Last April the Coast Guard asked for public comments regarding the need to
continue HF high seas weather broadcasts over single sideband voice,
facsimile charts and text messages over radiotelex.

After reviewing the public responses to their query and reading the
conclusions of the business case report on the subject, the Coast Guard has
decided to continue those broadcasts without interruption. The report,
which in a few days will be posted here
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/marcomms/...-WX_notice.htm,
concluded that:

"The responding public collectively perceives that the USCG HF broadcasts
are essential to their safety. There is no viable alternative to the USCG
HF broadcasts because present alternatives are perceived by the public to be
out of financial reach. Also, marine weather forecasts available through
these alternative sources may not guarantee the same level of accuracy,
timeliness, and/or sufficiency as provided by the USCG HF broadcasts."

The Coast Guard still doesn't have funds necessary to replace all their high
power transmitters and some services will have to be cut (mostly their own
internal services), but they should now have the funds to replace the 20
transmitters used for weather broadcasts.

Good news.

Joe Hersey

Hooray, Huzzah !!!
I find the HF WeFAX invaluable.

OK. But what about the local weather? Am I the only one who finds it
annoying that the Coast Guard ties up a frequency while reading the local
report. I figure you can check the weather before you launch, and monitor
the Weather Channel. The people who don't do either probably don't listen to
the Coast Guard report, either.

"RichH" wrote in message
...
Hooray, Huzzah !!!
I find the HF WeFAX invaluable.

The HF weather broadcast are the only game in town once you are outside VHF
WX.. Actually they are better for someone trained in rudimentary
meteorology. This is because of the graphical presentation of analysis, and
forecast of surface and 500 mb weather maps.

Personally if the government were to broadcast via satellite, I believe they
would save some money, we would get better service.

Patrick Harman
M/V Meriwether


"JOSEPH D HERSEY" wrote in message
news:Kcsoj.22440$ar6.13122@trnddc07...
Last April the Coast Guard asked for public comments regarding the need to
continue HF high seas weather broadcasts over single sideband voice,
facsimile charts and text messages over radiotelex.

After reviewing the public responses to their query and reading the
conclusions of the business case report on the subject, the Coast Guard
has decided to continue those broadcasts without interruption. The
report, which in a few days will be posted here
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/marcomms/...-WX_notice.htm,
concluded that:

"The responding public collectively perceives that the USCG HF broadcasts
are essential to their safety. There is no viable alternative to the USCG
HF broadcasts because present alternatives are perceived by the public to
be out of financial reach. Also, marine weather forecasts available
through these alternative sources may not guarantee the same level of
accuracy, timeliness, and/or sufficiency as provided by the USCG HF
broadcasts."

The Coast Guard still doesn't have funds necessary to replace all their
high power transmitters and some services will have to be cut (mostly
their own internal services), but they should now have the funds to
replace the 20 transmitters used for weather broadcasts.

Good news.

Joe Hersey

"JOSEPH D HERSEY" wrote in
news:Kcsoj.22440$ar6.13122@trnddc07:

After reviewing the public responses to their query and reading the
conclusions of the business case report on the subject, the Coast
Guard has decided to continue those broadcasts without interruption.

Yeah!!!!

-- Geoff
www.GeoffSchultz.org

In article ,
"William Andersen" wrote:

OK. But what about the local weather? Am I the only one who finds it
annoying that the Coast Guard ties up a frequency while reading the local
report. I figure you can check the weather before you launch, and monitor
the Weather Channel. The people who don't do either probably don't listen to
the Coast Guard report, either.

"RichH" wrote in message
...
Hooray, Huzzah !!!
I find the HF WeFAX invaluable.


Your Objections are concerning Sea Area 1 Weather,and the topic at hand
is for Sea Areas 2,3,& 4. When you venture out passed VHF Coverage,
where do you get your Weather Information from? Every Vessel or 300
Gross Tons, will have GMDSS, and part of that MAY include MF/HF Weather
Data, and this is what the USCG was addressing...... Up here in the
North Pacific, we have NOAA HF Radio from selected Weather Stations,
as well as USCG CommSta Kodiak for Sea Areas 2-4, and these broadcasts
are VITAL for ALL Mariners in these areas, especially those guys that
fish the Bering Sea, in winter. We don't much care for the USCG Rambo
Boarding Parties, BUT, the Helo folks, and the CommSta folks, are our
HEROS, and are VERY MUCH APPRECIATED, and Respected, by the folks who
live, and work, up here.

Bruce in alaska

--
Bruce (semiretired powderman & exFCC Field Inspector for Southeastern Alaska)

Bruce Gordon * Debora Gordon R.N. Bruce's Trading Post
P.O. Box EXI Excursion Inlet South
Juneau, Alaska 99850 Excursion Inlet, Alaska 99850
AL7AQ * KL7WJ www.btpost.net www.99850.net