"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..

Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.

It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike

No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.

Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike

On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...

Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.

It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike

No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.

Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike

It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
m...

Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.

It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike

No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.

Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike

It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.

You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for 8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike

On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...

Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.

It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike

No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.

Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike

It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.

You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for 8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike

Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's
# on a monthly basis.

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
m...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:998035p93g23qr6fffc4sinp35cj046k67@4ax. com...

Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.

It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike

No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.

Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike

It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.

You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at
this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for 8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike

Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's
# on a monthly basis.

No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of
political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be for
a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some arbitrary
time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been purely caused
by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house for the past 6
months...

Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade.

--Mike

On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:41:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:998035p93g23qr6fffc4sinp35cj046k67@4ax .com...

Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.

It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike

No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.

Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike

It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.

You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at
this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for 8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike

Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's
# on a monthly basis.

No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of
political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be for
a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some arbitrary
time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been purely caused
by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house for the past 6
months...

Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade.

--Mike

Tom doesn't post a single item that doesn't have a link. What the
diff between cut and paste and a pointer?

Your partisan bent is what...

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:41:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
m...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:ioc035dr1m5rf46jrt7edoteov0abjgp1g@4ax. com...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:998035p93g23qr6fffc4sinp35cj046k67@4a x.com...

Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide
the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.

It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike

No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.

Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike

It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.

You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at
this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for
8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike

Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's
# on a monthly basis.

No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of
political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be
for
a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some arbitrary
time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been purely
caused
by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house for the past 6
months...

Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade.

--Mike

Tom doesn't post a single item that doesn't have a link. What the
diff between cut and paste and a pointer?

Your partisan bent is what...

There ya go... you spin to deflect. The *point* here is that harry has been
posting *exponentially* more political garbage than Tom. Can you not agree
with that?? I don't care who is cut-n-pasting or posting links. Personally,
I'd prefer the latter anyway. A cut and paste is an *attempt* to force feed
your message, a link doesn't have to be clicked. The point is that harry has
turned this place into a political garbage dump... no one else. Anyone else
that's doing it is just having fun with harry... pure and simple.

--Mike

On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:22:27 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:41:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:ioc035dr1m5rf46jrt7edoteov0abjgp1g@4ax .com...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:998035p93g23qr6fffc4sinp35cj046k67@4 ax.com...

Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide
the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.

It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike

No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.

Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike

It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.

You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at
this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for
8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike

Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's
# on a monthly basis.

No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of
political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be
for
a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some arbitrary
time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been purely
caused
by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house for the past 6
months...

Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade.

--Mike

Tom doesn't post a single item that doesn't have a link. What the
diff between cut and paste and a pointer?

Your partisan bent is what...

There ya go... you spin to deflect. The *point* here is that harry has been
posting *exponentially* more political garbage than Tom. Can you not agree
with that?? I don't care who is cut-n-pasting or posting links. Personally,
I'd prefer the latter anyway. A cut and paste is an *attempt* to force feed
your message, a link doesn't have to be clicked. The point is that harry has
turned this place into a political garbage dump... no one else. Anyone else
that's doing it is just having fun with harry... pure and simple.

--Mike

You're not forced to read or click so they're the same.

Again, I didn't say who *posted* more, I was pointing out that Tom has
eclipsed Harry in *initiating* political threads.

That's all I said.

"mgg" wrote in message
...

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:59:06 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:21:34 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
om...
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:37 -0700, "mgg" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
news:998035p93g23qr6fffc4sinp35cj046k67@4ax .com...

Your spate of new threads on Obama and/or whatever will not hide
the
ugliness perpetrated by a right wing lunatic in DC today.

It's annoying when the "other" side does it, isn't it?

--Mike

No one is as prolific with propaganda as Tom.

Are you SERIOUS!? No one, anywhere is more prolific at propaganda than
your
buddy harry. That includes Tokyo Rose...sheesh.

--Mike

It's my estimate that Tom has passed Harry for initiating political
posts.

You haven't been around here long have you? It's not even a contest at
this
point. Maybe if Tom keeps up his current level of political postings for
8
or 9 years, he might get *close* to what harry's posted.

--Mike

--Mike

Oh, okay. I see we're playing by make-up-the-rules-as-we-go-along.

How about that Tom's avg. # initiating political posts exceeds Harry's
# on a monthly basis.

No, ... *you're* making up the rules as you go along. harry is the king of
political posts (mostly cut-n-pastes, no original thought), and will be
for a LOOOONG time. The only real measure is historically, not some
arbitrary time limit. Using your logic, then our economic mess has been
purely caused by the liberals... after all, they've had the white house
for the past 6 months...

Be a man and quit the spin... call a spade a spade.

--Mike


Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years.

On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:24:53 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


Actually the liberals have been in charge of Congress for 2 1/2 years.

How can you mistake half the congressional Democrats for liberals is a
testament to your powers of perception.

Have a look at the Blue Dogs. They're your kinda Dem.