Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 4, 8:24 am, "
wrote: Oh, forgot my favorite boat that is much dismissed................... look at the 1970s Cascade boats. Should be several up there. Bob |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
ups.com... On Sep 5, 5:45 pm, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... My wife and I have had a 30 year old swing keel Catalina 22 for five years.We just spent four weeks sailing it from Port Townsend WA, where we live, to Princess Louisa Inlet. The boat handled everything fine, but we are beginning to think we want something a bit bigger if we are going to do more of the same and perhaps go further north. We have been so pleased with the C22 that we are starting to look for a C27 in the $10,000-12,000 range. However I recall reading somewhere that the old C27s didn't sail too well and the Catalina 270, introduced in 1994, was a big improvement - though that is probably outside our price range. We need a boat with headroom around 6 ft, and easily singlehanded as I can't always persuade the first mate to come. Does anyone have any comments on the C27, or alternative boats of this size ? The best 27-footer ever built and you can find one for sale from time to time. http://captneal.homestead.com/Vessel.html (from my mentor's site) The good Captain has told me he has offers all the time from people who want to buy his find blue-water cruising vessel. He's been offered up to 20 grand but refuses to sell because it would take close to 40 or 50 grand in labor and equipment to build up a bare Coronado 27 to the same specs. Be sure to follow the links at the bottom of the page to see lots of pictures of the inside and outside of this impressive vessel. You'll understand the meaning of "Bristol fashion." Wilbur Hubbard Wilbur, Thanks, but I am not sure what you are saying. Is a Coronado 27 a great boat in itself, or is it just that your Captain's individually modified boat is a great boat ? Richard He's saying that he (Wilber and Neal are the same person) spent a lot of time and effort fixing up a boat that he could afford. If he sold it, he'd be living in a rented RV. Coronados are so-so boats. Not terrible, not great. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 5, 9:49 pm, Bob wrote:
On Sep 4, 8:24 am, " wrote: Oh, forgot my favorite boat that is much dismissed................... look at the 1970s Cascade boats. Should be several up there. Bob Bob, Thanks. Do tell me more about the Cascade 27 and how it compares with a Catalina 27. Is this the boat you bought in PT? Richard |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 6, 8:21 am, "
wrote: On Sep 5, 9:49 pm, Bob wrote: On Sep 4, 8:24 am, " wrote: Thanks. Do tell me more about the Cascade 27 and how it compares with a Catalina 27. Is this the boat you bought in PT? Richard Hi Richard: The boat I bought in PT is a Gannon built and finished 1979 Freya 39. A bit more robust that a Cascade 27 but better suited for what I do. I have sat on and yacked with several ownners of Cascades over the years. They vary suprisingly in finsih and configuation realy can not comment other than the 1970s hulls are bulit proof in that you gots lots of hand layed glass. ALl the owners I talked to said they were stable predictable boats. Not fast by Wilburs standards but good boats. Just need to remember with any 1970s boat you'll replace the rig, portlights (windows) and fuel tank; rebed all deck hardware , and gut/ the DC/AC electric pannel and most the wire. You can either do it right the first time or end up llike Skip & Lydia half assing piece by piece along the road. Personally i belive cruising should be fun not one repair after another. Did you look at the Mahina link I left? There are lots of really sound boats out there for where you plan on cruising. Dont get locked into an one boat just because its popular. Take the Freya for example. NOt many out there. Most folks haven't heard of them, but a very fine boat fo rwhat I do. ALthough a very slow boat according to Willl burr. If your like most, including myself, youll find toooo many boats to consider. I'll leave you with what a surgeon friend of mine says, "better is the enemy of good." Get a good boat, not the "best boat," clean it up, and go have some fun! Bob |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... Thanks, but I am not sure what you are saying. Is a Coronado 27 a great boat in itself, or is it just that your Captain's individually modified boat is a great boat ? Richard Both. You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. The good Captain would never be so stupid as to throw good money after bad. Wilbur Hubbard |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-09-04 11:24:10 -0400, "
said: My wife and I have had a 30 year old swing keel Catalina 22 for five years.We just spent four weeks sailing it from Port Townsend WA, where we live, to Princess Louisa Inlet. The boat handled everything fine, but we are beginning to think we want something a bit bigger if we are going to do more of the same and perhaps go further north. We did the same 15 years ago. Short story: I suggest you determine what you can reasonably expect to do for the next 5-7 years and list what you need in a boat, particularly accommodations as they will mean quite a bit more than they did in the 22. I'll tell you, the first time you stand up to put on your pants will be an eye-opener! 95% of the time, long distance cruisers are in a harbor, so accomodationss become more important the further and longer you go. Our priorities: Full-time berth for two real adults. (75% of the boats out there fail that test.) Making up the bed each evening gets old fast. Head, galley, interior seating, stowage, and cockpit followed in rough priority. Only after both of us were satisfied with that did my concerns (keel, hull form, sail plan, etc.) come into play. After some pretty-fair cruising, I'd add having a reliable engine with fairly high priority. A "slow" sailboat can be considerably improved with a good set of sails. Ours is fast enough stock, but I like speed, so we have a couple of semi-custom jibs, a proper main and great cruising chute. We generally keep up with (or pass) boats 10' longer, and regularly pass 30-35' cats under chute. After 16 seasons of doing far more than our pre-purchase expectations, Xan's still sufficient for our expected needs for the next 5-7 years, including an extended trip at least in the Bahamas, possibly through the BVI. I hope you do as well. -- Jere Lull Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD Xan's new pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI pages: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-09-04 11:24:10 -0400, "
said: we are beginning to think we want something a bit bigger if we are going to do more of the same and perhaps go further north. Oh, a good site from someone who did the same thing: cruisenews.net (Oh, and guess what boat he got? [it wasn't the Alberg which was his ideal when he started the site.] ;-) -- Jere Lull Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD Xan's new pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI pages: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 6, 11:08 am, Bob wrote:
On Sep 6, 8:21 am, " wrote: On Sep 5, 9:49 pm, Bob wrote: On Sep 4, 8:24 am, " wrote: Thanks. Do tell me more about the Cascade 27 and how it compares with a Catalina 27. Is this the boat you bought in PT? Richard Hi Richard: The boat I bought in PT is a Gannon built and finished 1979 Freya 39. A bit more robust that a Cascade 27 but better suited for what I do. I have sat on and yacked with several ownners of Cascades over the years. They vary suprisingly in finsih and configuation realy can not comment other than the 1970s hulls are bulit proof in that you gots lots of hand layed glass. ALl the owners I talked to said they were stable predictable boats. Not fast by Wilburs standards but good boats. ....And I assume heavy with a full-keel. In other words, what we call here in the Pac NW an "offshore-capable" boat. "Offshore" is a mystical word here. Because we have a HUGE breakwater known as Vancouver Island, most boaters never go "offshore". So, there's a mystique around it. "Did you hear about Bob on 'Endless Love'? He went offshore..." So there's a romantic appeal to an "offshore" boat. OTOH, I call them GTE: Get There Eventually. There are virtually NO conditions "inside" that require a full keel, and since most of the time the winds are light (and Murphy says they're also blowing from your destination!), you need a boat that will sail well upwind in light air, or you'll be motoring wherever you go. So, if you want a "good solid boat" like a Cascade (or Columbia, Grampian, Alberg...) be prepared to either wallow in the swells a lot, or motor. If you want to sail, you need a lighter-weight, fin-keel boat. (Yes, Columbias and Grampians are both fin-keel, but perform terribly in light air!). That's not to say you can't get a well-built boat, though. The Cal/Crown line is VERY well-built, but sail quite well in any conditions you find "inside" (and not bad "outside", like the WCVI, but probably not Oregon Coast). Islanders seem well-built as well. Ericsons are great, although the 27 is another GTE. Where does Catalina fit into all this? They're EXCELLENT in terms of a well-sailing boat with lots of room. Their "fit and finish" are not that great, so the older boats tend to have lots of little things wrong with them. I wouldn't take a Cat 27 "offshore" (although many have), but they're actually better suited for the Pac NW than a Cascade. Just my opinion... druid http://www.bcboatnet.org |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
druid wrote:
On Sep 6, 11:08 am, Bob wrote: On Sep 6, 8:21 am, " wrote: On Sep 5, 9:49 pm, Bob wrote: On Sep 4, 8:24 am, " wrote: Thanks. Do tell me more about the Cascade 27 and how it compares with a Catalina 27. Is this the boat you bought in PT? Richard Hi Richard: The boat I bought in PT is a Gannon built and finished 1979 Freya 39. A bit more robust that a Cascade 27 but better suited for what I do. I have sat on and yacked with several ownners of Cascades over the years. They vary suprisingly in finsih and configuation realy can not comment other than the 1970s hulls are bulit proof in that you gots lots of hand layed glass. ALl the owners I talked to said they were stable predictable boats. Not fast by Wilburs standards but good boats. ...And I assume heavy with a full-keel. In other words, what we call here in the Pac NW an "offshore-capable" boat. "Offshore" is a mystical word here. Because we have a HUGE breakwater known as Vancouver Island, most boaters never go "offshore". So, there's a mystique around it. "Did you hear about Bob on 'Endless Love'? He went offshore..." So there's a romantic appeal to an "offshore" boat. OTOH, I call them GTE: Get There Eventually. There are virtually NO conditions "inside" that require a full keel, and since most of the time the winds are light (and Murphy says they're also blowing from your destination!), you need a boat that will sail well upwind in light air, or you'll be motoring wherever you go. So, if you want a "good solid boat" like a Cascade (or Columbia, Grampian, Alberg...) be prepared to either wallow in the swells a lot, or motor. If you want to sail, you need a lighter-weight, fin-keel boat. (Yes, Columbias and Grampians are both fin-keel, but perform terribly in light air!). That's not to say you can't get a well-built boat, though. The Cal/Crown line is VERY well-built, but sail quite well in any conditions you find "inside" (and not bad "outside", like the WCVI, but probably not Oregon Coast). Islanders seem well-built as well. Ericsons are great, although the 27 is another GTE. Where does Catalina fit into all this? They're EXCELLENT in terms of a well-sailing boat with lots of room. Their "fit and finish" are not that great, so the older boats tend to have lots of little things wrong with them. I wouldn't take a Cat 27 "offshore" (although many have), but they're actually better suited for the Pac NW than a Cascade. Just my opinion... druid http://www.bcboatnet.org Cascade 27 is a fin keel with balanced rudder that goes well in light air. Gordon |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
25 foot umiak | General | |||
foot in mouth | ASA | |||
Expense per foot | Boat Building | |||
30 to 35-foot boats, days used? | ASA | |||
FS: 7 foot oars in NY | Marketplace |