Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Most of the recreational radios scan 70 most all the time, so if there's
anybody within range with a recent radio, DSC is going to get their attention. And if you are out of range of VHF, you're out of range, DSC or not. The selective calling thing works, though ICOM's human factors to use it suck. SH's human factor are great -- both radios get set to the working channel, ring like a telephone, pick up the mike and talk. That's it. "Larry" wrote in message ... "RB" wrote in news ![]() @bignews5.bellsouth.net: What is the DSC term used with marine VHFs? A half-assed, 1980's digital technology invented to call one ship from another so shipping companies can eliminate the expensive crew position of radio officer the unions used to force upon them with government intervention. It was poorly planned, draggedly implemented causing its effectiveness to be very poor in emergency conditions. The attempts to implement it in yacht transcievers with only a one-push- button emergency mode plus a one-at-a-time selective calling feature is nearly useless as the radios only switch to Channel 16 for FM voice if someone within the 10-15 miles of VHF range happens to be listening to DSC's channel 70, which only the ships are, forced by international law to do so. If you're "out there" and cannot see a ship on the horizon and are further than 20 miles at sea, noone will hear the call....so don't think DSC is going to save you any more than channel 16 is under these conditions. Buy a 406 Mhz EPIRB with a GPS receiver in it and properly register it. "They" are listening to it because "they" are using it to save their own asses. http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories/s1199.htm |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pascal" wrote in message oups.com... Thank You very much. I know the diference betwen the two (DSC and AIS) , but I am not concerned with distress comunications with others ships or coast guards, but am looking for AIS to get the ships information to avoid any potential colision danger and for fun in the sea. Praticaly, here in Brazil, DSC do not exist, and here the so called Coast Guard does not exist either, only a very few of the navy ships and some airplanes (all obsoletes, without AIS) do to surveilance os the imense brasilian coast (about 3,000 nm), so a mayday in the sea is almost a null attempt. "DSC and AIS use almost exactly the same digital modulation/demodulation technology so the R&D money spend on either system to adapt existing analog radio designs to digital modulation benefits the other" Exactly, why do not include (combine) an AIS Modem (Chanel 87/88) and the AIS software into the recent launched Standard Horizon CVP350VHF/DSC radio/plotter, for example? Regards Pascal I couldn't find information concerning a standard horizon model cpv350 anywhere on the net. I suspect that the problem is the display firmware. Manufacturers such as standard horizon already make GPS chart plotters that can handle one or a few waypoints from a DSC receiver but I suspect that their firmware in the display cannot handle the hundreds of complex waypoints that would come flooding in from an AIS decoder. The display firmware will need to be significantly enhanced to show not only lat and lon but the direction the ship is pointing and the speed of the ship. |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's CPV350, not CVP350.
http://www.standardhorizon.com/index...3&isArchived=0 I found it no sweat on SH's website. "Ted" wrote in message .net... "Pascal" wrote in message oups.com... Thank You very much. I know the diference betwen the two (DSC and AIS) , but I am not concerned with distress comunications with others ships or coast guards, but am looking for AIS to get the ships information to avoid any potential colision danger and for fun in the sea. Praticaly, here in Brazil, DSC do not exist, and here the so called Coast Guard does not exist either, only a very few of the navy ships and some airplanes (all obsoletes, without AIS) do to surveilance os the imense brasilian coast (about 3,000 nm), so a mayday in the sea is almost a null attempt. "DSC and AIS use almost exactly the same digital modulation/demodulation technology so the R&D money spend on either system to adapt existing analog radio designs to digital modulation benefits the other" Exactly, why do not include (combine) an AIS Modem (Chanel 87/88) and the AIS software into the recent launched Standard Horizon CVP350VHF/DSC radio/plotter, for example? Regards Pascal I couldn't find information concerning a standard horizon model cpv350 anywhere on the net. I suspect that the problem is the display firmware. Manufacturers such as standard horizon already make GPS chart plotters that can handle one or a few waypoints from a DSC receiver but I suspect that their firmware in the display cannot handle the hundreds of complex waypoints that would come flooding in from an AIS decoder. The display firmware will need to be significantly enhanced to show not only lat and lon but the direction the ship is pointing and the speed of the ship. |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry" wrote in message ... "Ted" wrote in . net: When the two systems are merged the AIS display will let you pick the ship you want to talk to and call only him using DSC. Everyone else will not have to listen to your conversation. That's true if you stay on Channel 70 and don't listen to 16 or the other CB channels...68, 69, 71, 72, 10, 12, 13....(c; I'm not sure why they dont implement DSC on all VHF marine channels. Maybe they will in the future after it is proven on channel 70. Do the current DSC capable radios allow you to use DSC on channels other than 70?? |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 02:23:31 GMT, "ted" wrote:
I'm not sure why they dont implement DSC on all VHF marine channels. Maybe they will in the future after it is proven on channel 70. You miss the point. Channel 70 is the calling channel for DSC, not the working channel, just as channel 16 is the calling channel for voice. |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And Larry seems to think that radio has to be tuned to 70 to receive DSC calls.
It doesn't. It scans 70, as nearly as I can tell, no matter what you do. It least my SH Spectrum does, as does a buddy's more recent SH, and another buddy's Icom. "ted" wrote in message news ![]() "Larry" wrote in message ... "Ted" wrote in . net: When the two systems are merged the AIS display will let you pick the ship you want to talk to and call only him using DSC. Everyone else will not have to listen to your conversation. That's true if you stay on Channel 70 and don't listen to 16 or the other CB channels...68, 69, 71, 72, 10, 12, 13....(c; I'm not sure why they dont implement DSC on all VHF marine channels. Maybe they will in the future after it is proven on channel 70. Do the current DSC capable radios allow you to use DSC on channels other than 70?? |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 02:23:31 GMT, "ted" wrote: I'm not sure why they dont implement DSC on all VHF marine channels. Maybe they will in the future after it is proven on channel 70. You miss the point. Channel 70 is the calling channel for DSC, not the working channel, just as channel 16 is the calling channel for voice. Perhaps I did miss something here. Are you saying that there is never any voice on channel 70, but only a digital data exchange and then both ships radio's change freqency to a working channel? Who decides which working channel to switch to? Does the radio check to make sure the channel is not in use first? I assume that the voice communication on the working channel is analog and can be heard by traditional radio equipment? |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is never any voice on 70, only data, at least in theory. DSC radios
won't let you do voice on 70. Dunno about older radios. For the emergency button, 16 is working channel. For individual calls, the calling human sets the working channel prior to the call. The radio does not check that the working channel is free. It's normal analog voice comms on the working channel. "Ted" wrote in message ink.net... "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 02:23:31 GMT, "ted" wrote: I'm not sure why they dont implement DSC on all VHF marine channels. Maybe they will in the future after it is proven on channel 70. You miss the point. Channel 70 is the calling channel for DSC, not the working channel, just as channel 16 is the calling channel for voice. Perhaps I did miss something here. Are you saying that there is never any voice on channel 70, but only a digital data exchange and then both ships radio's change freqency to a working channel? Who decides which working channel to switch to? Does the radio check to make sure the channel is not in use first? I assume that the voice communication on the working channel is analog and can be heard by traditional radio equipment? |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 21:01:32 -0800, "Chuck Tribolet"
wrote: And Larry seems to think that radio has to be tuned to 70 to receive DSC calls. It doesn't. It scans 70, as nearly as I can tell, no matter what you do. It least my SH Spectrum does, as does a buddy's more recent SH, and another buddy's Icom. The SC-101 class radios allow the user to disable the channel 70 scan, effectively disabling DSC reception. My brother-in-law's new Icom 502 came set that way - confused us when I tried some DSC tests with him - his older, cheaper Icom could receive my calls regardless of the selected channel, but the new expensive unit had to be set to 70. (He discovered this setting while reading the book later in the day, after we'd left our boats - we assume that DSC reception will work as expected once he enables the Ch70 scan) -- Peter Bennett, VE7CEI peterbb4 (at) interchange.ubc.ca new newsgroup users info : http://vancouver-webpages.com/nnq GPS and NMEA info: http://vancouver-webpages.com/peter Vancouver Power Squadron: http://vancouver.powersquadron.ca |
#20
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Chuck Tribolet" wrote: And Larry seems to think that radio has to be tuned to 70 to receive DSC calls. It doesn't. It scans 70, as nearly as I can tell, no matter what you do. It least my SH Spectrum does, as does a buddy's more recent SH, and another buddy's Icom. I think that you should qualify your above statement, a bit. You should state that, "Your radio receiver scans VHF Marine Ch 70 while it is not transmitting, and you think your buddies radios do as well". There are a lot of DSC Equiped radios that may or may not, scan VHF Marine Ch 70, or may or may not have a dedicated Ch 70 Receiver builtin. Just how each model radio's Scan Routine is implimented by the OEM is propritary, and problematic, to how it responds to a DSC Signal. There are some radios that don't receive on CH 70, while the receiver is receiving a signal on the programed channel, and some that don't recieve on Ch 70 while the radio is on Ch 16. DSC in the Western Hemisphere is still mostly under implimented, and untill the USCG, and other Governmental Entities, catch up with their European Counterparts, the OEM's aren't really going to get the Consumer Type Radios up to dealing with DSC with a full implimentation. Bruce in alaska -- add a 2 before @ |