Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Battery isolation
On 20 Sep 2004 01:58:46 -0700, "klog"
wrote: ChrisGibboGibson wrote: snip The damage has already been done. snip May I stick my nose in? (it's a low-impedance nose, so should not disrupt the thread much...). What exactly is the typical nature of the alternator damage experienced? Fried regulator or winding insulation breakdown or zapped diodes ? You suggested that (whatever the failure mode) it was too fast for an SCR to catch (I'm thinking of a conventional crowbar circuit - and even *they* are too easy to get wrong). How about a combo; the grunt of the work being done by a ballasted SCR, plus some transient suppressor to handle things whilst this kicks in? The cheapest protection must be a battery... Beat me to it klog :^) anyone have know how this could be done? cheers, Pete. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Comment below.
Doug s/v Callista "Pete C" wrote in message ... On 20 Sep 2004 01:58:46 -0700, "klog" wrote: ChrisGibboGibson wrote: snip The damage has already been done. snip May I stick my nose in? (it's a low-impedance nose, so should not disrupt the thread much...). Actually a high impedance nose would be less intrusive. What exactly is the typical nature of the alternator damage experienced? Fried regulator or winding insulation breakdown or zapped diodes ? Zapped diodes is what I see the most. You suggested that (whatever the failure mode) it was too fast for an SCR to catch (I'm thinking of a conventional crowbar circuit - and even *they* are too easy to get wrong). How about a combo; the grunt of the work being done by a ballasted SCR, plus some transient suppressor to handle things whilst this kicks in? The cheapest protection must be a battery... Snubbers seems to work well. Beat me to it klog :^) anyone have know how this could be done? cheers, Pete. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:33:27 -0400, "Doug Dotson"
wrote: Comment below. Doug s/v Callista "Pete C" wrote in message ChrisGibboGibson wrote: You suggested that (whatever the failure mode) it was too fast for an SCR to catch (I'm thinking of a conventional crowbar circuit - and even *they* are too easy to get wrong). How about a combo; the grunt of the work being done by a ballasted SCR, plus some transient suppressor to handle things whilst this kicks in? The cheapest protection must be a battery... Snubbers seems to work well. Hi, We were discussing ways of protecting alternators from load disconnection, when a high current continues to flow until the regulator kicks in. Apart from an SCR a power mosfet might do it, some like a VNP49N04 have an autoclamping feature that would help. cheers, Pete. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Removing battery | General | |||
Using car battery in boat | Electronics | |||
Deep cycle batteries - miscellaneous advice? | Electronics | |||
alternator charging to high? | Electronics | |||
Question about battery life | Electronics |