Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2009
Posts: 312
Default Hey, guess what's new?!


Bzzzzztttttt. We do believe in the Bible, specifically the King James
version. We do however see the Book of Mormon as an additional text to
the bible, as with the Doctrine and Covenants and the Pearl of Great
Price.. But like you, and I can see that you are open minded, I don't
care to discuss it with the bigotshere...


One of the articles of faith in Mormonism is: "We believe in the bible as
far as it is correctly translated." That allows throwing out anything that
contradicts Mormondom.

The "historical" underpinnings of the Book of Mormon transcend the
bizarre.


Which book of Mormon are you referring to? There has been scores of
versions, revised from the previous to make up for some error. If it is
prophesy, there are no errors. Bibles have different "versions", but they
don't rewrite things they disagree with.


  #42   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,054
Default Hey, guess what's new?!

On Apr 22, 9:14*pm, "SteveB" wrote:
Bzzzzztttttt. We do believe in the Bible, specifically the King James
version. We do however see the Book of Mormon as an additional text to
the bible, as with the Doctrine and Covenants and the Pearl of Great
Price.. But like you, and I can see that you are open minded, I don't
care to discuss it with the bigotshere...


One of the articles of faith in Mormonism is: *"We believe in the bible as
far as it is correctly translated." *That allows throwing out anything that
contradicts Mormondom.

The "historical" underpinnings of the Book of Mormon transcend the
bizarre.


Which book of Mormon are you referring to? *There has been scores of
versions, revised from the previous to make up for some error. *If it is
prophesy, there are no errors. *Bibles have different "versions", but they
don't rewrite things they disagree with.


The "historical" underpinnings of the Book of Mormon transcend
the
bizarre.


Just like their false Prophet, Joseph Smith.
  #43   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
HK HK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2007
Posts: 13,347
Default Hey, guess what's new?!

wrote:
On Apr 22, 9:14 pm, "SteveB" wrote:
Bzzzzztttttt. We do believe in the Bible, specifically the King James
version. We do however see the Book of Mormon as an additional text to
the bible, as with the Doctrine and Covenants and the Pearl of Great
Price.. But like you, and I can see that you are open minded, I don't
care to discuss it with the bigotshere...

One of the articles of faith in Mormonism is: "We believe in the bible as
far as it is correctly translated." That allows throwing out anything that
contradicts Mormondom.

The "historical" underpinnings of the Book of Mormon transcend the
bizarre.

Which book of Mormon are you referring to? There has been scores of
versions, revised from the previous to make up for some error. If it is
prophesy, there are no errors. Bibles have different "versions", but they
don't rewrite things they disagree with.


The "historical" underpinnings of the Book of Mormon transcend
the
bizarre.


Just like their false Prophet, Joseph Smith.



Careful readers might note I made no comment on the Book(s) of Mormon or
their iterations, but, rather, the historical underpinnings of the work.
Joseph Smith claimed he translated the work from a set of ancient golden
plates he found in New York State after an angel told him where to look.
Many scholars claim the work was plagarized, and give comparative sources.

Then there is the business of Jesus visiting native Americans.


Hey, believe whatever you want, right?
  #44   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2009
Posts: 312
Default Hey, guess what's new?!


"HK" wrote in message
m...
wrote:
On Apr 22, 9:14 pm, "SteveB" wrote:
Bzzzzztttttt. We do believe in the Bible, specifically the King James
version. We do however see the Book of Mormon as an additional text to
the bible, as with the Doctrine and Covenants and the Pearl of Great
Price.. But like you, and I can see that you are open minded, I don't
care to discuss it with the bigotshere...
One of the articles of faith in Mormonism is: "We believe in the bible
as
far as it is correctly translated." That allows throwing out anything
that
contradicts Mormondom.

The "historical" underpinnings of the Book of Mormon transcend the
bizarre.
Which book of Mormon are you referring to? There has been scores of
versions, revised from the previous to make up for some error. If it is
prophesy, there are no errors. Bibles have different "versions", but
they
don't rewrite things they disagree with.


The "historical" underpinnings of the Book of Mormon transcend
the
bizarre.


Just like their false Prophet, Joseph Smith.



Careful readers might note I made no comment on the Book(s) of Mormon or
their iterations, but, rather, the historical underpinnings of the work.
Joseph Smith claimed he translated the work from a set of ancient golden
plates he found in New York State after an angel told him where to look.
Many scholars claim the work was plagarized, and give comparative sources.

Then there is the business of Jesus visiting native Americans.


Hey, believe whatever you want, right?


Yes, even though the American Indians took issue with the church, and there
were extensive DNA tests done. Results of which somehow quietly went away
............. Or at least are not talked about................


  #45   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
jps jps is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,720
Default Hey, guess what's new?!

On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:10:07 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:29:44 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:30:02 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:39:02 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"SteveB" wrote in message
...
There's lots of paranoid lunatics with guns. Not hoodlums,
****ing
lunatics. We're the only country on the planet, save from some
real
backwards tribals outposts, that host such a profusion of
firepower.
We're also the western civilization that sports the higest per
capita
rate of gun death in the world.


Ah, yes. If we could only improve the technologies of
underdeveloped
nations and get them to quit using those machetes...................


Those underdeveloped nations also get in to massive Genocide via
firearms.
Maybe if the genocided had more firearms the genocidee's might be less
inclined to engage in genocide. Hell the genocidee's also seem to use
hacking instuments with vigor.

I don't think it's a good thing to compete with underdeveloped nations
for the most savagery and violence.

You seem to think that is all we do here in America.

Seems to be showing up a lot in the paper, every day.

Economic stress is not helping.

Well, Pollyanna, what would YOU do? I mean, besides taking everyone's
guns
and other liberties and having ID numbers stenciled on the inside of the
forearm.

Steve


****in' well arm everybody Steve. Elementary schoolers need
protection from bullies on the playground. If a kid wants your lunch
money, blast 'em!

Putting guns in everyone's hands is a recipe for disaster. If you
don't recognize that you're ****ing stupid.


Now you have me confused. In the first sentence of the first paragraph, you
say arm everyone. Then in the second paragraph, you contradict yourself.
You are wearing me down. Are you on drugs?

That's because you're too ****ing dense to recognize sarcasm.


  #46   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2009
Posts: 312
Default Hey, guess what's new?!


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:10:07 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:29:44 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
m...
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:30:02 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:vmjsu41trhgqr2hfqqiq08aq66j58kqep6@4ax. com...
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:39:02 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"SteveB" wrote in message
...
There's lots of paranoid lunatics with guns. Not hoodlums,
****ing
lunatics. We're the only country on the planet, save from some
real
backwards tribals outposts, that host such a profusion of
firepower.
We're also the western civilization that sports the higest per
capita
rate of gun death in the world.


Ah, yes. If we could only improve the technologies of
underdeveloped
nations and get them to quit using those
machetes...................


Those underdeveloped nations also get in to massive Genocide via
firearms.
Maybe if the genocided had more firearms the genocidee's might be
less
inclined to engage in genocide. Hell the genocidee's also seem to
use
hacking instuments with vigor.

I don't think it's a good thing to compete with underdeveloped
nations
for the most savagery and violence.

You seem to think that is all we do here in America.

Seems to be showing up a lot in the paper, every day.

Economic stress is not helping.

Well, Pollyanna, what would YOU do? I mean, besides taking everyone's
guns
and other liberties and having ID numbers stenciled on the inside of the
forearm.

Steve

****in' well arm everybody Steve. Elementary schoolers need
protection from bullies on the playground. If a kid wants your lunch
money, blast 'em!

Putting guns in everyone's hands is a recipe for disaster. If you
don't recognize that you're ****ing stupid.


Now you have me confused. In the first sentence of the first paragraph,
you
say arm everyone. Then in the second paragraph, you contradict yourself.
You are wearing me down. Are you on drugs?

That's because you're too ****ing dense to recognize sarcasm.


Oh, that's what it was. Oh, dopey me. It's just that your writing style is
all over the map, and I'm never sure what it is that you are saying exactly.
Other than the ****ing and moaning, that is. Are you in ALANON?


  #47   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
jps jps is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,720
Default Hey, guess what's new?!

On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:49:06 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:10:07 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:29:44 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:30:02 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:vmjsu41trhgqr2hfqqiq08aq66j58kqep6@4ax .com...
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:39:02 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"SteveB" wrote in message
...
There's lots of paranoid lunatics with guns. Not hoodlums,
****ing
lunatics. We're the only country on the planet, save from some
real
backwards tribals outposts, that host such a profusion of
firepower.
We're also the western civilization that sports the higest per
capita
rate of gun death in the world.


Ah, yes. If we could only improve the technologies of
underdeveloped
nations and get them to quit using those
machetes...................


Those underdeveloped nations also get in to massive Genocide via
firearms.
Maybe if the genocided had more firearms the genocidee's might be
less
inclined to engage in genocide. Hell the genocidee's also seem to
use
hacking instuments with vigor.

I don't think it's a good thing to compete with underdeveloped
nations
for the most savagery and violence.

You seem to think that is all we do here in America.

Seems to be showing up a lot in the paper, every day.

Economic stress is not helping.

Well, Pollyanna, what would YOU do? I mean, besides taking everyone's
guns
and other liberties and having ID numbers stenciled on the inside of the
forearm.

Steve

****in' well arm everybody Steve. Elementary schoolers need
protection from bullies on the playground. If a kid wants your lunch
money, blast 'em!

Putting guns in everyone's hands is a recipe for disaster. If you
don't recognize that you're ****ing stupid.

Now you have me confused. In the first sentence of the first paragraph,
you
say arm everyone. Then in the second paragraph, you contradict yourself.
You are wearing me down. Are you on drugs?

That's because you're too ****ing dense to recognize sarcasm.


Oh, that's what it was. Oh, dopey me. It's just that your writing style is
all over the map, and I'm never sure what it is that you are saying exactly.
Other than the ****ing and moaning, that is. Are you in ALANON?


No, you?
  #48   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
jps jps is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,720
Default Hey, guess what's new?!

On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:58:32 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
om...
wrote:
On Apr 22, 9:14 pm, "SteveB" wrote:
Bzzzzztttttt. We do believe in the Bible, specifically the King James
version. We do however see the Book of Mormon as an additional text to
the bible, as with the Doctrine and Covenants and the Pearl of Great
Price.. But like you, and I can see that you are open minded, I don't
care to discuss it with the bigotshere...
One of the articles of faith in Mormonism is: "We believe in the bible
as
far as it is correctly translated." That allows throwing out anything
that
contradicts Mormondom.

The "historical" underpinnings of the Book of Mormon transcend the
bizarre.
Which book of Mormon are you referring to? There has been scores of
versions, revised from the previous to make up for some error. If it is
prophesy, there are no errors. Bibles have different "versions", but
they
don't rewrite things they disagree with.

The "historical" underpinnings of the Book of Mormon transcend
the
bizarre.

Just like their false Prophet, Joseph Smith.



Careful readers might note I made no comment on the Book(s) of Mormon or
their iterations, but, rather, the historical underpinnings of the work.
Joseph Smith claimed he translated the work from a set of ancient golden
plates he found in New York State after an angel told him where to look.
Many scholars claim the work was plagarized, and give comparative sources.

Then there is the business of Jesus visiting native Americans.


Hey, believe whatever you want, right?


Yes, even though the American Indians took issue with the church, and there
were extensive DNA tests done. Results of which somehow quietly went away
............ Or at least are not talked about................


I'm sure the Mormons have baptized thousands of American Indians
posthumously.

Reminds me of the Christian missionaries who would chase oboriginals
through the brush or jungle and kill them so they could be saved in
the name of Jesus.

They're all fruitcakes.
  #49   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,533
Default Hey, guess what's new?!


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:10:07 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:29:44 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
m...
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:30:02 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:vmjsu41trhgqr2hfqqiq08aq66j58kqep6@4ax. com...
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:39:02 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"SteveB" wrote in message
...
There's lots of paranoid lunatics with guns. Not hoodlums,
****ing
lunatics. We're the only country on the planet, save from some
real
backwards tribals outposts, that host such a profusion of
firepower.
We're also the western civilization that sports the higest per
capita
rate of gun death in the world.


Ah, yes. If we could only improve the technologies of
underdeveloped
nations and get them to quit using those
machetes...................


Those underdeveloped nations also get in to massive Genocide via
firearms.
Maybe if the genocided had more firearms the genocidee's might be
less
inclined to engage in genocide. Hell the genocidee's also seem to
use
hacking instuments with vigor.

I don't think it's a good thing to compete with underdeveloped
nations
for the most savagery and violence.

You seem to think that is all we do here in America.

Seems to be showing up a lot in the paper, every day.

Economic stress is not helping.

Well, Pollyanna, what would YOU do? I mean, besides taking everyone's
guns
and other liberties and having ID numbers stenciled on the inside of the
forearm.

Steve

****in' well arm everybody Steve. Elementary schoolers need
protection from bullies on the playground. If a kid wants your lunch
money, blast 'em!

Putting guns in everyone's hands is a recipe for disaster. If you
don't recognize that you're ****ing stupid.


Now you have me confused. In the first sentence of the first paragraph,
you
say arm everyone. Then in the second paragraph, you contradict yourself.
You are wearing me down. Are you on drugs?

That's because you're too ****ing dense to recognize sarcasm.


Can't try to make a point without the nasty language? A real sign of
immaturity.


  #50   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,609
Default Hey, guess what's new?!

On Apr 23, 2:31*am, jps wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:58:32 -0600, "SteveB"
wrote:







"HK" wrote in message
om...
wrote:
On Apr 22, 9:14 pm, "SteveB" wrote:
Bzzzzztttttt. We do believe in the Bible, specifically the King James
version. We do however see the Book of Mormon as an additional text to
the bible, as with the Doctrine and Covenants and the Pearl of Great
Price.. But like you, and I can see that you are open minded, I don't
care to discuss it with the bigotshere...
One of the articles of faith in Mormonism is: *"We believe in the bible
as
far as it is correctly translated." *That allows throwing out anything
that
contradicts Mormondom.


The "historical" underpinnings of the Book of Mormon transcend the
bizarre.
Which book of Mormon are you referring to? *There has been scores of
versions, revised from the previous to make up for some error. *If it is
prophesy, there are no errors. *Bibles have different "versions", but
they
don't rewrite things they disagree with.


The "historical" underpinnings of the Book of Mormon transcend
the
bizarre.


Just like their false Prophet, Joseph Smith.


Careful readers might note I made no comment on the Book(s) of Mormon or
their iterations, but, rather, the historical underpinnings of the work.
Joseph Smith claimed he translated the work from a set of ancient golden
plates he found in New York State after an angel told him where to look.
Many scholars claim the work was plagarized, and give comparative sources.


Then there is the business of Jesus visiting native Americans.


Hey, believe whatever you want, right?


Yes, even though the American Indians took issue with the church, and there
were extensive DNA tests done. *Results of which somehow quietly went away
............ *Or at least are not talked about................


I'm sure the Mormons have baptized thousands of American Indians
posthumously.

Reminds me of the Christian missionaries who would chase oboriginals
through the brush or jungle and kill them so they could be saved in
the name of Jesus.

They're all fruitcakes.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Comparing posthumous baptizims which of course hurts nobody, to
killing? You are a fool, a troll, and a liar... You are a joke...
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Guess who the dad is. Dweedle Fogpath General 9 September 26th 08 03:04 PM
Well, I guess................................................................ [email protected] General 13 September 2nd 08 01:52 AM
Guess who? Lloyd Bonafide ASA 3 September 3rd 07 10:44 PM
Guess WHAT????!!!! Capt. Rob ASA 13 September 30th 06 12:57 AM
I guess we all know thunder General 0 August 31st 05 05:56 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017