Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi, I am pretty sure this question has been covered before, but I thinking now about casting my lead fin keel. The architects drawings show the keelbolts bent over inside the keel to lock them in, but I have always been told to draw a keel bolt every few years to check their condition. Any thoughts on this? It would be simple enough to fit a frame with nuts to screw the keelbolts into before pouring the lead around, so that they stay unscrewble, but is this the best solution? And is there a better material to use than stainless steel? - Within reason that is. The keel weight is 2 tons Pete |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been told that for a lead keel, one must use bronze fasteners.
Roger http://home.insightbb.com/~derbyrm "pete" wrote in message news ![]() Hi, I am pretty sure this question has been covered before, but I thinking now about casting my lead fin keel. The architects drawings show the keelbolts bent over inside the keel to lock them in, but I have always been told to draw a keel bolt every few years to check their condition. Any thoughts on this? It would be simple enough to fit a frame with nuts to screw the keelbolts into before pouring the lead around, so that they stay unscrewble, but is this the best solution? And is there a better material to use than stainless steel? - Within reason that is. The keel weight is 2 tons Pete |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete,
The best choice is maleable iron, but finding them is difficult. Find a guy that makes wrought iron gates. It is best to have them made by a blacksmith. The second best is manganese bronze. The absolute last material to use is stainless. The explanation is long and tortuous, but here is a short version. Stainless is susceptable to crevise corrosion and when it occurs, it is very fast. Stainless is rust free only in the presence of oxygen. If the bolt is subjected to rubbing, even a little bit, the oxide coating is removed and must replentish. When the water around the bolt is oxygen depleted (stagnent water), the corrosion begins. Iron is non-homogenous and is not susceptible to internal electrolosis like steel, because steel is an alloy (homogenous). Bronze is also good, but it is suceptable to dissimilar metal electrolosis, especially with steel alloys and requires extensive galvanic protection.(sacrificial anodes) In making your choice, you need to consider hull material and underwater metal. When using iron, use old fashion red lead packing for protection outside and tar inside. Steve "pete" wrote in message news ![]() Hi, I am pretty sure this question has been covered before, but I thinking now about casting my lead fin keel. The architects drawings show the keelbolts bent over inside the keel to lock them in, but I have always been told to draw a keel bolt every few years to check their condition. Any thoughts on this? It would be simple enough to fit a frame with nuts to screw the keelbolts into before pouring the lead around, so that they stay unscrewble, but is this the best solution? And is there a better material to use than stainless steel? - Within reason that is. The keel weight is 2 tons Pete |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, where I live there are loads of these guys. You have confirmed
what I thought about the stainless problem, but do I need to use larger diameter iron bolts in lieu of a given diameter for the stainless ones? The hull is wood strip composite, so no problems for anything there. On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:24:17 +0100, "Steve Lusardi" wrote: Pete, The best choice is maleable iron, but finding them is difficult. Find a guy that makes wrought iron gates. It is best to have them made by a blacksmith. The second best is manganese bronze. The absolute last material to use is stainless. The explanation is long and tortuous, but here is a short version. Stainless is susceptable to crevise corrosion and when it occurs, it is very fast. Stainless is rust free only in the presence of oxygen. If the bolt is subjected to rubbing, even a little bit, the oxide coating is removed and must replentish. When the water around the bolt is oxygen depleted (stagnent water), the corrosion begins. Iron is non-homogenous and is not susceptible to internal electrolosis like steel, because steel is an alloy (homogenous). Bronze is also good, but it is suceptable to dissimilar metal electrolosis, especially with steel alloys and requires extensive galvanic protection.(sacrificial anodes) In making your choice, you need to consider hull material and underwater metal. When using iron, use old fashion red lead packing for protection outside and tar inside. Steve "pete" wrote in message news ![]() Hi, I am pretty sure this question has been covered before, but I thinking now about casting my lead fin keel. The architects drawings show the keelbolts bent over inside the keel to lock them in, but I have always been told to draw a keel bolt every few years to check their condition. Any thoughts on this? It would be simple enough to fit a frame with nuts to screw the keelbolts into before pouring the lead around, so that they stay unscrewble, but is this the best solution? And is there a better material to use than stainless steel? - Within reason that is. The keel weight is 2 tons Pete |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You will have a very hard time finding malleable iron bolts these days. 99%
of what we call "wrought iron" these days is actually mild steel. You can find aluminum bronze which is much better but it will cost you more than the rest of the boat. Because of all the talk about crevasse corrosion I did a lot of research before settling on 316 stainless. Crevasse corrosion requires an oxygen depleted environment AND an electrolyte like seawater. If the hull to keel joint is reasonably well sealed there will be no electrolyte. Stainless is a compromise but 99% of production boats are built with stainless keel bolts. If it were as bad as a lot of people think we would have keels falling off all over the place. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com "pete" wrote in message ... Thanks, where I live there are loads of these guys. You have confirmed what I thought about the stainless problem, but do I need to use larger diameter iron bolts in lieu of a given diameter for the stainless ones? The hull is wood strip composite, so no problems for anything there. On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:24:17 +0100, "Steve Lusardi" wrote: Pete, The best choice is maleable iron, but finding them is difficult. Find a guy that makes wrought iron gates. It is best to have them made by a blacksmith. The second best is manganese bronze. The absolute last material to use is stainless. The explanation is long and tortuous, but here is a short version. Stainless is susceptable to crevise corrosion and when it occurs, it is very fast. Stainless is rust free only in the presence of oxygen. If the bolt is subjected to rubbing, even a little bit, the oxide coating is removed and must replentish. When the water around the bolt is oxygen depleted (stagnent water), the corrosion begins. Iron is non-homogenous and is not susceptible to internal electrolosis like steel, because steel is an alloy (homogenous). Bronze is also good, but it is suceptable to dissimilar metal electrolosis, especially with steel alloys and requires extensive galvanic protection.(sacrificial anodes) In making your choice, you need to consider hull material and underwater metal. When using iron, use old fashion red lead packing for protection outside and tar inside. Steve "pete" wrote in message news ![]() Hi, I am pretty sure this question has been covered before, but I thinking now about casting my lead fin keel. The architects drawings show the keelbolts bent over inside the keel to lock them in, but I have always been told to draw a keel bolt every few years to check their condition. Any thoughts on this? It would be simple enough to fit a frame with nuts to screw the keelbolts into before pouring the lead around, so that they stay unscrewble, but is this the best solution? And is there a better material to use than stainless steel? - Within reason that is. The keel weight is 2 tons Pete |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry Glenn, there are keels falling off all over the place. You just don't
hear about them so often. I can think of 2 incidents that were highly publicized. Simon something-or-other of Bonjovi putzing about the Solent about 15 years ago in his 75' Maxi and "Plop" right in front of hundreds of other boaters in Southhampton water he nearly drowns. Then you had that Tony something-or-other in one of the more recent BOAC challenges off the coast of Australia. Took an act of God and the Australian Navy to save his ass. You are correct about having to have both a depleted environment and an electrolyte, but that is exactly what you have. You are also correct about sealing, but I don't think it is possible to do. There is simply to much movement between the hull and the external ballast to give me peace of mind. All it takes is a little seapage and you have stagnant water just ready to be depleted of oxygen. Iron is available and it is cheap. It resists fatique better than stainless and rusts only to a point and stops. Most importantly, it resists electrolysis because it is non-homogenous and it is proven solution over a very long time of useage. I know you believe in what you say. You practise what you preach. You did a super job on your ballast and I truly wish you success, but the stainless bolts still trouble me. Steve "Glenn Ashmore" wrote in message news:a9GIf.32633$Dh.4639@dukeread04... You will have a very hard time finding malleable iron bolts these days. 99% of what we call "wrought iron" these days is actually mild steel. You can find aluminum bronze which is much better but it will cost you more than the rest of the boat. Because of all the talk about crevasse corrosion I did a lot of research before settling on 316 stainless. Crevasse corrosion requires an oxygen depleted environment AND an electrolyte like seawater. If the hull to keel joint is reasonably well sealed there will be no electrolyte. Stainless is a compromise but 99% of production boats are built with stainless keel bolts. If it were as bad as a lot of people think we would have keels falling off all over the place. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com "pete" wrote in message ... Thanks, where I live there are loads of these guys. You have confirmed what I thought about the stainless problem, but do I need to use larger diameter iron bolts in lieu of a given diameter for the stainless ones? The hull is wood strip composite, so no problems for anything there. On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:24:17 +0100, "Steve Lusardi" wrote: Pete, The best choice is maleable iron, but finding them is difficult. Find a guy that makes wrought iron gates. It is best to have them made by a blacksmith. The second best is manganese bronze. The absolute last material to use is stainless. The explanation is long and tortuous, but here is a short version. Stainless is susceptable to crevise corrosion and when it occurs, it is very fast. Stainless is rust free only in the presence of oxygen. If the bolt is subjected to rubbing, even a little bit, the oxide coating is removed and must replentish. When the water around the bolt is oxygen depleted (stagnent water), the corrosion begins. Iron is non-homogenous and is not susceptible to internal electrolosis like steel, because steel is an alloy (homogenous). Bronze is also good, but it is suceptable to dissimilar metal electrolosis, especially with steel alloys and requires extensive galvanic protection.(sacrificial anodes) In making your choice, you need to consider hull material and underwater metal. When using iron, use old fashion red lead packing for protection outside and tar inside. Steve "pete" wrote in message news ![]() Hi, I am pretty sure this question has been covered before, but I thinking now about casting my lead fin keel. The architects drawings show the keelbolts bent over inside the keel to lock them in, but I have always been told to draw a keel bolt every few years to check their condition. Any thoughts on this? It would be simple enough to fit a frame with nuts to screw the keelbolts into before pouring the lead around, so that they stay unscrewble, but is this the best solution? And is there a better material to use than stainless steel? - Within reason that is. The keel weight is 2 tons Pete |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Steve Lusardi wrote: Simon something-or-other of Bonjovi Ha ha, that is "Simon Le Bon" from Duran Duran, even. :-) |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok Steve now lets ignore such things as canting keels, keels on high tech
racing boats which are fourteen feet deep and fastened with minimum strength to save weight. Give us a few examples of normal production boats that have lost their keels. "Steve Lusardi" wrote in message ... Sorry Glenn, there are keels falling off all over the place. You just don't hear about them so often. I can think of 2 incidents that were highly publicized. Simon something-or-other of Bonjovi putzing about the Solent about 15 years ago in his 75' Maxi and "Plop" right in front of hundreds of other boaters in Southhampton water he nearly drowns. Then you had that Tony something-or-other in one of the more recent BOAC challenges off the coast of Australia. Took an act of God and the Australian Navy to save his ass. You are correct about having to have both a depleted environment and an electrolyte, but that is exactly what you have. You are also correct about sealing, but I don't think it is possible to do. There is simply to much movement between the hull and the external ballast to give me peace of mind. All it takes is a little seapage and you have stagnant water just ready to be depleted of oxygen. Iron is available and it is cheap. It resists fatique better than stainless and rusts only to a point and stops. Most importantly, it resists electrolysis because it is non-homogenous and it is proven solution over a very long time of useage. I know you believe in what you say. You practise what you preach. You did a super job on your ballast and I truly wish you success, but the stainless bolts still trouble me. Steve "Glenn Ashmore" wrote in message news:a9GIf.32633$Dh.4639@dukeread04... You will have a very hard time finding malleable iron bolts these days. 99% of what we call "wrought iron" these days is actually mild steel. You can find aluminum bronze which is much better but it will cost you more than the rest of the boat. Because of all the talk about crevasse corrosion I did a lot of research before settling on 316 stainless. Crevasse corrosion requires an oxygen depleted environment AND an electrolyte like seawater. If the hull to keel joint is reasonably well sealed there will be no electrolyte. Stainless is a compromise but 99% of production boats are built with stainless keel bolts. If it were as bad as a lot of people think we would have keels falling off all over the place. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com "pete" wrote in message ... Thanks, where I live there are loads of these guys. You have confirmed what I thought about the stainless problem, but do I need to use larger diameter iron bolts in lieu of a given diameter for the stainless ones? The hull is wood strip composite, so no problems for anything there. On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:24:17 +0100, "Steve Lusardi" wrote: Pete, The best choice is maleable iron, but finding them is difficult. Find a guy that makes wrought iron gates. It is best to have them made by a blacksmith. The second best is manganese bronze. The absolute last material to use is stainless. The explanation is long and tortuous, but here is a short version. Stainless is susceptable to crevise corrosion and when it occurs, it is very fast. Stainless is rust free only in the presence of oxygen. If the bolt is subjected to rubbing, even a little bit, the oxide coating is removed and must replentish. When the water around the bolt is oxygen depleted (stagnent water), the corrosion begins. Iron is non-homogenous and is not susceptible to internal electrolosis like steel, because steel is an alloy (homogenous). Bronze is also good, but it is suceptable to dissimilar metal electrolosis, especially with steel alloys and requires extensive galvanic protection.(sacrificial anodes) In making your choice, you need to consider hull material and underwater metal. When using iron, use old fashion red lead packing for protection outside and tar inside. Steve "pete" wrote in message news ![]() Hi, I am pretty sure this question has been covered before, but I thinking now about casting my lead fin keel. The architects drawings show the keelbolts bent over inside the keel to lock them in, but I have always been told to draw a keel bolt every few years to check their condition. Any thoughts on this? It would be simple enough to fit a frame with nuts to screw the keelbolts into before pouring the lead around, so that they stay unscrewble, but is this the best solution? And is there a better material to use than stainless steel? - Within reason that is. The keel weight is 2 tons Pete |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Keel Shield | Cruising | |||
Offshore in a Bristol 32, Full Keel, Cutter Rig | Cruising | |||
loose footed vs. bolt rope | ASA | |||
Need Starboard or other plastic parts and material? | Crew | |||
keel strip | General |