Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
HF Freq question for Larry
Back in 2000 the FCC eliminated the "Amateur Advanced" license as an upgrade
but all the published band plans still have 3,700 to 3,800 on 80 meters, 14,175 to 14,225 on 40 meters and 21,225 to 21,275 on 15 meters reserved for Advanced and Extra. Any idea why there is still a separate rule for Advanced when they no longer exist? -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
#2
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
HF Freq question for Larry
In article ,
"Glenn Ashmore" wrote: Back in 2000 the FCC eliminated the "Amateur Advanced" license as an upgrade but all the published band plans still have 3,700 to 3,800 on 80 meters, 14,175 to 14,225 on 40 meters and 21,225 to 21,275 on 15 meters reserved for Advanced and Extra. Any idea why there is still a separate rule for Advanced when they no longer exist? You have your Facts a bit wrong here....the FCC over the years have chaged the rules a number of times concerning the Advanced Class License. What they have NEVER done is abandon, or eliminate, the License itself. What they have done, a number of times, is not allow any NEW Advanced Licenses to be issued, which is exactly the case, today. Us Advanced Licensee's can keep our licenses and renew them, but no New licenses will be issued. I could have applied for and upgraded to an Extra, many years ago, after I received my RadioTelgraph License, but choose to keep the Advanced because it is a small CLUB that is unique aand limited in nature. and I really don't talk to those Exclusive Extra's down on the XtraPortion anyway. Bruce in alaska -- add a 2 before @ |
#3
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
HF Freq question for Larry
"Glenn Ashmore" wrote in news:7E3uh.99531$jb3.54907
@newsfe18.lga: Any idea why there is still a separate rule for Advanced when they no longer exist? Advanced Class licenses still exist and I think they are still being renewed to current holders, last time I checked.... Ham radio has always resisted any changes to the status quo, especially the ARRL who has always wanted to turn back the clock to 1939. They fought against AM, SSB, RTTY, Packet and every digital mode. Then they fought to preserve prime frequency territories for the old fart Extras who never took a test in the first place, but happened to be born into it. I'm old enough to remember them fighting Wayne Green (73 Magazine's founder) over RTTY, trying to restrict it so much as to be useless. FCC has gotten a dose of its own testosterone, of late, mostly from Riley Hollingsworth. He gave a speech at our Charleston Hamfest a couple years back, which was excellent. After the speech, he hung around, jealously guarded by an ARRL official all dressed up to look like someone important. I shook his hand and asked him, "Is this your ARRL handler?", pointing to the suit next to him. The look on the ARRL suit's face was one of shock. Any time an FCC official comes to a hamfest, ARRL is right there to try to make sure he thinks ARRL is the official voice of all hams, which might have been true many decades ago, but is not for the last decades. FCC knows that and tries to do what it can to preserve ham radio, lately, ESPECIALLY eliminating this 1939 Morse Code nonsense they should have dumped in 1955...before I was forced to learn it for no reason at all... I never said code should be eliminated from ham radio. Those that love code should be allowed to live in the 30's and use it. However, as code has always been used as a phone band jamming device since the first AM station started transmitting, I have always promoted the idea it be CONFINED to the code-only part of the bands. Code has no place in the phone bands, except as a jamming device of some jealous *******s. I just hope it's not too late to save ham radio from its death of old age and ARRL's reticence. Go to any hamfest and guess the average age of the total attendees. My guess is now in the low 60's, where I am. Few kids are interested. They have full duplex video conferencing in their bedrooms on serious broadband with the whole world at their keyboard. What the hell do they need some ancient form of communications for, populated by an bunch of really nasty old *******s that bitch at them using "their frequencies" just because they've had some totally unnecessary traffic net on it for the last 60 years. Saving ham radio may depend of waiting for death to free up HF for a newer generation. Unfortunately, the newer generation could care less, having moved on to better technology. Oops...got a Skype call coming in from Guam. Who needs ham radio? Ah, boaters...right. Larry -- Democracy is when two wolves and a sheep vote on who's for dinner. Liberty is when the sheep has his own gun. |
#4
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
HF Freq question for Larry
|
#5
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
HF Freq question for Larry
krj wrote in news:TM9uh.3963$p%6.3322
@bignews7.bellsouth.net: You can't always tell if someone has an extra ticket by their call. I keep w4ind because we are usually operating from the sailboat. I liked WIND and as soon as they start processing vanity calls again my wife will apply for W4AVE, WAVE. de W4IND Extra Class I hated the damned call FCC gave me with my Advanced ticket, KN4IM. I swore to NEVER have another call with N and M in it, ever again, having to repeat it over and over phonetically so the idiot on the other end, who just HAD to have it right, could get it. So, I looked in QRZ for possible vanity calls to replace it. N4SEX was very tempting and open at that time...Not 4 Sex...great fun. But, to my amazement, Charleston, South Carolina's namesake call had been open for almost 4 years after the original owner died in the Shenandoah Valley. That was my first choice, even though it was not an "Extra Call" they all cherish. I wanted an original, well as original as FCC will let us have, 1x3 call. So I got W4CharlestonSouthCarolina, W4CSC. If I say it like that, they even get my location right...(c; I've gotten permission from WCSC, our CBS affiliate, to take a picture of their new broadcast TV building with the HUGE broadbased Doppler 5000 radar tower behind it for a picture QSL card. A little paintbrushed 4 over the WCSC door logo looks just great on my hamfest golf shirts. The 4 is in red and looks like someone painted it by hand...(c; I never followed through on the QSL production as I rarely use them, any more, and the ones I do send out seem to be more appreciated with Magnolia Gardens Plantation cards from the tourist trap across the Ashley River from me. http://www.magnoliaplantation.com/ Watch the movie. These are my neighbors....(c; They even have a little dock setup for the tour boats which refuse to come this far up the river just to feed them. There's a webcam on the bridge, if it's working. Larry -- Democracy is when two wolves and a sheep vote on who's for dinner. Liberty is when the sheep has his own gun. |
#6
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
HF Freq question for Larry
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:00:38 -0500, Larry wrote:
....snip FWIW... The ARRL tries to represent it's members and that usually means the ones who make the most noise. That, in turn, usually means those who are against change. I don't think the ARRL are intrinsically bad. I never said code should be eliminated from ham radio. Those that love code should be allowed to live in the 30's and use it. However, as code has always been used as a phone band jamming device since the first AM station started transmitting, I have always promoted the idea it be CONFINED to the code-only part of the bands. I don't agree. Some folks like code - what's wrong with that? Some folks use code because code transmitters are by far the least expensive to build and they aren't terribly rich. Code has no place in the phone bands, except as a jamming device of some jealous *******s. Well, I'd agree with that, but I'm not on the air much, so I wasn't aware that was going on. I just hope it's not too late to save ham radio from its death of old age and ARRL's reticence. Go to any hamfest and guess the average age of the total attendees. My guess is now in the low 60's, where I am. Few kids are interested. They have full duplex video conferencing in their bedrooms on serious broadband with the whole world at their keyboard. What the hell do they need some ancient form of communications for, populated by an bunch of really nasty old *******s that bitch at them using "their frequencies" just because they've had some totally unnecessary traffic net on it for the last 60 years. Saving ham radio may depend of waiting for death to free up HF for a newer generation. Unfortunately, the newer generation could care less, having moved on to better technology. Unfortunately, there's a lot to agree with there. The expense connected with the hobby has risen quite a bit as well. If it isn't something one likes as a sport or hobby, it is a lot cheaper to get involved with computers. FWIW, I'm 66 and licensed since I was 14 - I hope I'm not a "nasty old *******"... -- Larry W1HJF email is rapp at lmr dot com 1/26/2007 10:51:02 AM |
#7
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
HF Freq question for Larry
Larry wrote in :
FWIW, I'm 66 and licensed since I was 14 - I hope I'm not a "nasty old *******"... -- Larry W1HJF email is rapp at lmr dot com 1/26/2007 10:51:02 AM Me, either! I'm 61, licensed since I was 11 in 1957.... ARRL USED to represent the licensees of ham radio. I feel that is no longer the case. Today, ARRL is a book and magazine specialty company. Ham clubs don't try to force you to join just to look at all their webpages. Larry -- Democracy is when two wolves and a sheep vote on who's for dinner. Liberty is when the sheep has his own gun. |
#8
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
HF Freq question for Larry
Glenn Ashmore wrote:
Back in 2000 the FCC eliminated the "Amateur Advanced" license as an upgrade but all the published band plans still have 3,700 to 3,800 on 80 meters, 14,175 to 14,225 on 40 meters and 21,225 to 21,275 on 15 meters reserved for Advanced and Extra. Any idea why there is still a separate rule for Advanced when they no longer exist? Advanced class hams do exist. They can remain Advanced as long as they renew their ticket or die if they don't want to upgrade to Extra class. There just is no licensing for new Advanced class hams. 73 de w4ind |
#9
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
HF Freq question for Larry
Glenn Ashmore wrote:
Back in 2000 the FCC eliminated the "Amateur Advanced" license as an upgrade but all the published band plans still have 3,700 to 3,800 on 80 meters, 14,175 to 14,225 on 40 meters and 21,225 to 21,275 on 15 meters reserved for Advanced and Extra. Any idea why there is still a separate rule for Advanced when they no longer exist? Glenn There are currently (as of 1/24/07) 69559 Advanced Class hams, 108344 Extra Class and there are still 23349 Novice class hams. 73 de w4ind |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another strip-plank question - a bit long | Boat Building | |||
Propeller efficiency question (electric) | Boat Building | |||
Other choice and counterpoise question | Electronics | |||
Exhaust question on inboard 1958 Chris Craft | Boat Building | |||
Sunday's VHF antics.....and a question.. | Electronics |