Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
posted to alt.boats,rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
More discussion on I/O motor oil
I have heard and read (in earlier postings) straight 30W oil is good to use,
and others recommend 25W40. I have an 1986 350 I/O and have been using the 25W40 for several years, but am now wondering if I can or should use straight 30W oil? Did they even have 25W40 back in 86, or is this an improvement over alternatives? Mark The Rail, Canopy, & LifeLine Hook guy www.ripnet.com/vtf/prod03.htm |
#2
posted to alt.boats,rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
More discussion on I/O motor oil
"Mark" wrote in message ... I have heard and read (in earlier postings) straight 30W oil is good to use, and others recommend 25W40. I have an 1986 350 I/O and have been using the 25W40 for several years, but am now wondering if I can or should use straight 30W oil? Did they even have 25W40 back in 86, or is this an improvement over alternatives? Mark The Rail, Canopy, & LifeLine Hook guy www.ripnet.com/vtf/prod03.htm My understanding is that some of the newer I/O engines based on the GM 350 block come with muti-viscosity oil recommendations. Those of your vintage call for straight 30 weight, IIRC. Eisboch |
#3
posted to alt.boats,rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
More discussion on I/O motor oil
Mark wrote:
I have heard and read (in earlier postings) straight 30W oil is good to use, and others recommend 25W40. I have an 1986 350 I/O and have been using the 25W40 for several years, but am now wondering if I can or should use straight 30W oil? Did they even have 25W40 back in 86, or is this an improvement over alternatives? Mark The Rail, Canopy, & LifeLine Hook guy www.ripnet.com/vtf/prod03.htm Since most people only use their boat during the warmer months, straight 30W is normally recommended. |
#4
posted to alt.boats,rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
More discussion on I/O motor oil
"Mark" wrote in news:4533749c$0$24817
: 25W40 Why not look in the manual? http://www.mercurymarine.com/fueloil...mendation_faqs "NOTE: The use of non-detergent oils, multi-viscosity oils (other than as specified), non-FC-W rated synthetic oils, low quality oils or oils that contain solid additives are specifically not recommended." The FC-W rating is at: http://www.nmma.org/certification/lo.../FCW_Certifica tion_Procedure_Manual.pdf http://www.nmma.org/certification/lo...documents/FCW- ProductApprovalSys%20_9.06_.pdf Of course, at $40/gallon for MY oil, I'd sure recommend you buy only MY oil from ME, too! Searching for these URLs on Google has revealed some halibut to me that makes me suspicious..... Not a single webpage from ANY real oil company (those with a real refinery, not just a bottling plant like Amsoil, who has 20 webpages about FC-W wonders and NO REFINERY), says anything about FC-W oil. Not Exxon-Mobil, Not Texaco, Not Chevron, NONE. This rings my bell and lights up the "SCAM!" light, here. Search Google for yourselves. Don't take my word for it. Remember NMMA is "them", not an independent certification and testing company like UL. NMMA never says, "this marine manufacturer's stuff just sucks and you shouldn't buy it." They love every product their members ever produce, even the Bayliners with pop rivets holding the doors on and all the chopper gun boats...(c; (Any Amsoil dealers watching that can point out the exact address of the AMSOIL REFINERY for me?) |
#5
posted to alt.boats,rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
More discussion on I/O motor oil
"Eisboch" wrote in
news My understanding is that some of the newer I/O engines based on the GM 350 block come with muti-viscosity oil recommendations. Those of your vintage call for straight 30 weight, IIRC. Eisboch All those old charts have been replaced by: http://www.mercurymarine.com/fueloil...mendation_faqs so we can sell 'em new, special, most profitable, NMMA FC oils at the dealerships, now, for $40/gallon. Sure wish someone would take two Mercruisers, fill one with Mercury FC oil and one with cheap, ol' Rotella T and drive 'em until they just fall apart to see how special FC is at 4-6 times the price.....a realworld test. |
#6
posted to alt.boats,rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
More discussion on I/O motor oil
It seems suspicious too that Shell stopped selling their Nautilus 25W40 a
few years ago (for $20/4L jug) while Merc cruiser's oil has made significant advances in marketing on the shelves (at $36+). I wonder if Shell sold their formulation out to Merc cruiser, who is now adding in the traditional huge markup because it is marine? I think I will be switching to straight 30W oil! Thanks to everyone for their input / feedback. Mark The Rail, Canopy, Lifeline Hook guy www.ripnet.com/vtf/prod03.htm "Larry" wrote in message ... "Mark" wrote in news:4533749c$0$24817 : 25W40 Why not look in the manual? http://www.mercurymarine.com/fueloil...mendation_faqs "NOTE: The use of non-detergent oils, multi-viscosity oils (other than as specified), non-FC-W rated synthetic oils, low quality oils or oils that contain solid additives are specifically not recommended." The FC-W rating is at: http://www.nmma.org/certification/lo.../FCW_Certifica tion_Procedure_Manual.pdf http://www.nmma.org/certification/lo...documents/FCW- ProductApprovalSys%20_9.06_.pdf Of course, at $40/gallon for MY oil, I'd sure recommend you buy only MY oil from ME, too! Searching for these URLs on Google has revealed some halibut to me that makes me suspicious..... Not a single webpage from ANY real oil company (those with a real refinery, not just a bottling plant like Amsoil, who has 20 webpages about FC-W wonders and NO REFINERY), says anything about FC-W oil. Not Exxon-Mobil, Not Texaco, Not Chevron, NONE. This rings my bell and lights up the "SCAM!" light, here. Search Google for yourselves. Don't take my word for it. Remember NMMA is "them", not an independent certification and testing company like UL. NMMA never says, "this marine manufacturer's stuff just sucks and you shouldn't buy it." They love every product their members ever produce, even the Bayliners with pop rivets holding the doors on and all the chopper gun boats...(c; (Any Amsoil dealers watching that can point out the exact address of the AMSOIL REFINERY for me?) |
#7
posted to alt.boats,rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
More discussion on I/O motor oil
"Mark" wrote in
: I think I will be switching to straight 30W oil! Thanks to everyone for their input / feedback. In the Magnusson-Moss Warranty Protection Act 15USC50 section 2300, one of the things it tells the manufacturers and dealers is if you REQUIRE the consumer to use a specific BRAND of oil, say Mercruiser Magic Mix, the US law says they have to give it to you for FREE for the life of the engine. Of course, I assume you are in the USA. So, one of the tactics that has been created to circumvent the law is they all (read that NMMA) get together in their cartel meeting and create a "special oil designation", TC-W3 or TC-whatever only cartel members have control of which limits your choices away from the discounts at WalMart. The TC-W3 game ran for many years before the oil companies knuckled under and paid them off for the rights to sell it. This let NMMA specify "their oil" to the consumers, without actually BRANDING it, which would force them to give it to consumers, and has made a tidy profit in the relabled/rebottled oil business at exhorbitant profits for them all. Before these new warranty laws, the old 2-stroke motors ran for 50 years on Quaker State SAE 30 motor oil from the cheapest place you could find it. There was no special oil at all. None was needed to circumvent the law. Motors all greasy with Quaker State never even corroded, lasting WAY too long to make dealers happy. Lots of them are STILL fishing lakes across the country. So, another tactic to help recycle blown powerheads was the 50:1 or 100:1 oil mix that came in with this monsterously expensive new oil scam. Look on the lake or river and notice how there are really OLD motors buzzing along, still on Quaker State many of them, then there's a blank bunch of years just after TC-W3 was specified up until the new motors that haven't succumbed to the lack of lubrication, which go back, conveniently, about 5 to 8 years, their engineered low-lube life span.... In I/O boats, we just put converted car engines in them never designed to be run wide open with a constant heavy load. They self destruct because they are too light for this service. There aren't many antique OMC, Volvo and Mercruisers with original engines. I/O was a fantastic marketing scheme that worked very well. We got them out of their "inboard" boats, with only one or two bearings, no transmission or gears or seals underwater to corrode, contaminate with water....no pot metal and plastic parts that self-destruct.......and talked them into using an outboard motor foot the water could eat away at, making a regular dealer profit center with its constant maintenance and parts replacements, including the lifting gadgets that always freeze up and fail. The ol' inboards needed a new packing and rubber bearing replacement every few years you could do yourself.... This same mentality is the reason you can't buy an electric car like GM's EV-1, which GM totally crushed into scrap. Dealers were raising hell because the EV-1 didn't need anything but a new battery pack every few years. No, we need piston gas engines that require constant repairs to make up for the selling price we didn't get out front..... |
#8
posted to alt.boats,rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
More discussion on I/O motor oil
Larry wrote:
"Mark" wrote in : I think I will be switching to straight 30W oil! Thanks to everyone for their input / feedback. In the Magnusson-Moss Warranty Protection Act 15USC50 section 2300, one of the things it tells the manufacturers and dealers is if you REQUIRE the consumer to use a specific BRAND of oil, say Mercruiser Magic Mix, the US law says they have to give it to you for FREE for the life of the engine. Of course, I assume you are in the USA. So, one of the tactics that has been created to circumvent the law is they all (read that NMMA) get together in their cartel meeting and create a "special oil designation", TC-W3 or TC-whatever only cartel members have control of which limits your choices away from the discounts at WalMart. The TC-W3 game ran for many years before the oil companies knuckled under and paid them off for the rights to sell it. This let NMMA specify "their oil" to the consumers, without actually BRANDING it, which would force them to give it to consumers, and has made a tidy profit in the relabled/rebottled oil business at exhorbitant profits for them all. Before these new warranty laws, the old 2-stroke motors ran for 50 years on Quaker State SAE 30 motor oil from the cheapest place you could find it. There was no special oil at all. None was needed to circumvent the law. Motors all greasy with Quaker State never even corroded, lasting WAY too long to make dealers happy. Lots of them are STILL fishing lakes across the country. So, another tactic to help recycle blown powerheads was the 50:1 or 100:1 oil mix that came in with this monsterously expensive new oil scam. Look on the lake or river and notice how there are really OLD motors buzzing along, still on Quaker State many of them, then there's a blank bunch of years just after TC-W3 was specified up until the new motors that haven't succumbed to the lack of lubrication, which go back, conveniently, about 5 to 8 years, their engineered low-lube life span.... In I/O boats, we just put converted car engines in them never designed to be run wide open with a constant heavy load. They self destruct because they are too light for this service. There aren't many antique OMC, Volvo and Mercruisers with original engines. I/O was a fantastic marketing scheme that worked very well. We got them out of their "inboard" boats, with only one or two bearings, no transmission or gears or seals underwater to corrode, contaminate with water....no pot metal and plastic parts that self-destruct.......and talked them into using an outboard motor foot the water could eat away at, making a regular dealer profit center with its constant maintenance and parts replacements, including the lifting gadgets that always freeze up and fail. The ol' inboards needed a new packing and rubber bearing replacement every few years you could do yourself.... This same mentality is the reason you can't buy an electric car like GM's EV-1, which GM totally crushed into scrap. Dealers were raising hell because the EV-1 didn't need anything but a new battery pack every few years. No, we need piston gas engines that require constant repairs to make up for the selling price we didn't get out front..... This smells of one big conspiracy theory to me. The 50:1 and 100:1 oil ratios do a great deal to reduce pollution and smoke from the still filthy 2 stroke motors. You can get a lot more than 7 or 8 years out of a 50:1 motor, mine is nearly 40 years old and runs well. A well maintained outboard will last many years if properly maintained, it doesn't have to be dowsed in oil for that. My dad has a crusty old Yamaha 15 he inherited which runs 100:1 and was very clearly neglected yet it fired up just fine last time I fiddled with it. That said, practically everything is built cheaper these days, I don't buy much new but the last few years I've had a hard time finding good tools, even formerly reputable brands have cheapened up to compete with the imported junk. I wouldn't be surprised at all if new outboards have been cost reduced to the point of quality and lifespan suffering. I/O arrangements have many functional advantages over straight inboards, the most appealing that come to mind being the ability to raise the prop up for beaching or trailering and the much improved low speed maneuverability gained by being able to direct the thrust. There's no one size fits all marine powerplant, if there were, there wouldn't be all the variations still being produced. The EV-1 cars were (stupidly IMO) crushed because they were too expensive to manufacture in large numbers to make a profit and law requires a car company to produce and stock spare parts for a given amount of time after a model is produced. GM is a business afterall, and they certainly are in no position to screw around with money losing deals. When it was determined that producing the cars would not earn them sufficient profit to be worthwhile, they pulled the plug. I would expect in the long term the expensive electronics needed to drive the motor and all the other systems in the car would be more expensive to maintain than a gasoline engine, and there would be far fewer people able to do the repairs themselves. The way in which GM killed it was wasteful and borders on criminal in my opinion but that sort of thing happens all the time, the whole purpose of a corporation is to make money. As soon as money can be made producing practical electric vehicles that will sell in large quantities, you can bet someone will jump in and make them. |
#9
posted to alt.boats,rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
More discussion on I/O motor oil
James Sweet wrote in news:hLaZg.3487$kG5.1533
@trndny07: This smells of one big conspiracy theory to me. The 50:1 and 100:1 oil ratios do a great deal to reduce pollution and smoke from the still filthy 2 stroke motors. Where's the pollution? Every lake in the USA has had "filthy 2 stroke motors" running in them for over a hundred years, now. According to your theory, they should all be about 3" deep in old motor oil that used to trail out behind my Elto outboard. But, alas, the only pollution I see on the lakes is mostly caused by factories and power plants spewing their crap into the air and water, not "filthy 2-stroke outboard motors", as you say. Wonder what happened to those billions of gallons of old 2-stroke oil?? Most interesting.... -- There's amazing intelligence in the Universe. You can tell because none of them ever called Earth. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Discussion Forum | General | |||
Bumfuzzel Multihull discussion link | Cruising | |||
Extraneous OT Discussion | ASA | |||
OT Hijacking a discussion, was Bought cool new digital charger....$89? | Electronics | |||
Glen-L discussion group | Boat Building |