Harry, I'm revising the original wager (reproduced below). Instead of
proving all three of your claims, you need to prove ONLY TWO. All
three were stated by you as facts here on this newsgroup, so providing
proof for only two should be no problem. How 'bout it Dude?

_________

Speaking of wagers, Harry, I remember an opportunity here a few years
ago that must have escaped your attention. For your possible
benefit,
I’ll renew it myself as follows:

You have claimed on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical
doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman-
like lobster boat.

So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts
of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated
escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the
“reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to
a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win
the wager.

On Dec 29, 8:55*am, GC Boater wrote:
Harry, I'm revising the original wager (reproduced below). *Instead of
proving all three of your claims, you need to prove ONLY TWO. *All
three were stated by you as facts here on this newsgroup, so providing
proof for only two should be no problem. *How 'bout it Dude?

_________

Speaking of wagers, Harry, I remember an opportunity here a few years
ago that must have escaped your attention. *For your possible
benefit,
I’ll renew it myself as follows:

You have claimed on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical
doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman-
like lobster boat.

So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts
of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated
escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the
“reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to
a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win
the wager.

Hey Harry, what say Old Fella? You could start the New Year off with
quite a windfall. Maybe with $100K, Karen would let you put your name
on the deed of the house you're living in!!

On Dec 29, 6:07*pm, GC Boater wrote:
On Dec 29, 8:55*am, GC Boater wrote:





Harry, I'm revising the original wager (reproduced below). *Instead of
proving all three of your claims, you need to prove ONLY TWO. *All
three were stated by you as facts here on this newsgroup, so providing
proof for only two should be no problem. *How 'bout it Dude?

_________

Speaking of wagers, Harry, I remember an opportunity here a few years
ago that must have escaped your attention. *For your possible
benefit,
I’ll renew it myself as follows:

You have claimed on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical
doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman-
like lobster boat.

So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts
of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated
escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the
“reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to
a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win
the wager.

Hey Harry, what say Old Fella? *You could start the New Year off with
quite a windfall. *Maybe with $100K, Karen would let you put your name
on the deed of the house you're living in!!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hey Old Fella, you playin' possum tonight?

On Dec 29, 7:03*pm, GC Boater wrote:
On Dec 29, 6:07*pm, GC Boater wrote:





On Dec 29, 8:55*am, GC Boater wrote:

Harry, I'm revising the original wager (reproduced below). *Instead of
proving all three of your claims, you need to prove ONLY TWO. *All
three were stated by you as facts here on this newsgroup, so providing
proof for only two should be no problem. *How 'bout it Dude?

_________

Speaking of wagers, Harry, I remember an opportunity here a few years
ago that must have escaped your attention. *For your possible
benefit,
I’ll renew it myself as follows:

You have claimed on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical
doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman-
like lobster boat.

So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts
of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated
escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the
“reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to
a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win
the wager.

Hey Harry, what say Old Fella? *You could start the New Year off with
quite a windfall. *Maybe with $100K, Karen would let you put your name
on the deed of the house you're living in!!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hey Old Fella, you playin' possum tonight?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Has Karen, 20 years your junior for sure, kicked your ass out of the
computer room?

GC Boater wrote:
On Dec 29, 8:55 am, GC Boater wrote:
Harry, I'm revising the original wager (reproduced below). Instead of
proving all three of your claims, you need to prove ONLY TWO. All
three were stated by you as facts here on this newsgroup, so providing
proof for only two should be no problem. How 'bout it Dude?

_________

Speaking of wagers, Harry, I remember an opportunity here a few years
ago that must have escaped your attention. For your possible
benefit,
I’ll renew it myself as follows:

You have claimed on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical
doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman-
like lobster boat.

So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts
of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated
escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the
“reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to
a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win
the wager.

Hey Harry, what say Old Fella? You could start the New Year off with
quite a windfall. Maybe with $100K, Karen would let you put your name
on the deed of the house you're living in!!

Neither will happen.

GC Boater wrote:
On Dec 29, 7:03 pm, GC Boater wrote:
On Dec 29, 6:07 pm, GC Boater wrote:





On Dec 29, 8:55 am, GC Boater wrote:
Harry, I'm revising the original wager (reproduced below). Instead of
proving all three of your claims, you need to prove ONLY TWO. All
three were stated by you as facts here on this newsgroup, so providing
proof for only two should be no problem. How 'bout it Dude?
_________
Speaking of wagers, Harry, I remember an opportunity here a few years
ago that must have escaped your attention. For your possible
benefit,
I’ll renew it myself as follows:
You have claimed on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical
doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman-
like lobster boat.
So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts
of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated
escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the
“reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to
a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win
the wager.
Hey Harry, what say Old Fella? You could start the New Year off with
quite a windfall. Maybe with $100K, Karen would let you put your name
on the deed of the house you're living in!!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Hey Old Fella, you playin' possum tonight?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Has Karen, 20 years your junior for sure, kicked your ass out of the
computer room?

He ignores, or pretends to killfile, people who are smarter than him.