Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Nobeltec Radar
I am considering replacing my broken radar with a the Nobeltec Radar
system. I am a long time user of Nobeltec software and comfortable with using a PC on board. Any experience or feedback on this integrated radar/pc system would be appreciated in helping make this decision. LarryR |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
LarryR wrote:
I am considering replacing my broken radar with a the Nobeltec Radar system. I am a long time user of Nobeltec software and comfortable with using a PC on board. Any experience or feedback on this integrated radar/pc system would be appreciated in helping make this decision. LarryR Hi Larry, I installed the 4kw radar 2 years ago; works wonderfully. I really like the radar overlay and side-by-side functionality. This year I upgraded to the Ethernet version of the radar-box; I now have 960x960 resolution of the radar image (helps to discern smaller blobs). I also added a solid state gyro to keep the image stabilized and upgraded the CPU from a 1 GHz VIA to a 600-1600 MHz Pentium M to get the redraw rate up. I suggest you make sure you have enough horsepower in the PC as the radar image's fast redraw sure eats cycles. Here's an image of the radar display side-by-side with a radar overlay in combination with AIS targets from this year's trip: http://www.scanner391.net/e107_plugi...album=35&pos=3 (click on the image to view the screendump 1-on-1) Kees |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Kees, Thanks very much for your feedback. For the last couple of
weeks I have been looking for both positive and negative information, but typically have found mostly promotional product literature. Nobeltec's new IR2, 2KW with 20" radardome, would probably work best for me. I have upgraded my computer to 2.4Ghz so that is not a concern. My big concern is the heading sensor. I have a steel hulled sailboat and I am told a flux-gate compass does not function well inside a metal boat. My Simrad autopilot system produces a 10Hz NMEA signal, but pulls it from a traditional compass. I am not sure if this will give an adequate update of my heading to have a stable radar image. Your website is very impressive. Larry |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
LarryR wrote:
My big concern is the heading sensor. I have a steel hulled sailboat and I am told a flux-gate compass does not function well inside a metal boat. My Simrad autopilot system produces a 10Hz NMEA signal, but pulls it from a traditional compass. I am not sure if this will give an adequate update of my heading to have a stable radar image. If it's 10Hz that's as quick as any of the other compasses send out data, and plenty fast enough. Whether the heading data it reports has the desired accuracy is up to you. My shot would be to give it a try first; you can always throw more money at the problem later. Note that you should give the fast heading data a separate serial input, as it's likely to overwhelm other data if you try to share it using a NMEA multiplexer (this happened to me). You can also read the newsgroup hosted by Nobeltec itself at news.nobeltec.com; plenty of independently minded folk can be found there. Kees |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Kees Verruijt" wrote in message
... If it's 10Hz that's as quick as any of the other compasses send out data, and plenty fast enough. Whether the heading data it reports has the desired accuracy is up to you. My shot would be to give it a try first; you can always throw more money at the problem later. Note that you should give the fast heading data a separate serial input, as it's likely to overwhelm other data if you try to share it using a NMEA multiplexer (this happened to me). Now I am curious: which type of multiplexer was that? The reason is ask is this: I have seen this problem too with my multiplexers, and have therefore added a so called "real-time" option on the -42 models, which effectively bypasses the internal NMEA buffer for that channel. This removes the delay on the heading signal that otherwise would build up, up to 20 seconds. Raymarine has extensively tested this feature on a boat, moving at 40 knots and still following a GPS route automatically, where the a fast heading sensor was used to keep the radar north-up. The GPS, heading sensor and wind/depth instruments were all coupled through the my multiplexer to an E series chart plotter. Meindert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Meindert Sprang" wrote in message
... Now I am curious: which type of multiplexer was that? Aha, I see you bought one of mine back in 2004 :-) This one does not have the real-time option though.... Meindert |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Meindert Sprang wrote:
"Meindert Sprang" wrote in message ... Now I am curious: which type of multiplexer was that? Aha, I see you bought one of mine back in 2004 :-) This one does not have the real-time option though.... Meindert jesting Not :-), :-( as I don't have that feature! Can't you make your multiplexers field upgradable? /jesting Actually, I am perfectly happy with the current set-up; everything is reliable as it is. It just meant an extra day setting up the 3rd serial port. I was lucky: my mini PC has 4 serial ports, and they can be set to be RS-422 ports instead of RS-232. The multiplexer is USB, so plenty of ports. Your multiplexer still handles the important job of switching from either GPS + Yeoman to/from Nobeltec sourced autopilot data. Still, NMEA input port priority makes for less hassle if I had to do it again and would start with a new multiplexer. Regards, Kees |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Kees Verruijt" wrote in message
... jesting Not :-), :-( as I don't have that feature! Can't you make your multiplexers field upgradable? /jesting Yes, I can probably. But I'm pretty low on internal memory, so adding a loader to handle a field upgrade is a challenge, especially the decryption algorithm takes up valuable space. So for now, we offer upgrades by letting the customer return the units. This also gives us the opportunity to swap boards if necessary on very old multiplexers. Actually, I am perfectly happy with the current set-up; everything is reliable as it is. It just meant an extra day setting up the 3rd serial port. I was lucky: my mini PC has 4 serial ports, and they can be set to be RS-422 ports instead of RS-232. The multiplexer is USB, so plenty of ports. Your multiplexer still handles the important job of switching from either GPS + Yeoman to/from Nobeltec sourced autopilot data. Ah, the Auto Mode. That is indeed a greatly valued option :-) Cheers/groeten, Meindert |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Kees, My concern was if the compass which is dampened would be
responsive enough for stable overlay, so I think we were thinking the same. If I make the purchase, I agree that it is worth while to give the existing system a chance to work properly. Last season I purchased a USB NMEA multiplexor(Brookhouse) and have hardwired my autopilot output to it. My compass heading comes through the autopilot and is converted in the autopilot from sine/cosine data to NMEA data. If it overpowers other data, I will at least have understanding why and maybe can reroute to a serial port. My goal is to find a system I can install with minimal problems since I will be purchasing it in the states and installing myself on the boat in Mexico where there will be no easy access to customer support. Thanks again for your insights. Larry |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Kees Verruijt wrote in
: Can't you make your multiplexers field upgradable? /jesting Just send it back to Meindert for the "Newsgroup Free Upgrade". Everyone on the newsgroup is eligible. Isn't he great?! -- Larry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Nobeltec Radar | Cruising | |||
Radar performance | Cruising | |||
Radar Return Anomaly. | Cruising | |||
info wanted: how to use radar | Electronics | |||
Vessel detectors - radar visibility of your own vessel | Cruising |