On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Dec 23, 6:56*am, Salmonbait wrote:


And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a
few years back.
--
John

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!


yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will?

No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could care less
about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal, concept.
Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular
progressives.

Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;)
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John

Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 22, 11:21 pm, wrote:
On Dec 22, 10:43 pm, Tim wrote:

They should
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7796700.stm
But the same media attacked Palin for momentarily believing that
someone calling into a radio talk show was the French President. She
was on the spot, while the NYT had days to check on it and think about
it before publishing. The liberal sheeple fell into lockstep behind
the image. Amazing.


I couldn't believe it the other day. A couple of nurses were talking
about Michelle Obama who was being interviewed, but still quite under
wraps and not really saying anything... They said. "She is so open and
real". "She wears real cloths and is such a normal person", "Her kids
are so normal" Pfffftttt, they look like caged puppies for ****s
sake.... After hearing how folks got on Sarah for being a real person,
and actually shopping at real stores I almost puked.. Michelle Obama
clammed up totally during the election and was never seen without very
expensive gowns and dresses, dressed up like a Barbie doll. Amazing
how the lemmings can be so hypocritical.


My wife says that Mrs. Obama wears the same sorts of clothes to work she
does, and that they are not that pricey for a professional woman who
goes to the office every day.

Obama's kids are delightful little girls, and the older one already
looks like she is going to be America's #1 heartbreaker in a couple of
years. They are smart kids, reasonably well-behaved, and I feel certain
neither of them are going to embarrass their parents by being public
drunks or unmarried teen-aged mothers. I hope one of them marries one of
my grandsons.

Perhaps your perspective colors your opinion a bit too much.

Oh...Sarah Palin...an undereducated, intellectually lazy, over-ambitious
ditz but since she is anti-abortion, anti-science, and anti-thinking,
she has great appeal to the extreme Republican right. She's also short
and dowdy.

Gag me with a spoon! You are pathetic.

Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:22:08 -0500, Boater wrote:

wrote:
On Dec 22, 11:21 pm, wrote:
On Dec 22, 10:43 pm, Tim wrote:

They should
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7796700.stm
But the same media attacked Palin for momentarily believing that
someone calling into a radio talk show was the French President. She
was on the spot, while the NYT had days to check on it and think about
it before publishing. The liberal sheeple fell into lockstep behind
the image. Amazing.

I couldn't believe it the other day. A couple of nurses were talking
about Michelle Obama who was being interviewed, but still quite under
wraps and not really saying anything... They said. "She is so open and
real". "She wears real cloths and is such a normal person", "Her kids
are so normal" Pfffftttt, they look like caged puppies for ****s
sake.... After hearing how folks got on Sarah for being a real person,
and actually shopping at real stores I almost puked.. Michelle Obama
clammed up totally during the election and was never seen without very
expensive gowns and dresses, dressed up like a Barbie doll. Amazing
how the lemmings can be so hypocritical.

My wife says that Mrs. Obama wears the same sorts of clothes to work she
does, and that they are not that pricey for a professional woman who
goes to the office every day.

Obama's kids are delightful little girls, and the older one already
looks like she is going to be America's #1 heartbreaker in a couple of
years. They are smart kids, reasonably well-behaved, and I feel certain
neither of them are going to embarrass their parents by being public
drunks or unmarried teen-aged mothers. I hope one of them marries one of
my grandsons.

That will never happen if either of them meets the grandson's grandfather.
--

John



Jiggle, jiggle...oh...is that a fish on the line...awwww....it's just a
little herring.

Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Dec 23, 6:56 am, Salmonbait wrote:

And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a
few years back.
--
John

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will?

No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could care less
about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal, concept.
Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular
progressives.

Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;)
--


John



snerk

Boater wrote:
Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:22:08 -0500, Boater
wrote:

wrote:
On Dec 22, 11:21 pm, wrote:
On Dec 22, 10:43 pm, Tim wrote:

They should
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7796700.stm
But the same media attacked Palin for momentarily believing that
someone calling into a radio talk show was the French President. She
was on the spot, while the NYT had days to check on it and think about
it before publishing. The liberal sheeple fell into lockstep behind
the image. Amazing.

I couldn't believe it the other day. A couple of nurses were talking
about Michelle Obama who was being interviewed, but still quite under
wraps and not really saying anything... They said. "She is so open and
real". "She wears real cloths and is such a normal person", "Her kids
are so normal" Pfffftttt, they look like caged puppies for ****s
sake.... After hearing how folks got on Sarah for being a real person,
and actually shopping at real stores I almost puked.. Michelle Obama
clammed up totally during the election and was never seen without very
expensive gowns and dresses, dressed up like a Barbie doll. Amazing
how the lemmings can be so hypocritical.

My wife says that Mrs. Obama wears the same sorts of clothes to work
she does, and that they are not that pricey for a professional woman
who goes to the office every day.

Obama's kids are delightful little girls, and the older one already
looks like she is going to be America's #1 heartbreaker in a couple
of years. They are smart kids, reasonably well-behaved, and I feel
certain neither of them are going to embarrass their parents by being
public drunks or unmarried teen-aged mothers. I hope one of them
marries one of my grandsons.

That will never happen if either of them meets the grandson's
grandfather.
--

John



Jiggle, jiggle...oh...is that a fish on the line...awwww....it's just a
little herring.

Lets project a little further. When Mrs O sits down with Krause for the
dowry chat and leans forward to give ol' Harry that beady eyed evil
stare of hers, He'll wet his pants.

Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:54:25 -0500, Jim wrote:

Boater wrote:
Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:22:08 -0500, Boater
wrote:

wrote:
On Dec 22, 11:21 pm, wrote:
On Dec 22, 10:43 pm, Tim wrote:

They should
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7796700.stm
But the same media attacked Palin for momentarily believing that
someone calling into a radio talk show was the French President. She
was on the spot, while the NYT had days to check on it and think about
it before publishing. The liberal sheeple fell into lockstep behind
the image. Amazing.
I couldn't believe it the other day. A couple of nurses were talking
about Michelle Obama who was being interviewed, but still quite under
wraps and not really saying anything... They said. "She is so open and
real". "She wears real cloths and is such a normal person", "Her kids
are so normal" Pfffftttt, they look like caged puppies for ****s
sake.... After hearing how folks got on Sarah for being a real person,
and actually shopping at real stores I almost puked.. Michelle Obama
clammed up totally during the election and was never seen without very
expensive gowns and dresses, dressed up like a Barbie doll. Amazing
how the lemmings can be so hypocritical.
My wife says that Mrs. Obama wears the same sorts of clothes to work
she does, and that they are not that pricey for a professional woman
who goes to the office every day.

Obama's kids are delightful little girls, and the older one already
looks like she is going to be America's #1 heartbreaker in a couple
of years. They are smart kids, reasonably well-behaved, and I feel
certain neither of them are going to embarrass their parents by being
public drunks or unmarried teen-aged mothers. I hope one of them
marries one of my grandsons.
That will never happen if either of them meets the grandson's
grandfather.
--

John


Jiggle, jiggle...oh...is that a fish on the line...awwww....it's just a
little herring.
Lets project a little further. When Mrs O sits down with Krause for the
dowry chat and leans forward to give ol' Harry that beady eyed evil
stare of hers, He'll wet his pants.

He'll offer his $850 desk chair and the Lobsta Boat! Maybe he'll throw in
the 'bobcat' for good measure.
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John


Well, well, well...it didn't take you long to revert to your normal
behaviour around here, Herring. What happened...did the meds wear
off...or did you run out of spiked eggnog?

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:36:44 -0500, Salmonbait wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Dec 23, 6:56*am, Salmonbait wrote:


And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a
few years back.
--
John

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!


yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will?

No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could care less
about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal, concept.
Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular
progressives.

Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;)

Some of the most amoral creeps in time have been Popes. It damn sure isn't
a religous concept.

If you're interested do some homework.

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:54:25 -0500, Jim wrote:

Boater wrote:
Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:22:08 -0500, Boater
wrote:

wrote:
On Dec 22, 11:21 pm, wrote:
On Dec 22, 10:43 pm, Tim wrote:

They should
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7796700.stm
But the same media attacked Palin for momentarily believing that
someone calling into a radio talk show was the French President. She
was on the spot, while the NYT had days to check on it and think about
it before publishing. The liberal sheeple fell into lockstep behind
the image. Amazing.

I couldn't believe it the other day. A couple of nurses were talking
about Michelle Obama who was being interviewed, but still quite under
wraps and not really saying anything... They said. "She is so open and
real". "She wears real cloths and is such a normal person", "Her kids
are so normal" Pfffftttt, they look like caged puppies for ****s
sake.... After hearing how folks got on Sarah for being a real person,
and actually shopping at real stores I almost puked.. Michelle Obama
clammed up totally during the election and was never seen without very
expensive gowns and dresses, dressed up like a Barbie doll. Amazing
how the lemmings can be so hypocritical.

My wife says that Mrs. Obama wears the same sorts of clothes to work
she does, and that they are not that pricey for a professional woman
who goes to the office every day.

Obama's kids are delightful little girls, and the older one already
looks like she is going to be America's #1 heartbreaker in a couple
of years. They are smart kids, reasonably well-behaved, and I feel
certain neither of them are going to embarrass their parents by being
public drunks or unmarried teen-aged mothers. I hope one of them
marries one of my grandsons.

That will never happen if either of them meets the grandson's
grandfather.
--

John



Jiggle, jiggle...oh...is that a fish on the line...awwww....it's just a
little herring.

Lets project a little further. When Mrs O sits down with Krause for the
dowry chat and leans forward to give ol' Harry that beady eyed evil
stare of hers, He'll wet his pants.

He'll offer his $850 desk chair and the Lobsta Boat! Maybe he'll throw in
the 'bobcat' for good measure.
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:03:15 -0500, Boater wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:54:25 -0500, Jim wrote:

Boater wrote:
Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:22:08 -0500, Boater
wrote:

wrote:
On Dec 22, 11:21 pm, wrote:
On Dec 22, 10:43 pm, Tim wrote:

They should
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7796700.stm
But the same media attacked Palin for momentarily believing that
someone calling into a radio talk show was the French President. She
was on the spot, while the NYT had days to check on it and think about
it before publishing. The liberal sheeple fell into lockstep behind
the image. Amazing.
I couldn't believe it the other day. A couple of nurses were talking
about Michelle Obama who was being interviewed, but still quite under
wraps and not really saying anything... They said. "She is so open and
real". "She wears real cloths and is such a normal person", "Her kids
are so normal" Pfffftttt, they look like caged puppies for ****s
sake.... After hearing how folks got on Sarah for being a real person,
and actually shopping at real stores I almost puked.. Michelle Obama
clammed up totally during the election and was never seen without very
expensive gowns and dresses, dressed up like a Barbie doll. Amazing
how the lemmings can be so hypocritical.
My wife says that Mrs. Obama wears the same sorts of clothes to work
she does, and that they are not that pricey for a professional woman
who goes to the office every day.

Obama's kids are delightful little girls, and the older one already
looks like she is going to be America's #1 heartbreaker in a couple
of years. They are smart kids, reasonably well-behaved, and I feel
certain neither of them are going to embarrass their parents by being
public drunks or unmarried teen-aged mothers. I hope one of them
marries one of my grandsons.
That will never happen if either of them meets the grandson's
grandfather.
--

John


Jiggle, jiggle...oh...is that a fish on the line...awwww....it's just a
little herring.
Lets project a little further. When Mrs O sits down with Krause for the
dowry chat and leans forward to give ol' Harry that beady eyed evil
stare of hers, He'll wet his pants.

He'll offer his $850 desk chair and the Lobsta Boat! Maybe he'll throw in
the 'bobcat' for good measure.
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John


Well, well, well...it didn't take you long to revert to your normal
behaviour around here, Herring. What happened...did the meds wear
off...or did you run out of spiked eggnog?

jiggle, jiggle,

:)
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:04:34 -0500, RLM wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:36:44 -0500, Salmonbait wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Dec 23, 6:56*am, Salmonbait wrote:


And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a
few years back.
--
John

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!


yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will?

No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could care less
about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal, concept.
Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular
progressives.

Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;)

Some of the most amoral creeps in time have been Popes. It damn sure isn't
a religous concept.

If you're interested do some homework.

A religious concept isn't necessarily followed by 'religious' people. Look
at Krause. He claims to be 'religious', but surely his faith doesn't
promote lying and name-calling.
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John