BAR wrote:
wrote:

You don't need to work for the "BFI", whatever that is, to get info on
a phone number very quickly and easily. You do have to have a clue,
however.


Ok smart guy who is it?



I know who it is, too...and it only took me about 20 seconds to find
out. Oh, and I don't know what the BFI is, either.

BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:42:49 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Jan 6, 2:40 pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:33:57 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Jan 6, 1:30 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:14:31 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Jan 6, 1:09 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:41:45 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 6, 12:34 pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:59:03 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:31:46 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
Check your E-mail... and have at it
Scotty...
Did you find the perp, and did he turn out to be the most likely
suspect ?
It's being worked on. I don't have any close cop friends
anymore, or it
would have been done.
We are just waiting for a confirmation, but I think we got it...
Interesting indeed...
Too funny. You nitwits have been handed the phone number of who you
are looking for, and two days later you don't know who they are.
When
you wake up in the morning, how long does it take you to find your
dick?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Not long at all, I just look in your mouth... We have not given
this
a priority, the number ain't going anywhere, neither is the
caller...
We have lives beyond trolling the internet, do you?
With a phone numbetr in hand, you can know who made it in less than a
minute. You are incompetent.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
and you are a coward.. now back under your desk...
I wonder why those who are 'in the know' don't just post the
information?
It's for damn sure someone who is pretty sick. It sure as hell wouldn't
hurt for everyone to know who it is.

I won't call the cops because I don't want to cause problems for the
guy's
family, assuming he has one. I know how my wife felt, just listening
to the
crap he left on the recorder and the phone ringing seventeen times.-
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Remember, it was salty and harry that said they knew already... you
know where I a going with this Harry went to Yale, and salty works
with the bfi... snerk

You don't need to work for the "BFI", whatever that is, to get info on
a phone number very quickly and easily. You do have to have a clue,
however.


Ok smart guy who is it?

It'll cost you $14.95

BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:42:49 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Jan 6, 2:40 pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:33:57 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Jan 6, 1:30 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:14:31 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Jan 6, 1:09 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:41:45 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 6, 12:34 pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:59:03 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:31:46 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
Check your E-mail... and have at it
Scotty...
Did you find the perp, and did he turn out to be the most likely
suspect ?
It's being worked on. I don't have any close cop friends
anymore, or it
would have been done.
We are just waiting for a confirmation, but I think we got it...
Interesting indeed...
Too funny. You nitwits have been handed the phone number of who you
are looking for, and two days later you don't know who they are.
When
you wake up in the morning, how long does it take you to find your
dick?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Not long at all, I just look in your mouth... We have not given
this
a priority, the number ain't going anywhere, neither is the
caller...
We have lives beyond trolling the internet, do you?
With a phone numbetr in hand, you can know who made it in less than a
minute. You are incompetent.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
and you are a coward.. now back under your desk...
I wonder why those who are 'in the know' don't just post the
information?
It's for damn sure someone who is pretty sick. It sure as hell wouldn't
hurt for everyone to know who it is.

I won't call the cops because I don't want to cause problems for the
guy's
family, assuming he has one. I know how my wife felt, just listening
to the
crap he left on the recorder and the phone ringing seventeen times.-
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Remember, it was salty and harry that said they knew already... you
know where I a going with this Harry went to Yale, and salty works
with the bfi... snerk

You don't need to work for the "BFI", whatever that is, to get info on
a phone number very quickly and easily. You do have to have a clue,
however.


Ok smart guy who is it?


The first reverse look up of the phone number showing the general
location provide all of the information I needed to know. I wonder if he
ever shows his head around here again?

"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:

************************************************** ***********

I have made it clear that I "did what I did" to make John stop doing
what he was doing.
Nothing more complicated than that.
JustHate.... if you're this concerned, why didn't you butt in and
advise John to stop...
you know..somewhat like taking your buddies keys if they had too many
drinks. You are your brothers keeper!
Don you are a completely misunderstood. You are nothing but a good
Samaritan.

Not in this case, but one of John's 'men' should have been.
Don, Just keep telling yourself. "I am not responsible for my actions",
and you might actually start to believe it. No one else does.

I'm glad you feel a person should be accountable and responsible for their
own actions.
We should review your major part in this whole mess.
You have been in a war with Harry for weeks about releasing personal
info...demanding wagers on same.. instigating and agitating, whipping up
less discplined posters like JohnH, loonyTunes, Justhate, Qc or whatever
until one of them lost control and crossed the line. All the while you
slither in the background, pulling strings, revealing nothing but your
sordid MO.

Don White wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:

************************************************** ***********

I have made it clear that I "did what I did" to make John stop doing
what he was doing.
Nothing more complicated than that.
JustHate.... if you're this concerned, why didn't you butt in and
advise John to stop...
you know..somewhat like taking your buddies keys if they had too many
drinks. You are your brothers keeper!
Don you are a completely misunderstood. You are nothing but a good
Samaritan.
Not in this case, but one of John's 'men' should have been.
Don, Just keep telling yourself. "I am not responsible for my actions",
and you might actually start to believe it. No one else does.

I'm glad you feel a person should be accountable and responsible for their
own actions.
We should review your major part in this whole mess.
You have been in a war with Harry for weeks about releasing personal
info...demanding wagers on same.. instigating and agitating, whipping up
less discplined posters like JohnH, loonyTunes, Justhate, Qc or whatever
until one of them lost control and crossed the line. All the while you
slither in the background, pulling strings, revealing nothing but your
sordid MO.




Reggie actually believes he is fooling people when his "game" is as
obvious as the yellow streak down the middle of his back.

"BAR" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:21:03 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:30:32 -0400, "Don White"

wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:33:57 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Jan 6, 1:30 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:14:31 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 6, 1:09 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:41:45 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 6, 12:34 pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:59:03 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:31:46 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
Check your E-mail... and have at it
Scotty...
Did you find the perp, and did he turn out to be the most
likely
suspect ?
It's being worked on. I don't have any close cop friends
anymore,
or it
would have been done.
We are just waiting for a confirmation, but I think we got
it...
Interesting indeed...
Too funny. You nitwits have been handed the phone number of who
you
are looking for, and two days later you don't know who they are.
When
you wake up in the morning, how long does it take you to find
your
dick?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Not long at all, I just look in your mouth... We have not given
this
a priority, the number ain't going anywhere, neither is the
caller...
We have lives beyond trolling the internet, do you?
With a phone numbetr in hand, you can know who made it in less
than a
minute. You are incompetent.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
and you are a coward.. now back under your desk...
I wonder why those who are 'in the know' don't just post the
information?
It's for damn sure someone who is pretty sick. It sure as hell
wouldn't
hurt for everyone to know who it is.

I won't call the cops because I don't want to cause problems for the
guy's
family, assuming he has one. I know how my wife felt, just listening
to
the
crap he left on the recorder and the phone ringing seventeen times.
I really hope you explained to her how all this
happened....especially
your
roll.

Unless it was Harry calling from just outside Cleveland, I've no idea.
Perhaps you could explain it.
You know what I mean.
For her own sense of security, she should know that this likely isn't
some
stalker out of the blue targeting her home & family.
Man up....you owe her that.
On the positive side, in the future she may more closely monitor your
activities at the computer.

She knows who I think it is, Don. One of your buddies, which, I guess,
is
why you've not condemned the behavior.

Perhaps you can explain how the posting of Harry's address, which has
been
done several times here, justifies that activity by someone *other than*
Harry. Hell, it wouldn't even justify Harry behaving that way.

No, I don't "know what you mean".

So your wife knows that you posted Harry's personal address and phone
number (without permission) 4 times encouraging people to contact him,
before I posted yours in an effort to stop you? Yes or no?

Reposting information already in the public domain.


ya but..... John went a step further encouraging posters to call Harry if
they disapproved of his so called "name calling".

On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:50:09 -0400, Don White wrote:


ya but..... John went a step further encouraging posters to call Harry
if they disapproved of his so called "name calling".

You know, I've been wondering when John is going to apologize to Harry
for that.

On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:10:13 -0500, Jim wrote:

Ok smart guy who is it?

It'll cost you $14.95

ROTFL!!!

On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:01:12 -0600, wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:50:09 -0400, Don White wrote:


ya but..... John went a step further encouraging posters to call Harry
if they disapproved of his so called "name calling".

You know, I've been wondering when John is going to apologize to Harry
for that.

That whole damn thing got out of hand - it's just so freakin'
frustrating to see intelligent people acting like morons.

Damn it's aggravating.

On Jan 7, 9:06*am, hk wrote:
BAR wrote:
wrote:
You don't need to work for the "BFI", whatever that is, to get info on
a phone number very quickly and easily. You do have to have a clue,
however.

Ok smart guy who is it?

I know who it is, too...and it only took me about 20 seconds to find
out. Oh, and I don't know what the BFI is, either.

No you don't...