On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:01:40 -0400, HK wrote:

wrote:
On Apr 17, 1:50 pm, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
Most of the "righty rights" here are as dumb as a doorknob. Loogy is a
lefty; he's also dumb as a doorknob. You're a moderate righty, and I
don't think you have been accused of being dumb.
You would be pleased to know that in another newsgroup that I
infrequently visit I am considered to be very much to the left. And
dumb.
It's all relative.
I admit though, Olbermann personifies the elitist attitude to which I
was referring.
He's not helping unite anybody, that's for sure.
Eisboch
I prefer Rachel. More cerebral than Keith, and she answers emails. But I
do watch Keith once or twice a week.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"More cerebral"? LOL... Just because she toes the party line.. Both
are babbling idiots...


The idea of you discussing cerebral in connection with anything other
than your hemorrhage is ludicrous. Rachel is a very bright young woman.
She was a Rhodes scholar and holds a DPhil from the University of
Oxford. *You* couldn't get a job cleaning toilets there.

I disagree with you there Harry. Freak could get a job cleaning
toilets at Oxford. However, chances are they'd toss him for doing a
****ty job.

jps wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:01:40 -0400, HK wrote:

wrote:
On Apr 17, 1:50 pm, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
Most of the "righty rights" here are as dumb as a doorknob. Loogy is a
lefty; he's also dumb as a doorknob. You're a moderate righty, and I
don't think you have been accused of being dumb.
You would be pleased to know that in another newsgroup that I
infrequently visit I am considered to be very much to the left. And
dumb.
It's all relative.
I admit though, Olbermann personifies the elitist attitude to which I
was referring.
He's not helping unite anybody, that's for sure.
Eisboch
I prefer Rachel. More cerebral than Keith, and she answers emails. But I
do watch Keith once or twice a week.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
"More cerebral"? LOL... Just because she toes the party line.. Both
are babbling idiots...

The idea of you discussing cerebral in connection with anything other
than your hemorrhage is ludicrous. Rachel is a very bright young woman.
She was a Rhodes scholar and holds a DPhil from the University of
Oxford. *You* couldn't get a job cleaning toilets there.

I disagree with you there Harry. Freak could get a job cleaning
toilets at Oxford. However, chances are they'd toss him for doing a
****ty job.


You could be right. But they'd flush him, not toss him.

On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:04:10 -0400, HK wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:01:40 -0400, HK wrote:

wrote:
On Apr 17, 1:50 pm, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
Most of the "righty rights" here are as dumb as a doorknob. Loogy is a
lefty; he's also dumb as a doorknob. You're a moderate righty, and I
don't think you have been accused of being dumb.
You would be pleased to know that in another newsgroup that I
infrequently visit I am considered to be very much to the left. And
dumb.
It's all relative.
I admit though, Olbermann personifies the elitist attitude to which I
was referring.
He's not helping unite anybody, that's for sure.
Eisboch
I prefer Rachel. More cerebral than Keith, and she answers emails. But I
do watch Keith once or twice a week.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
"More cerebral"? LOL... Just because she toes the party line.. Both
are babbling idiots...

The idea of you discussing cerebral in connection with anything other
than your hemorrhage is ludicrous. Rachel is a very bright young woman.
She was a Rhodes scholar and holds a DPhil from the University of
Oxford. *You* couldn't get a job cleaning toilets there.

I disagree with you there Harry. Freak could get a job cleaning
toilets at Oxford. However, chances are they'd toss him for doing a
****ty job.


You could be right. But they'd flush him, not toss him.

Flush the tosser.

jps wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:04:10 -0400, HK wrote:

You could be right. But they'd flush him, not toss him.

Flush the tosser.

You two going to have a baby?

Johnson.

On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:29:32 -0400, Johnson
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:04:10 -0400, HK wrote:

You could be right. But they'd flush him, not toss him.

Flush the tosser.

You two going to have a baby?

Johnson.

Speaking of flushing the tosser...

On Apr 17, 3:56*pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:01:40 -0400, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Apr 17, 1:50 pm, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
Most of the "righty rights" here are as dumb as a doorknob. Loogy is a
lefty; he's also dumb as a doorknob. You're a moderate righty, and I
don't think you have been accused of being dumb.
You would be pleased to know that in another newsgroup that I
infrequently visit *I am considered to be very much to the left. * And
dumb.
It's all relative.
I admit though, *Olbermann personifies the elitist attitude to which I
was referring.
He's not helping unite anybody, that's for sure.
Eisboch
I prefer Rachel. More cerebral than Keith, and she answers emails. But I
do watch Keith once or twice a week.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"More cerebral"? LOL... *Just because she toes the party line.. Both
are babbling idiots...

The idea of you discussing cerebral in connection with anything other
than your hemorrhage is ludicrous. Rachel is a very bright young woman.
She was a Rhodes scholar and holds a DPhil from the University of
Oxford. *You* couldn't get a job cleaning toilets there.

I disagree with you there Harry. *Freak could get a job cleaning
toilets at Oxford. *However, chances are they'd toss him for doing a
****ty job.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Seems you guys have all the qualifications to be considered
"extremists" and of course bigots too...
SNIP
1. CHARACTER ASSASSINATION.
Extremists often attack the character of an opponent rather than deal
with the facts or issues raised. They will question motives,
qualifications, past associations, alleged values, personality, looks,
mental health, and so on as a diversion from the issues under
consideration. Some of these matters are not entirely irrelevant , but
they should not serve to avoid the real issues.
Extremists object strenuously when this is done to them, of course!
/SNIP

You guys are two ****ers in a pot..... pffftttt.. Neither one of you
has the character or intellect to debate anything without name-
calling..

wrote:
On Apr 17, 3:56 pm, jps wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:01:40 -0400, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Apr 17, 1:50 pm, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Most of the "righty rights" here are as dumb as a doorknob. Loogy is a
lefty; he's also dumb as a doorknob. You're a moderate righty, and I
don't think you have been accused of being dumb.
You would be pleased to know that in another newsgroup that I
infrequently visit I am considered to be very much to the left. And
dumb.
It's all relative.
I admit though, Olbermann personifies the elitist attitude to which I
was referring.
He's not helping unite anybody, that's for sure.
Eisboch
I prefer Rachel. More cerebral than Keith, and she answers emails. But I
do watch Keith once or twice a week.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
"More cerebral"? LOL... Just because she toes the party line.. Both
are babbling idiots...
The idea of you discussing cerebral in connection with anything other
than your hemorrhage is ludicrous. Rachel is a very bright young woman.
She was a Rhodes scholar and holds a DPhil from the University of
Oxford. *You* couldn't get a job cleaning toilets there.
I disagree with you there Harry. Freak could get a job cleaning
toilets at Oxford. However, chances are they'd toss him for doing a
****ty job.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Seems you guys have all the qualifications to be considered
"extremists" and of course bigots too...
SNIP
1. CHARACTER ASSASSINATION.
Extremists often attack the character of an opponent rather than deal
with the facts or issues raised. They will question motives,
qualifications, past associations, alleged values, personality, looks,
mental health, and so on as a diversion from the issues under
consideration. Some of these matters are not entirely irrelevant , but
they should not serve to avoid the real issues.
Extremists object strenuously when this is done to them, of course!
/SNIP

You guys are two ****ers in a pot..... pffftttt.. Neither one of you
has the character or intellect to debate anything without name-
calling..


Sure we do. It's just that you are too stupid to debate.

I haven't been here in a long time, but I see Ole Harry still has a way
with words.
==================================
According to who? You? An uneducated dum****?

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:01:40 -0400, HK wrote:

wrote:
On Apr 17, 1:50 pm, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
Most of the "righty rights" here are as dumb as a doorknob. Loogy is
a
lefty; he's also dumb as a doorknob. You're a moderate righty, and I
don't think you have been accused of being dumb.
You would be pleased to know that in another newsgroup that I
infrequently visit I am considered to be very much to the left. And
dumb.
It's all relative.
I admit though, Olbermann personifies the elitist attitude to which I
was referring.
He's not helping unite anybody, that's for sure.
Eisboch
I prefer Rachel. More cerebral than Keith, and she answers emails. But
I
do watch Keith once or twice a week.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"More cerebral"? LOL... Just because she toes the party line.. Both
are babbling idiots...


The idea of you discussing cerebral in connection with anything other
than your hemorrhage is ludicrous. Rachel is a very bright young woman.
She was a Rhodes scholar and holds a DPhil from the University of
Oxford. *You* couldn't get a job cleaning toilets there.

I disagree with you there Harry. Freak could get a job cleaning
toilets at Oxford. However, chances are they'd toss him for doing a
****ty job.

He'd get carried away with the 'all you can eat' benefit.

Don White wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:01:40 -0400, HK wrote:

wrote:
On Apr 17, 1:50 pm, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
Most of the "righty rights" here are as dumb as a doorknob. Loogy is
a
lefty; he's also dumb as a doorknob. You're a moderate righty, and I
don't think you have been accused of being dumb.
You would be pleased to know that in another newsgroup that I
infrequently visit I am considered to be very much to the left. And
dumb.
It's all relative.
I admit though, Olbermann personifies the elitist attitude to which I
was referring.
He's not helping unite anybody, that's for sure.
Eisboch
I prefer Rachel. More cerebral than Keith, and she answers emails. But
I
do watch Keith once or twice a week.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
"More cerebral"? LOL... Just because she toes the party line.. Both
are babbling idiots...

The idea of you discussing cerebral in connection with anything other
than your hemorrhage is ludicrous. Rachel is a very bright young woman.
She was a Rhodes scholar and holds a DPhil from the University of
Oxford. *You* couldn't get a job cleaning toilets there.
I disagree with you there Harry. Freak could get a job cleaning
toilets at Oxford. However, chances are they'd toss him for doing a
****ty job.

He'd get carried away with the 'all you can eat' benefit.




I feel certain would not let JustHate keep a motorcycle in the kitchen.