HK wrote:
thunder wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009 09:25:36 -0700, justwaitafrekinminute wrote:


why gas is up to $2.50 again.

That would be because you live in Connecticut. ;-) It's still right
at $2.00 hereabouts.

I filled up Yo Ho's tank yesterday, 71 gallons at $2.05 a gallon.

That'll probably last you all summer.

On May 13, 3:09*pm, jim78565 wrote:
HK wrote:
wrote:
On May 13, 12:18 pm, thunder wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009 12:13:28 -0400, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
So it’s easy to sit back in the armchair and say that torture can
never
be used. But when you’re in the foxhole, it’s a very different deal."
Senator Chuck Schumer, June 8, 2004
What would Schumer know about being in a foxhole?

It's just a tactic, kind of like Lobsta' Boats and German/American
screwdrivers... Soundbites for elections. Remember Hillary's personal
firefight? I think the congress should be spending it's time finding
out why 1-2/3 of soldiers votes were not counted in the last election,
or why gas is up to $2.50 again. Remember, Pelosi said that was going
to be job 1 when she took the lead.. It has been a disaster ever
since, companies can't even plan ahead because of the volatility...
That's what's important, not who you can "Scooter Libby/Trent Lott,
Newt Gingrich" out of an office...

Why are you concerned about the economy? You sure as hell are not part
of it.

"1-2/3" of soldiers votes were not counted..."

Is that less than two soldiers?

You didn't actually get through a Connecticut high school, did you? With
a diploma?

Krause's Connecticut High school is ranked exactly where?
Look it up for yourself. James Hillhouse HS New London Ct.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Man, that place sure is a dump! Especially for someone who's father
was very well off, new Ole Evinrude well, had the largest marina/
dealership in the eastern U.S., etc.!!

jim78565 wrote:
HK wrote:
thunder wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009 09:25:36 -0700, justwaitafrekinminute wrote:


why gas is up to $2.50 again.

That would be because you live in Connecticut. ;-) It's still right
at $2.00 hereabouts.

I filled up Yo Ho's tank yesterday, 71 gallons at $2.05 a gallon.

That'll probably last you all summer.

Only if he runs the boat at WOT.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

thunder wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009 12:30:21 -0400, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:


If accountability is to be imposed, let it be imposed across the board -
let's not single out the Bush Administration if it's found to be a
criminal action.

Works for me, but, frankly, I'd settle for just Cheney. The SOB just
can't seem to keep his mouth shut. Oh, and I'm still waiting for
Hannity's waterboarding for charity. That would be pay for view at it's
finest. ;-)

We'll shut Cheney up if you shut up Al Gore.

On Wed, 13 May 2009 18:49:59 -0400, BAR wrote:

thunder wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009 12:30:21 -0400, Wizard of Woodstock wrote:


If accountability is to be imposed, let it be imposed across the board -
let's not single out the Bush Administration if it's found to be a
criminal action.

Works for me, but, frankly, I'd settle for just Cheney. The SOB just
can't seem to keep his mouth shut. Oh, and I'm still waiting for
Hannity's waterboarding for charity. That would be pay for view at it's
finest. ;-)

We'll shut Cheney up if you shut up Al Gore.

There's a moral equivalent. You betcha.

"HK" wrote in message
...
thunder wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009 09:25:36 -0700, justwaitafrekinminute wrote:


why gas is up to $2.50 again.

That would be because you live in Connecticut. ;-) It's still right at
$2.00 hereabouts.

I filled up Yo Ho's tank yesterday, 71 gallons at $2.05 a gallon.

Was $2.32 at Costco today in Livermore, CA.

On Wed, 13 May 2009 14:32:02 -0400, Zombie of Woodstock wrote:


Works for me, but, frankly, I'd settle for just Cheney. The SOB just
can't seem to keep his mouth shut.

You can't just single him out, assuming that this is found to be
criminal.

The thing about Cheney was mostly tongue in cheek. I have mixed emotions
about going after these guys. I don't feel the need for prosecutions,
but it is a democracy and we need to know what happened to keep it from
happening again. These guys, ill-advised as they were IMO, were working
for our benefit. I don't need vengeance. I just need it not to happen
again. But Cheney should keep his mouth shut.

On Wed, 13 May 2009 18:49:59 -0400, BAR wrote:


We'll shut Cheney up if you shut up Al Gore.

LOL, while it might be possible to shut up Cheney, I don't think it's
possible to keep Gore quiet. ;-(

On Wed, 13 May 2009 13:25:14 -0400, HK wrote:


Rush, Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachman, Eric Cantor, and Newt Gingrich,
your GOP leadership for 2010.

The scary thing, in that group, Newt almost seems like a normal human,
almost. ;-)

thunder wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009 14:32:02 -0400, Zombie of Woodstock wrote:


Works for me, but, frankly, I'd settle for just Cheney. The SOB just
can't seem to keep his mouth shut.
You can't just single him out, assuming that this is found to be
criminal.

The thing about Cheney was mostly tongue in cheek. I have mixed emotions
about going after these guys. I don't feel the need for prosecutions,
but it is a democracy and we need to know what happened to keep it from
happening again. These guys, ill-advised as they were IMO, were working
for our benefit. I don't need vengeance. I just need it not to happen
again. But Cheney should keep his mouth shut.

I don't see how torturing prisoners is "working for our benefit."