On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:31:25 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:07:38 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:07:15 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:09:15 -0500, John H
wrote:

Do you honestly feel my posting of Harry's information was justification
for some sick asshole to call my house 17 times saying he wanted to "****
my wife"?

Why didn't you put a block on the number, call the provider to put a
trace on the number and have them forward the complaint to the State
Police?

Didn't think about it. Usually if I call Cox, I'm on hold for a half hour,
nor did I know they could or would trace the number.

I honestly don't have a lot of experience with that kind of behavior.

Well, you can still have it traced. It's fits a pattern and that's
what they look for. And you can also identify the perps carrier and
file a complaint with them. I know for a fact, based on the repeated
pattern, that they will pull the service from who ever did it.

Well, I may end up calling Cox. The $4.95 search didn't pan out, although
they did refund my credit card! Now I'll have to watch my credit card
carefully!

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:53:55 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:21:03 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
m...
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:30:32 -0400, "Don White"

wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
news:3mc7m4t41r60tif8cpvde4622npm57rie3@4ax. com...
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:33:57 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Jan 6, 1:30 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:14:31 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 6, 1:09 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:41:45 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 6, 12:34 pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:59:03 -0500, Wayne.B

wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:31:46 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

Check your E-mail... and have at it

Scotty...

Did you find the perp, and did he turn out to be the most
likely
suspect ?

It's being worked on. I don't have any close cop friends
anymore,
or it
would have been done.

We are just waiting for a confirmation, but I think we got
it...
Interesting indeed...

Too funny. You nitwits have been handed the phone number of who
you
are looking for, and two days later you don't know who they
are.
When
you wake up in the morning, how long does it take you to find
your
dick?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not long at all, I just look in your mouth... We have not given
this
a priority, the number ain't going anywhere, neither is the
caller...
We have lives beyond trolling the internet, do you?

With a phone numbetr in hand, you can know who made it in less
than
a
minute. You are incompetent.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

and you are a coward.. now back under your desk...

I wonder why those who are 'in the know' don't just post the
information?
It's for damn sure someone who is pretty sick. It sure as hell
wouldn't
hurt for everyone to know who it is.

I won't call the cops because I don't want to cause problems for the
guy's
family, assuming he has one. I know how my wife felt, just listening
to
the
crap he left on the recorder and the phone ringing seventeen times.

I really hope you explained to her how all this happened....especially
your
roll.


Unless it was Harry calling from just outside Cleveland, I've no idea.
Perhaps you could explain it.

You know what I mean.
For her own sense of security, she should know that this likely isn't
some
stalker out of the blue targeting her home & family.
Man up....you owe her that.
On the positive side, in the future she may more closely monitor your
activities at the computer.


She knows who I think it is, Don. One of your buddies, which, I guess,
is
why you've not condemned the behavior.

Perhaps you can explain how the posting of Harry's address, which has
been
done several times here, justifies that activity by someone *other than*
Harry. Hell, it wouldn't even justify Harry behaving that way.

No, I don't "know what you mean".

So your wife knows that you posted Harry's personal address and phone
number
(without permission) 4 times encouraging people to contact him, before I
posted yours in an effort to stop you? Yes or no?


You think my posting of Harry's address prompted the calls to me?

I guess that would depend on whether the caller reads rec.boats or not.
At this point I have no idea who the caller is and would rather not know.

On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:20:49 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Jan 6, 5:07*pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:07:15 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports

wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:09:15 -0500, John H
wrote:

Why didn't you put a block on the number, call the provider to put a
trace on the number and have them forward the complaint to the State
Police?

Didn't think about it. Usually if I call Cox, I'm on hold for a half hour,
nor did I know they could or would trace the number.

I honestly don't have a lot of experience with that kind of behavior.

John, I'd seriously take Tom's advice into consideration.

OK. I'll call Cox.

On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:04:08 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:53:55 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:21:03 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
om...
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:30:32 -0400, "Don White"

wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
news:3mc7m4t41r60tif8cpvde4622npm57rie3@4ax .com...
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:33:57 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Jan 6, 1:30 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:14:31 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 6, 1:09 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:41:45 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 6, 12:34 pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:59:03 -0500, Wayne.B

wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:31:46 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

Check your E-mail... and have at it

Scotty...

Did you find the perp, and did he turn out to be the most
likely
suspect ?

It's being worked on. I don't have any close cop friends
anymore,
or it
would have been done.

We are just waiting for a confirmation, but I think we got
it...
Interesting indeed...

Too funny. You nitwits have been handed the phone number of who
you
are looking for, and two days later you don't know who they
are.
When
you wake up in the morning, how long does it take you to find
your
dick?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not long at all, I just look in your mouth... We have not given
this
a priority, the number ain't going anywhere, neither is the
caller...
We have lives beyond trolling the internet, do you?

With a phone numbetr in hand, you can know who made it in less
than
a
minute. You are incompetent.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

and you are a coward.. now back under your desk...

I wonder why those who are 'in the know' don't just post the
information?
It's for damn sure someone who is pretty sick. It sure as hell
wouldn't
hurt for everyone to know who it is.

I won't call the cops because I don't want to cause problems for the
guy's
family, assuming he has one. I know how my wife felt, just listening
to
the
crap he left on the recorder and the phone ringing seventeen times.

I really hope you explained to her how all this happened....especially
your
roll.


Unless it was Harry calling from just outside Cleveland, I've no idea.
Perhaps you could explain it.

You know what I mean.
For her own sense of security, she should know that this likely isn't
some
stalker out of the blue targeting her home & family.
Man up....you owe her that.
On the positive side, in the future she may more closely monitor your
activities at the computer.


She knows who I think it is, Don. One of your buddies, which, I guess,
is
why you've not condemned the behavior.

Perhaps you can explain how the posting of Harry's address, which has
been
done several times here, justifies that activity by someone *other than*
Harry. Hell, it wouldn't even justify Harry behaving that way.

No, I don't "know what you mean".

So your wife knows that you posted Harry's personal address and phone
number
(without permission) 4 times encouraging people to contact him, before I
posted yours in an effort to stop you? Yes or no?


You think my posting of Harry's address prompted the calls to me?

I guess that would depend on whether the caller reads rec.boats or not.
At this point I have no idea who the caller is and would rather not know.


Don, the person is (or was) a rec.boats participant.

hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"hk" wrote in message
m...

I know who made the call from the number in question. Took 20
seconds. No $$$.


I wouldn't spend 20 seconds trying to find out.

Eisboch

Yeah, but you have horses and snow. I just have another 64 pages of
blueline to proofread.

Sure you do.

Don White wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:33:57 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Jan 6, 1:30 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:14:31 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Jan 6, 1:09 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:41:45 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Jan 6, 12:34 pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:59:03 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:31:46 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
Check your E-mail... and have at it
Scotty...
Did you find the perp, and did he turn out to be the most likely
suspect ?
It's being worked on. I don't have any close cop friends anymore,
or it
would have been done.
We are just waiting for a confirmation, but I think we got it...
Interesting indeed...
Too funny. You nitwits have been handed the phone number of who you
are looking for, and two days later you don't know who they are. When
you wake up in the morning, how long does it take you to find your
dick?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Not long at all, I just look in your mouth... We have not given this
a priority, the number ain't going anywhere, neither is the caller...
We have lives beyond trolling the internet, do you?
With a phone numbetr in hand, you can know who made it in less than a
minute. You are incompetent.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
and you are a coward.. now back under your desk...
I wonder why those who are 'in the know' don't just post the information?
It's for damn sure someone who is pretty sick. It sure as hell wouldn't
hurt for everyone to know who it is.

I won't call the cops because I don't want to cause problems for the guy's
family, assuming he has one. I know how my wife felt, just listening to
the
crap he left on the recorder and the phone ringing seventeen times.

I really hope you explained to her how all this happened....especially your
roll.



"roll"? We say "role". Is your wife proud of the crap YOU post, dummy?

On Jan 6, 4:21*pm, "Don White" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message

...





On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:30:32 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:33:57 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Jan 6, 1:30 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:14:31 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Jan 6, 1:09 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:41:45 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 6, 12:34 pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:59:03 -0500, Wayne.B

wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:31:46 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

Check your E-mail... and have at it

Scotty...

Did you find the perp, and did he turn out to be the most
likely
suspect ?

It's being worked on. I don't have any close cop friends
anymore,
or it
would have been done.

We are just waiting for a confirmation, but I think we got it....
Interesting indeed...

Too funny. You nitwits have been handed the phone number of who you
are looking for, and two days later you don't know who they are.
When
you wake up in the morning, how long does it take you to find your
dick?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not long at all, I just look in your mouth... We have not given this
a priority, the number ain't going anywhere, neither is the caller....
We have lives beyond trolling the internet, do you?

With a phone numbetr in hand, you can know who made it in less than a
minute. You are incompetent.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

and you are a coward.. now back under your desk...

I wonder why those who are 'in the know' don't just post the
information?
It's for damn sure someone who is pretty sick. It sure as hell wouldn't
hurt for everyone to know who it is.

I won't call the cops because I don't want to cause problems for the
guy's
family, assuming he has one. I know how my wife felt, just listening to
the
crap he left on the recorder and the phone ringing seventeen times.

I really hope you explained to her how all this happened....especially
your
roll.

Unless it was Harry calling from just outside Cleveland, I've no idea.
Perhaps you could explain it.

You know what I mean.
For her own sense of security, she should know that this likely isn't some
stalker out of the blue targeting her home & family.
Man up....you owe her that.
On the positive side, in the future she may more closely monitor your
activities at the computer.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What a piece of work you are, still trying to justify what you did?

Eisboch wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:07:38 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:46:53 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
m...

I know who made the call from the number in question. Took 20
seconds.
No
$$$.


I wouldn't spend 20 seconds trying to find out.

Eisboch

Yabut, it wasn't your house!

I don't post people's personal information in a newsgroup either.

Eisboch

Do you honestly feel my posting of Harry's information was justification
for some sick asshole to call my house 17 times saying he wanted to "****
my wife"?

Of course not. But, if you hadn't posted *his* info, yours would not
have been posted and you wouldn't be bothered with idiots calling your
house.

Or did I miss something here?

Eisboch

IIRC, John didn't originally post the information and WAFA sent it to
the guy who did - someone he trashes frequently.

wrote:
On Jan 6, 4:21 pm, "Don White" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message

...





On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:30:32 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:33:57 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Jan 6, 1:30 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:14:31 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Jan 6, 1:09 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:41:45 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 6, 12:34 pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:59:03 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:31:46 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
Check your E-mail... and have at it
Scotty...
Did you find the perp, and did he turn out to be the most
likely
suspect ?
It's being worked on. I don't have any close cop friends
anymore,
or it
would have been done.
We are just waiting for a confirmation, but I think we got it...
Interesting indeed...
Too funny. You nitwits have been handed the phone number of who you
are looking for, and two days later you don't know who they are.
When
you wake up in the morning, how long does it take you to find your
dick?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Not long at all, I just look in your mouth... We have not given this
a priority, the number ain't going anywhere, neither is the caller...
We have lives beyond trolling the internet, do you?
With a phone numbetr in hand, you can know who made it in less than a
minute. You are incompetent.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
and you are a coward.. now back under your desk...
I wonder why those who are 'in the know' don't just post the
information?
It's for damn sure someone who is pretty sick. It sure as hell wouldn't
hurt for everyone to know who it is.
I won't call the cops because I don't want to cause problems for the
guy's
family, assuming he has one. I know how my wife felt, just listening to
the
crap he left on the recorder and the phone ringing seventeen times.
I really hope you explained to her how all this happened....especially
your
roll.
Unless it was Harry calling from just outside Cleveland, I've no idea.
Perhaps you could explain it.
You know what I mean.
For her own sense of security, she should know that this likely isn't some
stalker out of the blue targeting her home & family.
Man up....you owe her that.
On the positive side, in the future she may more closely monitor your
activities at the computer.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What a piece of work you are, still trying to justify what you did?


You still justifying what Herring did?

Don White wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:30:32 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:33:57 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Jan 6, 1:30 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:14:31 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 6, 1:09 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:41:45 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 6, 12:34 pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:59:03 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:31:46 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
Check your E-mail... and have at it
Scotty...
Did you find the perp, and did he turn out to be the most
likely
suspect ?
It's being worked on. I don't have any close cop friends
anymore,
or it
would have been done.
We are just waiting for a confirmation, but I think we got it...
Interesting indeed...
Too funny. You nitwits have been handed the phone number of who
you
are looking for, and two days later you don't know who they are.
When
you wake up in the morning, how long does it take you to find your
dick?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Not long at all, I just look in your mouth... We have not given
this
a priority, the number ain't going anywhere, neither is the
caller...
We have lives beyond trolling the internet, do you?
With a phone numbetr in hand, you can know who made it in less than
a
minute. You are incompetent.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
and you are a coward.. now back under your desk...
I wonder why those who are 'in the know' don't just post the
information?
It's for damn sure someone who is pretty sick. It sure as hell
wouldn't
hurt for everyone to know who it is.

I won't call the cops because I don't want to cause problems for the
guy's
family, assuming he has one. I know how my wife felt, just listening
to
the
crap he left on the recorder and the phone ringing seventeen times.
I really hope you explained to her how all this happened....especially
your
roll.

Unless it was Harry calling from just outside Cleveland, I've no idea.
Perhaps you could explain it.
You know what I mean.
For her own sense of security, she should know that this likely isn't
some stalker out of the blue targeting her home & family.
Man up....you owe her that.
On the positive side, in the future she may more closely monitor your
activities at the computer.
Don,
Since you did the EXACT same thing that JohnH did, following your logic,
someone should post your home address and telephone number.

......and using your logic...a 4th party should come forward and post the
name & address of the individual who posted mine.. etc etc
Why don't you try being a positive force in here for a change, rather than
one of the worse offenders in making this newsgroup what it is.



I like the way you post JohnH's phone number and everyone else is
responsible. I did not make any suggestion that anyone post anything.
Why don't you accept responsibility for your poor behavior instead of
blaming everyone else?