Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... wrote: Not much in usenet is funnier than an uneducated ignorant ass like you commenting on the education of some and knowledge of someone far smarter than you will ever be. I don't know whether she would be a good, bad, or indifferent U.S. senator, but I do know this: your only qualification seems to be as the Shove Him Down the Stairs Dummy. Isn't it ironic that the average IQ elects the "smart" leaders? Eisboch If you are referring to Obama as a smart leader, an analysis of voters who actually voted showed Obama carried every group except white evangelicals. Every group includes the smartest Americans. That analysis appeared on many major media outlets. Just Hate doesn't present to me as "average,' but, rather, below average. You missed my point, but the hell with it. Eisboch |
#32
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... wrote: Not much in usenet is funnier than an uneducated ignorant ass like you commenting on the education of some and knowledge of someone far smarter than you will ever be. I don't know whether she would be a good, bad, or indifferent U.S. senator, but I do know this: your only qualification seems to be as the Shove Him Down the Stairs Dummy. Isn't it ironic that the average IQ elects the "smart" leaders? Eisboch If you are referring to Obama as a smart leader, an analysis of voters who actually voted showed Obama carried every group except white evangelicals. Every group includes the smartest Americans. That analysis appeared on many major media outlets. Just Hate doesn't present to me as "average,' but, rather, below average. You missed my point, but the hell with it. Eisboch Oh, well. |
#33
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 4, 1:59*pm, (Richard Casady) wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:47:02 -0500, HK wrote: Obama carried every group except white evangelicals. Every group includes the smartest Americans As I said, the Alaskan bimbo cost the votes of the top half of the IQ scale. Casady So another one who believes anyone that does not subscribe to his ideology has a low IQ.. That is the type of anti-democratic elitism half the country is afraid of... |
#34
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:32:36 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:08:30 -0700, "Canuck57" wrote: Me, I don't believe in aristocracy, just because she is a "Kennedy". Same here, but as a non-voting Canuckastani terrorist, what difference does your opinion make ? All Canadians are our brothers. Well, except for those who live in Quebec. Or Nova Scotia. I mean seriously - Nova Scotia? What the heck kind of name for a province is Nova Scotia? Then again, it is Canada. Which is full of Canadians. :) Although I have to admit - they do make a great boat. Right Don? :) -- Happy Holidays and Merry Whatever It Is That ****es Liberals Off. |
#35
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#36
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 4, 6:41*pm, hk wrote:
wrote: On Jan 4, 1:59 pm, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:47:02 -0500, HK wrote: Obama carried every group except white evangelicals. Every group includes the smartest Americans As I said, the Alaskan bimbo cost the votes of the top half of the IQ scale. Casady So another one who believes anyone that does not subscribe to his ideology has a low IQ.. That is the type of anti-democratic elitism half the country is afraid of... My opinion of Palin's IQ has nothing to do with her ideology. There are plenty of smart conservatives on the national scene. Ok, as long as you understand that.. I have had my fill over the years with ones who only get their information from NPR, New York Lies, and Jon Stewart telling me conservatives are simply "uninformed"... or refering to half of America as "fly over states". Carry on... ![]() She isn't one of them. The world is not as simple as you would like it to be, Scotty. |
#38
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:32:36 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:08:30 -0700, "Canuck57" wrote: Me, I don't believe in aristocracy, just because she is a "Kennedy". Same here, but as a non-voting Canuckastani terrorist, what difference does your opinion make ? All Canadians are our brothers. Well, except for those who live in Quebec. Or Nova Scotia. I mean seriously - Nova Scotia? What the heck kind of name for a province is Nova Scotia? Then again, it is Canada. Which is full of Canadians. :) Although I have to admit - they do make a great boat. Right Don? :) -- They sure do and it's nice to see them appreciated by a man of your refined taste and exceptional judgement. ;-) |
#39
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:31:35 -0800, justwaitafrekinminute wrote:
So another one who believes anyone that does not subscribe to his ideology has a low IQ.. That is the type of anti-democratic elitism half the country is afraid of... While I understand, and I'm sympathetic to your point, I just wanted to point out that "anti-democratic elitism" was built into the Constitution by our founding fathers. It's why we are a republic, not a true democracy. It's a tough question really. While I think I would prefer a more democratic approach. There are dangers, populist rabble-rousers, fascist movements, etc. The founding fathers may have been right. After all, we haven't been doing our democratic duty of holding our leader's feet to the fire. |
#40
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:37:38 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
I mean seriously - Nova Scotia? What the heck kind of name for a province is Nova Scotia? At least somebody up there knows Latin. ;-) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|