Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am in the process of refitting a santana 22 that will be used on the
san francisco bay, and will be replacing the standing rigging. The upper and lower shrouds on each side attach to one chainplate. This chainplate is located about 18" inboard of the beam, passes through the cabintop, and is throughbolted to the main bulkhead. That's all the background, now the problem. I have the chainplates out, and have found an area of pitting in the stainless (grade unknown) that is about 1" wide and 2 1/2" tall, with a few small isolated pits outside of this area. The pits range from barely a pinhole with almost no depth, to nearly 1/16" diam by nearly 1/16" deep. All of the pitting is in the area where the plate passes through the deck, and there is evidence on the bulkhead of water getting through the deck seal. The plate is 2" wide, 1/4" thick, and about 18" long. the shrouds attached are 5/32" upper and 3/16" lower. The boat is about 35 years old, but the original chainplates from Schock were 1/4" aluminum plate, and I don't know how far back the stainless plates were put in. I have gotten three opinions on whether the pitting is a big deal or not: 1. YES, it's a big deal, the pitting will continue and likely extends beyond what is visible now. Replace the plates immediately. 2. No, it's insignificant, the plate is way, way, way oversized and a little pitting won't hurt a bit. You could lift the boat (2600 lbs unloaded) with a plate half that size. 3. Probably not. Just paint the area of the plate that will be sealed off from the atmosphere before reinstalling to prevent further pitting. The machine shop offering the third opinion also said that they could fabricate two new chainplates for $200 us. Relative to the cost of things on this boat, $200 is a large sum and I don't want to throw it away on servicable parts, but I also don't want to suffer a dramatic failure out on the bay. In the realm of peace of mind, my wife / co-owner was present to hear the first and most troubling opinion, but not the other more calming opinions. any thoughts? thanks, Joe |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Replace 'em. I agree with (1). The chainplate with both shrouds attached represents a single point of failure for all support against side loads. Blowing out a chainplate on the bay could ruin your entire day. While it's true that a 1/4" x 2" chainplate cross-section is way overkill for the size of the rig, you can't tell by looking at the surface how deep and pervasive the damage really is. If the $200 is outside your budget, find a metals supplier and buy a piece of stainless strap of the right dimensions and make them yourself. You can cut it with a hacksaw with some difficulty, but if you can find a friend with a metal-cutting bandsaw and a drill press and a bench grinder it'll go a lot faster and better. Or perhaps you can do some of the fabrication and have a machine shop do just the drilling and bending, at less expense to you. The $200 quote seems in line with what a boatyard machine shop would want for the job, but it seems a little high to me for the actual amount of work that needs to be done. I doubt if there's an hour of work in the job, and even at $75/hour (my local boatyard shop's rate) that's a little high. Probably you got the quote from a shop that caters to the marine trades. If you supply the materials, just about any auto parts store with a machine shop in the back could probably do the fabrication for you at a lower price. Get 316L stainless while you're at it, instead of the cheaper 304 or 18-8 - the 316L is relatively immune to the crevice corrosion problem you're experiencing. You can probably buy the metal for twenty dollars or less - they sell it by the pound. Before you reinstall the chainplates, look very carefully at the condition of the bulkhead where the chainplates are fastened. If water has been getting in for a long time, it's possible that there's localized deterioration of the plywood. If there is, do whatever is necessary to restore the strength of that area. It doesn't make much difference how new and strong your chainplate is, if it pulls out of the bulkhead. When you're done, caulk the hell out of the openings where the chain plates pass through the deck. If you can make a slotted cover plate that slides down over the chain plate and covers the opening and is separately fastened to the deck, you can protect the caulking from UV degradation and it will last longer. Good luck, Tom Dacon "joe anglim" wrote in message om... I am in the process of refitting a santana 22 that will be used on the san francisco bay, and will be replacing the standing rigging. The upper and lower shrouds on each side attach to one chainplate. This chainplate is located about 18" inboard of the beam, passes through the cabintop, and is throughbolted to the main bulkhead. That's all the background, now the problem. I have the chainplates out, and have found an area of pitting in the stainless (grade unknown) that is about 1" wide and 2 1/2" tall, with a few small isolated pits outside of this area. The pits range from barely a pinhole with almost no depth, to nearly 1/16" diam by nearly 1/16" deep. All of the pitting is in the area where the plate passes through the deck, and there is evidence on the bulkhead of water getting through the deck seal. The plate is 2" wide, 1/4" thick, and about 18" long. the shrouds attached are 5/32" upper and 3/16" lower. The boat is about 35 years old, but the original chainplates from Schock were 1/4" aluminum plate, and I don't know how far back the stainless plates were put in. I have gotten three opinions on whether the pitting is a big deal or not: 1. YES, it's a big deal, the pitting will continue and likely extends beyond what is visible now. Replace the plates immediately. 2. No, it's insignificant, the plate is way, way, way oversized and a little pitting won't hurt a bit. You could lift the boat (2600 lbs unloaded) with a plate half that size. 3. Probably not. Just paint the area of the plate that will be sealed off from the atmosphere before reinstalling to prevent further pitting. The machine shop offering the third opinion also said that they could fabricate two new chainplates for $200 us. Relative to the cost of things on this boat, $200 is a large sum and I don't want to throw it away on servicable parts, but I also don't want to suffer a dramatic failure out on the bay. In the realm of peace of mind, my wife / co-owner was present to hear the first and most troubling opinion, but not the other more calming opinions. any thoughts? thanks, Joe |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is a _lot_ of info about Santana's around SF bay. Why not walk
around and ask around. You can find lots of examples and experiences. Those sound like HUGE chain plates for that boat. Even if you postulate that all the pitted metal is just cut out, the remaining stuff would probably still be over kill. Since the plates are out, maybe you could go walk into a surveyer's office and get his opinion on the spot. However, by talking with local owners (or on the web), you can find out what common practice is, and at least get new ones more or less sized to that boat. The "hole in the roof" would need a little extra caulking, though. Slotted cover plates that slide down the chain plate onto the deck surface really make a difference to leaking. If the bulkhead is messed up, get new metal double or triple the original length and bolt it into something that remains solid lower down there. I think you would want to install it so the upper shroud (the one with the most load) gets the fair lead, but then again, ask around of those who have done it before or take a look at a bunch of boats and see what people have done. Rufus |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
joe anglim wrote:
I am in the process of refitting a santana 22 that will be used on the san francisco bay, and will be replacing the standing rigging. The upper and lower shrouds on each side attach to one chainplate. This chainplate is located about 18" inboard of the beam, passes through the cabintop, and is throughbolted to the main bulkhead. That's all the background, now the problem. I have the chainplates out, and have found an area of pitting in the stainless (grade unknown) that is about 1" wide and 2 1/2" tall, with a few small isolated pits outside of this area. The pits range from barely a pinhole with almost no depth, to nearly 1/16" diam by nearly 1/16" deep. All of the pitting is in the area where the plate passes through the deck, and there is evidence on the bulkhead of water getting through the deck seal. The plate is 2" wide, 1/4" thick, and about 18" long. the shrouds attached are 5/32" upper and 3/16" lower. The boat is about 35 years old, but the original chainplates from Schock were 1/4" aluminum plate, and I don't know how far back the stainless plates were put in. I have gotten three opinions on whether the pitting is a big deal or not: 1. YES, it's a big deal, the pitting will continue and likely extends beyond what is visible now. Replace the plates immediately. 2. No, it's insignificant, the plate is way, way, way oversized and a little pitting won't hurt a bit. You could lift the boat (2600 lbs unloaded) with a plate half that size. 3. Probably not. Just paint the area of the plate that will be sealed off from the atmosphere before reinstalling to prevent further pitting. The machine shop offering the third opinion also said that they could fabricate two new chainplates for $200 us. Relative to the cost of things on this boat, $200 is a large sum and I don't want to throw it away on servicable parts, but I also don't want to suffer a dramatic failure out on the bay. In the realm of peace of mind, my wife / co-owner was present to hear the first and most troubling opinion, but not the other more calming opinions. any thoughts? thanks, Joe why not take it to a welder, and have the damaged spots welded up and then grind them down to a flush surface? might be cheaper than having a new one made. just my $0.02. -- An amateur built the ark ....professionals built the Titanic. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() www.schaefermarine.com makes chainplates as a stock item. Cheap. Their website seems a bit bent at the moment. Google for schaefer chainplates. joe anglim wrote: I am in the process of refitting a santana 22 that will be used on the san francisco bay, and will be replacing the standing rigging. The upper and lower shrouds on each side attach to one chainplate. This chainplate is located about 18" inboard of the beam, passes through the cabintop, and is throughbolted to the main bulkhead. That's all the background, now the problem. I have the chainplates out, and have found an area of pitting in the stainless (grade unknown) that is about 1" wide and 2 1/2" tall, with a few small isolated pits outside of this area. The pits range from barely a pinhole with almost no depth, to nearly 1/16" diam by nearly 1/16" deep. All of the pitting is in the area where the plate passes through the deck, and there is evidence on the bulkhead of water getting through the deck seal. The plate is 2" wide, 1/4" thick, and about 18" long. the shrouds attached are 5/32" upper and 3/16" lower. The boat is about 35 years old, but the original chainplates from Schock were 1/4" aluminum plate, and I don't know how far back the stainless plates were put in. I have gotten three opinions on whether the pitting is a big deal or not: 1. YES, it's a big deal, the pitting will continue and likely extends beyond what is visible now. Replace the plates immediately. 2. No, it's insignificant, the plate is way, way, way oversized and a little pitting won't hurt a bit. You could lift the boat (2600 lbs unloaded) with a plate half that size. 3. Probably not. Just paint the area of the plate that will be sealed off from the atmosphere before reinstalling to prevent further pitting. The machine shop offering the third opinion also said that they could fabricate two new chainplates for $200 us. Relative to the cost of things on this boat, $200 is a large sum and I don't want to throw it away on servicable parts, but I also don't want to suffer a dramatic failure out on the bay. In the realm of peace of mind, my wife / co-owner was present to hear the first and most troubling opinion, but not the other more calming opinions. any thoughts? thanks, Joe |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the comments. I can respond to some of the points made:
It's true that there are lots of these boats around here, and lots of collective wisdom. Opinion 2 came from a respected rigger with years and years of Santana experience. He replaces the stock aluminum chainplates with 1/8" stainless. Schock also sells new chainplates now that they are selling new santana 22's again, but the bolt pattern is different on the new hulls so I would have to mess with the bulkhead. Same case for the standard Schaefer plates. I'll look more closely before buttoning everything back up, but the plywood seems to be in pretty good shape - some varnish has dissappeared, but no apparent softness in the plys or raised surface. I do have slotted caps and will caulk well. I'm not wild about going to mild steel/paint or spending much money or effort improving the ones I have. If I'm going to mess with it, I want less worries, not more. The $200 quote was for 316 at a generic machine shop - I had to describe what a chainplate is and does, I take that as a good sign but I probably should have just said it was for farm equipment. I didn't ask them about 316L. My gut feeling is that if I don't replace them, I'll probably worry about them enough that even if there is no spectacular failure on the bay, the $200 would have been worth it. I'll have to check with a friend to see if he can handle stainless in his limited backyard shop. McMaster-Carr's price for a 2" x 36" x 1/4 flat bar of 316 is $42 plus shipping. They don't have the 316L in 2" bars so I would have to cut down a larger plate, for $65. Local would be a better bet anyway to avoid shipping... Thanks again. I appreciate all the fast responses. Joe |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe
I think that if you stand back a little from this and read your own words, you will clean it up and put it back. From where I sit you are saying that original construction was 1/8 aluminum, and that you have a replacement made from 1/4 SS. I've no idea of the loads or stresses, but if the original alu was anywhere near good enough, then 1/8 SS would have been overkill. Or if the original was under-sized, the 1/8 is OK. So even if you had lost 50% thickness all over ( which you don't sem to be suggesting) seems to me you are still well into the OK range. Just remember that SS requires oxygen for it's corrosion resistance and don't go overboard on sealing/bedding which might exclude oxygen and accelerate corrosion. If you are accepting the advice of the rigger who replaces the 1/8 alu in 1/8" SS, why are you planning to go back with new 1/4?. What thickness are the new Schock ones? What grade? I suggest you could either stay with the 1/4 SS and inspect it again in a few years, or make the replacement out of 1/8" and be pretty comfortable either way ..... Regards David "joe anglim" wrote in message om... Thanks for the comments. I can respond to some of the points made: It's true that there are lots of these boats around here, and lots of collective wisdom. Opinion 2 came from a respected rigger with years and years of Santana experience. He replaces the stock aluminum chainplates with 1/8" stainless. Schock also sells new chainplates now that they are selling new santana 22's again, but the bolt pattern is different on the new hulls so I would have to mess with the bulkhead. Same case for the standard Schaefer plates. I'll look more closely before buttoning everything back up, but the plywood seems to be in pretty good shape - some varnish has dissappeared, but no apparent softness in the plys or raised surface. I do have slotted caps and will caulk well. I'm not wild about going to mild steel/paint or spending much money or effort improving the ones I have. If I'm going to mess with it, I want less worries, not more. The $200 quote was for 316 at a generic machine shop - I had to describe what a chainplate is and does, I take that as a good sign but I probably should have just said it was for farm equipment. I didn't ask them about 316L. My gut feeling is that if I don't replace them, I'll probably worry about them enough that even if there is no spectacular failure on the bay, the $200 would have been worth it. I'll have to check with a friend to see if he can handle stainless in his limited backyard shop. McMaster-Carr's price for a 2" x 36" x 1/4 flat bar of 316 is $42 plus shipping. They don't have the 316L in 2" bars so I would have to cut down a larger plate, for $65. Local would be a better bet anyway to avoid shipping... Thanks again. I appreciate all the fast responses. Joe |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
For some reason google wouldn't let me respond to David post.
The original aluminum chainplates were 1/4" thick. Enough of those failed in the early years on the bay that most of the fleet was converted to stainless. At least one prominent local rigger was using 1/8 stainless in the swap (with apparently no reported failure after the swap.) There was also at least someone out there using 1/4" stainless in the swap, because that's what my boat ended up with. You're right, I should ask Schock what size and grade the new chainplates are. joe |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can buy 3' of 2 x 0.25 of 304L bar for $16 from
http://www.onlinemetals.com/ What's to discuss? On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:40:17 -0800, "Tom Dacon" wrote: Replace 'em. I agree with (1). The chainplate with both shrouds attached represents a single point of failure for all support against side loads. Blowing out a chainplate on the bay could ruin your entire day. While it's true that a 1/4" x 2" chainplate cross-section is way overkill for the size of the rig, you can't tell by looking at the surface how deep and pervasive the damage really is. If the $200 is outside your budget, find a metals supplier and buy a piece of stainless strap of the right dimensions and make them yourself. You can cut it with a hacksaw with some difficulty, but if you can find a friend with a metal-cutting bandsaw and a drill press and a bench grinder it'll go a lot faster and better. Or perhaps you can do some of the fabrication and have a machine shop do just the drilling and bending, at less expense to you. The $200 quote seems in line with what a boatyard machine shop would want for the job, but it seems a little high to me for the actual amount of work that needs to be done. I doubt if there's an hour of work in the job, and even at $75/hour (my local boatyard shop's rate) that's a little high. Probably you got the quote from a shop that caters to the marine trades. If you supply the materials, just about any auto parts store with a machine shop in the back could probably do the fabrication for you at a lower price. Get 316L stainless while you're at it, instead of the cheaper 304 or 18-8 - the 316L is relatively immune to the crevice corrosion problem you're experiencing. You can probably buy the metal for twenty dollars or less - they sell it by the pound. Before you reinstall the chainplates, look very carefully at the condition of the bulkhead where the chainplates are fastened. If water has been getting in for a long time, it's possible that there's localized deterioration of the plywood. If there is, do whatever is necessary to restore the strength of that area. It doesn't make much difference how new and strong your chainplate is, if it pulls out of the bulkhead. When you're done, caulk the hell out of the openings where the chain plates pass through the deck. If you can make a slotted cover plate that slides down over the chain plate and covers the opening and is separately fastened to the deck, you can protect the caulking from UV degradation and it will last longer. Good luck, Tom Dacon "joe anglim" wrote in message . com... I am in the process of refitting a santana 22 that will be used on the san francisco bay, and will be replacing the standing rigging. The upper and lower shrouds on each side attach to one chainplate. This chainplate is located about 18" inboard of the beam, passes through the cabintop, and is throughbolted to the main bulkhead. That's all the background, now the problem. I have the chainplates out, and have found an area of pitting in the stainless (grade unknown) that is about 1" wide and 2 1/2" tall, with a few small isolated pits outside of this area. The pits range from barely a pinhole with almost no depth, to nearly 1/16" diam by nearly 1/16" deep. All of the pitting is in the area where the plate passes through the deck, and there is evidence on the bulkhead of water getting through the deck seal. The plate is 2" wide, 1/4" thick, and about 18" long. the shrouds attached are 5/32" upper and 3/16" lower. The boat is about 35 years old, but the original chainplates from Schock were 1/4" aluminum plate, and I don't know how far back the stainless plates were put in. I have gotten three opinions on whether the pitting is a big deal or not: 1. YES, it's a big deal, the pitting will continue and likely extends beyond what is visible now. Replace the plates immediately. 2. No, it's insignificant, the plate is way, way, way oversized and a little pitting won't hurt a bit. You could lift the boat (2600 lbs unloaded) with a plate half that size. 3. Probably not. Just paint the area of the plate that will be sealed off from the atmosphere before reinstalling to prevent further pitting. The machine shop offering the third opinion also said that they could fabricate two new chainplates for $200 us. Relative to the cost of things on this boat, $200 is a large sum and I don't want to throw it away on servicable parts, but I also don't want to suffer a dramatic failure out on the bay. In the realm of peace of mind, my wife / co-owner was present to hear the first and most troubling opinion, but not the other more calming opinions. any thoughts? thanks, Joe |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
removing corrosion | General | |||
Parker boat trim corrosion | General | |||
Corrosion Questions | General |