Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
We have a broker up in Anacortes, WA that has been around almost 20 years.
Nice bunch of low-key folks who sell primarily sailboats ( hey, everybody has a cross to bear). The firm has always been known as Voyager Yachts, and Fred West is the owner. Last weekend at the Anacortes Floating Boat Show, I noticed that Voyager Yachts had changed its name to West Yachts. Seemed like an odd move after building up a decent reputation for a couple of decades, so I asked one of the brokers about the name change. A tale of ridiculous corporate bullying ensued..... Seems that Carver Yacht Company (one of the largest mass-pro powerboat builders) has offered a Carver "Voyager" since about 1977, and continues to offer a version of the vessel today. Carver got a bug up its butt to threaten Voyager Yachts with a suit for trademark violation. Odds are probably good that Voyager Yachts would win in court. They have used the name for almost 20 years, "voyager" is a common nautical term, and Carver's "Voyager" is a model designation, not the corporate tradename. Voyager Yachts is (primarily) a sailboat brokerage, and would never have made any attempt to mislead the public into a belief that Voyager Yachts was a Carver powerboat dealer. The nearest Carver dealer is in Seattle, about 65 miles away. Looks like a pretty strong position, at least to me. I'd side with the broker if I was on a jury. Only problem, Voyager Yachts would have been required to defend its position in court. Carver could fly out a planeload of staff attorneys who would otherwise be sitting around on payroll with nothing to do. Even if the court had decided in favor of Voyager Yachts, the local broker would have had to absorb a fortune in legal fees. As it is, the local broker is absorbing the expense of changing all his signs, phone listings, business cards, stationary, etc etc etc to a new name. I asked one of his salespeople, "Did anybody ever come in expecting you to be representing Carver Voyager boats?" "Nope. Not even once." Score one for Goliath, zip for David on this round. I'm willing to bet that if Fred West ever decides to represent a line of new powerboats, it's extremely unlikely to be Carver. Is business so slow for Carver up this way that they even have time to worry about a non consequential similarity in trade names? You'd sue Brunswick or Genmar for calling a boat line "Voyager", but nobody other than a ridiculous bully is going to hassle a small businessman in Anacortes, WA. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is business so slow for Carver up this way that they
even have time to worry about a non consequential similarity in trade names? yes. it is *that* slow, according to broker reports. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gould 0738 wrote:
... at the Anacortes Floating Boat Show, I noticed that Voyager Yachts had changed its name to West Yachts That is ridiculous. But I don't know how things would have stood in court, it's a dice throw. I've seen some engineering contract disputes get settled in extremely stupid ways. Here in out town there used to be a laid back little guitar shop Gibson Music. About two years ago Gibson Guitars (which was recently under new ownership) got bit by the same stupid bug and threatened to sue. The owner, whose last name was really Gibson, closed up shop and moved on. Sad. I really don't understand what is gained by this kind of move. One less yacht brokerage is not going to increase Carver sales, and one less guitar store is certainly not going to help Gibson. Maybe it's something in the water? Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Family names are exempt for trade mark or name infringments. You don't even
have to do a public notice of your intent to use you family name as your business name. However, don't try to get 'tricky' line that kid that registered a interenet domain as MicRowSoft.com (not sure of the spelling).. Seem his first name was Mike and last name was Rowe (or something like that).. Anyway he lost in court but MicroSoft gave him some other concesions, out of the goodness of their hearts.. I have registered my business name in both Calif and WA and each time it involved publishing a notice of intent to use that name. The state licensing offices also verify if it has already been registered at the state level.. However, such an action only protects me from another business using the name in those states.. If a business from outside these two states has TradeMarked or registered this name with the feds. then I'm scewed if they move into Calif. or WA... Even if I had state register it before them.. I've never been challenged and wouldn't have any 'good' reason to fight it if it came to that. I only maintain my business lic. for wholesale and business discount advantages. Steve s/v Good Intentions |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
They can't trademark the family name, it's self, but they could chanlenge
him for using the name Guitars, since Gibson Guitars was most likely already registered This little guy could have renamed his business Gibson Music, etc. But they can't keep him from using his own name. Steve |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve wrote:
They can't trademark the family name, it's self, but they could chanlenge him for using the name Guitars, since Gibson Guitars was most likely already registered This little guy could have renamed his business Gibson Music, etc. But they can't keep him from using his own name. Well, that's what I thought too. BTW he did not call his shop Gibson Guitars, it was Gibson Music. But it's too late now. DSK |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24 Mar 2004 04:00:57 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:
yes. it is *that* slow, according to broker reports. According to what broker reports? bb |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Damn, a guitar suit, and I always thought guitars came in cases. -- Capt. Frank __c \ _ | \_ __\_| oooo \_____ ~~~~|______________/ ~~~~~ www.home.earthlink.net/~aartworks "DSK" wrote in message ... Gould 0738 wrote: ... at the Anacortes Floating Boat Show, I noticed that Voyager Yachts had changed its name to West Yachts That is ridiculous. But I don't know how things would have stood in court, it's a dice throw. I've seen some engineering contract disputes get settled in extremely stupid ways. Here in out town there used to be a laid back little guitar shop Gibson Music. About two years ago Gibson Guitars (which was recently under new ownership) got bit by the same stupid bug and threatened to sue. The owner, whose last name was really Gibson, closed up shop and moved on. Sad. I really don't understand what is gained by this kind of move. One less yacht brokerage is not going to increase Carver sales, and one less guitar store is certainly not going to help Gibson. Maybe it's something in the water? Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You wrote:
Score one for Goliath, zip for David on this round ... nobody other than a ridiculous bully is going to hassle a small businessman in Anacortes, WA. In the UK, there are far fewer cases of this nature, for one simple reason: If I sue you and I lose, I pay my costs and your costs too. Why don't we do this in the US? Because, of course, attorneys would do less business handling frivolous cases; and so their lobby ensures that things stay as they are. My guess is that this case has more to do with Carver's lawyers than Carver. A Carver attorney says to the big boss, "This brokerage represents a potential threat to a Carver trademark." The big boss doesn't know if that's true, and s/he only has one person to ask -- the attorney who just raised the issue. So to be on the safe side, the attorney gets the go-ahead. Most of the contracts I sign these days come about because one attorney has sat down and thought carefully through all the unpleasant things that another attorney could do to hurt me or the other party. I've come to see that it's America's version of redistribution of income. In the UK, they do it with modified socialism. In the US, we do it by suing one another. E.J. Bleendreeble http://www.casualsailor.com |