On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:00:09 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
om...
Calif Bill wrote:
"mgg" wrote in message
...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide
the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.
It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike
No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.
Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda
than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike
It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.
You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at
this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings
for 8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike
Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's
# on a monthly basis.
No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king
of political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will
be for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some
arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been
purely caused by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house
for the past 6 months...

Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade.

--Mike


Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years.


Nope. If the "liberals" had been in charge, we'd already be out of Iraq,
we'd have single-payer health care, Cheney would be under indictment, a
hate crimes bill would have been passed, gay marriage would be legal in
all 50 states, and the rich would be paying taxes on all income, as is
their privilege.

You really don't know anyting about politics, Bilious.



--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Seems as if you know very little about politics. The Liberal arm of
politics has had control of Congress for 2 years. They are not in control
yet? Seems as if they are incompetent in more ways than you can count.


More pseudo-conservative bullpucky.

Bill, when are you just going to throw in the towel and admit you're a
Republican?

"jps" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:00:09 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
news:4O6dnXFB8Z35Qa3XnZ2dnUVZ_tSdnZ2d@earthlink. com...
Calif Bill wrote:
"mgg" wrote in message
...
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not
hide
the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.
It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike
No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.
Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda
than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike
It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.
You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest
at
this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings
for 8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike
Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds
Harry's
# on a monthly basis.
No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the
king
of political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and
will
be for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some
arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has
been
purely caused by the liberals... after all, they've had the white
house
for the past 6 months...

Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade.

--Mike


Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years.


Nope. If the "liberals" had been in charge, we'd already be out of Iraq,
we'd have single-payer health care, Cheney would be under indictment, a
hate crimes bill would have been passed, gay marriage would be legal in
all 50 states, and the rich would be paying taxes on all income, as is
their privilege.

You really don't know anyting about politics, Bilious.



--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Seems as if you know very little about politics. The Liberal arm of
politics has had control of Congress for 2 years. They are not in control
yet? Seems as if they are incompetent in more ways than you can count.


More pseudo-conservative bullpucky.

Bill, when are you just going to throw in the towel and admit you're a
Republican?

Actually I am the majority group now. Independents. Sucks to be a minority
party jps?

Calif Bill wrote:


Actually I am the majority group now. Independents. Sucks to be a minority
party jps?


Yeah? Who is the last independent candidate for national office you
voted for?


--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Calif Bill wrote:


Actually I am the majority group now. Independents. Sucks to be a
minority party jps?

Yeah? Who is the last independent candidate for national office you voted
for?


--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Last election I voted Libertarian. We know who you would have voted for if
you could vote.

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Calif Bill wrote:


Actually I am the majority group now. Independents. Sucks to be a
minority party jps?

Yeah? Who is the last independent candidate for national office you voted
for?


--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Last election I voted Libertarian. We know who you would have voted for
if you could vote.


The problem with hairy is that he doesn't think when he votes... he simply
pulls the "D" lever. That's a wonderful way to choose a candidate.

--Mike

mgg wrote:
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
m...
"HK" wrote in message
m...
Calif Bill wrote:

Actually I am the majority group now. Independents. Sucks to be a
minority party jps?
Yeah? Who is the last independent candidate for national office you voted
for?


--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.
Last election I voted Libertarian. We know who you would have voted for
if you could vote.


The problem with hairy is that he doesn't think when he votes... he simply
pulls the "D" lever. That's a wonderful way to choose a candidate.

--Mike



He's been programed by his labor union trainers to do that. They do all
of his thinking for him.

Calif Bill wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
m...
Calif Bill wrote:

Actually I am the majority group now. Independents. Sucks to be a
minority party jps?
Yeah? Who is the last independent candidate for national office you voted
for?


--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Last election I voted Libertarian. We know who you would have voted for if
you could vote.



Loonitarian, eh? Figures.


--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Calif Bill wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
m...
Calif Bill wrote:

Actually I am the majority group now. Independents. Sucks to be a
minority party jps?
Yeah? Who is the last independent candidate for national office you
voted for?


--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Last election I voted Libertarian. We know who you would have voted for
if you could vote.

Loonitarian, eh? Figures.


--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Both the other candidates were bad. I did vote for Obama in the primary.
Buyers remorse. Hillary could not screw up worse than what is happening.

On Jun 12, 5:12*am, HK wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
om...
Calif Bill wrote:

Actually I am the majority group now. *Independents. *Sucks to be a
minority party jps?
Yeah? Who is the last independent candidate for national office you voted
for?

--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Last election I voted Libertarian. *We know who you would have voted for if
you could vote.

Loonitarian, eh? Figures.

--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Your droll comments Herr Krause, are predictably void of content.

HK wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:


Actually I am the majority group now. Independents. Sucks to be a
minority party jps?

Yeah? Who is the last independent candidate for national office you
voted for?


Four years of College (English major) wasted on a moron. He's talking
about voters not candidates.