![]() |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... In article , Jonathan Ganz wrote: The colregs do. Did you actually go to the link? I bet you didn't. Well, have a great evening... I'm outta here until tomorrow evening. Guess I'll go sailing and see if there are any jetskiers out there who know the rules of the road. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com Better not get in front of a tanker. Your posting will come back to haunt you. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Bill McKee" wrote in message .net... "Jim Carter" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message nk.net... "Jim Carter" wrote in message ... Bill, if "you" collided with them, "you" would be at fault. It is your responsibility, under Rule 8, the collision regulations, to avoid a collision. Jim Not when he is 15' from me and makes a 90 degree turn in front of a boat moving 25 miles per hour. His responsibility requires him to avoid the collision and has to keep in a continous direction when being overtaken. Yes Bill, You would still be at fault in this instance. You are breaking several of the Collision Regulations. rule 5, rule 6, rule 7, and rule 8. You have disregarded all of these. How? You were not paying attention in rule 5, and allowed yourself to get too close to the sailboat. You were going to fast to avoid the collision which is in contradiction of rule 6. You, most definitely broke rule 7, (part a.) in as much as you collided with the sailboat. You broke rule 8 because you did not take action to avoid the collision. Jim Bzzt: Sailboat made a bad move. Prove I was not paying attention, and that an illegal direction change while being overtaken did not cause the accident. Bill, here is the proof for you. If "you" hit the sailboat that means that you were not paying attention to various factors, those factors being your speed & your proximity to the sailboat. Ergo.......your broke Rule 5. The sailboat making a bad move has nothing to do with it. You were too close! You were going too fast! You hit the sailboat! You're in the wrong....... Jim Carter "The Boat" Bayfield. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Jim Carter" wrote in message .. . "Bill McKee" wrote in message .net... "Jim Carter" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message nk.net... "Jim Carter" wrote in message ... Bill, if "you" collided with them, "you" would be at fault. It is your responsibility, under Rule 8, the collision regulations, to avoid a collision. Jim Not when he is 15' from me and makes a 90 degree turn in front of a boat moving 25 miles per hour. His responsibility requires him to avoid the collision and has to keep in a continous direction when being overtaken. Yes Bill, You would still be at fault in this instance. You are breaking several of the Collision Regulations. rule 5, rule 6, rule 7, and rule 8. You have disregarded all of these. How? You were not paying attention in rule 5, and allowed yourself to get too close to the sailboat. You were going to fast to avoid the collision which is in contradiction of rule 6. You, most definitely broke rule 7, (part a.) in as much as you collided with the sailboat. You broke rule 8 because you did not take action to avoid the collision. Jim Bzzt: Sailboat made a bad move. Prove I was not paying attention, and that an illegal direction change while being overtaken did not cause the accident. Bill, here is the proof for you. If "you" hit the sailboat that means that you were not paying attention to various factors, those factors being your speed & your proximity to the sailboat. Ergo.......your broke Rule 5. The sailboat making a bad move has nothing to do with it. You were too close! You were going too fast! You hit the sailboat! You're in the wrong....... Jim Carter "The Boat" Bayfield. I may get a minority of the blame, but he CAN NOT CHANGE DIRECTION IN FRONT OF THE OVERTAKING BOAT! He gets the majority of the fault. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Bill McKee wrote:
I may get a minority of the blame Nah, majority. ... but he CAN NOT CHANGE DIRECTION IN FRONT OF THE OVERTAKING BOAT! He gets the majority of the fault. Please cite the ColReg which says so. DSK |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"DSK" wrote in message .. . Bill McKee wrote: I may get a minority of the blame Nah, majority. ... but he CAN NOT CHANGE DIRECTION IN FRONT OF THE OVERTAKING BOAT! He gets the majority of the fault. Please cite the ColReg which says so. DSK Rule 17 a) i) |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Bill McKee" wrote in message nk.net... "DSK" wrote in message .. . Bill McKee wrote: I may get a minority of the blame Nah, majority. ... but he CAN NOT CHANGE DIRECTION IN FRONT OF THE OVERTAKING BOAT! He gets the majority of the fault. Please cite the ColReg which says so. DSK Rule 17 a) i) Wrong again Bill. Did you not read Rule 13 part (a)? If not, here it is for you. "Notwithstanding anything contained in the Rules of Part B, Sections I and II, any vessel overtaking any other vessel shall keep out of the way of the vessel being overtaken." This means that you were, at 25 feet behind the sailboat, and going 25 MPH, you were not in a position to "keep out of the way". Right Bill? Proof of this is in Rule 17 (b) . Did you read this part Bill? If not, here it is for you. "When, from any cause, the vessel required to keep her course and speed finds herself so close that collision cannot be avoided by the action of the give-way vessel alone, she shall take such action as will best aid to avoid collision. This could be the reason for her turning. Right Bill? This means Bill, that if you collided with the sailboat, the majority of the blame is YOURS. Jim Carter "The Boat" Bayfield. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Capt Joe,
All security experts strongly recommend you do not include your address and phone number in your UseNet Posts. "Captain Joe Redcloud" wrote in message ... On 2 Nov 2005 16:47:08 -0800, lid (Jonathan Ganz) wrote: In article . net, Bill McKee bmckee=at-ix.netcom.com wrote: "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Yeah, so? What's your point? I know the regs and clearly you can quote them. What are you trying to tell us here? That you are an idiot. Ah, a name caller. Well, ok then. You sure won that argument on the merits. Yes, you can be sure that Jon Gayanzy has NEVER resorted to name calling when it suited his own purposes. Captain Joe Redcloud 1882 Chestnut Hill Road Mohnton PA (610) 856-7118 |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Jon,
In a passing situation both boats must maintain their course and heading. Some boaters, both power and sail do not understand the ColRegs, the biggest problem some sail boaters make is assuming they are a sailboat when they are under power, and assuming they have the right of way under all conditions when they are under sail. "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... In article . net, Bill McKee bmckee=at-ix.netcom.com wrote: "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Yeah, so? What's your point? I know the regs and clearly you can quote them. What are you trying to tell us here? That you are an idiot. Ah, a name caller. Well, ok then. You sure won that argument on the merits. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Jet Ski overheating problem
JimC,
If there is a collision and both boats could have avoided the collision, both boats can be held partially reasonable. If the sailboat in a passing situation turns in front of another boat and it is not reasonable for the other boater to avoid the collision, the powerboater will not be held responsible. "Jim Carter" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message news:fkaaf.4109 I know what is involved with sailing. Married a good sailors daughter and used to windsurf. But too many "sailors" figure they have the right of way as they have a sailboat. I have had "sailors" do a 90 degree in front of me when lifting the sails and the iron sail is still running, and then yell at me. They would yell even louder if I collided with them and when they had to pay enormous sums of money to me. Bill, if "you" collided with them, "you" would be at fault. It is your responsibility, under Rule 8, the collision regulations, to avoid a collision. Jim |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Dr. Dr. Smithers" Ask Me about my Phd @ Diploma Mill .com wrote in message . .. JimC, If there is a collision and both boats could have avoided the collision, both boats can be held partially reasonable. If the sailboat in a passing situation turns in front of another boat and it is not reasonable for the other boater to avoid the collision, the powerboater will not be held responsible. Dr. Smithers, the first part of your statement is absolutely correct. The second part of your statement is incorrect in as much as there is no such thing as it being "not reasonable" for the powerboater to avoid the collision in the way Bill has described the situation. In this case it would have been the fault of Bill's judgement. He was too close and too fast in the situation. He MUST stay clear in the overtaking situation. Jim Carter "The Boat" Bayfield |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com