Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
The antennas are directional in what is called a spot beam. If they were
omni they would cover equal distance North/South but a LOT more power would be required to have the required EIRP to be received by the auto antennas. krj Doug Dotson wrote: So the antennas on the bird are directional targeted at the US? Otherwise I would think that an equal area below the equator would be covered. Doug "krj" wrote in message ... There are two satellites in geosynchronous orbit, XM-1 (named Roll) at 85 degrees and XM-2 (names Rock) at 115 degrees. Both are 24 transponder C band satellites with antennas that are positioned to have a footprint for the CONUS. The footprints extend slightly into Canada and Mexico and about 100 miles offshore. krj Doug Dotson wrote: I thought Sirius and XM worked off of geosynchronous sats over the equator. "krj" wrote in message .. . Problem is that XM and Sirius only work in the US and near coastal waters. No Coverage in the BVI and south. krj Larry W4CSC wrote: Terry Spragg wrote in : Normally, I would want my entertainment radio to have excellant reception, and could not bear to be at anchor on a hot, buggy night with a nice new tune just barely distinguishable through a bad, noisy antenna. Is now a good time to show off the XM Radio satellite antenna magnet stuck to the side of the fire extinguisher next to the hatch?...(c; One of these days I gotta actually find a place to put it but it works so good stuck to the fire extinguisher I hate to screw around with something that always works. It's even sideways from the way it's supposed to be stuck.....go figure?? XM is the way to fly, not that damned string of continuous commercials spaced with minor bits of "programming" playing in between......on USA commercial FM from Clear Channel. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Dennis Pogson wrote:
wrote: Hello: I want to install a new FM radio / CD player on my boat. Thought I would mount the antenna in the stern area. I also like the idea of having a redundant marine VHF antenna. Is it reasonable to use a marine VHF antenna for an FM car radio antenna? Other sugestions that will alow me to get the local tunes and news and also have secondary VHF antenna? Thanks Chris You can get a splitter to have the VHF antenna serve both units, but it isn't as good as dedicated VHF + FM antennas. Chandlers can usually supply the splitter. Does the problem lie with mucking about with a splitter or less than optimal reception for FM radio using VHF antenna? I like the mast head idea to help the FM peak over the horizon but would that simply be a wash if VHF antenna doesnt match well with the FM radio? Chris - - - Satellite photocharts of the UK & Ireland available, excellent detail and accurate calibration using Oziexplorer. Remove *nospam* to reply. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
krj wrote in
: Using an antenna on a dish would work for XM if you put the feed at the correct focal point for C band (DirectTV and Dish are Ku band), but would be a problem for Sirius because their three satellites are not GEO. They are LEO in an eliptical orbit so you would need the latest Keplers and a tracking antenna. Also they are at 2.3 Ghz. krj If Sirius' birds were LEO and they only had 3 of them, you'd only have service in three 8 minute periods per 90 minute orbits, but only if those changing orbits caused by the earth's rotation were to happen to have you in their footprint. No, Sirius is Geosynchronous, too. You are right about the 2.3G on the C-band dish, but there would be some reflection. I'd bet the excellent TV hackers across the Caribbean at fixed locations have some big dishes pointed to XM or Sirius birds to get enough signal for a lock on exotic islands. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Shakespeare makes a device that allows the VHF antenna to be used
for both the VHF and FM. Works well, but they do seem to fail after a while. I've twice isolated VHF transmit problems to a fail one of these devices. Best to have 2 separate antennas, but the device is a reasonable compromise. Doug wrote in message oups.com... Dennis Pogson wrote: wrote: Hello: I want to install a new FM radio / CD player on my boat. Thought I would mount the antenna in the stern area. I also like the idea of having a redundant marine VHF antenna. Is it reasonable to use a marine VHF antenna for an FM car radio antenna? Other sugestions that will alow me to get the local tunes and news and also have secondary VHF antenna? Thanks Chris You can get a splitter to have the VHF antenna serve both units, but it isn't as good as dedicated VHF + FM antennas. Chandlers can usually supply the splitter. Does the problem lie with mucking about with a splitter or less than optimal reception for FM radio using VHF antenna? I like the mast head idea to help the FM peak over the horizon but would that simply be a wash if VHF antenna doesnt match well with the FM radio? Chris - - - Satellite photocharts of the UK & Ireland available, excellent detail and accurate calibration using Oziexplorer. Remove *nospam* to reply. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Doug Dotson" dougdotson@NOSPAMcablespeedNOSPAMcom wrote: I thought Sirius and XM worked off of geosynchronous sats over the equator. "krj" wrote in message ... Problem is that XM and Sirius only work in the US and near coastal waters. No Coverage in the BVI and south. krj Larry W4CSC wrote: Terry Spragg wrote in : Normally, I would want my entertainment radio to have excellant reception, and could not bear to be at anchor on a hot, buggy night with a nice new tune just barely distinguishable through a bad, noisy antenna. Is now a good time to show off the XM Radio satellite antenna magnet stuck to the side of the fire extinguisher next to the hatch?...(c; One of these days I gotta actually find a place to put it but it works so good stuck to the fire extinguisher I hate to screw around with something that always works. It's even sideways from the way it's supposed to be stuck.....go figure?? XM is the way to fly, not that damned string of continuous commercials spaced with minor bits of "programming" playing in between......on USA commercial FM from Clear Channel. XM is geosynch using SpotBeams, but Sirius is using none-geosynch, and the farther north you go the bigger the dropout when the Sat Constellation can't cover the area. for southeastern alaska we lose signal about 2 hours out of 12 with what Sirius has running now. Bruce in alaska -- add a 2 before @ |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Unlike XM, Sirius does not use GEO satellites. Instead, its three
SS/L-1300 satellites form an inclined elliptical satellite constellation. Sirius says the elliptical path of its satellite constellation ensures that each satellite spends about 16 hours a day over the continental United States, with at least one satellite over the country at all times. Sirius completed its three-satellite constellation on November 30, 2000. A fourth satellite will remain on the ground, ready to be launched if any of the three active satellites encounter transmission problems. http://search.netscape.com/ns/boomfr...ite-radio3.htm Larry W4CSC wrote: krj wrote in : Using an antenna on a dish would work for XM if you put the feed at the correct focal point for C band (DirectTV and Dish are Ku band), but would be a problem for Sirius because their three satellites are not GEO. They are LEO in an eliptical orbit so you would need the latest Keplers and a tracking antenna. Also they are at 2.3 Ghz. krj If Sirius' birds were LEO and they only had 3 of them, you'd only have service in three 8 minute periods per 90 minute orbits, but only if those changing orbits caused by the earth's rotation were to happen to have you in their footprint. No, Sirius is Geosynchronous, too. You are right about the 2.3G on the C-band dish, but there would be some reflection. I'd bet the excellent TV hackers across the Caribbean at fixed locations have some big dishes pointed to XM or Sirius birds to get enough signal for a lock on exotic islands. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Larry,
I incorrectly used the term LEO. Technically LEO satellites are those between 300 and 800 miles up. Ic sometimes use the term generically to indicate a satellite not in geo. orbit. I sometimes refer to GPS birds as low earth orbit, but they are actually a little over 10,000 nm up. Sorry if I confused you,but Sirus birds are not geo. They are in an Elliptical Orbit A satellite in elliptical orbit follows an oval-shaped path. One part of the orbit is closest to the center of Earth (perigee) and the other part is farthest away (apogee). A satellite in this orbit takes about 12 hours to circle the planet. Like polar orbits, elliptical orbits move in a north-south direction. krj wrote: Unlike XM, Sirius does not use GEO satellites. Instead, its three SS/L-1300 satellites form an inclined elliptical satellite constellation. Sirius says the elliptical path of its satellite constellation ensures that each satellite spends about 16 hours a day over the continental United States, with at least one satellite over the country at all times. Sirius completed its three-satellite constellation on November 30, 2000. A fourth satellite will remain on the ground, ready to be launched if any of the three active satellites encounter transmission problems. http://search.netscape.com/ns/boomfr...ite-radio3.htm Larry W4CSC wrote: krj wrote in : Using an antenna on a dish would work for XM if you put the feed at the correct focal point for C band (DirectTV and Dish are Ku band), but would be a problem for Sirius because their three satellites are not GEO. They are LEO in an eliptical orbit so you would need the latest Keplers and a tracking antenna. Also they are at 2.3 Ghz. krj If Sirius' birds were LEO and they only had 3 of them, you'd only have service in three 8 minute periods per 90 minute orbits, but only if those changing orbits caused by the earth's rotation were to happen to have you in their footprint. No, Sirius is Geosynchronous, too. You are right about the 2.3G on the C-band dish, but there would be some reflection. I'd bet the excellent TV hackers across the Caribbean at fixed locations have some big dishes pointed to XM or Sirius birds to get enough signal for a lock on exotic islands. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
krj wrote in
: Larry, I incorrectly used the term LEO. Technically LEO satellites are those between 300 and 800 miles up. Ic sometimes use the term generically to indicate a satellite not in geo. orbit. I sometimes refer to GPS birds as low earth orbit, but they are actually a little over 10,000 nm up. Sorry if I confused you,but Sirus birds are not geo. They are in an Elliptical Orbit A satellite in elliptical orbit follows an oval-shaped path. One part of the orbit is closest to the center of Earth (perigee) and the other part is farthest away (apogee). A satellite in this orbit takes about 12 hours to circle the planet. Like polar orbits, elliptical orbits move in a north-south direction. Hmm...This may explain why the signals to it at Best Buy's store here sometimes works and sometimes dies. That high elliptical orbit put the satellite at some serious distance (read that attenuation) when it's "way out there" at apogee. We have several ham radio satellites with orbits like these. You can talk to them a long time as they go over the apogee hump. Thanks for the info. All I knew about Sirius was it was near bankruptcy with much-lower-than-expected subscriptions. http://finance.yahoo.com/q/cf?s=SIRI It just bleeds money.....even though some keep priming the pump. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SSB Antenna theory | Electronics | |||
Notes on short SSB antennas, for Larry | Electronics | |||
How to use a simple SWR meter and what it means to your VHF | Electronics | |||
Icom 402 radio woes..or is it my antenna system? | Cruising |