Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Hello John,
Thanks for the info. My first reaction is to suggest that we use 5 ma because we Yanks are a less hardy lot and need that extra protection. But if you look at the link: http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2000/JackHsu.shtml Electric Current Needed to Kill a Human you'll see that 60 - 70 ma. may be a lethal dose. My guess is that the 5 ma was chosen to be below the general human threshold of sensation. But I have no idea why Australia has chosen so high a threshold. And did I read somewhere that in Europe the residential distribution lines are nowhere grounded? A two-wire system, I seem to recall. You don't have that kind of system in Australia, do you John? Regards, Chuck John Proctor wrote: On 2005-02-25 12:44:20 +1100, chuck said: Hello Eric, Thanks for clarifying. I believe you are correct. You are talking about high-resistance onboard leakages that generate currents too small to be detected by the GFI circuit or the breakers. The isolator diodes would probably not conduct under those circumstances and a capacitor would help. UL requires the GFI to trip at a 5 ma unbalance, so 24,000 ohms of leakage would trip it. Actually, the isolator diodes would probably pass 5 ma in that circuit without a capacitor. The capacitor would be necessary when the leakage resistance was in the megohms and the currents in the microamps. Would rather not have that stuff flowing through my ground connections through the water to adjacent boats, even at those low current levels. This underscores the importance of making sure you don't have dangerous leakages onboard in the first place. Easy enough to check, but how many regularly test their GFIs? We sure agree on the isolation transformer, too. Thanks again, Eric. Chuck Chuck, I am puzzled by your UL 5 ma rating. Here in Australia we have basically two ratings. The first is for most domestic installations an is 30 ma. The second is for hazerdous locations including hospitals where the rating is 10 ma. There are other higher rating RCD (Residual Current Devices) which are used in industrial contexts (eg 60 ma) but the majority of installations are either 30 ma. or 10 ma. BTW I am an EE as well as a licensed Electrical Contractor. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks, Wally.
Here's a link to fairly comprehensive discussion on some of this topic: http://www.mikeholt.com/documents/st...inal5-3-03.pdf MultiGroundedNeutralFinal5-3-03.pdf (application/pdf Object) A look a world-wide systems can be found he http://www.selinc.com/techpprs/6123.pdf REVIEW OF GROUND FAULT PROTECTION METHODS FOR GROUNDED, UNGROUNDED ... Chuck WaIIy wrote: On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:12:08 -0500, chuck wrote: And did I read somewhere that in Europe the residential distribution lines are nowhere grounded? A two-wire system, I seem to recall. You don't have that kind of system in Australia, do you John? Regards, Chuck Here's an interesting read.... http://www.epanorama.net/documents/g...al_wiring.html |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Galvanic Isolator | Electronics | |||
Galvanic corrosion and Radio | Electronics | |||
Seamanship Question #17 Galvanic Corrosion | ASA | |||
Galvanic Isolators/All the same? | Boat Building | |||
galvanic corrosion | Electronics |