Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
I hear NMEA...
When I turn on my SSB radio, I hear what appears to be the NMEA
sentence being transmitted. It sounds kind of like morse code. Disappears when I turn the GPS off. The GPS signal is being fed into the SSB, the VHF, the navigation computer and the radar. This noise doesn't appear anywhere else... any ideas? |
#2
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
I hear NMEA...
"Keith" wrote in message
oups.com... When I turn on my SSB radio, I hear what appears to be the NMEA sentence being transmitted. It sounds kind of like morse code. Disappears when I turn the GPS off. The GPS signal is being fed into the SSB, the VHF, the navigation computer and the radar. This noise doesn't appear anywhere else... any ideas? Is the signal fed into the SSB, VHF, computer and radar directly from the GPS or did you use a buffer/splitter? If so, read a bit about single-ended and differential NMEA connections at http://www.shipmodul.com/en/index.html There is a good chance that a differential output of a splitter is connected to a singe ended input (an input with ground). What happens then is that one signal of the output is short-circuited to ground, resulting in high currents, in turn producing harmonics up to the HF range. Meindert |
#3
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
I hear NMEA...
"Larry" wrote in message
... "Keith" wrote in news:1148989790.905246.127580 @u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com: any ideas? Welcome to NMEA, the big interference transmitter aboard! Nonsense. It's the sometimes crappy implementations that do the harm. I've given up trying to cure it. Damned unbalanced connections, grounding the - NMEA terminal causes a lot of it. Stupid NMEA, itself, trying to save the manufacturers a few bucks with no shielding, no shielded connectors, screw terminals all over in plastic boxes....we did it to ourselves. How stupid. Again, nonsense. Example: our multiplexers are tested and being certified for IEC 945/EN60945 which imposes very low limits of allowed radiated RF. The tests are done with cables attached to the multiplexer, transmitting data over the cables. These cables are not shielded and the emissions stay below the legal limits, which means you can hardly hear them above the noise floor on HF and VHF. Best of luck trying to cure it. None of the plastic boxed computers running all over the boat on the network are properly shielded, either, making the problems even more acute. They all radiate like hell to the HF antenna. Again nonsense. The very same multiplexers are housed in plastic. It just comes down to proper filtering on all terminals and a decent EMC-proof printed circuit design. I just turn it all off when I'm on HF. The big transmitter scrambles the data, anyways radiating into all the unbalanced, unshielded crapware. Oh and the same rules apply the other way around. They have to withstand a fieldstrength of10V/m, 1kV induced spikes on the terminals, contact discharge of 6kV on the terminals and 8kV near the housing. All tests passed. What's that again about stupid NMEA? NMEA is nothing more than a RS-422 connection, something that is used all over the world without problems. It's just that some manufacturers screw up big time... Meindert |
#4
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
I hear NMEA...
"Meindert Sprang" wrote in
: NMEA is nothing more than a RS-422 connection, something that is used all over the world without problems. It's just that some manufacturers screw up big time... Not at all. No RS-422 connection is made with screw terminal from little bare wires sticking out of a plastic plug, plugged into a plastic box. There have never been any screw terminals on any of my computers....er, ah, well, since the first one back in the early 70's...(c; All those manufacturers you refer to are the trouble, the cheap *******s. $500 and it comes with wires sticking out of it, 30 cm long. |
#5
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
I hear NMEA...
"Larry" wrote in message
... "Meindert Sprang" wrote in : NMEA is nothing more than a RS-422 connection, something that is used all over the world without problems. It's just that some manufacturers screw up big time... Not at all. No RS-422 connection is made with screw terminal from little bare wires sticking out of a plastic plug, plugged into a plastic box. Oh? When I look for RS422 converters on Google, several boxes turn up that all have screw terminals for the RS422/485 connection. Look at Moxa, a brand that is used a lot in industrial applications: http://www.moxa.com/product/Media_Converters.htm Plastic box, screw terminals. There have never been any screw terminals on any of my computers....er, ah, well, since the first one back in the early 70's...(c; I think you'll find more RS-422 devices with screw terminals than with connectors. Talk to a professional installer why this is. Meindert |
#6
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
I hear NMEA...
The cable comes from the GPS to a terminal strip, then from there to
the various instruments. I used a Noland Multiplexer once, but it didn't seem to make any difference and actually seemed to harm the signal, so I took it out. I'll go check out the article you mentioned, thanks. Meindert Sprang wrote: Is the signal fed into the SSB, VHF, computer and radar directly from the GPS or did you use a buffer/splitter? |
#7
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
I hear NMEA...
"Meindert Sprang" wrote in
: I think you'll find more RS-422 devices with screw terminals than with connectors. Talk to a professional installer why this is. Meindert I give up. The problem here is RF interference with very close by HF radio equipment used on BOATS. No amount of excuses is going to change the fact that the damned screw terminals, unshielded wiring (even balanced, which it's not) and open cabling hooked to the big boat DC antenna is going to change it. NMEA should have used a SEALED, WATERPROOF, SHIELDED connector, STANDARD to all devices from all manufacturers to eliminate RF interference. They should have mandated the inside of the cheap plastic boxes be painted with shielding paint and displays be covered with shielding plastic to stop the radiation from there. They didn't. Everyone "did their own thing", like you did. The customers pay for it with all this non-standardized ****ware screwed together with the corroded wiring and rotting terminal strips open to the sea air. Stupid...really stupid. |
#8
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
I hear NMEA...
"Larry" wrote in message
... "Meindert Sprang" wrote in : I think you'll find more RS-422 devices with screw terminals than with connectors. Talk to a professional installer why this is. Meindert I give up. The problem here is RF interference with very close by HF radio equipment used on BOATS. No amount of excuses is going to change the fact that the damned screw terminals, unshielded wiring (even balanced, which it's not) and open cabling hooked to the big boat DC antenna is going to change it. The issue is: when a device is designed properly, there is nothing to transmit. Even IF you use unshielded cable and screw terminals. The output signal of a 4800 baud port should be frequency limited with an internal filter to prevent fast transients on the signal. If that is done properly, there is nothing to transmit on whatever cable used. NMEA should have used a SEALED, WATERPROOF, SHIELDED connector, STANDARD to all devices from all manufacturers to eliminate RF interference. Again, not necessary. They should have mandated the inside of the cheap plastic boxes be painted with shielding paint and displays be covered with shielding plastic to stop the radiation from there. Why? if the design is right, no need for shielded housing. They didn't. Everyone "did their own thing", like you did. The customers pay for it with all this non-standardized ****ware screwed together with the corroded wiring and rotting terminal strips open to the sea air. Using nickel plated brass/copper terminal strips prevents corrosion, indeed like I did. The drawback of connectors is that 1) you have to mount them, which is something not everyone can do properly and 2) when moulded to a cable, you have to drill oversized holes to run the connectors through. That's why most installers like bare cables and screw terminals. At least, that's what they tell me. Your everlasting rant against this holds no ground. Meindert |
#9
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
I hear NMEA...
There have never been any screw terminals on any of my computers....er, ah, well, since the first one back in the early 70's...(c; Bull, but then it's clear you've never seen or worked with industrial or military computers. They continue to have screw terminals for all sorts of connections. Mostly to guarantee secure connections. All those manufacturers you refer to are the trouble, the cheap *******s. $500 and it comes with wires sticking out of it, 30 cm long. Indeed, but that's always been the case. Good, fast, cheap... pick two. |
#10
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
I hear NMEA...
I give up.
We can only but pray... NMEA should have used a SEALED, WATERPROOF, SHIELDED connector, STANDARD to all devices from all manufacturers to eliminate RF interference. Which NMEA 2000 offers. Stupid...really stupid. And meanwhile a great many improvements came along, utilizing the NMEA-0183 standard. Things evolve, and those that recognize change has costs have benefitted greatly along the way. Sure, plenty of vendors have done a less-than-ideal job of implementing it, but that's true for everything. Meanwhile we've evolved away from purely proprietary cruft, that alone makes it worth the hassles. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
how to read AIS data from encapsulated NMEA VDO sentence | Electronics | |||
A question about NMEA, AIS and Raymarine | Electronics | |||
Objective of NMEA | Electronics | |||
Bluetooth NMEA anyone? | Electronics | |||
Getting nmea connections into my laptop | Cruising |