Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
chew on this for a while.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_conjecture And don't prove the weak conjecture. That's for pansies. I'll check in later and see what the results are. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 22, 10:59*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: chew on this for a while. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_conjecture And don't prove the weak conjecture. That's for pansies. I'll check in later and see what the results are. The guy had excellent taste in beer. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... chew on this for a while. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_conjecture And don't prove the weak conjecture. That's for pansies. I'll check in later and see what the results are. Holy crap. And people think me and my ions are boring. Eisboch |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:23:47 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Dec 22, 10:59*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: chew on this for a while. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_conjecture And don't prove the weak conjecture. That's for pansies. I'll check in later and see what the results are. The guy had excellent taste in beer. I'll be dropping you a line on Wed - we'll get together and I can hand off that beer. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 03:45:35 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... chew on this for a while. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_conjecture And don't prove the weak conjecture. That's for pansies. I'll check in later and see what the results are. Holy crap. And people think me and my ions are boring. Ok - just because I'm a nice guy - here's an easy one. In the Fletcher's Paradox, the Greek philosopher Zeno (who was the inspiration for the Socratic Method) stated that for motion to be occurring, an object must change the position which it occupies. In keeping with the name of the paradox, let's use an arrow as the example. For motion to occur, the arrow must move to where it is not. Thus there are two states - where it is and where it is not. If we think of time as points (or instants) the arrow cannot move to where it is not and it cannot move to where it is because it is already there. Thus, motion cannot occur at any point (or instant) of time - everything should remain motionless. Solve that one - it's actually easy. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 03:45:35 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... chew on this for a while. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_conjecture And don't prove the weak conjecture. That's for pansies. I'll check in later and see what the results are. Holy crap. And people think me and my ions are boring. Ok - just because I'm a nice guy - here's an easy one. In the Fletcher's Paradox, the Greek philosopher Zeno (who was the inspiration for the Socratic Method) stated that for motion to be occurring, an object must change the position which it occupies. In keeping with the name of the paradox, let's use an arrow as the example. For motion to occur, the arrow must move to where it is not. Thus there are two states - where it is and where it is not. If we think of time as points (or instants) the arrow cannot move to where it is not and it cannot move to where it is because it is already there. Thus, motion cannot occur at any point (or instant) of time - everything should remain motionless. Solve that one - it's actually easy. I always wondered just how the transporter on the Starship Enterprise worked. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 03:45:35 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... chew on this for a while. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_conjecture And don't prove the weak conjecture. That's for pansies. I'll check in later and see what the results are. Holy crap. And people think me and my ions are boring. Ok - just because I'm a nice guy - here's an easy one. In the Fletcher's Paradox, the Greek philosopher Zeno (who was the inspiration for the Socratic Method) stated that for motion to be occurring, an object must change the position which it occupies. In keeping with the name of the paradox, let's use an arrow as the example. For motion to occur, the arrow must move to where it is not. Thus there are two states - where it is and where it is not. If we think of time as points (or instants) the arrow cannot move to where it is not and it cannot move to where it is because it is already there. Thus, motion cannot occur at any point (or instant) of time - everything should remain motionless. Solve that one - it's actually easy. What is the question? |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:42:26 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 03:45:35 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... chew on this for a while. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_conjecture And don't prove the weak conjecture. That's for pansies. I'll check in later and see what the results are. Holy crap. And people think me and my ions are boring. Ok - just because I'm a nice guy - here's an easy one. In the Fletcher's Paradox, the Greek philosopher Zeno (who was the inspiration for the Socratic Method) stated that for motion to be occurring, an object must change the position which it occupies. In keeping with the name of the paradox, let's use an arrow as the example. For motion to occur, the arrow must move to where it is not. Thus there are two states - where it is and where it is not. If we think of time as points (or instants) the arrow cannot move to where it is not and it cannot move to where it is because it is already there. Thus, motion cannot occur at any point (or instant) of time - everything should remain motionless. Solve that one - it's actually easy. What is the question? Duh... |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 23, 6:04*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:23:47 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 22, 10:59*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: chew on this for a while. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_conjecture And don't prove the weak conjecture. That's for pansies. I'll check in later and see what the results are. The guy had excellent taste in beer. I'll be dropping you a line on Wed - we'll get together and I can hand off that beer. I wasn't poking on you about the beer... it was actually an attempt at humor. A poor one, I guess. :-) I'll be around Wed. until late afternoon, then back late Thursday afternoon. It's supposed to be nice Friday and Saturday... you got that new boat with you? |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:30:23 -0500, Boater
wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 03:45:35 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... chew on this for a while. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach's_conjecture And don't prove the weak conjecture. That's for pansies. I'll check in later and see what the results are. Holy crap. And people think me and my ions are boring. Ok - just because I'm a nice guy - here's an easy one. In the Fletcher's Paradox, the Greek philosopher Zeno (who was the inspiration for the Socratic Method) stated that for motion to be occurring, an object must change the position which it occupies. In keeping with the name of the paradox, let's use an arrow as the example. For motion to occur, the arrow must move to where it is not. Thus there are two states - where it is and where it is not. If we think of time as points (or instants) the arrow cannot move to where it is not and it cannot move to where it is because it is already there. Thus, motion cannot occur at any point (or instant) of time - everything should remain motionless. Solve that one - it's actually easy. I always wondered just how the transporter on the Starship Enterprise worked. Quantum physics. We already have an example of instant transfer of energy - gravity. It affects all things at the same time. If it didn't, then you wouldn't have round balls of stuff floating around space and each other. And it's been shown in numerous experiments that one particle can exist in two places at the same time. It's just a question of engineering. Think Eisboch and his ions. :) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
For you shortwave types | General | |||
Other wood types | Boat Building | |||
coax types | Electronics | |||
Boat Types ? | General |