Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Payrolls Post Biggest Annual Decline Since 1945
U.S. Economy: Payrolls Post Biggest Annual Decline Since 1945
By Shobhana Chandra Jan. 9 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. lost more jobs in 2008 than in any year since 1945 as employers fired another 524,000 people in December, indicating a free-fall in the economy just days before President-elect Barack Obama takes office. “Consumers are now going to get more and more scared at the prospect of losing their job,” said Nariman Behravesh, chief economist at IHS Global Insight in Lexington, Massachusetts. Obama’s proposed fiscal stimulus “needs to be big, needs to be bold, needs to be swift. If they can do something quickly we can limit the hemorrhage by mid-year.” The Labor Department reported that the nation lost 2.589 million jobs in 2008, just shy of the 2.75 million decline at the end of World War II. The unemployment rate climbed more than economists forecast, to 7.2 percent in December, the highest level in almost 16 years. Today’s figures will intensify pressure on U.S. lawmakers to act quickly on Obama’s recovery program, which may exceed $775 billion and aims to save or create 3 million jobs. They also underscore the urgency of the Federal Reserve’s $200 billion initiative to restart consumer financing markets that’s scheduled to begin next month. - - - Thank you for your leadership on these economic issues, President Bush. |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Payrolls Post Biggest Annual Decline Since 1945
hk wrote:
U.S. Economy: Payrolls Post Biggest Annual Decline Since 1945 By Shobhana Chandra Jan. 9 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. lost more jobs in 2008 than in any year since 1945 as employers fired another 524,000 people in December, indicating a free-fall in the economy just days before President-elect Barack Obama takes office. “Consumers are now going to get more and more scared at the prospect of losing their job,” said Nariman Behravesh, chief economist at IHS Global Insight in Lexington, Massachusetts. Obama’s proposed fiscal stimulus “needs to be big, needs to be bold, needs to be swift. If they can do something quickly we can limit the hemorrhage by mid-year.” The Labor Department reported that the nation lost 2.589 million jobs in 2008, just shy of the 2.75 million decline at the end of World War II. The unemployment rate climbed more than economists forecast, to 7.2 percent in December, the highest level in almost 16 years. Today’s figures will intensify pressure on U.S. lawmakers to act quickly on Obama’s recovery program, which may exceed $775 billion and aims to save or create 3 million jobs. They also underscore the urgency of the Federal Reserve’s $200 billion initiative to restart consumer financing markets that’s scheduled to begin next month. - - - Thank you for your leadership on these economic issues, President Bush. Couldn't possibly be lack of confidence in our president elect, could it? Where is all this recovery and stimulus money, that Mr Obama intends to spend, coming from? |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Payrolls Post Biggest Annual Decline Since 1945
"hk" wrote in message m... U.S. Economy: Payrolls Post Biggest Annual Decline Since 1945 By Shobhana Chandra Jan. 9 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. lost more jobs in 2008 than in any year since 1945 as employers fired another 524,000 people in December, indicating a free-fall in the economy just days before President-elect Barack Obama takes office. “Consumers are now going to get more and more scared at the prospect of losing their job,” said Nariman Behravesh, chief economist at IHS Global Insight in Lexington, Massachusetts. Obama’s proposed fiscal stimulus “needs to be big, needs to be bold, needs to be swift. If they can do something quickly we can limit the hemorrhage by mid-year.” The Labor Department reported that the nation lost 2.589 million jobs in 2008, just shy of the 2.75 million decline at the end of World War II. The unemployment rate climbed more than economists forecast, to 7.2 percent in December, the highest level in almost 16 years. Today’s figures will intensify pressure on U.S. lawmakers to act quickly on Obama’s recovery program, which may exceed $775 billion and aims to save or create 3 million jobs. They also underscore the urgency of the Federal Reserve’s $200 billion initiative to restart consumer financing markets that’s scheduled to begin next month. - - - Thank you for your leadership on these economic issues, President Bush. Now if we could get the Feds from stop over spending and there would be money for the economy to grow on, we could get out of this mess. |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Payrolls Post Biggest Annual Decline Since 1945
Calif Bill wrote:
"hk" wrote in message m... U.S. Economy: Payrolls Post Biggest Annual Decline Since 1945 By Shobhana Chandra Jan. 9 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. lost more jobs in 2008 than in any year since 1945 as employers fired another 524,000 people in December, indicating a free-fall in the economy just days before President-elect Barack Obama takes office. “Consumers are now going to get more and more scared at the prospect of losing their job,” said Nariman Behravesh, chief economist at IHS Global Insight in Lexington, Massachusetts. Obama’s proposed fiscal stimulus “needs to be big, needs to be bold, needs to be swift. If they can do something quickly we can limit the hemorrhage by mid-year.” The Labor Department reported that the nation lost 2.589 million jobs in 2008, just shy of the 2.75 million decline at the end of World War II. The unemployment rate climbed more than economists forecast, to 7.2 percent in December, the highest level in almost 16 years. Today’s figures will intensify pressure on U.S. lawmakers to act quickly on Obama’s recovery program, which may exceed $775 billion and aims to save or create 3 million jobs. They also underscore the urgency of the Federal Reserve’s $200 billion initiative to restart consumer financing markets that’s scheduled to begin next month. - - - Thank you for your leadership on these economic issues, President Bush. Now if we could get the Feds from stop over spending and there would be money for the economy to grow on, we could get out of this mess. I don't think that is the way out. We need massive infusion of capital to get the economy moving, and corporate America ain't spending it. |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Payrolls Post Biggest Annual Decline Since 1945
"Calif Bill" wrote in message m... Now if we could get the Feds from stop over spending and there would be money for the economy to grow on, we could get out of this mess. The problem is that nobody knows for sure how to fix this. They are using a shot gun approach, hoping they hit something. I am totally convinced that the current panic reaction is going to do nothing but further cause more problems. It's time for people to stop being so idealistic and become realistic. Eisboch |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Payrolls Post Biggest Annual Decline Since 1945
"hk" wrote in message m... I don't think that is the way out. We need massive infusion of capital to get the economy moving, and corporate America ain't spending it. Why should they? All they will do is become penalized via taxes. Eisboch |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Payrolls Post Biggest Annual Decline Since 1945
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message m... I don't think that is the way out. We need massive infusion of capital to get the economy moving, and corporate America ain't spending it. Why should they? All they will do is become penalized via taxes. Eisboch Well, then, let them liquidate themselves so others who want to run a business can fill the voids. |
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Payrolls Post Biggest Annual Decline Since 1945
"hk" wrote in message m... Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message m... I don't think that is the way out. We need massive infusion of capital to get the economy moving, and corporate America ain't spending it. Why should they? All they will do is become penalized via taxes. Eisboch Well, then, let them liquidate themselves so others who want to run a business can fill the voids. You have to be kidding. Businesses survive, employ people, provide health plans, and grow because they can make a profit. Take that incentive away and you get what we have now. Eisboch |
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Payrolls Post Biggest Annual Decline Since 1945
"Calif Bill" wrote in message m... "hk" wrote in message m... U.S. Economy: Payrolls Post Biggest Annual Decline Since 1945 By Shobhana Chandra Jan. 9 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. lost more jobs in 2008 than in any year since 1945 as employers fired another 524,000 people in December, indicating a free-fall in the economy just days before President-elect Barack Obama takes office. "Consumers are now going to get more and more scared at the prospect of losing their job," said Nariman Behravesh, chief economist at IHS Global Insight in Lexington, Massachusetts. Obama's proposed fiscal stimulus "needs to be big, needs to be bold, needs to be swift. If they can do something quickly we can limit the hemorrhage by mid-year." The Labor Department reported that the nation lost 2.589 million jobs in 2008, just shy of the 2.75 million decline at the end of World War II. The unemployment rate climbed more than economists forecast, to 7.2 percent in December, the highest level in almost 16 years. Today's figures will intensify pressure on U.S. lawmakers to act quickly on Obama's recovery program, which may exceed $775 billion and aims to save or create 3 million jobs. They also underscore the urgency of the Federal Reserve's $200 billion initiative to restart consumer financing markets that's scheduled to begin next month. - - - Thank you for your leadership on these economic issues, President Bush. Now if we could get the Feds from stop over spending and there would be money for the economy to grow on, we could get out of this mess. Mess?? You Californians better start paying your taxes before Arnold sells off the lot of you. |
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Payrolls Post Biggest Annual Decline Since 1945
"hk" wrote in message m... Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message m... I don't think that is the way out. We need massive infusion of capital to get the economy moving, and corporate America ain't spending it. Why should they? All they will do is become penalized via taxes. Eisboch Well, then, let them liquidate themselves so others who want to run a business can fill the voids. BTW, I just found out about 30 min. ago that the company I started just won a major contract for technology that I can't identify just yet. They are hiring. And their achievement has absolutely nothing to do with proposed economic salvation plans proposed by the incoming administration. Eisboch |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sharp decline in Bruswick Stock | General | |||
Article on the decline of river fishing | UK Paddle | |||
Decline! | ASA | |||
Bush on the decline | ASA |