wrote in message
...
On Jan 21, 9:31 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 21, 9:16 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:





wrote in message

...
On Jan 21, 9:10 am, John H wrote:

On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:00:04 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
The stock market had its worst inauguration day in history as the
market gave its verdict of Obama's probable policies. Looks like
"hope n change" is something that you find on the bottom of your
shoe.

You don't reach much, eh? Why is that? Did your parents beat you if
they
caught you with books or newspapers? Do you still speak to your
lunatic
parents?

Have you noticed a liberal tendency to stoop to name-calling and
personal
insults? Does it enhance your self-esteem? Does it make your
'argument'
more persuasive?

And, you've got to insult parents also? Does that make you feel *very*
good
about yourself?
--
John H

*A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick
boxing. *

It's all he really has, have you not been paying attention. Seems some
sort of game to him, like a bad movie that really has no ending... You
know, Spielberg with a hangover....

============

Are you agreeing with Frogwatch when he attempts to connect Obama with
the
stock market's performance yesterday? You might be right, but I just
need
to
know.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Show me where I said that? Do it while picking your nose and lighting
a fart with a flint!

=============

I'm wondering whether you can focus on the issue at hand here. Frogwatch
did
not read yesterday's news, so he's making a claim which is clearly silly.
It's like saying I ran out of milk yesterday because of the inauguration.

So, do you agree with him? Or are you not interested in discussing the
actual issue?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I have found over the years "discussion" with you is somewhat futile.
You never pin down your own opinion, only send folks down a twisted
road of deflective questions that eventually lead to insults and
ridicule. Sorry, I was just warning Frogwatch. No one really wants to
waste their time on a road to nowhere...

=============

These discussions wouldn't be futile if you'd either discuss the issue at
hand, or stay out of the way. Let's see if we can do better, starting right
now.

Do you agree with Frogwatch's theory, connecting Obama to the market drop?

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Jan 21, 9:16 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 21, 9:10 am, John H wrote:





On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:00:04 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
The stock market had its worst inauguration day in history as the
market gave its verdict of Obama's probable policies. Looks like
"hope n change" is something that you find on the bottom of your
shoe.
You don't reach much, eh? Why is that? Did your parents beat you if
they
caught you with books or newspapers? Do you still speak to your lunatic
parents?
Have you noticed a liberal tendency to stoop to name-calling and
personal
insults? Does it enhance your self-esteem? Does it make your 'argument'
more persuasive?
And, you've got to insult parents also? Does that make you feel *very*
good
about yourself?
--
John H
*A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick
boxing. *
It's all he really has, have you not been paying attention. Seems some
sort of game to him, like a bad movie that really has no ending... You
know, Spielberg with a hangover....

============

Are you agreeing with Frogwatch when he attempts to connect Obama with the
stock market's performance yesterday? You might be right, but I just need
to
know.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Show me where I said that? Do it while picking your nose and lighting
a fart with a flint!

=============

I'm wondering whether you can focus on the issue at hand here. Frogwatch did
not read yesterday's news, so he's making a claim which is clearly silly.
It's like saying I ran out of milk yesterday because of the inauguration.

So, do you agree with him? Or are you not interested in discussing the
actual issue?




You think you are going to have a *discussion* with an uneducated,
ignorant clod who suggests "Do it while picking your nose and lighting a
fart with a flint!" and who gets shoved down the stairs at his local
police station for mouthing off to the cops?

On Jan 21, 9:48*am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 21, 9:31 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:





wrote in message

....
On Jan 21, 9:16 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:

wrote in message

....
On Jan 21, 9:10 am, John H wrote:

On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:00:04 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
The stock market had its worst inauguration day in history as the
market gave its verdict of Obama's probable policies. Looks like
"hope n change" is something that you find on the bottom of your
shoe.

You don't reach much, eh? Why is that? Did your parents beat you if
they
caught you with books or newspapers? Do you still speak to your
lunatic
parents?

Have you noticed a liberal tendency to stoop to name-calling and
personal
insults? Does it enhance your self-esteem? Does it make your
'argument'
more persuasive?

And, you've got to insult parents also? Does that make you feel *very*
good
about yourself?
--
John H

*A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick
boxing. *

It's all he really has, have you not been paying attention. Seems some
sort of game to him, like a bad movie that really has no ending... You
know, Spielberg with a hangover....

============

Are you agreeing with Frogwatch when he attempts to connect Obama with
the
stock market's performance yesterday? You might be right, but I just
need
to
know.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Show me where I said that? Do it while picking your nose and lighting
a fart with a flint!

=============

I'm wondering whether you can focus on the issue at hand here. Frogwatch
did
not read yesterday's news, so he's making a claim which is clearly silly.
It's like saying I ran out of milk yesterday because of the inauguration.

Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
wrote:


Kind of like the anti-Bush demonstrations?


Bush got off easy with a few boos. He should have been tarred and
feathered, murderous, lying, stupid piece of crap president that he was.

But Cheney...a special place in hell is reserved for Cheney.


You really need to get off the Olbermann/Maddow kick. They are bad for
your mental health and certainly don't represent main stream America.

Even Joe Scarborough came close this morning to calling Olbermann out.
He didn't mention him by name, but referenced one of his "network
colleagues" while discussing some of the radial left dimensions of the
modern news media. There was no question who he was talking about.
Olbermann is allowed to be the jackass that he is on his "Countdown"
show, but he's supposed to be non-partisan when anchoring live events
like the inauguration. He couldn't help himself though, and stepped
over the line several times.

Eisboch


My feelings about Bush and Cheney were expressed here long before either
Keith or Rachel became commentator-hosts on MSNBC. The other day I
stated I did not want to see Bush prosecuted, but that I did want to see
Cheney on trial. Cheney is smart and knew what he was doing.

On Jan 21, 12:23*pm, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...

You think you are going to have a *discussion* with an uneducated,
ignorant clod who suggests "Do it while picking your nose and lighting
a fart with a flint!" and who gets shoved down the stairs at his local
police station for mouthing off to the cops?

You get a "Whhhhhooooooosse" * for that one.

It's about the same but funnier than the terms and conditions for
responses imposed by Doug.

Eisboch

Whooooooosh indeed.

Did you see the post in which JustHate made that nose-picking
suggestion? Or the posts in which he described being pushed down the
stairs at the local cop shop?

JustHate is about as uneducated and ignorant as they come, a fool who
actually believes *all* the right-wing propaganda he can find.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Tell us what you know about his education. While your at it, have any
grand stories about the galas and balls that you went to in DC
yesterday? Have any pictures?

On Jan 21, 12:17*pm, HK wrote:
wrote:

Kind of like the anti-Bush demonstrations?

Bush got off easy with a few boos. He should have been tarred and
feathered, murderous, lying, stupid piece of crap president that he was.

But Cheney...a special place in hell is reserved for Cheney.

If a soldier dies today on Obama's watch, will he be deemed
"murderous"?

HK wrote:
The other day I
stated I did not want to see Bush prosecuted, but that I did want to see
Cheney on trial. Cheney is smart and knew what he was doing.

Do you honestly believe anyone cares what your opinion is?

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:24:27 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:10:58 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
m...
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:04:52 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
news:6phen4l4onpf95bcquf79tt0m2sg40v752@4ax. com...
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:30:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
Have you noticed a liberal tendency to stoop to name-calling and
personal
insults? Does it enhance your self-esteem? Does it make your
'argument'
more persuasive?

That was the issue at hand. Did you skip over it?
--
John H


Not any more.


Where's your courage?
--
John H


The subject is now State Street Bank.


I expect if I were in your shoes, I'd try to jump over those puddles
also.

At least you seem to have slowed the insults and name-calling, so maybe
you
got the message.

BTW, Iranian students don't seem to be too happy with Obama.

http://www.isna.ir/ISNA/PicView.aspx...75042-2&Lang=P

John H


Sadly, the picture makes no sense, and was probably staged by their
government.


I hope not. I hope it was just students. If it's the government already,
they're not giving Obama much of a chance.

Here's another.

http://www.isna.ir/ISNA/PicView.aspx...75042-1&Lang=P


Why would you hope "it was just students" when reality, as reported by
reputable sources, indicates that students would actually support a leader
who didn't wave his dick at their country like his predecessor?

On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:24:27 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:10:58 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:04:52 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
om...
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:30:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
Have you noticed a liberal tendency to stoop to name-calling and
personal
insults? Does it enhance your self-esteem? Does it make your
'argument'
more persuasive?

That was the issue at hand. Did you skip over it?
--
John H


Not any more.


Where's your courage?
--
John H


The subject is now State Street Bank.


I expect if I were in your shoes, I'd try to jump over those puddles also.

At least you seem to have slowed the insults and name-calling, so maybe
you
got the message.

BTW, Iranian students don't seem to be too happy with Obama.

http://www.isna.ir/ISNA/PicView.aspx...75042-2&Lang=P

John H


Sadly, the picture makes no sense, and was probably staged by their
government.


I hope not. I hope it was just students. If it's the government already,
they're not giving Obama much of a chance.

Here's another.

http://www.isna.ir/ISNA/PicView.aspx...75042-1&Lang=P

Gotta go play golf. Sun's out. Temp's a cool 29F. Wind's are down. Gonna be
fun!
--
John H

*Don't take life too seriously; no one gets out alive. *

On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:01:50 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Jan 21, 12:17*pm, HK wrote:
wrote:

Kind of like the anti-Bush demonstrations?

Bush got off easy with a few boos. He should have been tarred and
feathered, murderous, lying, stupid piece of crap president that he was.

But Cheney...a special place in hell is reserved for Cheney.

If a soldier dies today on Obama's watch, will he be deemed
"murderous"?

He would have to be, would he not? Well, that's not fair. Give him two
weeks to get the troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan. After that any deaths
should earn him the same labels Bush got.

It's for damn sure the deaths of any civilians in Iraq or Afghanistan will
be on Obama's head.
--
John H

*Don't take life too seriously; no one gets out alive. *