Herr Krause. here is some new Obama for you:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...are-chest.html


And someone thought they were doing your first lady a favour.

Maybe there were.

wrote:
Herr Krause. here is some new Obama for you:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...are-chest.html


And someone thought they were doing your first lady a favour.

Maybe there were.

Outrageous and disgraceful. That artwork is not likely to ever be
brought to America to be put on public display.

On Mon, 04 May 2009 10:10:12 -0400, jim78565 wrote:


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...thamerica/usa/
barackobama/2979378/Bold-sculpture-of-Michelle-Obama-with-American-flag-
across-her-bare-chest.html

Outrageous and disgraceful. That artwork is not likely to ever be
brought to America to be put on public display.

Nothing for nothing, but it's art. It was created to touch an emotion.
In that, it's obviously succeeded. I don't care for it myself, but if
anything is, that is an example of free speech.

thunder wrote:
On Mon, 04 May 2009 10:10:12 -0400, jim78565 wrote:


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...thamerica/usa/
barackobama/2979378/Bold-sculpture-of-Michelle-Obama-with-American-flag-
across-her-bare-chest.html

Outrageous and disgraceful. That artwork is not likely to ever be
brought to America to be put on public display.

Nothing for nothing, but it's art. It was created to touch an emotion.
In that, it's obviously succeeded. I don't care for it myself, but if
anything is, that is an example of free speech.


Well, it doesn't look very much like Mrs. Obama.

On May 4, 7:37*am, wrote:
Herr Krause. here is some new Obama *for you:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...usa/barackobam...

And someone thought they were doing your first lady a favour.

Maybe there were.

Cripes!

I couldn't beleive that when I saw it.

Come to think of it, I'm actually wondering what I was looking at.

It can't be flattery. Too big of boobs for that.

On May 4, 10:14*am, HK wrote:
thunder wrote:
On Mon, 04 May 2009 10:10:12 -0400, jim78565 wrote:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...thamerica/usa/
barackobama/2979378/Bold-sculpture-of-Michelle-Obama-with-American-flag-
across-her-bare-chest.html

Outrageous and disgraceful. That artwork is not likely to ever be
brought to America to be put on public display.

Nothing for nothing, but it's art. *It was created to touch an emotion. *
In that, it's obviously succeeded. *I don't care for it myself, but if
anything is, that is an example of free speech.

Well, it doesn't look very much like Mrs. Obama.

How would you know, Herr Krause? Are you familiar with seeing your
first lady while she is topless?