Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Prop fouling is one of the biggest pains about having a boat in warm
waters. Even coating it with anti-fouling every year doesnt help as the anti-fouling is blasted off by cavitation and sand. Using the boat every week seems to help but if you use it less, soon you are just giving the barnacles a thrill ride. You might think that bronze props wouldnt foul due to their copper content but the use of a shaft zinc suppresses Cu ions from going into the water because the Zn is more electronegative. I have observed that the shaft zinc doesnt seem to foul although it does sacrificially erode. So, if Zn suppresses fouling, why not coat props with a thick coating of Zn? This would not only protect the prop and related gear from corrosion but suppress fouling. I can imagine doing this either by electro-deposition or hot-dip galvanizing. Hot-dip methods sometimes leave metal drips and other flaws that would unbalance the prop but perhaps a better quality process is available. The problem with Zn electro-deposition is that the coatings are normally fairly thin. For work, I do Nickel and copper electro-deposition to thickness up to 1 mm (.040") on a routine basis. It is slow, taking over 48 hours but perhaps the same could be done for Zn to produce a coating say .005" thick. If such a service existed where you could send your prop every year or two for such a caoting to protect it, how many people would use it? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Our sailboat prop had the same problem with barnacles for years until I was
advised to coat it heavily with that stuff that parents use on baby bottoms, Desitin. It worked like a charm, but for best coverage it had to be applied a couple of times a summer. "Parallax" wrote in message om... Prop fouling is one of the biggest pains about having a boat in warm waters. Even coating it with anti-fouling every year doesnt help as the anti-fouling is blasted off by cavitation and sand. Using the boat every week seems to help but if you use it less, soon you are just giving the barnacles a thrill ride. You might think that bronze props wouldnt foul due to their copper content but the use of a shaft zinc suppresses Cu ions from going into the water because the Zn is more electronegative. I have observed that the shaft zinc doesnt seem to foul although it does sacrificially erode. So, if Zn suppresses fouling, why not coat props with a thick coating of Zn? This would not only protect the prop and related gear from corrosion but suppress fouling. I can imagine doing this either by electro-deposition or hot-dip galvanizing. Hot-dip methods sometimes leave metal drips and other flaws that would unbalance the prop but perhaps a better quality process is available. The problem with Zn electro-deposition is that the coatings are normally fairly thin. For work, I do Nickel and copper electro-deposition to thickness up to 1 mm (.040") on a routine basis. It is slow, taking over 48 hours but perhaps the same could be done for Zn to produce a coating say .005" thick. If such a service existed where you could send your prop every year or two for such a caoting to protect it, how many people would use it? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have the same grief in keeping antifoul on props - But is it OK to put
Zinc on top of Bronze? I have noticed that different metals together (say aluminium rivets into stainless) seem to promote electrolytic (or some) type corrosion. regards Shawn "Scallywag" Brisbane Australia "Parallax" wrote in message om... Prop fouling is one of the biggest pains about having a boat in warm waters. Even coating it with anti-fouling every year doesnt help as the anti-fouling is blasted off by cavitation and sand. Using the boat every week seems to help but if you use it less, soon you are just giving the barnacles a thrill ride. You might think that bronze props wouldnt foul due to their copper content but the use of a shaft zinc suppresses Cu ions from going into the water because the Zn is more electronegative. I have observed that the shaft zinc doesnt seem to foul although it does sacrificially erode. So, if Zn suppresses fouling, why not coat props with a thick coating of Zn? This would not only protect the prop and related gear from corrosion but suppress fouling. I can imagine doing this either by electro-deposition or hot-dip galvanizing. Hot-dip methods sometimes leave metal drips and other flaws that would unbalance the prop but perhaps a better quality process is available. The problem with Zn electro-deposition is that the coatings are normally fairly thin. For work, I do Nickel and copper electro-deposition to thickness up to 1 mm (.040") on a routine basis. It is slow, taking over 48 hours but perhaps the same could be done for Zn to produce a coating say .005" thick. If such a service existed where you could send your prop every year or two for such a caoting to protect it, how many people would use it? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
hi Tom
Did you apply this stuff as well as (or over?) antifouling or just straight onto a sanded clean bronze prop? Does it dry and stay on? regards Shawn "Scallywag" Brisbane Australia "Tom R." wrote in message ... Our sailboat prop had the same problem with barnacles for years until I was advised to coat it heavily with that stuff that parents use on baby bottoms, Desitin. It worked like a charm, but for best coverage it had to be applied a couple of times a summer. "Parallax" wrote in message om... Prop fouling is one of the biggest pains about having a boat in warm waters. Even coating it with anti-fouling every year doesnt help as the anti-fouling is blasted off by cavitation and sand. Using the boat every week seems to help but if you use it less, soon you are just giving the barnacles a thrill ride. You might think that bronze props wouldnt foul due to their copper content but the use of a shaft zinc suppresses Cu ions from going into the water because the Zn is more electronegative. I have observed that the shaft zinc doesnt seem to foul although it does sacrificially erode. So, if Zn suppresses fouling, why not coat props with a thick coating of Zn? This would not only protect the prop and related gear from corrosion but suppress fouling. I can imagine doing this either by electro-deposition or hot-dip galvanizing. Hot-dip methods sometimes leave metal drips and other flaws that would unbalance the prop but perhaps a better quality process is available. The problem with Zn electro-deposition is that the coatings are normally fairly thin. For work, I do Nickel and copper electro-deposition to thickness up to 1 mm (.040") on a routine basis. It is slow, taking over 48 hours but perhaps the same could be done for Zn to produce a coating say .005" thick. If such a service existed where you could send your prop every year or two for such a caoting to protect it, how many people would use it? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Shawn" wrote in message ...
I have the same grief in keeping antifoul on props - But is it OK to put Zinc on top of Bronze? I have noticed that different metals together (say aluminium rivets into stainless) seem to promote electrolytic (or some) type corrosion. regards Shawn "Scallywag" Brisbane Australia "Parallax" wrote in message om... Prop fouling is one of the biggest pains about having a boat in warm waters. Even coating it with anti-fouling every year doesnt help as the anti-fouling is blasted off by cavitation and sand. Using the boat every week seems to help but if you use it less, soon you are just giving the barnacles a thrill ride. You might think that bronze props wouldnt foul due to their copper content but the use of a shaft zinc suppresses Cu ions from going into the water because the Zn is more electronegative. I have observed that the shaft zinc doesnt seem to foul although it does sacrificially erode. So, if Zn suppresses fouling, why not coat props with a thick coating of Zn? This would not only protect the prop and related gear from corrosion but suppress fouling. I can imagine doing this either by electro-deposition or hot-dip galvanizing. Hot-dip methods sometimes leave metal drips and other flaws that would unbalance the prop but perhaps a better quality process is available. The problem with Zn electro-deposition is that the coatings are normally fairly thin. For work, I do Nickel and copper electro-deposition to thickness up to 1 mm (.040") on a routine basis. It is slow, taking over 48 hours but perhaps the same could be done for Zn to produce a coating say .005" thick. If such a service existed where you could send your prop every year or two for such a caoting to protect it, how many people would use it? The Zinc will "protect" the bronze. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Having a prop copper plated solves the fouling problem.
Many outfits do this for around $100 per prop. Been around for many years. Doug s/v Callista "Parallax" wrote in message om... Prop fouling is one of the biggest pains about having a boat in warm waters. Even coating it with anti-fouling every year doesnt help as the anti-fouling is blasted off by cavitation and sand. Using the boat every week seems to help but if you use it less, soon you are just giving the barnacles a thrill ride. You might think that bronze props wouldnt foul due to their copper content but the use of a shaft zinc suppresses Cu ions from going into the water because the Zn is more electronegative. I have observed that the shaft zinc doesnt seem to foul although it does sacrificially erode. So, if Zn suppresses fouling, why not coat props with a thick coating of Zn? This would not only protect the prop and related gear from corrosion but suppress fouling. I can imagine doing this either by electro-deposition or hot-dip galvanizing. Hot-dip methods sometimes leave metal drips and other flaws that would unbalance the prop but perhaps a better quality process is available. The problem with Zn electro-deposition is that the coatings are normally fairly thin. For work, I do Nickel and copper electro-deposition to thickness up to 1 mm (.040") on a routine basis. It is slow, taking over 48 hours but perhaps the same could be done for Zn to produce a coating say .005" thick. If such a service existed where you could send your prop every year or two for such a caoting to protect it, how many people would use it? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Doug Dotson" wrote in message ...
Having a prop copper plated solves the fouling problem. Many outfits do this for around $100 per prop. Been around for many years. Doug s/v Callista "Parallax" wrote in message om... Prop fouling is one of the biggest pains about having a boat in warm waters. Even coating it with anti-fouling every year doesnt help as the anti-fouling is blasted off by cavitation and sand. Using the boat every week seems to help but if you use it less, soon you are just giving the barnacles a thrill ride. You might think that bronze props wouldnt foul due to their copper content but the use of a shaft zinc suppresses Cu ions from going into the water because the Zn is more electronegative. I have observed that the shaft zinc doesnt seem to foul although it does sacrificially erode. So, if Zn suppresses fouling, why not coat props with a thick coating of Zn? This would not only protect the prop and related gear from corrosion but suppress fouling. I can imagine doing this either by electro-deposition or hot-dip galvanizing. Hot-dip methods sometimes leave metal drips and other flaws that would unbalance the prop but perhaps a better quality process is available. The problem with Zn electro-deposition is that the coatings are normally fairly thin. For work, I do Nickel and copper electro-deposition to thickness up to 1 mm (.040") on a routine basis. It is slow, taking over 48 hours but perhaps the same could be done for Zn to produce a coating say .005" thick. If such a service existed where you could send your prop every year or two for such a caoting to protect it, how many people would use it? A couple years ago, Practical Sailor tested such copper coated props and found it did not ussually work. They didnt know why but now I know it is the suppression of Cu ions by teh nearby zinc. If you leave the zinc off your prop shaft, you will have far less fouling. The difference is dramatic between zinc and no zinc. However, you really do not want to go without a zinc. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Seems to work well around here.
Doug s/v Callista "Parallax" wrote in message om... "Doug Dotson" wrote in message ... Having a prop copper plated solves the fouling problem. Many outfits do this for around $100 per prop. Been around for many years. Doug s/v Callista "Parallax" wrote in message om... Prop fouling is one of the biggest pains about having a boat in warm waters. Even coating it with anti-fouling every year doesnt help as the anti-fouling is blasted off by cavitation and sand. Using the boat every week seems to help but if you use it less, soon you are just giving the barnacles a thrill ride. You might think that bronze props wouldnt foul due to their copper content but the use of a shaft zinc suppresses Cu ions from going into the water because the Zn is more electronegative. I have observed that the shaft zinc doesnt seem to foul although it does sacrificially erode. So, if Zn suppresses fouling, why not coat props with a thick coating of Zn? This would not only protect the prop and related gear from corrosion but suppress fouling. I can imagine doing this either by electro-deposition or hot-dip galvanizing. Hot-dip methods sometimes leave metal drips and other flaws that would unbalance the prop but perhaps a better quality process is available. The problem with Zn electro-deposition is that the coatings are normally fairly thin. For work, I do Nickel and copper electro-deposition to thickness up to 1 mm (.040") on a routine basis. It is slow, taking over 48 hours but perhaps the same could be done for Zn to produce a coating say .005" thick. If such a service existed where you could send your prop every year or two for such a caoting to protect it, how many people would use it? A couple years ago, Practical Sailor tested such copper coated props and found it did not ussually work. They didnt know why but now I know it is the suppression of Cu ions by teh nearby zinc. If you leave the zinc off your prop shaft, you will have far less fouling. The difference is dramatic between zinc and no zinc. However, you really do not want to go without a zinc. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
prop advise needed | General | |||
Volvo 270 outdrive prop cone replacement? | General | |||
Prop fouling | Cruising | |||
Removing lower unit from 40 hp Johnson outboard - Help? | General |