Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Jan 6, 4:21 pm, "Don White" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:30:32 -0400, "Don White" wrote: "John H" wrote in message . .. On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:33:57 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 6, 1:30 pm, wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:14:31 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 6, 1:09 pm, wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:41:45 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 6, 12:34 pm, John H wrote: On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:59:03 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:31:46 -0800 (PST), wrote: Check your E-mail... and have at it ![]() Scotty... Did you find the perp, and did he turn out to be the most likely suspect ? It's being worked on. I don't have any close cop friends anymore, or it would have been done. We are just waiting for a confirmation, but I think we got it... Interesting indeed... Too funny. You nitwits have been handed the phone number of who you are looking for, and two days later you don't know who they are. When you wake up in the morning, how long does it take you to find your dick?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not long at all, I just look in your mouth... We have not given this a priority, the number ain't going anywhere, neither is the caller... We have lives beyond trolling the internet, do you? With a phone numbetr in hand, you can know who made it in less than a minute. You are incompetent.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - and you are a coward.. now back under your desk... I wonder why those who are 'in the know' don't just post the information? It's for damn sure someone who is pretty sick. It sure as hell wouldn't hurt for everyone to know who it is. I won't call the cops because I don't want to cause problems for the guy's family, assuming he has one. I know how my wife felt, just listening to the crap he left on the recorder and the phone ringing seventeen times. I really hope you explained to her how all this happened....especially your roll. Unless it was Harry calling from just outside Cleveland, I've no idea. Perhaps you could explain it. You know what I mean. For her own sense of security, she should know that this likely isn't some stalker out of the blue targeting her home & family. Man up....you owe her that. On the positive side, in the future she may more closely monitor your activities at the computer.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What a piece of work you are, still trying to justify what you did? ************************************************** *********** I have made it clear that I "did what I did" to make John stop doing what he was doing. Nothing more complicated than that. JustHate.... if you're this concerned, why didn't you butt in and advise John to stop... you know..somewhat like taking your buddies keys if they had too many drinks. You are your brothers keeper! |
#32
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
D K wrote:
IIRC, John didn't originally post the information and WAFA sent it to the guy who did - someone he trashes frequently. IIRC, Harry said only someone with NO BALLS would care if their name, address and phone number was published. I do believe that is what instigated his info being posted. |
#33
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 6, 10:59*pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote: Don White wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message m... Don White wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:30:32 -0400, "Don White" wrote: "John H" wrote in message om... On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:33:57 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 6, 1:30 pm, wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:14:31 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 6, 1:09 pm, wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:41:45 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 6, 12:34 pm, John H wrote: On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:59:03 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:31:46 -0800 (PST), wrote: Check your E-mail... and have at it ![]() Scotty... Did you find the perp, and did he turn out to be the most likely suspect ? It's being worked on. I don't have any close cop friends anymore, or it would have been done. We are just waiting for a confirmation, but I think we got it.... Interesting indeed... Too funny. You nitwits have been handed the phone number of who you are looking for, and two days later you don't know who they are. When you wake up in the morning, how long does it take you to find your dick?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not long at all, I just look in your mouth... We have not given this a priority, the number ain't going anywhere, neither is the caller... We have lives beyond trolling the internet, do you? With a phone numbetr in hand, you can know who made it in less than a minute. You are incompetent.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - and you are a coward.. now back under your desk... I wonder why those who are 'in the know' don't just post the information? It's for damn sure someone who is pretty sick. It sure as hell wouldn't hurt for everyone to know who it is. I won't call the cops because I don't want to cause problems for the guy's family, assuming he has one. I know how my wife felt, just listening to the crap he left on the recorder and the phone ringing seventeen times.. I really hope you explained to her how all this happened....especially your roll. Unless it was Harry calling from just outside Cleveland, I've no idea. Perhaps you could explain it. You know what I mean. For her own sense of security, she should know that this likely isn't some stalker out of the blue targeting her home & family. Man up....you owe her that. On the positive side, in the future she may more closely monitor your activities at the computer. Don, Since you did the EXACT same thing that JohnH did, following your logic, someone should post your home address and telephone number. ......and using your logic...a 4th party should come forward and post the name & address of the individual who posted mine.. etc etc Why don't you try being a positive force in here for a change, rather than one of the worse offenders in making this newsgroup what it is. I like the way you post JohnH's phone number and everyone else is responsible. * I did not make any suggestion that anyone post anything. * Why don't you accept responsibility for your poor behavior instead of blaming everyone else?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - These people are not really into self accountability... |
#34
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don White wrote:
************************************************** *********** I have made it clear that I "did what I did" to make John stop doing what he was doing. Nothing more complicated than that. JustHate.... if you're this concerned, why didn't you butt in and advise John to stop... you know..somewhat like taking your buddies keys if they had too many drinks. You are your brothers keeper! Don you are a completely misunderstood. You are nothing but a good Samaritan. |
#35
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message ... Don White wrote: ************************************************** *********** I have made it clear that I "did what I did" to make John stop doing what he was doing. Nothing more complicated than that. JustHate.... if you're this concerned, why didn't you butt in and advise John to stop... you know..somewhat like taking your buddies keys if they had too many drinks. You are your brothers keeper! Don you are a completely misunderstood. You are nothing but a good Samaritan. Not in this case, but one of John's 'men' should have been. |
#36
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don White wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message ... Don White wrote: ************************************************** *********** I have made it clear that I "did what I did" to make John stop doing what he was doing. Nothing more complicated than that. JustHate.... if you're this concerned, why didn't you butt in and advise John to stop... you know..somewhat like taking your buddies keys if they had too many drinks. You are your brothers keeper! Don you are a completely misunderstood. You are nothing but a good Samaritan. Not in this case, but one of John's 'men' should have been. Don, Just keep telling yourself. "I am not responsible for my actions", and you might actually start to believe it. No one else does. |
#37
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Don White wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message ... Don White wrote: ************************************************** *********** I have made it clear that I "did what I did" to make John stop doing what he was doing. Nothing more complicated than that. JustHate.... if you're this concerned, why didn't you butt in and advise John to stop... you know..somewhat like taking your buddies keys if they had too many drinks. You are your brothers keeper! Don you are a completely misunderstood. You are nothing but a good Samaritan. Not in this case, but one of John's 'men' should have been. Don, Just keep telling yourself. "I am not responsible for my actions", and you might actually start to believe it. No one else does. Harry says everyone is responsible for their own actions, even Don. |
#39
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:09:15 -0500, John H wrote: Do you honestly feel my posting of Harry's information was justification for some sick asshole to call my house 17 times saying he wanted to "**** my wife"? Why didn't you put a block on the number, call the provider to put a trace on the number and have them forward the complaint to the State Police? The police are useless, they want the phone company to collect evidence before the police get involved or even start a file. |
#40
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don White wrote:
"John H" wrote in message ... On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:21:03 -0400, "Don White" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:30:32 -0400, "Don White" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:33:57 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 6, 1:30 pm, wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:14:31 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 6, 1:09 pm, wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:41:45 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 6, 12:34 pm, John H wrote: On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:59:03 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:31:46 -0800 (PST), wrote: Check your E-mail... and have at it ![]() Scotty... Did you find the perp, and did he turn out to be the most likely suspect ? It's being worked on. I don't have any close cop friends anymore, or it would have been done. We are just waiting for a confirmation, but I think we got it... Interesting indeed... Too funny. You nitwits have been handed the phone number of who you are looking for, and two days later you don't know who they are. When you wake up in the morning, how long does it take you to find your dick?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not long at all, I just look in your mouth... We have not given this a priority, the number ain't going anywhere, neither is the caller... We have lives beyond trolling the internet, do you? With a phone numbetr in hand, you can know who made it in less than a minute. You are incompetent.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - and you are a coward.. now back under your desk... I wonder why those who are 'in the know' don't just post the information? It's for damn sure someone who is pretty sick. It sure as hell wouldn't hurt for everyone to know who it is. I won't call the cops because I don't want to cause problems for the guy's family, assuming he has one. I know how my wife felt, just listening to the crap he left on the recorder and the phone ringing seventeen times. I really hope you explained to her how all this happened....especially your roll. Unless it was Harry calling from just outside Cleveland, I've no idea. Perhaps you could explain it. You know what I mean. For her own sense of security, she should know that this likely isn't some stalker out of the blue targeting her home & family. Man up....you owe her that. On the positive side, in the future she may more closely monitor your activities at the computer. She knows who I think it is, Don. One of your buddies, which, I guess, is why you've not condemned the behavior. Perhaps you can explain how the posting of Harry's address, which has been done several times here, justifies that activity by someone *other than* Harry. Hell, it wouldn't even justify Harry behaving that way. No, I don't "know what you mean". So your wife knows that you posted Harry's personal address and phone number (without permission) 4 times encouraging people to contact him, before I posted yours in an effort to stop you? Yes or no? Reposting information already in the public domain. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hey John! | ASA | |||
(OT) Vietnam Veterans Against John Kerry (Sorry John H) | General | |||
(OT) Gift for John H, NOYB, John Gaguin and other right wingers | General |