That must be some deep sticky steaming hopeandchange sucking the
market down. Dontcha love that obamanomics.

On Jan 23, 12:59*pm, wrote:
On Jan 23, 12:54*pm, wrote:

http://crooksandliars.com/node/24348

One statement in this report:
While the NEBR determined the George W. Bush's first recession
actually began in March 2001, the history of U.S. GDP shows that the
traditional definition of recession - two straight quarters of GDP
decline - was never met during either the last year of the Clinton
presidency or the first of Bush's tenu

That is just more of what *is* is... While the definition of recession
might not have been met until March, but the downturn started well
before that...

Nope. Has nothing to do with what is is. The stock market flucuates on
a daily, weekly monthly, yearly basis. That is not a recession. A
recession IS a recession.

On Jan 23, 1:01*pm, wrote:
On Jan 23, 12:56*pm, wrote:





On Jan 23, 12:36*pm, Frogwatch wrote:

On Jan 23, 12:15 pm, wrote:

On Jan 23, 12:01 pm, jps wrote:

On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:48:20 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Jan 23, 11:45 am, wrote:
On Jan 23, 10:54 am, Frogwatch wrote:

That must be some deep sticky steaming hopeandchange sucking the
market down. *Dontcha love that obamanomics.

I don't know if you remember or not, but just last week there was a
different president. The stock market is in the shape it's in because
of what happened on HIS watch.

Why such a different standard from Repub to Dem, as from Dem to Repub?
Bush inherited a Clinton recession caused by the bust of an over
inflated stock market and everyone put it on Bush, what's different
now?

And what did he do? *Tax cuts for the rich!!! *Our economy was
strengthened and *soared!

Tax cuts for the rich! Tax cuts for the rich!!! *Hey, I got one too,
and I am not rich... And Markets were fine until Pelosi and Reid sold
us out to Fannie and Freddie.. Remember Bank of Americas ads "Bank of
opportunity"? I complained back then that is was a deliberate tactic
to get money and give loans to illegals,, every one laughed....
Hrummph...

Not.

What did he do when we got hit? *He invaded Afghanistan, the same
country that cost the USSR its existence and then mounted the biggest
fiasco war in history.

Instead of investing in our future, we invested in weapons, bullets,
fuel and wasted Americans lives.

Republicans love to get elected but haven't a clue about governing.

You can't do a good job for an organization that you hate.

More unsubstantiated blather from a blind ideologue.. Go back to NPR
and the Huffington Hoax...

That's the difference.

My sister at NPR got laid off. *You haveta be sympathetic although in
the back of yer mind you think, "its gonna be a larnin 'sperience for
an arrogant lib". *It will be an introduction to how all non-
government types live.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

At least the liberals will learn. Seems as though most conservatives
are still convinced Bush did a GRAND job!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Quite the opposite.. Most Repubs, and Liberatarians such as myself
that I actually know and talk to are quite dissappointed with Bush in
a lot of areas. The big difference is we are not afraid to admit it..- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Then why are you so dead set against a man that has had two days to
prove himself? You and others were deeming him a complete failure
before he ever even got into office.

On Jan 23, 12:58*pm, wrote:


One statement in this report:
While the NEBR determined the George W. Bush's first recession
actually began in March 2001, the history of U.S. GDP shows that the
traditional definition of recession - two straight quarters of GDP
decline - was never met during either the last year of the Clinton
presidency or the first of Bush's tenu

Why not take a look at the worth of stock at the beginning of the Bush
admin, then at the start of the Pelosi and Reid control of congress,
*then* at the end of the Bush administration.

Question reposted..