Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bert van den Berg" wrote in message
b.com... As far as manual windlasses are concerned..... yesterday I watched (and heard) a manual windlass in action. The conditions were perfect, hardly any wind but it took the poor fellow almost ten minutes to bring up his anchor. The sailboat was around 35 feet long and the depth was also about 35 feet. In my opinion an electric windlass is as much a safety feature as well as a great convenience. If the weather had suddenly turned or the boat was dragging anchor or someone else was dragging anchor and about to collide with the 35 footer above I think the poor guy above would have been hurting. With an electric windlass you don't really have to think twice about re-anchoring elsewhere or dropping anchor at one spot only for a bit of a dive or other temporary activity. With a manual windlass (or none) you would think twice about doing same. My two cents worth... ====================[reply}================== And, two cents is about all your comments are worth because your comments assume electric windlasses will work each and every time. Too bad that is not the case. Ergo, this thread. Like any other electrical system, electrical windlasses can and do fail with great regularity and assuming they will always pull the fat out of the fire, so to speak, is a disaster waiting to happen. Your attitude indicates laziness, ignorance and overreliance upon technology which technology remains unreliable and should not be taken for granted, especially when safety and lives are at stake. Your rationale is tantamount to that of a diesel motor sailor who takes a chance on motoring into untenable conditions because he views his motor as infallible and thus takes chances he would not normally take. When he ends up on the rocks because of his attitude does he blame himself? No, he blames the motor. The very same thing can be said about relying upon electric windlasses on small, recreational sailboats. Get a clue before you end up being the object of a maritime rescue. -- Sir Gregory |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message
... On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 17:58:48 +1300, "Bert van den Berg" wrote: As far as manual windlasses are concerned..... yesterday I watched (and heard) a manual windlass in action. The conditions were perfect, hardly any wind but it took the poor fellow almost ten minutes to bring up his anchor. The sailboat was around 35 feet long and the depth was also about 35 feet. In my opinion an electric windlass is as much a safety feature as well as a great convenience. If the weather had suddenly turned or the boat was dragging anchor or someone else was dragging anchor and about to collide with the 35 footer above I think the poor guy above would have been hurting. With an electric windlass you don't really have to think twice about re-anchoring elsewhere or dropping anchor at one spot only for a bit of a dive or other temporary activity. With a manual windlass (or none) you would think twice about doing same. My two cents worth... Bert S/V Guinevere I surely agree. A year or so ago my wife and I set off for a little vacation and decided to make a trip to Langkawi, Malaysia. We usually stop several nights on the way and just laze along and the first night we anchored at Phi Phi Island. The next morning the winch is dead :-( Well, 10 Mtrs of water and 3/8" inch chain. I can do it! so hauled the anchor by hand and set off for our next stop. And so it went for three days...... But I can tell you I really, really, looked for shallow water :-) Perhaps you should consider that 3/8" chain is overkill. Duh! Hell, you could lift your sailboat off the ground with 3/8" chain and the MOST force you'd ever put on in even in a typhoon would be about a thousand pounds. The wind just doesn't produce that much force upon a battened-own sailboat. You, sir, are no sailor! -- Sir Gregory -- Sir Gregory |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:30:25 -0700, slide wrote:
On 1/26/2014 12:30 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· wrote: Public admission of damaging or destroying coral reefs with an all-chain rode noted! I don't know about elsewhere but here in the Florida Keys it's illegal to anchor on coral. OK, oyster beds then. Satisfied? Oyster beds, more commonly known as "Pearl Farms" in this part of the world are buoyed and policed. If you even approach them a power boat loaded with energetic people will immediately roar out and prevent you from anchoring there. -- Cheers, Bruce in Bangkok |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:25:28 -0500, " Sir Gregory Hall, Esq·"
åke wrote: "Bert van den Berg" wrote in message eb.com... As far as manual windlasses are concerned..... yesterday I watched (and heard) a manual windlass in action. The conditions were perfect, hardly any wind but it took the poor fellow almost ten minutes to bring up his anchor. The sailboat was around 35 feet long and the depth was also about 35 feet. In my opinion an electric windlass is as much a safety feature as well as a great convenience. If the weather had suddenly turned or the boat was dragging anchor or someone else was dragging anchor and about to collide with the 35 footer above I think the poor guy above would have been hurting. With an electric windlass you don't really have to think twice about re-anchoring elsewhere or dropping anchor at one spot only for a bit of a dive or other temporary activity. With a manual windlass (or none) you would think twice about doing same. My two cents worth... ====================[reply}================== And, two cents is about all your comments are worth because your comments assume electric windlasses will work each and every time. Too bad that is not the case. Ergo, this thread. Like any other electrical system, electrical windlasses can and do fail with great regularity and assuming they will always pull the fat out of the fire, so to speak, is a disaster waiting to happen. Your attitude indicates laziness, ignorance and overreliance upon technology which technology remains unreliable and should not be taken for granted, especially when safety and lives are at stake. Your rationale is tantamount to that of a diesel motor sailor who takes a chance on motoring into untenable conditions because he views his motor as infallible and thus takes chances he would not normally take. When he ends up on the rocks because of his attitude does he blame himself? No, he blames the motor. The very same thing can be said about relying upon electric windlasses on small, recreational sailboats. Get a clue before you end up being the object of a maritime rescue. More glorious words of wisdom from the armchair sailor. -- Cheers, Bruce in Bangkok |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:58:02 -0500, " Sir Gregory Hall, Esq·"
åke wrote: "Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 17:58:48 +1300, "Bert van den Berg" wrote: As far as manual windlasses are concerned..... yesterday I watched (and heard) a manual windlass in action. The conditions were perfect, hardly any wind but it took the poor fellow almost ten minutes to bring up his anchor. The sailboat was around 35 feet long and the depth was also about 35 feet. In my opinion an electric windlass is as much a safety feature as well as a great convenience. If the weather had suddenly turned or the boat was dragging anchor or someone else was dragging anchor and about to collide with the 35 footer above I think the poor guy above would have been hurting. With an electric windlass you don't really have to think twice about re-anchoring elsewhere or dropping anchor at one spot only for a bit of a dive or other temporary activity. With a manual windlass (or none) you would think twice about doing same. My two cents worth... Bert S/V Guinevere I surely agree. A year or so ago my wife and I set off for a little vacation and decided to make a trip to Langkawi, Malaysia. We usually stop several nights on the way and just laze along and the first night we anchored at Phi Phi Island. The next morning the winch is dead :-( Well, 10 Mtrs of water and 3/8" inch chain. I can do it! so hauled the anchor by hand and set off for our next stop. And so it went for three days...... But I can tell you I really, really, looked for shallow water :-) Perhaps you should consider that 3/8" chain is overkill. Duh! Hell, you could lift your sailboat off the ground with 3/8" chain and the MOST force you'd ever put on in even in a typhoon would be about a thousand pounds. The wind just doesn't produce that much force upon a battened-own sailboat. You, sir, are no sailor! -- Sir Gregory An interesting statement albeit false. During the tsunami a French woman anchored in Chalong Bay had her anchor chain snap. But other than that a 3/8" chain is generally recommended for a 40+ foot boat and adds considerably to the anchor's holding power. Of course, sitting there in your arm chair you probably didn't realize that, after all you don't cruise, unless one counts your epic voyage down the bay and back, so you obviously lack experience. -- Cheers, Bruce in Bangkok |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
windlasses | General | |||
Honda EU2000i. Using the 12Volt Output | Electronics | |||
12volt PC Power Supply | Cruising | |||
12volt PC Power Supply | Electronics | |||
12volt fridge | Cruising |