Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tim" wrote in message ... Thanks guys. I'm not blinded to the fact that it can't happen,but i suppose thats from leading a sheltered life of fresh-water trailer boating..... ?;^ ) Fresh water boating and salt water boating are two different animals, that's for sure. Also, boats that stay in the water (at a slip or mooring) for the entire season or year-round, particularly in salt water, lead a rough life compared to a trailered boat that is hauled and kept "dry" most of the time. Eisboch |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:54:31 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote: Remember the old Century with the rotted out engine plug that was ****ing water out the side of the engine? For those people not familiar with this story, it wasn't a "freeze" plug. It was a heavy, threaded plug in the side wall of the raw water cooled (GM) 350 engine that rotted away over time. I noticed it after starting the engine and saw a healthy stream of water coming out of the side of the engine. I also had that happen to the 350 in my old runabout. It was right underneath the exhaust manifold on the port side and a real bear to replace. |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:54:31 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: Remember the old Century with the rotted out engine plug that was ****ing water out the side of the engine? For those people not familiar with this story, it wasn't a "freeze" plug. It was a heavy, threaded plug in the side wall of the raw water cooled (GM) 350 engine that rotted away over time. I noticed it after starting the engine and saw a healthy stream of water coming out of the side of the engine. I also had that happen to the 350 in my old runabout. It was right underneath the exhaust manifold on the port side and a real bear to replace. That's the one. In my case it was temporarily fixed with some Marine Tex to get through the remaining boating season and then the plug was replaced after hauling. The Century's engine access was horrible and the plug was virtually impossible to replace without removing the manifold. Eisboch |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:54:31 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote: "jim78565" wrote in message ... Tim wrote: Dave, I was wondering abou that myself. I've never known of anybody having an oil pan rust though like what Richard is describing. besides, if it was THAT bad, then the bildge would already be filed with oil, I would think. I'm wondering if the gasket[s] or main seals are leaking instead? Salt water takes it's toll. This is not uncommon to have a pan rusted out. He's lucky to have caught it before it leaked. The corners of the sump and near the drain plug are usually the problem areas because they are the lowest and wettest parts of the pan. I've heard the same thing and have been told that you need to be particularly careful not to scratch the paint on the pans with wrenches or when pulling the engine for any repairs. As you know, I've had a bunch of older boats in the past, but this is the first time I've had to deal with this issue. I *do* know that replacement marine oil pans are available in aluminum specifically made to avoid rusting. Remember the old Century with the rotted out engine plug that was ****ing water out the side of the engine? For those people not familiar with this story, it wasn't a "freeze" plug. It was a heavy, threaded plug in the side wall of the raw water cooled (GM) 350 engine that rotted away over time. I noticed it after starting the engine and saw a healthy stream of water coming out of the side of the engine. I've had older cars that got pinhole leaks in the gas tank, but never in the oil pan (that I know of). They have made a zillion gas tanks from Terne plate, lead coated steel. Very rust resistant, although not perfect. Casady |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:11:38 -0500, Dave Brown
wrote: Eisboch wrote: Ran into a potential problem with the boat sale. The buyer's surveyor discovered that the oil pans on the engines were in bad shape and need to be replaced. I never noticed (although I never really personally inspected them having owned the boat for less than a year) and the surveyor I had when I bought it missed them completely. Just for my own further education, how did he determine they were not longer fit for service? Has the boat seen salt water? I have only ever had to replace one oil pan in 33 years working on boats (and it was cracked) so this is very interesting to me. |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:59:37 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: Thanks guys. I'm not blinded to the fact that it can't happen,but i suppose thats from leading a sheltered life of fresh-water trailer boating..... Can I get an OooRah for outboards over inboards in salt water ? ;-) I never liked that much hardware in a place I couldn't get to. I agree, but outboards aren't really practical on a 40 foot cruiser. Eisboch |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:56:31 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: Can I get an OooRah for outboards over inboards in salt water ? ;-) I never liked that much hardware in a place I couldn't get to. I agree, but outboards aren't really practical on a 40 foot cruiser. Eisboch I keep forgetting you guys are not really "boaters" you are "yachtsmen" ;-) On the other hand when I see these guys with three 275s on the back, I wonder why you couldn't have outboards. $$$$$$$$ Three 275hp outboards are mighty expensive, compared to two 454ci inboards. Plus, handling becomes a significant issue. Outboards would radically change the pivot point (or whatever you call it) on a larger boat, I would think. I've watched boats as large as a 36' with outboards (four, big Mercs) maneuver into a slip. It appears much easier to do with inboards where you have two props located further forward. I don't know for a fact, because I've never tried it, but it appears to be more difficult with outboards from watching. BTW, a forty footer is hardly a yacht. I used to think the Navigator we had was a big boat at 52'8" LOA until I took it to Florida. Down there it was a peanut. Eisboch |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:00:54 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: BTW, a forty footer is hardly a yacht. I used to think the Navigator we had was a big boat at 52'8" LOA until I took it to Florida. Down there it was a peanut. Yup, when you take a little cruise down the New River in Ftc Lauderdale you get a hint how the rich people live and that still isn't Palm Beach. I am still chugging around in "The Butt Ugly" and pretty happy with my 1 GPH even if gas is half price now. As Wayne can tell you, I am not getting a 40 footer down my canal. I often think now that we should have kept the Grand Banks. It was slow, but relaxing. The only time I felt any anxiousness was transiting the Cape Cod Canal at the wrong time (meaning against a 5-6 kt current). The speed drop off wasn't a big issue, but the way the current swirls through certain sections it makes the bow want to fall off one way or the other. I suspect if it happened it could be tough trying to come around again. My other fear was going through *with* the current and having them lower the railroad bridge you go under as you approached it. If too close, the procedure would be to turn around (against the current) and throttle up hoping to keep you in place and not up against the bridge. At only 120hp and a single screw, it didn't have much power. Eisboch |
#20
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message m... Eisboch wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Apr 16, 6:34 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "Jim22208" wrote in message news ![]() Horsepower limited by width of transom. Example http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=24euqu9&s=5 If that's for real, it's insane. I have to check that out closely for PhotoShop evidence. Eisboch It's real, Richard. There was discussion on here some time ago about it. ------------------------------------------ I don't know. I'll buy the four center engines. I don't see any obvious umbilical cables running to the four outboard engines. Eisboch Looks to me like the outboard engines (the ones closest to the gunnels) are mounted 10-12" higher than the four engines in the center. Not likely. I've seen quad setups like that. The two center engines are mounted lower than the two outboard engines. There's a 36' Yellowfin CC down at the marina with quad Mercs on it set up as described. Eisboch Yes, of course, typically 25" and 30" engines. That's 5". |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
DIY Survey questions when buying a used boat. | Cruising | |||
On Topic: The pain of boat survey... | General | |||
Boat insurance without a survey? | General | |||
Survey - why did you buy a recreational boat? | General | |||
Recommendations for Boat Survey | General |