifies him for the Bolo
Bullis Foam Duck - AUK's highest lifetime-achievement award for
stupidity.

From - http://www.caballista.org/auk/awards.html

"Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - The spoonerism for "dumb ****", for those
who've lost more marbles than a Chinese Checker factory will ever
make."

I hereby nominate "Michael Cranston attorney"/Miguel to become Bolo
Bullis Foam Duck #27.

Seconds, anyone?

The nomination is ridiculous.

It's interesting how say that this *nomination* is ridiculous - not
Cranston's threat.

In the more than...I saw something from a 2004 post that indicated it
was 12 years then, so that would make it 15 years that Chaney has been
acting like a psychopath online...Mike has made absolutely no effort to
seek out Chaney and "put him in the hospital."

That would lead me to the conclusion that someone is overreacting to
words on the screen, and I don't mean Mike.

Note - To those

That would be my cue.

Paranoid much? I was referring to the nominee.

I'm the only person who has ever made the claim that any of these
nominations of Mike are revenge nominations, so it follows that I would
be the most likely person to do so for this nomination too.

That's logic, not paranoia.

who will want to make the k'laim that this nomination
is based on 'revenge' due to some coincidental flamewar in which
I've never participated, let it be known that there have been many
flamewars in which individual AUKers have participated where not a
single nomination was ever made. Such k'laims are ludicrous,
unfounded, and based on ignorance (and quite possibly, based on
cluelessness)

Precisely the opposite. Unfortunately, I'm still working with the
very same hand tied behind my back.

as opposed to being based on rational thought.

Honor is rational. Without it, civilization would not survive. If I
had no honor, this would be a different argument entirely.

You take the awards' programme *far* too seriously.

Oh, I'm pretty sure it's not *me* who takes the awards' programme far
too seriously.

*whoosh*

Right. It's like being back in fifth grade. No one had a clue then
either.

Let's see if you have a sufficient number of neurons firing today
to comprehend a fairly simple argument.

First (not firstly, that's semi-literate), you kookologists
universally disdain taking usenet to real life. "Real life" is
fairly understood to mean consequences in meatspace.

I think that standard of behavior is stupid and cowardly. I think
if somebody types some nasty **** safely from under his bed in
momma's basement he ought to possess enough character or courage
to say it to somebody's face. If said nasty **** has real world
consequences, even moreso. Perhaps there is one or two of you
kookologists who possess the character and courage to abide that
standard. I think I've read about one of you who does MMA training
at one point or another. The rest of you hide behind your
self-serving rule of conduct that serves only to insulate you from
any consequences for your bad behavior.

Second, since you kookologists hold universal disdain for taking
usenet to real life, one might expect you to refrain from doing so,
and that when one of your number elects out of desperation to do
so, others of you might be intellectually honest enough to point
out the hypocrisy.

I expect I'll be waiting a long time to see any display of that.

It's the same sort of hypocrisy I pointed out to you about your
netkopping post. Are you too emotionally overwrought to be
objective about this?

miguel

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay

"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message

miguel wrote in
:

Sean Monaghan wrote:
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote in
:

"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message

miguel wrote in
:

Kali wrote:
miguel said:
Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote:
Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking
usenet to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying
to accomplish.
Good job there kOOk.
miguel
So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney?
If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^

This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence.
This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis,
or from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal
kook', or from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet
flamewar.
This snippet of evidence not only justifies the open KotM
nomination of Michael Cranston attorney, but it also qualifies him
for the Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - AUK's highest lifetime-achievement
award for stupidity.

From - http://www.caballista.org/auk/awards.html

"Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - The spoonerism for "dumb ****", for those
who've lost more marbles than a Chinese Checker factory will ever
make."

I hereby nominate "Michael Cranston attorney"/Miguel to become
Bolo Bullis Foam Duck #27.

Seconds, anyone?
The nomination is ridiculous.

It's interesting how say that this *nomination* is ridiculous - not
Cranston's threat.

How can you know whether the threat is ridiculous without knowing
what predicated it?

Irrelevant. The actions of one net.kook never make it okay for
another to make (utterly stupid) life-threatening statements on
Usenet.

Life-threatening?

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote in
:

"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote in
:

"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message

miguel wrote in
:

Kali wrote:
miguel said:
Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote:

Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking
usenet to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying to
accomplish.

Good job there kOOk.

miguel

So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney?

If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^

This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence.
This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or
from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or
from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar.
This snippet of evidence not only justifies the open KotM
nomination of Michael Cranston attorney, but it also qualifies him
for the Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - AUK's highest lifetime-achievement
award for stupidity.

From - http://www.caballista.org/auk/awards.html

"Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - The spoonerism for "dumb ****", for those
who've lost more marbles than a Chinese Checker factory will ever
make."

I hereby nominate "Michael Cranston attorney"/Miguel to become Bolo
Bullis Foam Duck #27.

Seconds, anyone?

The nomination is ridiculous.

It's interesting how say that this *nomination* is ridiculous - not
Cranston's threat.

In the more than...I saw something from a 2004 post that indicated it
was 12 years then, so that would make it 15 years that Chaney has been
acting like a psychopath online...Mike has made absolutely no effort
to seek out Chaney and "put him in the hospital."

That would lead me to the conclusion that someone is overreacting to
words on the screen, and I don't mean Mike.

See http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html#question27

Note - To those

That would be my cue.

Paranoid much? I was referring to the nominee.

I'm the only person who has ever made the claim that any of these
nominations of Mike are revenge nominations, so it follows that I
would be the most likely person to do so for this nomination too.

That's logic, not paranoia.

1. You assumed.

2. You came to an inaccurate conclusion.

3. Your 'logic' failed you.

who will want to make the k'laim that this nomination
is based on 'revenge' due to some coincidental flamewar in which
I've never participated, let it be known that there have been many
flamewars in which individual AUKers have participated where not a
single nomination was ever made. Such k'laims are ludicrous,
unfounded, and based on ignorance (and quite possibly, based on
cluelessness)

Precisely the opposite. Unfortunately, I'm still working with the
very same hand tied behind my back.

as opposed to being based on rational thought.

Honor is rational. Without it, civilization would not survive. If I
had no honor, this would be a different argument entirely.

You take the awards' programme *far* too seriously.

Oh, I'm pretty sure it's not *me* who takes the awards' programme far
too seriously.

Says the person who is post-humping my nominations.

*whoosh*

Right. It's like being back in fifth grade. No one had a clue then
either.

Let's see if you have a sufficient number of neurons firing today
to comprehend a fairly simple argument.

First (not firstly, that's semi-literate), you kookologists
universally disdain taking usenet to real life. "Real life" is
fairly understood to mean consequences in meatspace.

I think that standard of behavior is stupid and cowardly. I think
if somebody types some nasty **** safely from under his bed in
momma's basement he ought to possess enough character or courage
to say it to somebody's face. If said nasty **** has real world
consequences, even moreso. Perhaps there is one or two of you
kookologists who possess the character and courage to abide that
standard. I think I've read about one of you who does MMA training
at one point or another. The rest of you hide behind your
self-serving rule of conduct that serves only to insulate you from
any consequences for your bad behavior.

Second, since you kookologists hold universal disdain for taking
usenet to real life, one might expect you to refrain from doing
so, and that when one of your number elects out of desperation to
do so, others of you might be intellectually honest enough to
point out the hypocrisy.

I expect I'll be waiting a long time to see any display of that.

It's the same sort of hypocrisy I pointed out to you about your
netkopping post. Are you too emotionally overwrought to be
objective about this?

miguel


--
Official FAQ for Alt.Usenet.Kooks: http://www.caballista.org/auk

COOSN-266-06-58907

Hammer of Thor - August 2005

Pierre Salinger Memorial "Hook, Line & Sinker" awards -
March 2005, July 2005, August 2005, August 2006, February 2007

[Co]Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote in
:

"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message

miguel wrote in
:

Sean Monaghan wrote:
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote in
:

"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message

miguel wrote in
:

Kali wrote:
miguel said:
Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote:
Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking
usenet to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying
to accomplish.
Good job there kOOk.
miguel
So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney?
If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^

This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence.
This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis,
or from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal
kook', or from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet
flamewar.
This snippet of evidence not only justifies the open KotM
nomination of Michael Cranston attorney, but it also qualifies
him for the Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - AUK's highest
lifetime-achievement award for stupidity.

From - http://www.caballista.org/auk/awards.html

"Bolo Bullis Foam Duck - The spoonerism for "dumb ****", for
those who've lost more marbles than a Chinese Checker factory
will ever make."

I hereby nominate "Michael Cranston attorney"/Miguel to become
Bolo Bullis Foam Duck #27.

Seconds, anyone?
The nomination is ridiculous.

It's interesting how say that this *nomination* is ridiculous - not
Cranston's threat.

How can you know whether the threat is ridiculous without knowing
what predicated it?

Irrelevant. The actions of one net.kook never make it okay for
another to make (utterly stupid) life-threatening statements on
Usenet.

Life-threatening?

Any type of a beating that requires hospitalisation is potentially
life-threatening.


--
Official FAQ for Alt.Usenet.Kooks: http://www.caballista.org/auk

COOSN-266-06-58907

Hammer of Thor - August 2005

Pierre Salinger Memorial "Hook, Line & Sinker" awards -
March 2005, July 2005, August 2005, August 2006, February 2007

[Co]Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler