Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:24:53 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years. How can you mistake half the congressional Democrats for liberals is a testament to your powers of perception. Have a look at the Blue Dogs. They're your kinda Dem. They are voting the Pelosi / Reid line. |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:25:43 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote: "jps" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:24:53 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years. How can you mistake half the congressional Democrats for liberals is a testament to your powers of perception. Have a look at the Blue Dogs. They're your kinda Dem. They are voting the Pelosi / Reid line. "Liberals" would be clamoring for a single payer, public option so there would be competition for health care insurance. You'll find very few congress members even considering the single payer option. They're not liberals, as you'd like to believe. |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 11, 12:28*am, jps wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:22:27 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:41:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message om... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message news:ioc035dr1m5rf46jrt7edoteov0abjgp1g@4ax .com... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message news:998035p93g23qr6fffc4sinp35cj046k67@4 ax.com... Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today. It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it? --Mike No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom. Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than your buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh. --Mike It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political posts. You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at this point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for 8 or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted. --Mike --Mike Oh, okay. *I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.. How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's # on a monthly basis. No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been purely caused by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house for the past 6 months... Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade. --Mike Tom doesn't post a single item that doesn't have a link. *What the diff between cut and paste and a pointer? Your partisan bent is what... There ya go... you spin to deflect. The *point* here is that harry has been posting *exponentially* more political garbage than Tom. Can you not agree with that?? I don't care who is cut-n-pasting or posting links. Personally, I'd prefer the latter anyway. A cut and paste is an *attempt* to force feed your message, a link doesn't have to be clicked. The point is that harry has turned this place into a political garbage dump... no one else. Anyone else that's doing it is just having fun with harry... pure and simple. --Mike You're not forced to read or click so they're the same. Again, I didn't say who *posted* more, I was pointing out that Tom has eclipsed Harry in *initiating* political threads. That's all I said.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oh yeah, that must be what "is", is. I really think you guys are proud of being dishonest little cowards, amazing.. |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 11, 1:24*am, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"mgg" wrote in message ... "jps" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message om... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message news:998035p93g23qr6fffc4sinp35cj046k67@4ax .com... Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today. It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it? --Mike No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom. Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than your buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh. --Mike It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political posts. You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at this point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for 8 or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted. --Mike --Mike Oh, okay. *I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along. How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's # on a monthly basis. No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been purely caused by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house for the past 6 months... Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade. --Mike Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, remember Pelosi's big deal about "first thing we will take care of will be gas prices"? Geeze, within a year 4 dollar gas puts the world in a recession, now it's happening again while the dems spend their time deflecting legal actions against criminals like Dodd, Pelosi, Jefferson, Murtha, Obama, Feinstein... The list of criminals being protected by the congress is endless.. |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Calif Bill wrote:
"mgg" wrote in message ... "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today. It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it? --Mike No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom. Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than your buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh. --Mike It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political posts. You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at this point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for 8 or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted. --Mike --Mike Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along. How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's # on a monthly basis. No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been purely caused by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house for the past 6 months... Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade. --Mike Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years. Nope. If the "liberals" had been in charge, we'd already be out of Iraq, we'd have single-payer health care, Cheney would be under indictment, a hate crimes bill would have been passed, gay marriage would be legal in all 50 states, and the rich would be paying taxes on all income, as is their privilege. You really don't know anyting about politics, Bilious. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 11, 2:32*am, jps wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:25:43 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "jps" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:24:53 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years. How can you mistake half the congressional Democrats for liberals is a testament to your powers of perception. Have a look at the Blue Dogs. *They're your kinda Dem. They are voting the Pelosi / Reid line. "Liberals" would be clamoring for a single payer, public option so there would be competition for health care insurance. You'll find very few congress members even considering the single payer option. They're not liberals, as you'd like to believe.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They're voting the Pelosi / Reid line, period.... And getting paid well for it. |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HK wrote:
Calif Bill wrote: "mgg" wrote in message ... "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today. It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it? --Mike No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom. Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than your buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh. --Mike It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political posts. You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at this point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for 8 or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted. --Mike --Mike Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along. How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's # on a monthly basis. No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been purely caused by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house for the past 6 months... Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade. --Mike Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years. Nope. If the "liberals" had been in charge, we'd already be out of Iraq, we'd have single-payer health care, Cheney would be under indictment, a hate crimes bill would have been passed, gay marriage would be legal in all 50 states, and the rich would be paying taxes on all income, as is their privilege. You really don't know anyting about politics, Bilious. So the liberals have taken over but they haven't taken charge yet. That sums up what you are saying. Well. We're waiting. I see the messiah declaring this and that, but he's only making a bigger mess out of everything. What do you know about politics, Krause? |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:25:43 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: "jps" wrote in message . .. On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:24:53 -0700, "Calif Bill" wrote: Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years. How can you mistake half the congressional Democrats for liberals is a testament to your powers of perception. Have a look at the Blue Dogs. They're your kinda Dem. They are voting the Pelosi / Reid line. "Liberals" would be clamoring for a single payer, public option so there would be competition for health care insurance. You'll find very few congress members even considering the single payer option. They're not liberals, as you'd like to believe. Yup, on the way to the dermatologist this morning, heard the report of Obama pitching his $1.3 Trillion program for the uninsured. That seems extremely expensive. Actually grossly, extremely overpriced plan. Cost me $1700 a month on HIPPA for 2 of us. That is about 29k a year per uninsured. Cheaper to buy a Kaiser or Blue Cross plan for them. Kids can get a plan for about $1200 a year. Which Dem is getting the contract? |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "HK" wrote in message m... Calif Bill wrote: "mgg" wrote in message ... "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today. It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it? --Mike No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom. Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than your buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh. --Mike It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political posts. You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at this point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for 8 or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted. --Mike --Mike Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along. How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's # on a monthly basis. No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been purely caused by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house for the past 6 months... Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade. --Mike Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years. Nope. If the "liberals" had been in charge, we'd already be out of Iraq, we'd have single-payer health care, Cheney would be under indictment, a hate crimes bill would have been passed, gay marriage would be legal in all 50 states, and the rich would be paying taxes on all income, as is their privilege. You really don't know anyting about politics, Bilious. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. Seems as if you know very little about politics. The Liberal arm of politics has had control of Congress for 2 years. They are not in control yet? Seems as if they are incompetent in more ways than you can count. |
#20
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:00:09 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote: "HK" wrote in message om... Calif Bill wrote: "mgg" wrote in message ... "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today. It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it? --Mike No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom. Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than your buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh. --Mike It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political posts. You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at this point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for 8 or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted. --Mike --Mike Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along. How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's # on a monthly basis. No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been purely caused by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house for the past 6 months... Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade. --Mike Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years. Nope. If the "liberals" had been in charge, we'd already be out of Iraq, we'd have single-payer health care, Cheney would be under indictment, a hate crimes bill would have been passed, gay marriage would be legal in all 50 states, and the rich would be paying taxes on all income, as is their privilege. You really don't know anyting about politics, Bilious. -- The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a gang of moral nihilists. Seems as if you know very little about politics. The Liberal arm of politics has had control of Congress for 2 years. They are not in control yet? Seems as if they are incompetent in more ways than you can count. More pseudo-conservative bullpucky. Bill, when are you just going to throw in the towel and admit you're a Republican? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So nice... NOT..! | General | |||
It's such a nice day... | General | |||
Nice, eh? | General | |||
Nice, eh? | General | |||
It sure is nice . . . | ASA |