Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Transponder cable length
I'm rigging an old Lowrance LFG300 flasher to use in a pedal boat (I know,
I'm nuts) that's to be used on a small residential lake. I would like to shorten the cable to about 6 or 8 ft. Will this have any or much effect on the unit? I'm only interested in checking depth of lake as it's been years since the lake was dredged. Also, does turning this unit on with out the transponder connected do any harm to this unit. Rob Mills ~ Tulsa |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Rob Mills" wrote in message
news:7NSYc.9395$gl.6387@okepread07... I'm rigging an old Lowrance LFG300 flasher to use in a pedal boat (I know, I'm nuts) that's to be used on a small residential lake. I would like to shorten the cable to about 6 or 8 ft. Will this have any or much effect on the unit? I'm only interested in checking depth of lake as it's been years since the lake was dredged. Theoretically yes but not enough to notice. Also, does turning this unit on with out the transponder connected do any harm to this unit? Dunno but might ruin it so I wouldn't. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Vito" wrote in message ... Theoretically yes but not enough to notice. That's what I was hoping. Thanks, RM~ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The cable should not be shortened at least that is what I was told. It
does not harm the unit to turn it on with out the transducer being connected. Rick Rob Mills wrote: I'm rigging an old Lowrance LFG300 flasher to use in a pedal boat (I know, I'm nuts) that's to be used on a small residential lake. I would like to shorten the cable to about 6 or 8 ft. Will this have any or much effect on the unit? I'm only interested in checking depth of lake as it's been years since the lake was dredged. Also, does turning this unit on with out the transponder connected do any harm to this unit. Rob Mills ~ Tulsa |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Rick" wrote in message ... The cable should not be shortened at least that is what I was told. It does not harm the unit to turn it on with out the transducer being connected. The transmitter sends a pulse of electromagnetic energy down the coax to the transducer at the speed of light. The transducer converts that to sound which travels at (yup) the speed of sound in water; then it listens for echos and converts them back to electromagnetic signals sent via the same cable to the receiver. The receiver measures the total time required by all this to determine depth. If you cut 10' off the cable that determination will be off by 2x the time required for a speed of light signal to do that 10'. Since the speed of light (186,000 miles PS IIRC) vs sound (about 1100 feet PS) that error is small. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Vito" wrote in message
... "Rick" wrote in message ... The cable should not be shortened at least that is what I was told. It does not harm the unit to turn it on with out the transducer being connected. The transmitter sends a pulse of electromagnetic energy down the coax to the transducer at the speed of light. The transducer converts that to sound which travels at (yup) the speed of sound in water; then it listens for echos and converts them back to electromagnetic signals sent via the same cable to the receiver. The receiver measures the total time required by all this to determine depth. If you cut 10' off the cable that determination will be off by 2x the time required for a speed of light signal to do that 10'. Since the speed of light (186,000 miles PS IIRC) vs sound (about 1100 feet PS) that error is small. It's not the cable delay that counts in this case. The cable capacity is important here and is used as part of the tuned circuit that drives the transducer. If you change the cable length, you change the capacity of the cable and therefore the resonance frequency of the tuned circuit. The result is that the sounder cannot generate a sufficient high voltage to drive the transducer. Meindert |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Meindert Sprang" wrote: It's not the cable delay that counts in this case. The cable capacity is important here and is used as part of the tuned circuit that drives the transducer. If you change the cable length, you change the capacity of the cable and therefore the resonance frequency of the tuned circuit. The result is that the sounder cannot generate a sufficient high voltage to drive the transducer. Meindert I hate to rain on your parade here Meindert, but most, if not all, consumer Marine Depth Sounders, have Transformer Coupled outputs that are resonate in and of themselves, and really don't care what is connected to their output link as long as it isn't shorted. The transducer is a Barium Titante Crystal that looks like a capacitive load to the sounder transmitter, and if it isn't actually connected, the few watts of transmitter power is just burned up in the transformer as heat, as the average power is very low, similar to a radars average power compared to it's Peak Power. Now if we are talking commercial Depth Sounders, we are talking a horse of a bit different color, but again operating them into an open transducer line isn't very likely to cause any problems with the transmitter, you just don't get any return. The result of all the above is that, one "could" actually go and tune the transmitter for the best coupling to the transducer connected, but the gain in signal/noise by doing so isn't really significant. (Like less than 2db or so) The length of the transducer cable isn't critical to the operation of the souder, and many of these installations in the North Pacific Fleet have splices in them due the cost of hauling the vessel to change transducers, compared with just connecting a new sounder to what is already in the hull. (Frequencys all being the same, between the old and new units) There is Theory, and then there is 30 years of Practical........ Bruce in alaska -- add a 2 before @ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Bruce in Alaska" wrote in message news:bruceg-
I hate to rain on your parade here Meindert, but most, if not all, consumer Marine Depth Sounders, have Transformer Coupled outputs that are resonate in and of themselves, and really don't care what is connected to their output link as long as it isn't shorted. That is technically impossible. And you as a radio man should know this. Just like it is impossible to create a fixed antenna tuner that matches anything between a screwdriver and a full size dipole, without changing a tuning element. Please read http://www.airmar.com/pdfs/technical/sensor.pdf. Specifically, at page 21, right column, last bullet, it says that if the cable must be extended, it requires removal of capacitance in the tuning circuit. So if you short a cable, adding capacity is required. In the example at the next page, a calculated capacitance of 2428 pF s shown for the crystal. To get the example resonating, the calculations show that 6776 pF is to be added for proper operation. Now, if you would cut a 10 meter cable in half, you remove 500pF from the equasion, which will have significant influence on the proper operation. Meindert |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
cable steering | General | |||
Fishfinder transducer extension cable hookup? | General | |||
Source for cheap tinned marine battery cable | Boat Building | |||
Radar Cable Connectors | Electronics | |||
Gear shift cable | UK Power Boats |