HK wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"Spender" wrote in message
ews.com...
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:51:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
m...
After you figure that part out, please tell us how someone born in
a U.S.
hospital is here "illegally," since that someone is immediately a U.S.
citizen.
Really dumb****. The court has actually never ruled on the Anchor
Babies.
The 14th when it went in force did not include some people born in
the USA.
Did not include indians born on reservations. Maybe you should do a
little
reading on the subject.
The court has never ruled on it, so the law stands as it reads. Anyone
born in the U.S. is a U.S. citizen.

If *you* would do a little reading you would discover that indian
reservations are not technically part of the U.S. They are in essence
considered to be sovereign territory.


True, but people born on a reservation are considered US Citizens now.
Rules change as interpretations change. Why I said the court has not
ruled on the anchor babies, but they could very well declare them non
citizens. The law does not stand as it reads. As the court has not
really said what it reads.



Even the right-wing court we now have is not going down that road,
bilious. Sorry, the days of white boy rule are over.

Good old Chameleon Krause, able to change color at will. What do you
call people that hate whites? Is racist still appropriate?

On Apr 17, 6:30*am, jim78565 wrote:
HK wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"Spender" wrote in message
ynews.com...
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:51:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
news:r46dnasdhsYNKHrUnZ2dnUVZ_gNi4p2d@earthlin k.com...
After you figure that part out, please tell us how someone born in
a U.S.
hospital is here "illegally," since that someone is immediately a U..S.
citizen.
Really dumb****. *The court has actually never ruled on the Anchor
Babies.
The 14th when it went in force did not include some people born in
the USA.
Did not include indians born on reservations. *Maybe you should do a
little
reading on the subject.
The court has never ruled on it, so the law stands as it reads. Anyone
born in the U.S. is a U.S. citizen.

If *you* would do a little reading you would discover that indian
reservations are not technically part of the U.S. They are in essence
considered to be sovereign territory.

True, but people born on a reservation are considered US Citizens now.
Rules change as interpretations change. *Why I said the court has not
ruled on the anchor babies, but they could very well declare them non
citizens. The law does not stand as it reads. *As the court has not
really said what it reads.

Even the right-wing court we now have is not going down that road,
bilious. Sorry, the days of white boy rule are over.

Good old Chameleon Krause, able to change color at will. What do you
call people that hate whites? Is racist still appropriate?

Old weird harold is lily white. Wonder what the Dr Dr wife would tell
him about self-hate?

He's a racist and a bigot. Represents the lefties well.

wrote:
On Apr 17, 6:30 am, jim78565 wrote:
HK wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"Spender" wrote in message
ews.com...
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:51:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
m...
After you figure that part out, please tell us how someone born in
a U.S.
hospital is here "illegally," since that someone is immediately a U.S.
citizen.
Really dumb****. The court has actually never ruled on the Anchor
Babies.
The 14th when it went in force did not include some people born in
the USA.
Did not include indians born on reservations. Maybe you should do a
little
reading on the subject.
The court has never ruled on it, so the law stands as it reads. Anyone
born in the U.S. is a U.S. citizen.
If *you* would do a little reading you would discover that indian
reservations are not technically part of the U.S. They are in essence
considered to be sovereign territory.
True, but people born on a reservation are considered US Citizens now.
Rules change as interpretations change. Why I said the court has not
ruled on the anchor babies, but they could very well declare them non
citizens. The law does not stand as it reads. As the court has not
really said what it reads.
Even the right-wing court we now have is not going down that road,
bilious. Sorry, the days of white boy rule are over.
Good old Chameleon Krause, able to change color at will. What do you
call people that hate whites? Is racist still appropriate?

Old weird harold is lily white. Wonder what the Dr Dr wife would tell
him about self-hate?

He's a racist and a bigot. Represents the lefties well.

My dislike for single-race rule makes me a racist...yeah...that's the
ticket. Of course, right-wing racist trash like you, floridajim, and a
few others here have been horrified since passage of the Voting Rights Act.

On Apr 17, 7:53*am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Apr 17, 6:30 am, jim78565 wrote:
HK wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"Spender" wrote in message
asynews.com...
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:51:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
news:r46dnasdhsYNKHrUnZ2dnUVZ_gNi4p2d@earthl ink.com...
After you figure that part out, please tell us how someone born in
a U.S.
hospital is here "illegally," since that someone is immediately a U.S.
citizen.
Really dumb****. *The court has actually never ruled on the Anchor
Babies.
The 14th when it went in force did not include some people born in
the USA.
Did not include indians born on reservations. *Maybe you should do a
little
reading on the subject.
The court has never ruled on it, so the law stands as it reads. Anyone
born in the U.S. is a U.S. citizen.
If *you* would do a little reading you would discover that indian
reservations are not technically part of the U.S. They are in essence
considered to be sovereign territory.
True, but people born on a reservation are considered US Citizens now.
Rules change as interpretations change. *Why I said the court has not
ruled on the anchor babies, but they could very well declare them non
citizens. The law does not stand as it reads. *As the court has not
really said what it reads.
Even the right-wing court we now have is not going down that road,
bilious. Sorry, the days of white boy rule are over.
Good old Chameleon Krause, able to change color at will. What do you
call people that hate whites? Is racist still appropriate?

Old weird harold is lily white. *Wonder what the Dr Dr wife would tell
him about self-hate?

He's a racist and a bigot. *Represents the lefties well.

My dislike for single-race rule makes me a racist...yeah...that's the
ticket. Of course, right-wing racist trash like you, floridajim, and a
few others here have been horrified since passage of the Voting Rights Act.

wrote:
On Apr 17, 7:53 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Apr 17, 6:30 am, jim78565 wrote:
HK wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"Spender" wrote in message
ews.com...
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:51:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
m...
After you figure that part out, please tell us how someone born in
a U.S.
hospital is here "illegally," since that someone is immediately a U.S.
citizen.
Really dumb****. The court has actually never ruled on the Anchor
Babies.
The 14th when it went in force did not include some people born in
the USA.
Did not include indians born on reservations. Maybe you should do a
little
reading on the subject.
The court has never ruled on it, so the law stands as it reads. Anyone
born in the U.S. is a U.S. citizen.
If *you* would do a little reading you would discover that indian
reservations are not technically part of the U.S. They are in essence
considered to be sovereign territory.
True, but people born on a reservation are considered US Citizens now.
Rules change as interpretations change. Why I said the court has not
ruled on the anchor babies, but they could very well declare them non
citizens. The law does not stand as it reads. As the court has not
really said what it reads.
Even the right-wing court we now have is not going down that road,
bilious. Sorry, the days of white boy rule are over.
Good old Chameleon Krause, able to change color at will. What do you
call people that hate whites? Is racist still appropriate?
Old weird harold is lily white. Wonder what the Dr Dr wife would tell
him about self-hate?
He's a racist and a bigot. Represents the lefties well.
My dislike for single-race rule makes me a racist...yeah...that's the
ticket. Of course, right-wing racist trash like you, floridajim, and a
few others here have been horrified since passage of the Voting Rights Act.

The fact that you qualify (or disqualify) people based on the color of
their skin makes you a racist. 'doh.

I'm not qualifying or disqualifying anyone, ****-for-brains, just noting
that the day of white man rule is, thankfully, over.

HK wrote:
wrote:
On Apr 17, 7:53 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Apr 17, 6:30 am, jim78565 wrote:
HK wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"Spender" wrote in message
ews.com...
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:51:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
m...
After you figure that part out, please tell us how someone
born in
a U.S.
hospital is here "illegally," since that someone is
immediately a U.S.
citizen.
Really dumb****. The court has actually never ruled on the Anchor
Babies.
The 14th when it went in force did not include some people born in
the USA.
Did not include indians born on reservations. Maybe you should
do a
little
reading on the subject.
The court has never ruled on it, so the law stands as it reads.
Anyone
born in the U.S. is a U.S. citizen.
If *you* would do a little reading you would discover that indian
reservations are not technically part of the U.S. They are in
essence
considered to be sovereign territory.
True, but people born on a reservation are considered US Citizens
now.
Rules change as interpretations change. Why I said the court has
not
ruled on the anchor babies, but they could very well declare them
non
citizens. The law does not stand as it reads. As the court has not
really said what it reads.
Even the right-wing court we now have is not going down that road,
bilious. Sorry, the days of white boy rule are over.
Good old Chameleon Krause, able to change color at will. What do you
call people that hate whites? Is racist still appropriate?
Old weird harold is lily white. Wonder what the Dr Dr wife would tell
him about self-hate?
He's a racist and a bigot. Represents the lefties well.
My dislike for single-race rule makes me a racist...yeah...that's the
ticket. Of course, right-wing racist trash like you, floridajim, and a
few others here have been horrified since passage of the Voting
Rights Act.

The fact that you qualify (or disqualify) people based on the color of
their skin makes you a racist. 'doh.

I'm not qualifying or disqualifying anyone, ****-for-brains, just noting
that the day of white man rule is, thankfully, over.
wasamatter Krause. Afraid to say "white boy rule" again? I don't blame you.

On Apr 17, 8:35*am, jim78565 wrote:
HK wrote:
wrote:
On Apr 17, 7:53 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Apr 17, 6:30 am, jim78565 wrote:
HK wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"Spender" wrote in message
news:dnvfu494315c7dnova9bur08blq0tt1vpo@new s.easynews.com...
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:51:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
news:r46dnasdhsYNKHrUnZ2dnUVZ_gNi4p2d@ear thlink.com...
After you figure that part out, please tell us how someone
born in
a U.S.
hospital is here "illegally," since that someone is
immediately a U.S.
citizen.
Really dumb****. *The court has actually never ruled on the Anchor
Babies.
The 14th when it went in force did not include some people born in
the USA.
Did not include indians born on reservations. *Maybe you should
do a
little
reading on the subject.
The court has never ruled on it, so the law stands as it reads.
Anyone
born in the U.S. is a U.S. citizen.
If *you* would do a little reading you would discover that indian
reservations are not technically part of the U.S. They are in
essence
considered to be sovereign territory.
True, but people born on a reservation are considered US Citizens
now.
Rules change as interpretations change. *Why I said the court has
not
ruled on the anchor babies, but they could very well declare them
non
citizens. The law does not stand as it reads. *As the court has not
really said what it reads.
Even the right-wing court we now have is not going down that road,
bilious. Sorry, the days of white boy rule are over.
Good old Chameleon Krause, able to change color at will. What do you
call people that hate whites? Is racist still appropriate?
Old weird harold is lily white. *Wonder what the Dr Dr wife would tell
him about self-hate?
He's a racist and a bigot. *Represents the lefties well.
My dislike for single-race rule makes me a racist...yeah...that's the
ticket. Of course, right-wing racist trash like you, floridajim, and a
few others here have been horrified since passage of the Voting
Rights Act.

The fact that you qualify (or disqualify) people based on the color of
their skin makes you a racist. *'doh.

I'm not qualifying or disqualifying anyone, ****-for-brains, just noting
that the day of white man rule is, thankfully, over.

wasamatter Krause. Afraid to say "white boy rule" again? I don't blame you.

Old weird harold is a racist and a bigot. He proves it every day.

wrote:
On Apr 17, 8:35 am, jim78565 wrote:
HK wrote:
wrote:
On Apr 17, 7:53 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Apr 17, 6:30 am, jim78565 wrote:
HK wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"Spender" wrote in message
ews.com...
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:51:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
m...
After you figure that part out, please tell us how someone
born in
a U.S.
hospital is here "illegally," since that someone is
immediately a U.S.
citizen.
Really dumb****. The court has actually never ruled on the Anchor
Babies.
The 14th when it went in force did not include some people born in
the USA.
Did not include indians born on reservations. Maybe you should
do a
little
reading on the subject.
The court has never ruled on it, so the law stands as it reads.
Anyone
born in the U.S. is a U.S. citizen.
If *you* would do a little reading you would discover that indian
reservations are not technically part of the U.S. They are in
essence
considered to be sovereign territory.
True, but people born on a reservation are considered US Citizens
now.
Rules change as interpretations change. Why I said the court has
not
ruled on the anchor babies, but they could very well declare them
non
citizens. The law does not stand as it reads. As the court has not
really said what it reads.
Even the right-wing court we now have is not going down that road,
bilious. Sorry, the days of white boy rule are over.
Good old Chameleon Krause, able to change color at will. What do you
call people that hate whites? Is racist still appropriate?
Old weird harold is lily white. Wonder what the Dr Dr wife would tell
him about self-hate?
He's a racist and a bigot. Represents the lefties well.
My dislike for single-race rule makes me a racist...yeah...that's the
ticket. Of course, right-wing racist trash like you, floridajim, and a
few others here have been horrified since passage of the Voting
Rights Act.
The fact that you qualify (or disqualify) people based on the color of
their skin makes you a racist. 'doh.
I'm not qualifying or disqualifying anyone, ****-for-brains, just noting
that the day of white man rule is, thankfully, over.
wasamatter Krause. Afraid to say "white boy rule" again? I don't blame you.

Old weird harold is a racist and a bigot. He proves it every day.


Yeah, I believe people "of color" should have the same opportunities as
"white boys." That makes me a racist and a bigot.

On Apr 17, 9:57*am, HK wrote:


That makes me a racist and a bigot.

Now you're getting it!

On Apr 17, 9:57*am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Apr 17, 8:35 am, jim78565 wrote:
HK wrote:
wrote:
On Apr 17, 7:53 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Apr 17, 6:30 am, jim78565 wrote:
HK wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"Spender" wrote in message
news:dnvfu494315c7dnova9bur08blq0tt1vpo@n ews.easynews.com...
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:51:47 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
news:r46dnasdhsYNKHrUnZ2dnUVZ_gNi4p2d@e arthlink.com...
After you figure that part out, please tell us how someone
born in
a U.S.
hospital is here "illegally," since that someone is
immediately a U.S.
citizen.
Really dumb****. *The court has actually never ruled on the Anchor
Babies.
The 14th when it went in force did not include some people born in
the USA.
Did not include indians born on reservations. *Maybe you should
do a
little
reading on the subject.
The court has never ruled on it, so the law stands as it reads..
Anyone
born in the U.S. is a U.S. citizen.
If *you* would do a little reading you would discover that indian
reservations are not technically part of the U.S. They are in
essence
considered to be sovereign territory.
True, but people born on a reservation are considered US Citizens
now.
Rules change as interpretations change. *Why I said the court has
not
ruled on the anchor babies, but they could very well declare them
non
citizens. The law does not stand as it reads. *As the court has not
really said what it reads.
Even the right-wing court we now have is not going down that road,
bilious. Sorry, the days of white boy rule are over.
Good old Chameleon Krause, able to change color at will. What do you
call people that hate whites? Is racist still appropriate?
Old weird harold is lily white. *Wonder what the Dr Dr wife would tell
him about self-hate?
He's a racist and a bigot. *Represents the lefties well.
My dislike for single-race rule makes me a racist...yeah...that's the
ticket. Of course, right-wing racist trash like you, floridajim, and a
few others here have been horrified since passage of the Voting
Rights Act.
The fact that you qualify (or disqualify) people based on the color of
their skin makes you a racist. *'doh.
I'm not qualifying or disqualifying anyone, ****-for-brains, just noting
that the day of white man rule is, thankfully, over.
wasamatter Krause. Afraid to say "white boy rule" again? I don't blame you.

Old weird harold is a racist and a bigot. *He proves it every day.

Yeah, I believe people "of color" should have the same opportunities as
"white boys." That makes me a racist and a bigot.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You are a bigot because you're bigoted. For instance
You've never had anything but antipathy for anything and anyone in the
southeast U.S. You are so narrow minded that you think everyone in the
south hasn't evolved with the rest of the world