![]() |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Capt. JG" wrote in
: Answer: PWCs are always at fault. They can't help it, they were built that way. I know someone who was passing a powerboat in a big PWC. The powerboat idiot didn't look behind him to see who was passing him and turned to port, into the PWC who ended up crashing into the port side of the powerboat. The PWC rider successfully sued for a new ski, medical costs, lost wages, etc., etc., after the DNR quoted the rules-of-the-road about maintaining course and speed when being overtaken someone else posted here. DNR investigated the accident and was not amused when the big powerboat rich boy pointed out "It's just a PWC", as you hotheads infer. The hotheaded attitudes displayed in this stupid thread over the hated PWC is a mixture for disaster on the waterways. The PWC riders have just as much rights to use the public's waterways as the millionaires in the Azimuts. Just ask the PWCer's attorney....(c; Someone said he drooled over this case when he found out how much money the powerboater was worth...(c; By the way, in SC, that PWC only needs be 50 ft away from your boat to run full throttle past you....50 ft....Says so right in the boating manual. Run over his little PWC. Make his day..... -- Larry, 3rd Mate S/V "Lionheart" |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Jeff wrote in
: proper to pass within 15 feet of boats doing 25 MPH shouldn't be out there. It's 50 ft in South Carolina...just like for a dock. 200' from the marina. -- Larry |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Here are a couple of the applicable rules to consider.
Note the specific rule for vessels less than 20 metres or a sailing vessel (any length) in a narrow channel. Note the specific rule on overtaking in narrow channels. There are also rules on safe speed which I am happy to provide to help the discussion. People with more savvy than any of use created and continue to improve the rules. It is up to us to learn them. Rule 9 Narrow Channels--International (a)A vessel proceeding along the course of a narrow channel or fairway shall keep as near to the outer limit of the channel or fairway which lies on her starboard side as is safe and practicable. (b)A vessel of less than 20 metres in length or a sailing vessel shall not impede the passage of a vessel which can safely navigate only within a narrow channel or fairway. (d)A vessel shall not cross a narrow channel or fairway if such crossing impedes the passage of a vessel which can safely navigate only within such channel or fairway. The latter vessel may use the sound signal prescribed in Rule 34(d) if in doubt as to the intention of the crossing vessel. (e)(i)In a narrow channel or fairway when overtaking can take place only if the vessel to be overtaken has to take action to permit safe passing, the vessel intending to overtake shall indicate her intention by sounding the appropriate signal prescribed in Rule 34(c)(i). The vessel to be overtaken shall, if in agreement, sound the appropriate signal prescribed in Rule 34(c)(ii) and take steps to permit safe passing. If in doubt she may sound the signals prescribed in Rule 34(d). (ii) This Rule does not relieve the overtaking vessel of her obligation under Rule 13. Rule 13 Overtaking--International (a)Notwithstanding anything contained in the Rules of Part B, Sections I and II, any vessel overtaking any other vessel shall keep out of the way of the vessel being overtaken. (d)Any subsequent alteration of the bearing between the two vessels shall not make the overtaking vessel a crossing vessel within the meaning of these Rules or relieve her of the duty of keeping clear of the overtaken vessel until she is finally past and clear. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Brian Whatcott wrote:
On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 06:34:14 GMT, "Bill McKee" wrote: Doing nothing is not an option. Gary And you put your tanker on the rocks entering San Francisco bay. Sure, we are all that stupid. Sounds like you are. [Bill] I am tired of hearing you two bicker. Why don't you cut rec.boats. building and rec.boats.cruising from your distribution? Please? PLEASE? Brian Whatcott p.s. You are both traceable - don't get me mad. I hope I don't sound like I'm bickering. I am treating this thread as a interesting Rules of the Road discussion and a bit of a review. It's not often that I get to hear the point of view of amateurs or recreational boaters on RofR situations. It is causing me to refer to my books and think. Sorry if you aren't enjoying the thread. Gary |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Bill McKee wrote:
Bzzt: wrong again. I never said I was a jetski. My boat has a jetdrive, but is not a jetski. I'm curious about your boat, Bill... does it have a remote control or a pedal on the floor for the throttle? -- frosty |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Bill McKee" wrote in message ink.net... "Scotty" wrote in message ... "Don White" wrote Not all sailors are familiar enough with the collision regulations either. In your case, sounds like you were overtaking him. You are the 'giveway boat'. That said, he has a responsibility to give you ample time to avoid a collision. Well, he did, didn't he? Was there a collision? SV Barely. But no collision, right? Because I was not drunk like most times. good for you. SBV |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Bill McKee" wrote
Is it really *that* hard to turn a steering wheel, Bill? Do you have wimpy limp wrists? SBV You remind me of the sailor who decides to turn with no signal and Oh, you were serious about those turn signals. SBV |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Gary wrote in news:D44bf.417596$tl2.177416@pd7tw3no:
Narrow Channels--International All this is great....if you're a ship from Le Havre. But, the jetski guy has his South Carolina Dept of Natural Resources, Boater's Handbook. (The guy on the sailboat probably doesn't have anything...and I'm serious.) Whatever bureaucrats are in charge locally are the ones that set the rules and bust them in the harbor and ICW. No boater safety course actually teaches these International Rules. So, the rules he goes by (assuming he goes by rules and is a nice guy with family out for a PWC cruise, not some freak, which most of them really are not) is the Boater's Handbook DNR handed him when he took his 2 sons to the PWC training course DNR ran at the high school so the boys could get their little DNR drivers permits. It says 50' from boats and docks and 200' from marinas. This nonsense of 8 layers of rule-making bureaucrats, all different in every fiefdom you boat across, is REALLY STUPID!! -- Larry |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Larry wrote:
Gary wrote in news:D44bf.417596$tl2.177416@pd7tw3no: Narrow Channels--International All this is great....if you're a ship from Le Havre. But, the jetski guy has his South Carolina Dept of Natural Resources, Boater's Handbook. (The guy on the sailboat probably doesn't have anything...and I'm serious.) Whatever bureaucrats are in charge locally are the ones that set the rules and bust them in the harbor and ICW. No boater safety course actually teaches these International Rules. So, the rules he goes by (assuming he goes by rules and is a nice guy with family out for a PWC cruise, not some freak, which most of them really are not) is the Boater's Handbook DNR handed him when he took his 2 sons to the PWC training course DNR ran at the high school so the boys could get their little DNR drivers permits. It says 50' from boats and docks and 200' from marinas. This nonsense of 8 layers of rule-making bureaucrats, all different in every fiefdom you boat across, is REALLY STUPID!! You are right. There are really only two sets of over-arching rules, the Colregs and the Inland Rules. Adhere to those and all is well. The people that don't learn them cause us all to come to grief. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Gary wrote:
You are right. There are really only two sets of over-arching rules, the Colregs and the Inland Rules. Adhere to those and all is well. The people that don't learn them cause us all to come to grief. It kills some of the yahoos that a slow moving sailboat has right of way over their 300hp, gas guzzlin', air polluting monstrosity. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Don White wrote:
Gary wrote: You are right. There are really only two sets of over-arching rules, the Colregs and the Inland Rules. Adhere to those and all is well. The people that don't learn them cause us all to come to grief. It kills some of the yahoos that a slow moving sailboat has right of way over their 300hp, gas guzzlin', air polluting monstrosity. Kinda like pedestrians, bicycles and cars. Although might has right it is not correct. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Gary" wrote in message
news:5b4bf.407926$oW2.221802@pd7tw1no... Brian Whatcott wrote: On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 06:34:14 GMT, "Bill McKee" wrote: Doing nothing is not an option. Gary And you put your tanker on the rocks entering San Francisco bay. Sure, we are all that stupid. Sounds like you are. [Bill] I am tired of hearing you two bicker. Why don't you cut rec.boats. building and rec.boats.cruising from your distribution? Please? PLEASE? Brian Whatcott p.s. You are both traceable - don't get me mad. I hope I don't sound like I'm bickering. I am treating this thread as a interesting Rules of the Road discussion and a bit of a review. It's not often that I get to hear the point of view of amateurs or recreational boaters on RofR situations. It is causing me to refer to my books and think. Sorry if you aren't enjoying the thread. Gary I think Brian is mostly referring to the bickering part - I apologize for my part in it. I think it's generally a worthwhile discussion of RofR situations. Sometimes the situation is not straightforward of course, and it requires some quick thinking. When I'm teaching, it's not atypical that we're in the midst of significant traffic with a number of different types of vessels... anything from tankers going in both directions, even three sometimes, to sailboats and cabin cruiser types, to small dinghies and human power boats, and even swimmers. I'll typically ask my students, who has stand-on or give way status for a particular boat, say port over starboard, then ask them about another boat coming from a different direction, then about the ferry, then about the kayaker, etc. It makes for an interesting sail if nothing else. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Larry" wrote in message
... "Capt. JG" wrote in : Answer: PWCs are always at fault. They can't help it, they were built that way. I know someone who was passing a powerboat in a big PWC. The powerboat idiot didn't look behind him to see who was passing him and turned to port, into the PWC who ended up crashing into the port side of the powerboat. The PWC rider successfully sued for a new ski, medical costs, lost wages, etc., etc., after the DNR quoted the rules-of-the-road about maintaining course and speed when being overtaken someone else posted here. DNR investigated the accident and was not amused when the big powerboat rich boy pointed out "It's just a PWC", as you hotheads infer. The hotheaded attitudes displayed in this stupid thread over the hated PWC is a mixture for disaster on the waterways. The PWC riders have just as much rights to use the public's waterways as the millionaires in the Azimuts. Just ask the PWCer's attorney....(c; Someone said he drooled over this case when he found out how much money the powerboater was worth...(c; By the way, in SC, that PWC only needs be 50 ft away from your boat to run full throttle past you....50 ft....Says so right in the boating manual. Run over his little PWC. Make his day..... -- Larry, 3rd Mate S/V "Lionheart" Larry, if you or anyone else really thought I was serious, then you have more problems that can be solved here. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Jet Ski overheating problem
I think Brian is mostly referring to the bickering part - I
apologize for my part in it. I think it's generally a worthwhile discussion of RofR situations. Sometimes the situation is not straightforward of course, and it requires some quick thinking. When I'm teaching, it's not atypical that we're in the midst of significant traffic with a number of different types of vessels... anything from tankers going in both directions, even three sometimes, to sailboats and cabin cruiser types, to small dinghies and human power boats, and even swimmers. I'll typically ask my students, who has stand-on or give way status for a particular boat, say port over starboard, then ask them about another boat coming from a different direction, then about the ferry, then about the kayaker, etc. It makes for an interesting sail if nothing else. When you are teaching multiple target situations, how do you prioritize them? Do you run plots with time to CPA? I have a hard time explaining to my watchkeepers that the closest is not always the most threatening and that whatever they do it has to not compound the next situation. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Larry" wrote in message ... Jeff wrote in : proper to pass within 15 feet of boats doing 25 MPH shouldn't be out there. It's 50 ft in South Carolina...just like for a dock. 200' from the marina. -- Larry |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Larry" wrote in message ... Jeff wrote in : proper to pass within 15 feet of boats doing 25 MPH shouldn't be out there. It's 50 ft in South Carolina...just like for a dock. 200' from the marina. -- Larry I guess you never pass on a 2 lane road. Both oncoming and same direction traffic. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Don White" wrote in message ... Gary wrote: You are right. There are really only two sets of over-arching rules, the Colregs and the Inland Rules. Adhere to those and all is well. The people that don't learn them cause us all to come to grief. It kills some of the yahoos that a slow moving sailboat has right of way over their 300hp, gas guzzlin', air polluting monstrosity. There is no "right of way" for boats. If there was as you state, a sailboat, could make any turn he wanted at any time and he would never be at fault. Look at Colregs section 17. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Scotty" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote Is it really *that* hard to turn a steering wheel, Bill? Do you have wimpy limp wrists? SBV You remind me of the sailor who decides to turn with no signal and Oh, you were serious about those turn signals. SBV \ You need to be more creative in your writings. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Gary" wrote in message
news:fd7bf.409721$oW2.156691@pd7tw1no... I think Brian is mostly referring to the bickering part - I apologize for my part in it. I think it's generally a worthwhile discussion of RofR situations. Sometimes the situation is not straightforward of course, and it requires some quick thinking. When I'm teaching, it's not atypical that we're in the midst of significant traffic with a number of different types of vessels... anything from tankers going in both directions, even three sometimes, to sailboats and cabin cruiser types, to small dinghies and human power boats, and even swimmers. I'll typically ask my students, who has stand-on or give way status for a particular boat, say port over starboard, then ask them about another boat coming from a different direction, then about the ferry, then about the kayaker, etc. It makes for an interesting sail if nothing else. When you are teaching multiple target situations, how do you prioritize them? Do you run plots with time to CPA? I have a hard time explaining to my watchkeepers that the closest is not always the most threatening and that whatever they do it has to not compound the next situation. Not familiar with the term CPA. Since this is a teaching situation, I try not to get them into a situation that is going to be overwhelming. We look at potential collision courses of the targets first, then I have them sort out plans of action. You're right of course. Many times, it's not the closest that one needs to be mindful of.. we also try and make an assessment about the level of knowledge on the other boat. Sometimes it's a shock when they do or don't do the right thing. :-) |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Capt. JG wrote:
"Gary" wrote in message news:fd7bf.409721$oW2.156691@pd7tw1no... I think Brian is mostly referring to the bickering part - I apologize for my part in it. I think it's generally a worthwhile discussion of RofR situations. Sometimes the situation is not straightforward of course, and it requires some quick thinking. When I'm teaching, it's not atypical that we're in the midst of significant traffic with a number of different types of vessels... anything from tankers going in both directions, even three sometimes, to sailboats and cabin cruiser types, to small dinghies and human power boats, and even swimmers. I'll typically ask my students, who has stand-on or give way status for a particular boat, say port over starboard, then ask them about another boat coming from a different direction, then about the ferry, then about the kayaker, etc. It makes for an interesting sail if nothing else. When you are teaching multiple target situations, how do you prioritize them? Do you run plots with time to CPA? I have a hard time explaining to my watchkeepers that the closest is not always the most threatening and that whatever they do it has to not compound the next situation. Not familiar with the term CPA. Since this is a teaching situation, I try not to get them into a situation that is going to be overwhelming. We look at potential collision courses of the targets first, then I have them sort out plans of action. You're right of course. Many times, it's not the closest that one needs to be mindful of.. we also try and make an assessment about the level of knowledge on the other boat. Sometimes it's a shock when they do or don't do the right thing. :-) Closest Point of Approach |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Capt. JG wrote:
When you are teaching multiple target situations, how do you prioritize them? Do you run plots with time to CPA? I have a hard time explaining to my watchkeepers that the closest is not always the most threatening and that whatever they do it has to not compound the next situation. Not familiar with the term CPA. Jeeze, Jon, how did you get that license? Did you take a course? (must of just been 6-pak, not master) I could understand if someone from FL didn't know it, but in your area, as well as mine, you should take fog seriously. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Jeff" wrote in message
. .. Capt. JG wrote: When you are teaching multiple target situations, how do you prioritize them? Do you run plots with time to CPA? I have a hard time explaining to my watchkeepers that the closest is not always the most threatening and that whatever they do it has to not compound the next situation. Not familiar with the term CPA. Jeeze, Jon, how did you get that license? Did you take a course? (must of just been 6-pak, not master) I could understand if someone from FL didn't know it, but in your area, as well as mine, you should take fog seriously. Never saw closest point of approach abbreviated. Got the license in the usual way... box of cereal, right? Fog seriously? Naw, just the big ships in it. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Gary" wrote in message
news:Rz9bf.420601$tl2.192513@pd7tw3no... Capt. JG wrote: "Gary" wrote in message news:fd7bf.409721$oW2.156691@pd7tw1no... I think Brian is mostly referring to the bickering part - I apologize for my part in it. I think it's generally a worthwhile discussion of RofR situations. Sometimes the situation is not straightforward of course, and it requires some quick thinking. When I'm teaching, it's not atypical that we're in the midst of significant traffic with a number of different types of vessels... anything from tankers going in both directions, even three sometimes, to sailboats and cabin cruiser types, to small dinghies and human power boats, and even swimmers. I'll typically ask my students, who has stand-on or give way status for a particular boat, say port over starboard, then ask them about another boat coming from a different direction, then about the ferry, then about the kayaker, etc. It makes for an interesting sail if nothing else. When you are teaching multiple target situations, how do you prioritize them? Do you run plots with time to CPA? I have a hard time explaining to my watchkeepers that the closest is not always the most threatening and that whatever they do it has to not compound the next situation. Not familiar with the term CPA. Since this is a teaching situation, I try not to get them into a situation that is going to be overwhelming. We look at potential collision courses of the targets first, then I have them sort out plans of action. You're right of course. Many times, it's not the closest that one needs to be mindful of.. we also try and make an assessment about the level of knowledge on the other boat. Sometimes it's a shock when they do or don't do the right thing. :-) Closest Point of Approach Ahh... thanks. We don't do formal ones during the on-the-water class. Eyeball only. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Larry wrote:
Gary wrote in news:D44bf.417596$tl2.177416@pd7tw3no: Narrow Channels--International All this is great....if you're a ship from Le Havre. But, the jetski guy has his South Carolina Dept of Natural Resources, Boater's Handbook. (The guy on the sailboat probably doesn't have anything...and I'm serious.) Whatever bureaucrats are in charge locally are the ones that set the rules and bust them in the harbor and ICW. No boater safety course actually teaches these International Rules. So, the rules he goes by (assuming he goes by rules and is a nice guy with family out for a PWC cruise, not some freak, which most of them really are not) is the Boater's Handbook DNR handed him when he took his 2 sons to the PWC training course DNR ran at the high school so the boys could get their little DNR drivers permits. It says 50' from boats and docks and 200' from marinas. This nonsense of 8 layers of rule-making bureaucrats, all different in every fiefdom you boat across, is REALLY STUPID!! Naw, it's the only way to sentance young Johnny to a day or two of trial and similar imprisonment or even fines for driving a jski like a, well, you know. Even just paying legal fees to not show up... 'snot worth a charter challenge, y'know? To some the only real punishment possible is being kept waiting beside the road for 20 minutes to sign for a ticket. Daddy's guy pops a chzek, and I'm Bob's boy again! But it gives an honest cop motivation to try to 'help' a few who might just kill themselves if they don't get a good talking to, possibly even to shoot a few suspects evading arrest. Rule 1 in the book is really "Do everything you can to avoid a collision, unless you are protecting the flag carrier." New robotic insects will telemeter odours as well as high quality vidio and audio to headquarters and nearby patrol vessels. Not all them skeeters is real. It's getting to be such a madhouse out here on the water that they are going to install bouyed lanes, like streets, in some areas, with speed limits and photoradar lights here and there, and helicopter camera and gun ship patrols, who will soon be overburdened and overbudgeted by medical rescues and evacuations. The photoradar fines will show up in your income tax, property tax, auto permit fees, and insurance premiums. They will even garnishee your X's support payments, but not your child support. Sailboats are, of course, to be avoided at all costs, have complete right of way, and are not so regulated. N'yah, N'yahh, N'ya N'ya N'Yahhhh! International boundary crossings must be authorised by automatic cell picturephone optional service documentation, six week setup required, pay per use, paypal required, or those crossing the line will be boarded. If your cell account application and passport quality photograph isn't notarized, witnessed, vetted, approved, enabled, vetted again and authorized, promulgated and verified biometrically, you will be boarded. Except for sailboats, who may zig zag wherever the hell they think the wind, rocks and compass pertubations want them to, so there. They have an express line to customs and a toll free number, too. They have their own rules about survival in the wind, and how to avoid each other. Some required turns could need to be initiated a mile in advance of heavy vessels, for a sailor to avoid being inadverdently mashed by an encumbered vessel in who's wind shadow they could become becalmed, and it's you who must avoid their attempts to non the less make time to weather, wherever their anchorage may be. God rest them all, safe at hawser's end, and thee, brother. Even if you have to go 100 extra yards to do it, even if you have to back up in your lane to make a hole in traffic, you got to do it. It's the law, Billy. God help you if you scratch their gelcoat, even shake their stirred martinii with wake. Damages is damages, and gin is expensive, too expensive to be ruined by you. (insert razzzzzberry, here) Sailors shouldn't need to look out for whirly gigs or steamboats, we can't get away, and can't catch you. Most of you are too hard to see, are our sails? All you need is to tongue your fly by wire joystick and Mr. Scott will beam you past us, right? Behind us, that is, it being safer, all 'round. Well clear. If the cook's flag is flying, you must not over agitate the poaching eggs with a heavy wake, right? If you know sailing, it is easy to differentiate a true sailboat from a stickboat, or motor sailer, who will endeavour to behave as a powerboat, but who is still capable of being spun about by the wake of a helicopter, or even broached, then reversed if they suddenly and unexpected must turn ever so slightly to avoid you avoiding that dead head he saw 20 minutes ago and still can't seem to get around, what with the current, and wind shiftiness, and all. Sailors called Kite skiers usually have the highest priority, being essentially pedestrians, or potential aspiring pedestrians, most of the time. To whom would you bitch if you ran over some stupid swimmer's head and the steel plate in his old veteran's head should scratch your epoxy coated prop? All considered, the best weapon on a boat is a yard sprayer full of gasoline. What about them Pelicans, eh? Terry K |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Bill McKee" wrote in
ink.net: I guess you never pass on a 2 lane road. Both oncoming and same direction traffic. This isn't about "me". I was simply stating the local rules. -- Larry |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Capt. JG" wrote in
: Larry, if you or anyone else really thought I was serious, then you have more problems that can be solved here. -- Oh. It's very hard to tell who's serious and who's just trolling, given I've seen this belligerent attitude problem on both sides of the issue out on the harbor. -- Larry |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Bill McKee" wrote I guess you never pass on a 2 lane road. Both oncoming and same direction traffic. I sail in a bay, not on the road. Does your little toy jet ski have wheels? SBV |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Bill McKee wrote:
I guess you never pass on a 2 lane road. Both oncoming and same direction traffic. Hey Bill. Here it is for you ins very simple terms A boat is NOT a car. DSK |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"DSK" wrote in message .. . Bill McKee wrote: I guess you never pass on a 2 lane road. Both oncoming and same direction traffic. Hey Bill. Here it is for you ins very simple terms A boat is NOT a car. DSK But passing is passing. And a car can be a boat. Both the Amphicar, and a couple models lately out of Cuba, and did you ever see a 1957 Buick? |
Jet Ski overheating problem
At this point, you've made it quite obvious that you are a clueless feeb
who is never going to get a clue, no matter how patiently it is explained to you. But for the benefit of others, I'm going to go just a bit further here. A boat is NOT a car. Bill McKee wrote: But passing is passing. No, it is not. If you would drive a boat at 60 mph just a few feet from another boat... or any object in the water... then you should be physically restrained from operating a boat since you are a deadly hazard to yourself and others. Are cars affected by wakes? Currents? Leeway? Do boats have brakes? Suppose you "pass" another boat, just as you wuould in a car, at the same moment a wake strikes that other boat and causes it to slew 20 degrees momentarily? Or just when your own boat meets a wake? If you overtake another vessel in such a way that you cannot avoid that vessel if his boat turns, or rolls, or side-slips, or has some minor equipment failure, the *you* have acted dangerously and incompetently. DSK |
Jet Ski overheating problem
DSK you are a pompus ass.
"DSK" wrote in message ... At this point, you've made it quite obvious that you are a clueless feeb who is never going to get a clue, no matter how patiently it is explained to you. But for the benefit of others, I'm going to go just a bit further here. A boat is NOT a car. Bill McKee wrote: But passing is passing. No, it is not. If you would drive a boat at 60 mph just a few feet from another boat... or any object in the water... then you should be physically restrained from operating a boat since you are a deadly hazard to yourself and others. Are cars affected by wakes? Currents? Leeway? Do boats have brakes? Suppose you "pass" another boat, just as you wuould in a car, at the same moment a wake strikes that other boat and causes it to slew 20 degrees momentarily? Or just when your own boat meets a wake? If you overtake another vessel in such a way that you cannot avoid that vessel if his boat turns, or rolls, or side-slips, or has some minor equipment failure, the *you* have acted dangerously and incompetently. DSK |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Bill McKee" wrote
I guess you never pass on a 2 lane road. Both oncoming and same direction traffic. Hey Bill. Here it is for you ins very simple terms A boat is NOT a car. DSK But passing is passing. Where Bill boats they have yellow lines painted on the water. And traffic lights at the intersections. I really believe he has turn signals on his boat. SBV |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Scotty" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote I guess you never pass on a 2 lane road. Both oncoming and same direction traffic. Hey Bill. Here it is for you ins very simple terms A boat is NOT a car. DSK But passing is passing. Where Bill boats they have yellow lines painted on the water. And traffic lights at the intersections. I really believe he has turn signals on his boat. SBV Actually some of the lakes in the USA have buoys defining the lanes of travel, and all boats have to go in the same direction on the same side of the buoys. And I guess a Hoby Cat can turn which ever direction he wants at any time he wants, without penalty of he hits another boat? |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"DSK" wrote in message ... At this point, you've made it quite obvious that you are a clueless feeb who is never going to get a clue, no matter how patiently it is explained to you. But for the benefit of others, I'm going to go just a bit further here. A boat is NOT a car. Bill McKee wrote: But passing is passing. No, it is not. If you would drive a boat at 60 mph just a few feet from another boat... or any object in the water... then you should be physically restrained from operating a boat since you are a deadly hazard to yourself and others. Are cars affected by wakes? Currents? Leeway? Do boats have brakes? Suppose you "pass" another boat, just as you wuould in a car, at the same moment a wake strikes that other boat and causes it to slew 20 degrees momentarily? Or just when your own boat meets a wake? If you overtake another vessel in such a way that you cannot avoid that vessel if his boat turns, or rolls, or side-slips, or has some minor equipment failure, the *you* have acted dangerously and incompetently. DSK You have minor or major equipment failure, you are responsible for the damage. You should maintain your boat better. If you are lucky, you only run into rocks or the bank, not into a swimming area. And you are supposed to look before you turn. Being an sailboater, does not relieve you for responsibility. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Bill McKee" wrote A boat is a car.. Where Bill boats they have yellow lines painted on the water. And traffic lights at the intersections. I really believe he has turn signals on his boat. SBV Actually some of the lakes in the USA have buoys defining the lanes of travel, and all boats have to go in the same direction on the same side of the buoys. And I guess a Hoby Cat can turn which ever direction he wants at any time he wants, without penalty of he hits another boat? So it was a Hobie Cat you were bearing down on at 25MPH. Were you trying to get revenge because of this; http://www.thebeachcats.com/OnTheWir...Repellent.html SBV |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Scotty" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote A boat is a car.. Where Bill boats they have yellow lines painted on the water. And traffic lights at the intersections. I really believe he has turn signals on his boat. SBV Actually some of the lakes in the USA have buoys defining the lanes of travel, and all boats have to go in the same direction on the same side of the buoys. And I guess a Hoby Cat can turn which ever direction he wants at any time he wants, without penalty of he hits another boat? So it was a Hobie Cat you were bearing down on at 25MPH. Were you trying to get revenge because of this; http://www.thebeachcats.com/OnTheWir...Repellent.html SBV No, it was a 25' sailboat under power. A powerboat. They then raised sails, while motor is still running and made a 90 degree turn in front of me. Still a powerboat. And I guess DSK would argue that it is a sailboat at all times. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Bill McKee wrote:
No, it was a 25' sailboat under power. A powerboat. They then raised sails, while motor is still running and made a 90 degree turn in front of me. Still a powerboat. And I guess DSK would argue that it is a sailboat at all times. How long are you gonna beat this dead horse? You should have raised the sailboat on VHF...bet you could have talked him to death. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Don White" wrote in message ... Bill McKee wrote: No, it was a 25' sailboat under power. A powerboat. They then raised sails, while motor is still running and made a 90 degree turn in front of me. Still a powerboat. And I guess DSK would argue that it is a sailboat at all times. How long are you gonna beat this dead horse? You should have raised the sailboat on VHF...bet you could have talked him to death. Seems as if you and yours are beating it to death. If there was time to raise him on the VHF, we would have been a lot further apart when he turned. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Is there any chance of declaring a cease-fire on this thread, or at least
consigning it to newsgroups other than rec.boats.building? It has had nothing to do with boat-building for the last 100 or so acrimonious, ad-hominem entries. Please allow us to get back to our usual squabbles over wood versus fiberglass. (g) Seems as if you and yours are beating it to death. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Alex" wrote in message
. net... Is there any chance of declaring a cease-fire on this thread, or at least consigning it to newsgroups other than rec.boats.building? It has had nothing to do with boat-building for the last 100 or so acrimonious, ad-hominem entries. Please allow us to get back to our usual squabbles over wood versus fiberglass. (g) Seems as if you and yours are beating it to death. Ah, but you should have interjected something about the potential difference between the damage sustained on a fiberglass vs. wooden vessel! Would the fiberglass better absorb the blow? g -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com