"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote in message
m...

That's a funny list of music venues and professional grade musical
instrument shops.

You're what, about 40 miles from Boston? How often do you drive into
Boston to see live, top-drawer professional musical performances? Once
every two years?

When I lived in Albany, we drove over to Lenox at least three times one
summer. The Julliard String Quartet is playing there later this
month...are you going? I would if I lived where you do...what is it, a
two hour drive?

I actually saw two Maldonado guitars for sale in a local music instrument
store in the DC some years ago. Got anything like that at your shoppe?
Armik plays a Maldonado...ever even *hear* of either, up there in
Duxbury?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dP0GCVhLMUY

or

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RCPY...eature=related



Sorry to break your heart, but yes, I have heard of Maldonado guitars and
am familiar with the history of them. You see, I've done some research
on guitars including the purchase of two comprehensive encyclopedias
dedicated to guitar brands, types, manufacturers and their histories. I
study them just about daily.

That said, I'd have no reason or purpose to buy and inventory a Maldonado.
It would collect dust.
My budding music shop business is geared towards a range of instruments of
interest to the majority of people, not an elitist, narrow minded snob who
turns his nose up to anything that does not meet *his* standards. You
know. Normal, decent people. I also desire to offer decent instruments
that are affordable. Currently the most expensive guitar in my inventory
is a mint, 2006 Martin HD28V. It is a vintage series Martin, built to the
pre-WWII Martin D-28 specifications. I acquired it and another guitar
from a professor (jazz composition) at the Berklee College of Music in
Boston who I had met for another reason about a year ago. He and his wife
visited our home in Duxbury Friday and we enjoyed a couple of hours
discussing guitars and music in general. You see, we also have access to
some cultural influences. We are just not snobs about it.



Eisboch

Hairy isn't a snob... he's just an asshole, that lies to top it off. You
know, a low life scumbag.

--Mike

On Jun 14, 7:20*pm, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
om...

No, you are conservatrash because you are behaving here like your buddy
floridajim.

You mean because I don't agree with you?

Because I think that you are often mean spirited and devoid of any
consideration for the feelings or opinions of others?

Is it because you enjoy using your knowledge and skill of writing to
denigrate and *insult?

Is that why I am now conservatrash?

Figures.

Eisboch

D'oh. I don't give a **** whether you or anyone else agrees with me or not.

On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:51:56 -0700 (PDT), Tom Murphy
wrote:

On Jun 14, 7:20*pm, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
om...

No, you are conservatrash because you are behaving here like your buddy
floridajim.

You mean because I don't agree with you?

Because I think that you are often mean spirited and devoid of any
consideration for the feelings or opinions of others?

Is it because you enjoy using your knowledge and skill of writing to
denigrate and *insult?

Is that why I am now conservatrash?

Figures.

Eisboch

D'oh. I don't give a **** whether you or anyone else agrees with me or not.

Agreeing has nothing to do with it.

What does: your devolving into the same slime behavior as your BFF
floridajim.

Got it? Or do you need it explained again?

--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Harry, after reading quite a few threads here recently it's quite
obvious that you're the epitome of a bored, old troll whose sole
purpose here is to provide a source of entertainment for yourself.
Part of this "fun" involves finding avenues to gather personal
information on others - so that you can eventually use it "down the
road" by making personal insults and derogatory remarks when people
disagree with you during debates. You also like to use your knowledge
and interpretation of the English language to attempt to "manipulate"
and "play" others. Quite obvious.

Problem is - you don't realize that you are, in many cases,
intellectually outmatched by many subscribers to this newsgroup.

Please let us in on your political affiliation, grade level completed
and professional standing. That way we can understand your ability
and legitimacy to pass judgment on another's intellect.

It's
very obvious. I suspect you are too narrow-minded and think too
highly of yourself to come to this recognition on your own. They are
on to your "game" and to "you" and as a result, you end up making a
fool of yourself more often than not. You're not even in the same
league as some here.

You, for example? From your writing, it seems you're also outmatched
by a good many here. One has to wonder about your ability to judge?

For whatever it's worth, stop playing your current "game", climb off
your high-horse, stop looking down your nose at everyone and open your
mind a bit. You may actually find that you'll enjoy some discussions
and debates with a greater sense of interest and enthusiasm and more
importantly, earn a level of respect from others...which frankly,
appears you have very little of.

Wow, so insightful! How long have you been a reader of rec.boats?

Whose writing do you enjoy? Tom's, Richard's, Vic's, Reggie's, The
Freak, Pontoon, Frogwatch, Loogy?

If you're smart, you also may be able to broaden your horizons a bit
by learning from other people's experiences and knowledge. If you're
not, you'll end up losing all the good people here that have a
tremendous amount of knowledge to share since they will wake up and
realize it's a waste of their time and conclude that the true cancer
in here is *you*.

There's plenty of people who concern themselves with boating subjects
and remain above the fray.

Those that Harry spars with aren't those folks. But I don't expect
you'll be speaking to any of them in this thought-filled manner.

Takes two to tango Tom.

Tom Murphy wrote:

Harry, after reading quite a few threads here recently it's quite
obvious


Oh, joy...another disgruntled right-wing turd, probably a sockpuppet.
Hey...Tom...bye-bye.

--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Tom Murphy wrote:
On Jun 14, 7:20 pm, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
m...
No, you are conservatrash because you are behaving here like your buddy
floridajim.
You mean because I don't agree with you?
Because I think that you are often mean spirited and devoid of any
consideration for the feelings or opinions of others?
Is it because you enjoy using your knowledge and skill of writing to
denigrate and insult?
Is that why I am now conservatrash?
Figures.
Eisboch
D'oh. I don't give a **** whether you or anyone else agrees with me or not.

Agreeing has nothing to do with it.

What does: your devolving into the same slime behavior as your BFF
floridajim.

Got it? Or do you need it explained again?

--
The modern GOP is little more than an army of moral absolutists led by a
gang of moral nihilists.

Harry, after reading quite a few threads here recently it's quite
obvious that you're the epitome of a bored, old troll whose sole
purpose here is to provide a source of entertainment for yourself.
Part of this "fun" involves finding avenues to gather personal
information on others - so that you can eventually use it "down the
road" by making personal insults and derogatory remarks when people
disagree with you during debates. You also like to use your knowledge
and interpretation of the English language to attempt to "manipulate"
and "play" others. Quite obvious.

Problem is - you don't realize that you are, in many cases,
intellectually outmatched by many subscribers to this newsgroup. It's
very obvious. I suspect you are too narrow-minded and think too
highly of yourself to come to this recognition on your own. They are
on to your "game" and to "you" and as a result, you end up making a
fool of yourself more often than not. You're not even in the same
league as some here.

For whatever it's worth, stop playing your current "game", climb off
your high-horse, stop looking down your nose at everyone and open your
mind a bit. You may actually find that you'll enjoy some discussions
and debates with a greater sense of interest and enthusiasm and more
importantly, earn a level of respect from others...which frankly,
appears you have very little of.

If you're smart, you also may be able to broaden your horizons a bit
by learning from other people's experiences and knowledge. If you're
not, you'll end up losing all the good people here that have a
tremendous amount of knowledge to share since they will wake up and
realize it's a waste of their time and conclude that the true cancer
in here is *you*.

If you're "way beyond" all of this, then continue with your bored, old
troll tactics for the rest of your life. You've been doing it now for
what? 10 plus years or so?

Got that? Or would you like it explained again?

I'll probably get a little hate mail for saying this, but .............
I've got to tell you, Tom, that, for a new contributor, you have Krausie
sized up pretty well. Anymore, he's just a play toy that we bang around
like a pinata. Unfortunately there are no prizes inside that empty old
dried up shell of a man.
The last of the more tolerant folks here have recently given up trying
to converse with him on an intelligent level. He has nothing left to
offer. He us a used up hack. The unions have certainly taken their toll
on him since the only spiel we here from him lately is union rhetoric
and cut and paste left wing blog messages.
Since you are new here Tom, you probably don't know that the worthless
POS named Krause is a draft dodging coward. Just thought I'd clue you in.

HK wrote:
Tom Murphy wrote:

Harry, after reading quite a few threads here recently it's quite
obvious


Oh, joy...another disgruntled right-wing turd, probably a sockpuppet.
Hey...Tom...bye-bye.

Hey Hairy, You have so many of us in your bozo bin now. Would you
consider throwing us an annual tent party. You know. Something like the
one your landlady is throwing for her friends. You, of course, can be
the caterer for this event as well.
BTW: Is your landlady so cheap that she won't hire a real professional
union caterer? I know you two are thrifty but your boy Obama wants you
to put some greenbacks into circulation to help his causes and of course
his friends. So loosen up those purse strings and spend....spend....spend.

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Tom Murphy wrote:

Harry, after reading quite a few threads here recently it's quite
obvious


Oh, joy...another disgruntled right-wing turd, probably a sockpuppet.
Hey...Tom...bye-bye.


The truth hurts don't it? I saw no indication of his political leaning in
his post, yet in your little mind, he must be a "righty" since he called you
out. A mindless response once again.

--Mike

On Jun 15, 8:35*pm, "mgg" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

m...

Tom Murphy wrote:

Harry, after reading quite a few threads here recently it's quite
obvious

Oh, joy...another disgruntled right-wing turd, probably a sockpuppet.
Hey...Tom...bye-bye.

The truth hurts don't it? I saw no indication of his political leaning in
his post, yet in your little mind, he must be a "righty" since he called you
out. A mindless response once again.

--Mike

And that is one reason why that, according to Herr Krause, all
*righties* and all *fundies* and all Christians should die, because
not only do they uncomfort and inconvenience him so. But, they
actually think for themselves.

mgg wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
m...
Tom Murphy wrote:

Harry, after reading quite a few threads here recently it's quite
obvious

Oh, joy...another disgruntled right-wing turd, probably a sockpuppet.
Hey...Tom...bye-bye.


The truth hurts don't it? I saw no indication of his political leaning in
his post, yet in your little mind, he must be a "righty" since he called you
out. A mindless response once again.

--Mike



No one would EVER call me a rightie, but I do find Harry, Donnie and jps
to be low lifes no matter what their politics are.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:23:28 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

mgg wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
m...
Tom Murphy wrote:

Harry, after reading quite a few threads here recently it's quite
obvious

Oh, joy...another disgruntled right-wing turd, probably a sockpuppet.
Hey...Tom...bye-bye.


The truth hurts don't it? I saw no indication of his political leaning in
his post, yet in your little mind, he must be a "righty" since he called you
out. A mindless response once again.

--Mike



No one would EVER call me a rightie, but I do find Harry, Donnie and jps
to be low lifes no matter what their politics are.

Righty.
--
John H

"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those
who are willing to work and give to those who would not."
Thomas Jefferson