Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 01 Apr 2007 08:34:05 -0700, Stephen Trapani
wrote: I think this is a bit deceptive. "Waves" are almost never encountered in the open ocean except in shallows. "Swells" are what the sea is filled with and other than comfort, there is no minimum size of boat making swells safer. It's the construction and design of the boat that matters, not size. Stephen Sorry Stephen, I must disagree. The bumpy surface of the sea at sea is a combination of waves caused by the ciurrent wind may continue after wind has ceased and swell which is evidence of waves and weather from a distance. In shallows waves increase in height until they break. That is why coming into shallows such an anchorage or harbour (especially against the tide) can be dangerous or uncomfortable. Agreed that it is the construction and design of the boat that matters but a not to be discounted factor is the seamanship of the crew. Often in sailing a course with high seas running and some breaking behind one, it is better to bear off so that the waves hit on the quarter. Any breaking surge rolls under the boat - you might surf a bit but if your sails are more forward, you will not be pushed around to beam on and a broach. For my boat in conditions where the wind is up and the seas are building, I drop the main altogether and use the genoa. You may have to tack either side of the course but there will be little danger of broaching anmd being rolled. I say "little" because it is the three big ones in a row that are the problem. The first one pushes your stern about and you may lose a bit of forward momentum. That's when it is possible for its friend to throw you around some more. Size of the boat is not as important as seamanship (obtained by making mistakes and experience), design and strength of construction in that order I believe. I'm not an expert on sailing but this is my experience. cheers Peter |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the great replies everybody, and KRJ, great idea, but my budget
is LESS than a billion dollars, unfortunately. ![]() But that does bring up an interesting question, what's the biggest ship that's been sent to the bottom by seas? Not icebergs, U-boats, or collisions, but by good ol' Mother Nature, other than turning the Cape and meeting up with the rocks, just out on the open blue water. Will have to look into that... John "krj" wrote in message news:g9TPh.19274$B7.6739@bigfe9... A 1000+ foot carrier is safe in any ocean |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Wrote:
"But that does bring up an interesting question, what's the biggest ship that's been sent to the bottom by seas? Not icebergs, U-boats, or collisions, but by good ol' Mother Nature, other than turning the Cape and meeting up with the rocks, just out on the open blue water. Will have to look into that..." Sometime during WWII the US Navy ran into a fierce typhoon in the Pacific that sunk a lot of their ships. Don't know the specifics on which types though. Red |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 1, 7:37 am, "John Reimer"
wrote: Is there a general rule of thumb on what size of seas become inherently unsafe for a particular size of boat? To quote Donald Rumsfeld, "... You go to sea with the boat you have, not the boat you want...." So get your ass out there and stop fllip flopping. Bob |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 2, 12:17 am, "Bob" wrote:
On Apr 1, 7:37 am, "John Reimer" wrote: Is there a general rule of thumb on what size of seas become inherently unsafe for a particular size of boat? To quote Donald Rumsfeld, "... You go to sea with the boat you have, not the boat you want...." So get your ass out there and stop fllip flopping. Bob This is a loaded question. A lot depends on how seaworthy the boat is, and how skilled the captian is. A good captian can get away with a lot, a good captian on a seaworthy boat can get away with a lot more (within reason). Their are plenty of larger boats that are just not very seaworthy, and plenty of small boats that are very seaworthy for their size. John |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"John Reimer" wrote: Thanks for the great replies everybody, and KRJ, great idea, but my budget is LESS than a billion dollars, unfortunately. ![]() But that does bring up an interesting question, what's the biggest ship that's been sent to the bottom by seas? Not icebergs, U-boats, or collisions, but by good ol' Mother Nature, other than turning the Cape and meeting up with the rocks, just out on the open blue water. Will have to look into that... 'Derbyshire' ? Molesworth |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() But that does bring up an interesting question, what's the biggest ship that's been sent to the bottom by seas? Not icebergs, U-boats, or collisions, but by good ol' Mother Nature, other than turning the Cape and meeting up with the rocks, just out on the open blue water. Will have to look into that... This typhoon and it's effect is interesting, but no ships as big as "Derbyshire". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halsey%27s_Typhoon |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is not the size of the boat but the skill of the sailor.
Cap'n Ric |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-04-01 10:37:46 -0400, "John Reimer"
said: Is there a general rule of thumb on what size of seas become inherently unsafe for a particular size of boat? Not really, if you're only considering wave size. I've been in 6-8' waves over 8' swells and it was a fun romp. I've also encountered 3' waves that convinced me to slink back into the anchorage, tail between my legs. What are the other conditions, depth of water, winds? Are you sailing, motoring, hove to, on a sea anchor or anchored to the bottom? I expect you're thinking about a storm at sea. While any storm makes me uncomfortable --I hate to spill drinks-- and I do everything in my power to stay away from them, I'd wouldn't be unduly alarmed to find myself in one if I were well away from any shore, was on a series drogue sea anchor, and had time to strip the exterior and unship our rudder and put it below. -- Jere Lull Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD Xan's new pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI pages: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
#20
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jere Lull" wrote in message news:2007040223482216807-jerelull@maccom... On 2007-04-01 10:37:46 -0400, "John Reimer" said: Is there a general rule of thumb on what size of seas become inherently unsafe for a particular size of boat? [...] I expect you're thinking about a storm at sea. While any storm makes me uncomfortable --I hate to spill drinks-- and I do everything in my power to stay away from them, I'd wouldn't be unduly alarmed to find myself in one if I were well away from any shore, was on a series drogue sea anchor, and had time to strip the exterior and unship our rudder and put it below. Unship your rudder? -Paul |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General |