wrote:

On Jan 27, 7:29Â*am, Darrell Stec wrote:
Cliff wrote:
According to The Book of Revelations the anti-Christ is

Matt knows know of what he writes. Â*There is no book of RevelationS. Â*Nor
does the Book of Revelation of John mention any antichrist. Â*Antichrists
appear ONLY in the epistles of John who was NOT the author of the Book of
Revelation of John. Â*Those works were written approximately 100 years
apart. Â*And furthermore the antichrists were not some boggeyman of the
future but rather other Christians who were living at the time of the
author of the epistles of John and who help different beliefs than he
did. Some Christian sects did not believe in the divinity of Joshua and
most especially did not believe in any Trinity. Â*That idea did not take
effect until Constantine started killing those Christians who believed
other than his new orthodoxy.

In fact, just about every sentence in Matt's diatribe is wrong. Â*But I've
commented on it before and won't belabor the point. Â*It's too much like
arguing with a pig.

--
Later,
Darrell


http://www.mysticalinternet.com/gema...hian&word=bush


http://www.mysticalinternet.com/gema...ian&word=obama

And you posted those links to that nonsense why? You might just as well
have posted links to L. Ron Hubbard's science fiction. What does it have
to do with Matt's baloney?


--
Later,
Darrell

On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:10:26 -0500, Who is John Galt "Men of The
wrote:

kurgan wrote:
On Jan 24, 5:23 pm, Garlicdude wrote:
Carla Fong wrote:

HK wrote:
Cliff wrote:
http://content.usatoday.com/communit.../01/61847002/1
"President Obama told the Republican lawmakers that "you can't just
listen to
Rush Limbaugh and get things done.""
To paraphrase Mark Twain: Never pick a fight with someone who has 20 million
listeners



He's not relevant. His 'base' are not swing voters. They'll vote
Republican no matter what.

The Obama comment was aimed at the moderates.

You may be able to say that they will *NOT* vote Liberal, but as we saw
with Ross Perot "At one point in June, Perot led the polls with 39%
(versus 31% for Bush and 25% for Clinton). " They may vote in other
directions.

There are far more conservatives than Moderates in the Republican
Party...which btw..is no longer considered to be Conservative by its
members.

They are in the midst of an identity crisis. The GOP has to go back to
its conservative grass roots, or lose most of its membership

The future of the GOP is decidely interesting

On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:49:24 -0800, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
Gunner Asch got double secret probation
for writing:

On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:10:26 -0500, Who is John Galt "Men of The
wrote:

kurgan wrote:
On Jan 24, 5:23 pm, Garlicdude wrote:
Carla Fong wrote:

HK wrote:
Cliff wrote:
http://content.usatoday.com/communit.../01/61847002/1
"President Obama told the Republican lawmakers that "you can't just
listen to
Rush Limbaugh and get things done.""
To paraphrase Mark Twain: Never pick a fight with someone who has 20 million
listeners



He's not relevant. His 'base' are not swing voters. They'll vote
Republican no matter what.

The Obama comment was aimed at the moderates.

You may be able to say that they will *NOT* vote Liberal, but as we saw
with Ross Perot "At one point in June, Perot led the polls with 39%
(versus 31% for Bush and 25% for Clinton). " They may vote in other
directions.

There are far more conservatives than Moderates in the Republican
Party...which btw..is no longer considered to be Conservative by its
members.

They are in the midst of an identity crisis. The GOP has to go back to
its conservative grass roots, or lose most of its membership

The future of the GOP is decidely interesting

It is decidedly terminal. They cannot appease the middle. Therefore
they can only play to the *base* (ignorant southern rednecks and
****wits like Gummy). Therefore the policies they espouse will
continue to marginalize a restrict their *base* because the same
policies disaffect the majority of americans. So, as they continue to
play to their *base* their *base* will continue to contract.

So much for Rove and the permanent republican majority. 8 years and
the electorate woke up, boggled and realized they had voted for a
bunch of morons that had screwed them.

Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:10:26 -0500, Who is John Galt "Men of The
wrote:

kurgan wrote:
On Jan 24, 5:23 pm, Garlicdude wrote:
Carla Fong wrote:

HK wrote:
Cliff wrote:
http://content.usatoday.com/communit.../01/61847002/1
"President Obama told the Republican lawmakers that "you can't just
listen to
Rush Limbaugh and get things done.""
To paraphrase Mark Twain: Never pick a fight with someone who has 20 million
listeners


He's not relevant. His 'base' are not swing voters. They'll vote
Republican no matter what.

The Obama comment was aimed at the moderates.
You may be able to say that they will *NOT* vote Liberal, but as we saw
with Ross Perot "At one point in June, Perot led the polls with 39%
(versus 31% for Bush and 25% for Clinton). " They may vote in other
directions.

There are far more conservatives than Moderates in the Republican
Party...which btw..is no longer considered to be Conservative by its
members.

They are in the midst of an identity crisis. The GOP has to go back to
its conservative grass roots, or lose most of its membership


Lose members to who?

The future of the GOP is decidely interesting

with the new RNC chairman Michael Steal, it's already interesting.

On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:12:29 -0500, "Who i$ John Galt" "Men of The
wrote:

Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:10:26 -0500, Who is John Galt "Men of The
wrote:

kurgan wrote:
On Jan 24, 5:23 pm, Garlicdude wrote:
Carla Fong wrote:

HK wrote:
Cliff wrote:
http://content.usatoday.com/communit.../01/61847002/1
"President Obama told the Republican lawmakers that "you can't just
listen to
Rush Limbaugh and get things done.""
To paraphrase Mark Twain: Never pick a fight with someone who has 20 million
listeners


He's not relevant. His 'base' are not swing voters. They'll vote
Republican no matter what.

The Obama comment was aimed at the moderates.
You may be able to say that they will *NOT* vote Liberal, but as we saw
with Ross Perot "At one point in June, Perot led the polls with 39%
(versus 31% for Bush and 25% for Clinton). " They may vote in other
directions.

There are far more conservatives than Moderates in the Republican
Party...which btw..is no longer considered to be Conservative by its
members.

They are in the midst of an identity crisis. The GOP has to go back to
its conservative grass roots, or lose most of its membership


Lose members to who?

There are other parties out there. Most are Christian based, which I
cannot get behind...but if the GOP doesnt get off the pot...they need to
remember they were originally the Whigs...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whig_Party_(United_States)


Perhaps a revival of the Whig Party?

http://modernwhig.org/



The future of the GOP is decidely interesting

with the new RNC chairman Michael Steal, it's already interesting.