Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
After a number of years away from sailing and cruising, I am starting to get
back ... little by little. Using my past boat ownership experience, three full keel boats. Two were ok, one was a DOG. I am looking at different boats on the net. There sure are a lot of boats for sale. My criteria: well built ( I don't care how old, just well built ), ocean worthy, either no engine or a diesel engine [ please don't tell me that a 35 year old Atomic 4 is fine, all you need to do it keep them maintained ], a conservative design [ I plan on cruising not racing ], and big enough to sail anywhere but small enough to sail alone. That is the question; what size? I want to have my family out with me but if they are busy or don't care to go or if I take off for an extended trip ........... what size sailboat [ I shudder at the term yacht ] would be just about right for a single hander? Here are a few of the boats I have looked at over the last few days. A Pearson 35 [ built late 60's and one built early 70's ], and Albin Ballad [ built 1976, Sweden? .. 29'something "'s .. not that heavy .. has fin keel ...spade rudder ?? ... ], and a whole bunch of boats like this. What do you experts think... if you aren't an expert and have an opinion... that is even better. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
After a summer sailing the Endeavor 32 we bought last year, I would
start looking for another one tomorrow if anything happened to it. This is from the perspective of a boat designer and a quarter century of sailing on a wide variety of boats between 7 and 380 feet. It's primarily a good choice if your budget is limited. We got a very clean 1980 boat for $15,000 and put about half of that again into upgrades. For that, we got a boat with full headroom, six berths (at least for an overnight), open and very woody interior, carries a few more than it sleeps comfortably on daysails. We got good sails and a great diesel engine. It's still small enough for easy singlehanding and managing alone in a tight marina berth. This is a very middle of the road boat that doesn't stand out in any particular area but does just about everything you need in cruising very well. It isn't fast but it isn't slow either. We often sail past faster boats if they aren't paying close attention to sail trim. I always feel like we are making good progress on cruising legs. It is a shoal draft, wide headsail sheeting base, vessel so windward isn't her best point of sail but beating performance is still way ahead of traditional vessels and she makes solid progress. What really endears her to me is the handling. The turning radius is tight and response quick which makes marinas and tight docking situations easier. Unlike most boats I've sailed with this kind of helm response, she can be overpowered and driven down hard in a tight spot without ever threatening to take charge. There is plenty of helm force but, when you overcome it, she does what you need her to do. I'd like slower helm response if we did more long cruising but she is just right for fun daysailing and shorter trips. A good autopilot would provide the best of both worlds. This is not a true blue water boat although they have sailed at least half way around the world that I know of. They were designed for island hopping in the Caribbean and have an excellent hot weather interior with all opening ports. With new ports and some beefing up of cockpit and other openings, they should be capable of going farther than most people would want to go. The detail work is a bit rough in spots, you can see that a lot of ganja got smoked during the construction but a three quarter inch solid glass hull makes up for a lot of sins. The decks are stiffened with plywood glassed under the main lay-up so there is no coring anywhere to worry about. If I suddenly had $50,000 to spend on a boat at this point, I would still look for one of these for about 20 and then have it stripped and redone soup to nuts. It's a great hull with the comfort and easy motion of a traditional boat but the responsive handling of a modern one. If I had $150,000 for a boat and were designing one for custom construction, it would still look a lot like our E32. Look for a 1980 - 1982 for the best features. You can see the story of our boat at: http://home.maine.rr.com/rlma/RWL.htm -- Roger Long |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:04:55 GMT, "Roger Long"
wrote: Look for a 1980 - 1982 for the best features. You can see the story of our boat at: http://home.maine.rr.com/rlma/RWL.htm ======================================== Good looking boat Roger, and nice documentation of the purchase and refurbishment process. It's amazing how all those little things add up isn't it? The good new is that you are probably now close to new boat condition and for a whole lot less money than that. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, at least in the areas I've been able to uncover. The decks are
primarily solid glass and the plywood panels have space all the way around. It would be still be a mess to tear out and replace one but nothing like dealing with a rotted core. There is less glass over them and good access to the edges. Not the most weight efficient construction but these boats will probably be around for a long time as a result. -- Roger Long "Dave" wrote in message ... On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:04:55 GMT, "Roger Long" said: The decks are stiffened with plywood glassed under the main lay-up so there is no coring anywhere to worry about. Could you clarify that? Do you mean that there is fiberglass deck above the plywood, but no glass below it so that the plywood is accessible from the cabin without having to remove any FG? |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roger Long" wrote in news:wWgtf.47100$XJ5.4425
@twister.nyroc.rr.com: Yes, at least in the areas I've been able to uncover. The decks are primarily solid glass and the plywood panels have space all the way around. It would be still be a mess to tear out and replace one but nothing like dealing with a rotted core. There is less glass over them and good access to the edges. Not the most weight efficient construction but these boats will probably be around for a long time as a result. -- Roger Long Roger, does the 32 leak around the chainplates and toe rails down the bulkheads, ruining the wood prettys inside? The '82 Endeavour 35, A- Plan, had a lot of leaks around there we had an awful time with on Claire's Navie, which belonged to a friend of mine. I sailed her from NC to Key West and it was, too, a great boat. I'll be sailing on her, probably, on Sunday with her new owner, another friend. She's called "Stray Dog" now... There's just so much ROOM in the 35 without the table in the middle to walk by. Very nicely appointed, too.... |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Our boat sat for six years with the mast up and a shrink wrap job that
didn't keep water off the deck so the chainplates did leak and a three of interior panels rotted. One replaced, one to go. They come out easily and replacement is very easy. I re-bedded the chainplates and they have been tight. There was some arrested just in time discoloration of the cabin trunk liner around the ports. This would be a real bear to replace so I'm glad the former owner got it fixed. I'm still trying to trace a small leak over the quarter berth but I'm pretty sure it's coming in around the companionway frame. No rot or problems that would be hard to deal with. The interior is also installed in way such that most deck edge leaks will go to the bilge instead of down the woodwork. I don't see any evidence of them on this hull though. More room is always nicer inside but smaller is always easier when you're horsing a boat around a tight dock alone, singlehanding, or paying the bills. If you are looking for lowest cost and easiest handling, 32 feet is kind of a magic size. It's the smallest that you can get full headroom without having a bulky looking boat with a lot of windage or a deep and very heavy hull. It's the smallest that six overnight bunks will fit and still have a decent head and galley. It's the smallest that is tolerable for four over a period of days. It's the smallest in which most couples would want to live aboard and cruise extensively. If our budget had been larger, I would have looked at 35 footers but we were already stretching up from the 27 - 28 foot range. Prices take a jump out of proportion to other things above 32 feet. If I suddenly had $40,000 to spend on a boat at this point, I would put it into this one instead of trying to trade up to something larger. We would then have a boat in which everything was right instead of just a larger and roomier collection of problems and projects. -- Roger Long |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry,
I just looked up the 35 on the owner's association web site: http://www.endeavourowners.com/boats.html Nice looking boat. It's wider and shallower than the 32, a more modern design and I'm sure faster for it's length. I don't expect that it would have the control authority and motion characteristics that make me love the 32 so much but I'm sure it's a boat I would like for other reasons. I see that there is a lot of PVC foam used in the construction. A number of people have asked if I've had trouble with the foam in my boat. Since there is none, this may be something the larger and later Endeavors have a problem with. There is also a 33 but it doesn't do anything for me. The 33's and 35's go for similar prices. I just looked and, figuring you pay 75 percent of list, the extra 1 - 3 feet of length (I know it's a lot more increased volume than that indicates) will cost about twice as much as we paid. I'm pretty damn happy with what I've got. -- Roger Long |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roger Long" wrote in news:mwktf.47122$XJ5.26410
@twister.nyroc.rr.com: No rot or problems that would be hard to deal with. The interior is also installed in way such that most deck edge leaks will go to the bilge instead of down the woodwork. I don't see any evidence of them on this hull though. Yeah, this one did leak down to the bilge, but it was constantly wet behind those wooden panels and it finally made it through them showing what was going on, hidden from view, behind them. Some kind of stress on the toe rails kept separating them enough to start the leaking, again. The new owner finally got the bilge to stay dry, but the boat hasn't been out in the Atlantic since so hasn't been knocked around by the waves, yet. Thanks for the info. 32 is a very nice size. I'm crew on an Amel Sharki 41 (er, ah, 39 if the dockmaster's watching..(c ![]() made, slug-slow ketch. New sails and lots of tuning hasn't fixed her very experienced captain's awful weather helm I'm usually fighting to keep her pointed up. The big B&G autopilot just loses control it's so bad in heavy winds. The Endeavour 35 had more "space", or the feeling of more space. The Amel is a far better blue water boat with that very deep center cockpit with hardtop cover. The owner has just installed new Lexan windscreens to replaced the starred plexiglass. I can almost see where she's going, now! Well, we'll sail her on New Year's Day. Weather is forecast to be fine. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roger Long" wrote in news:K_ktf.56946$XC4.39049
@twister.nyroc.rr.com: I'm sure faster for it's length. I don't expect that it would have the control authority and motion characteristics that make me love the 32 so much but I'm sure it's a boat I would like for other reasons. I see that there is a lot of PVC foam used in the construction. A number of people have asked if I've had trouble with the foam in my boat. Since there is none, this may be something the larger and later Endeavors have a problem with. Naw...she's not fast. Weighs too much to be fast. The Amel is even heavier and slower... The Catalinas walk right by both of them. But, heavier is much more comfortable in the slop. It's a trade. It would probably help if my captain didn't just HAVE to have every tool a shipyard would have and two of every part the boat could ever need. I think there's a spare Perkins 4-108, in tiny bits, stored under the aft cabin berths....(c; We don't need an anchor on the Amel. We just heave over half a ton of chain out of the chain locker forward of the forward watertight bulkhead. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:53:03 -0500, Larry wrote:
New sails and lots of tuning hasn't fixed her very experienced captain's awful weather helm I'm usually fighting to keep her pointed up. ====================== This may be old news but here are some possible cures for weather helm: Flatter sails - more outhaul, backstay, cunningham and halyard tension, a bit of mast bend if do able, jib leads further aft. Get a flattening reef installed in the mainsail. Reduce sail area and heeling. Move weight out of the stern to further forward. Decrease mast rake if any. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ANNOUNCE: Cut to size Starboard and plastics fabrication | Marketplace | |||
The Right Size Outboard Gas Engine for a 18-ft Boat? - FollowUp | General | |||
Motor Size | General | |||
What is the Right Size Motor for a 17-Ft Fiberglass Boat? | General | |||
Ideals on Size? | General |