![]() |
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum
I've created a Fischer Panda Owner's Forum to act as a repository for
information related to these generators. If you own (or owned) one of these generators, please post your history/experience in the forum. I personally have had non-stop problems with my 4200 (mini) generator and know of many other owners who have had similar problems. This forum is an attempt to see if these problems are unique or systemic. The forum is located at www.FischerPandaSucks.com and despite the URL, the intent is to collect information on both the good and the bad. -- Geoff Schultz |
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum
I replaced my 4200 with a NextGen 3.5 Kw unit (www.nextgenerationpower.com)
that utilizes a Kubota engine and other parts that are available anywhere. For me, being able to repair it anywhere is a key issue. Reading this dummies account shows he failed to do his homework. His attack on the company is a long standing and rather odd affair. Worth reading for laughs. There's a 48 foot ketch at my Marina with a Panda and they never had a problem. RB |
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum
I have started a new webpage for idiots who spam newsgroups
with material not related in any way to sailing. Check it out at www.Geoffrey_W._Schultz_Sucks.com "Geoffrey W. Schultz" wrote in message 4.17... I've created a Fischer Panda Owner's Forum to act as a repository for information related to these generators. If you own (or owned) one of these generators, please post your history/experience in the forum. I personally have had non-stop problems with my 4200 (mini) generator and know of many other owners who have had similar problems. This forum is an attempt to see if these problems are unique or systemic. The forum is located at www.FischerPandaSucks.com and despite the URL, the intent is to collect information on both the good and the bad. -- Geoff Schultz |
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum
From what I now understand, the fellow asked a salesperson out at Panda, was
rejected and has not gotten over it. RB |
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum
I've created a Fischer Panda Owner's Forum to act as a repository for
information related to these generators. If you own (or owned) one of these generators, please post your history/experience in the forum. I personally have had non-stop problems with my 4200 (mini) generator and know of many other owners who have had similar problems. This forum is an attempt to see if these problems are unique or systemic. The forum is located at www.FischerPandaSucks.com and despite the URL, the intent is to collect information on both the good and the bad. -- Geoff Schultz This guy is *still* on his crusade! Amazing. |
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum
Geoff,
I, unfortunately, have been in this sort of situation before. I've learned from my mistakes. Before I make a major purchase, I do some research to avoid costly mistakes. Jonathan "Geoffrey W. Schultz" wrote in message 9.17... (Bobsprit) wrote in : I replaced my 4200 with a NextGen 3.5 Kw unit (www.nextgenerationpower.com) that utilizes a Kubota engine and other parts that are available anywhere. For me, being able to repair it anywhere is a key issue. Reading this dummies account shows he failed to do his homework. His attack on the company is a long standing and rather odd affair. Worth reading for laughs. There's a 48 foot ketch at my Marina with a Panda and they never had a problem. So the fact that there's a boat in your marina that has a Fischer Panda that works is proof that they all work and they're reliable generators? Huh? When I bought my generator I tried to do my homework. I searched the net and found very little info on them. Do a Google search prior to 1999 and tell me what you find. Nothing. I'm trying to rectify that. The fact of the matter is that while cruising I've found other owners that have had worse problems than I have. My problems are not unique. -- Geoff |
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum
Fantastic page! Thanks!
"Simple Simon" wrote in message ... I have started a new webpage for idiots who spam newsgroups with material not related in any way to sailing. Check it out at www.Geoffrey_W._Schultz_Sucks.com "Geoffrey W. Schultz" wrote in message 4.17... I've created a Fischer Panda Owner's Forum to act as a repository for information related to these generators. If you own (or owned) one of these generators, please post your history/experience in the forum. I personally have had non-stop problems with my 4200 (mini) generator and know of many other owners who have had similar problems. This forum is an attempt to see if these problems are unique or systemic. The forum is located at www.FischerPandaSucks.com and despite the URL, the intent is to collect information on both the good and the bad. -- Geoff Schultz |
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum
"Gould 0738" wrote in message | This guy is *still* on his crusade! Amazing. Yeah... and if some dipwad company ripped me off by misrepresenting their product... I'd be just as bad a thorn in their side. You on the other hand are fatalist with a sheep like mentality and the result is companies that can and will rip people off.... because you've laid the groundwork for their assumptions. The only IDIOT here is You!!! CM |
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum
gee, why can't we all just get along.
At least the man did something about it, how many can say that? |
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum
Geoffrey, your pointer to Next Generation Power doesn't work off the
forum. I found another website I think belongs to them, truckgen.com, but it is also a dead link from Google. Have they gone pitchpole on us, too? On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:03:07 GMT, "Geoffrey W. Schultz" wrote: I've created a Fischer Panda Owner's Forum to act as a repository for information related to these generators. If you own (or owned) one of these generators, please post your history/experience in the forum. I personally have had non-stop problems with my 4200 (mini) generator and know of many other owners who have had similar problems. This forum is an attempt to see if these problems are unique or systemic. The forum is located at www.FischerPandaSucks.com and despite the URL, the intent is to collect information on both the good and the bad. -- Geoff Schultz Larry W4CSC 3600 planes with transponders are burning 8-10 million gallons of kerosene per hour over the USA. R-12 car air conditioners are responsible for the ozone hole, right? |
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum
That link had been working as of last week. I suspect that it's a problem with their web hosting site. Just try later this work week. -- Geoff (Larry W4CSC) wrote in : Geoffrey, your pointer to Next Generation Power doesn't work off the forum. I found another website I think belongs to them, truckgen.com, but it is also a dead link from Google. Have they gone pitchpole on us, too? On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:03:07 GMT, "Geoffrey W. Schultz" wrote: I've created a Fischer Panda Owner's Forum to act as a repository for information related to these generators. If you own (or owned) one of these generators, please post your history/experience in the forum. I personally have had non-stop problems with my 4200 (mini) generator and know of many other owners who have had similar problems. This forum is an attempt to see if these problems are unique or systemic. The forum is located at www.FischerPandaSucks.com and despite the URL, the intent is to collect information on both the good and the bad. -- Geoff Schultz Larry W4CSC 3600 planes with transponders are burning 8-10 million gallons of kerosene per hour over the USA. R-12 car air conditioners are responsible for the ozone hole, right? |
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum
I have never seen a F-P genset, but I have heard a lot of complaints from
cruising owners. That aside, as a long-time marine engineer, I would never be a fan of high-speed (3600RPM) gensets. Engine "wear" is directly related to piston speed (read:RPM) and so if I were to consider a genset, I'd much prefer an 1800 RPM unit. The only thing better than that is no genset at all; I've cruised the Eastern Caribbean for many years with an Aerogen 6 wind machine and four 75-watt Astro-Power PV panels. John "Truelove" Westsail 43 Trinidad, W.I. |
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum
I have a friend that owns a marine busness that used to carry FP gensets.
He had many problems but they were all related to a failed capacitor or diode (can't remember which) that cost $200 per failure to fix. Never any problem with mechanical problems. Our generator is a 3600 RPM model and we are very happy with it. The higher RPM gensets make it easier to insulate the sound and are more fuel efficient. If you are in Trinidad, why don't you own a KISS? Much better than an Aerogen. Doug s/v Callista "Truelove39" wrote in message ... I have never seen a F-P genset, but I have heard a lot of complaints from cruising owners. That aside, as a long-time marine engineer, I would never be a fan of high-speed (3600RPM) gensets. Engine "wear" is directly related to piston speed (read:RPM) and so if I were to consider a genset, I'd much prefer an 1800 RPM unit. The only thing better than that is no genset at all; I've cruised the Eastern Caribbean for many years with an Aerogen 6 wind machine and four 75-watt Astro-Power PV panels. John "Truelove" Westsail 43 Trinidad, W.I. |
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum
1. They are not well-balanced, and they vibrate
2. They are noisy, unlike the Aerogen which is virtually silent. 3. They have a thermal shut down device which functions juat as you are getting good output. 4. I have had my Aerogen 6 since 1997 and it has performed flawlessly. John Doug wrote: If you are in Trinidad, why don't you own a KISS? Much better than an Aerogen. |
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum
Sorry, but that is not my experience having a KISS for over a year
and using it all last winter. A friend just down the pier said that his Aerogen is very quiet (I've heard it, it is very quiet). He also says it really doesn't generate that much power compared to some of the newer generators but he is happy with it. "Truelove39" wrote in message ... 1. They are not well-balanced, and they vibrate. You balance it yourself after installation and attaching the blades to the hub. If you take your time and do it right there is little or no vibration. Mine has no disernable vibration. 2. They are noisy, unlike the Aerogen which is virtually silent. Just not true. It is one of the quietest generators I have heard. The only one that is more quiet is the Rutland but it had the unfortunate property of not generating much power. In a 15kt breeze you can hardly hear it when sitting in the cockpitright under it. Does start to woosh a bit ubove that. 3. They have a thermal shut down device which functions juat as you are getting good output. Mine will run continuously in a 20+ knot breeze while outputing over 20 amps. It will shut down when it gets up around 30 though. Better than burning up the alternator. 4. I have had my Aerogen 6 since 1997 and it has performed flawlessly. Well, the jury is still out on that for me having only had mine for 1.5 years. I know someone that bought one of the original models something like 4+ years ago. Only problem they have had is a burned up switch. Other than that it is still operating as good as when it was new. They did say they have the original blades which are noisier than those provided now. In the anchorage we shared I can agree that theirs was noisier but not nearly as loud as the Air Marine units. Although the new Air Marines are much quieter than the older ones. John Doug wrote: If you are in Trinidad, why don't you own a KISS? Much better than an Aerogen. |
KISS Wind Generators (was Fischer Panda Owner's Forum)
Doug,
I just installed a KISS in Ft. Lauderdale (where I was replacing my Fischer Panda (ooops, slap, slap, slap :-) ) before I moved the boat back to Guatemala. As a result I only have a few weeks experience with it. I will say that I'm having trouble with vibration. I've carefully followed their instructions on ballancing the blades, but I'm still getting vibration. I'm planning on machining a replacement support-pole hub that will have a bearing in it that will ride against the stainless pole. That will get rid of most of the vibration I suspect. I will also agree that the thermal cutouts seem to cut-out too soon. I noted I was getting cut-outs in the 20-25 kt range. Even worse, this seemed to have disabled the STOP switch position. To me this means that if I don't stop it in time that I may have to use a pole to swing it sideways into the wind, which is probably something that I don't want to do if the wind is getting up there and especially if I'm out at sea. If this is what is really happening (and I think that it is), this is a serious design flaw. On the plus side it's very easy to maintain and parts are available anywhere. And it's VERY quiet. You can hear the blades woosh, but that's about all. I hate the Air Marines and have even moved in an anchorage due to their noise. -- Geoff P.S. If you're interested, there's a photo of the generator at http://www.geoffschultz.org/2003 _Sailing/BlueJacket_Work/imagepages/image9.htm "Doug Dotson" wrote in : Sorry, but that is not my experience having a KISS for over a year and using it all last winter. A friend just down the pier said that his Aerogen is very quiet (I've heard it, it is very quiet). He also says it really doesn't generate that much power compared to some of the newer generators but he is happy with it. "Truelove39" wrote in message ... 1. They are not well-balanced, and they vibrate. You balance it yourself after installation and attaching the blades to the hub. If you take your time and do it right there is little or no vibration. Mine has no disernable vibration. 2. They are noisy, unlike the Aerogen which is virtually silent. Just not true. It is one of the quietest generators I have heard. The only one that is more quiet is the Rutland but it had the unfortunate property of not generating much power. In a 15kt breeze you can hardly hear it when sitting in the cockpitright under it. Does start to woosh a bit ubove that. 3. They have a thermal shut down device which functions juat as you are getting good output. Mine will run continuously in a 20+ knot breeze while outputing over 20 amps. It will shut down when it gets up around 30 though. Better than burning up the alternator. 4. I have had my Aerogen 6 since 1997 and it has performed flawlessly. Well, the jury is still out on that for me having only had mine for 1.5 years. I know someone that bought one of the original models something like 4+ years ago. Only problem they have had is a burned up switch. Other than that it is still operating as good as when it was new. They did say they have the original blades which are noisier than those provided now. In the anchorage we shared I can agree that theirs was noisier but not nearly as loud as the Air Marine units. Although the new Air Marines are much quieter than the older ones. John Doug wrote: If you are in Trinidad, why don't you own a KISS? Much better than an Aerogen. |
KISS Wind Generators (was Fischer Panda Owner's Forum)
Geoff,
Interesting about the thermal cutout bypassing the switch. That bears looking into. The few times I experienced the cutouts engaging, I just went and threw the switch and it shutdown. It could have been that the cutouts had released by then anyway. I used the pole mount kit that had rubber pads at the base. The 2 braces go to the side and top of the radar arch and also have rubber pads inside the pipe clamps. Very little vibration and then only at higher speeds. Doug "Geoffrey W. Schultz" wrote in message 7.77... Doug, I just installed a KISS in Ft. Lauderdale (where I was replacing my Fischer Panda (ooops, slap, slap, slap :-) ) before I moved the boat back to Guatemala. As a result I only have a few weeks experience with it. I will say that I'm having trouble with vibration. I've carefully followed their instructions on ballancing the blades, but I'm still getting vibration. I'm planning on machining a replacement support-pole hub that will have a bearing in it that will ride against the stainless pole. That will get rid of most of the vibration I suspect. I will also agree that the thermal cutouts seem to cut-out too soon. I noted I was getting cut-outs in the 20-25 kt range. Even worse, this seemed to have disabled the STOP switch position. To me this means that if I don't stop it in time that I may have to use a pole to swing it sideways into the wind, which is probably something that I don't want to do if the wind is getting up there and especially if I'm out at sea. If this is what is really happening (and I think that it is), this is a serious design flaw. On the plus side it's very easy to maintain and parts are available anywhere. And it's VERY quiet. You can hear the blades woosh, but that's about all. I hate the Air Marines and have even moved in an anchorage due to their noise. -- Geoff P.S. If you're interested, there's a photo of the generator at http://www.geoffschultz.org/2003 _Sailing/BlueJacket_Work/imagepages/image9.htm "Doug Dotson" wrote in : Sorry, but that is not my experience having a KISS for over a year and using it all last winter. A friend just down the pier said that his Aerogen is very quiet (I've heard it, it is very quiet). He also says it really doesn't generate that much power compared to some of the newer generators but he is happy with it. "Truelove39" wrote in message ... 1. They are not well-balanced, and they vibrate. You balance it yourself after installation and attaching the blades to the hub. If you take your time and do it right there is little or no vibration. Mine has no disernable vibration. 2. They are noisy, unlike the Aerogen which is virtually silent. Just not true. It is one of the quietest generators I have heard. The only one that is more quiet is the Rutland but it had the unfortunate property of not generating much power. In a 15kt breeze you can hardly hear it when sitting in the cockpitright under it. Does start to woosh a bit ubove that. 3. They have a thermal shut down device which functions juat as you are getting good output. Mine will run continuously in a 20+ knot breeze while outputing over 20 amps. It will shut down when it gets up around 30 though. Better than burning up the alternator. 4. I have had my Aerogen 6 since 1997 and it has performed flawlessly. Well, the jury is still out on that for me having only had mine for 1.5 years. I know someone that bought one of the original models something like 4+ years ago. Only problem they have had is a burned up switch. Other than that it is still operating as good as when it was new. They did say they have the original blades which are noisier than those provided now. In the anchorage we shared I can agree that theirs was noisier but not nearly as loud as the Air Marine units. Although the new Air Marines are much quieter than the older ones. John Doug wrote: If you are in Trinidad, why don't you own a KISS? Much better than an Aerogen. |
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum
I have an F-P 12Kw and it will not shut down electrically. I have to
go down to mechanically choke of the fuel supply. The mechanics can't find what is wrong? Any experiences? |
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum
|
Fischer Panda Owner's Forum
"Geoffrey W. Schultz" wrote in message 04.17...
I've created a Fischer Panda Owner's Forum to act as a repository for information related to these generators. If you own (or owned) one of these generators, please post your history/experience in the forum. I personally have had non-stop problems with my 4200 (mini) generator and know of many other owners who have had similar problems. This forum is an attempt to see if these problems are unique or systemic. The forum is located at www.FischerPandaSucks.com and despite the URL, the intent is to collect information on both the good and the bad. -- Geoff Schultz Never had one, my buds boat did from the factory. I think in the 1st year it ran a couple hours, went in the shop 3 times. He sold the boat, a month later the generator broke again the buyer said. Not ready for prime time, definently not a honda thats fer sure |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com