Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#51
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote: On Jun 18, 2:40 pm, Loogypicker wrote: On Jun 18, 2:34 pm, HK wrote: Frogwatch wrote: No need to insult bitches everywhere, just refer to her as "Democratic Senator" which is as derogatory as possible. Just curious, what have you "invented" for which you have been issued a patent or patents that might be something that interests me as a boater. or even just an ordinary consumer and buyer of computer/electronic/photographic technology? I mean, you talk a lot about inventions, and you surely have put forth a number of less than half baked ideas for products that might be of interest here. Which have you developed to fruition? Who is selling them? What is their brand name? How many units have been sold? Maybe he'll answer those questions when you answer questions like: For Harry: Go to the USPTO website, click on search. go to the keyword input spot and put in:"David OHara, X-ray" and you will see. Otherwise, you can go to my company website by googling "Parallax Research, Inc., X-ray". As far as who is selling our products, that is always proprietary (We have NDA in place so I cannot tell you) but they are the largest names in analytical instrumentation and in the semiconductor business. I do not try to develop consumer products because I admit to being "aesthetically challenged" meaning I have poor taste. Nothing of interest to boaters unless you are a materials science person. My first attempt to patent was for an anti-fouling compund to be applied while the boat was in the water. I personally did the search and found it had already been developed by a British company. Since then I have stuck to x-ray stuff that pays my bills. I think 6 patents and 3 in the works. Yeah, I know of your x-ray stuff, since I visited your site a long time ago. So, you've got nothing that would interest boaters or just ordinary consumers who buy computers/electronics/photo technology for hobbies? Can you be any more narcissistic, WAFA? This is over the top! |
#52
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John H wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:02:35 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Frogwatch wrote: . Froggy, I would be VERY VERY careful providing Harry with ANY personal info. I most fervently agree with that post. -- John H If WAFA pulls any ****, he will see his personal information reposted (yes, it's available in Google)and cross posted to no less than 100 "interesting" groups. He was quiet for a week after it landed here. He'll have to move if he pushes his luck. |
#53
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HK wrote:
John H wrote: On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:18:29 -0400, HK wrote: John H wrote: On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:02:35 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Frogwatch wrote: . Froggy, I would be VERY VERY careful providing Harry with ANY personal info. I most fervently agree with that post. -- John H Really, Herring? I've known your address for years. Ever seen me sniffing around your humble abode? Of course not. -- "John H" wrote in message ... Please note that Interstate 90 will be closed this weekend across South Dakota. This closure will allow the Federal Government free access to haul a 200 ton piece of coal to Mt. Rushmore so that President Obama can be added to the Presidents on the monument. -- John H Filter break? WAFL! -- John H No...just have it turned off for the moment while I make a couple of adjustments. It'll be up in a minute or two, and you'll be back in the septic tank, where you belong. Any chance of you injuring yourself really seriously in the next few months? Always hopeful. Adjustments? Do you think you are fooling anyone, WAFA? |
#54
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim24242 wrote:
Don White wrote: "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message ... JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jun 18, 12:42 pm, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryEGmkjv8R8 -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects Problem is with her, she always has that attitude with military.. It's part of her Shtick while her husband makes a fortune in the supply side of it.. ![]() He was being VERY respectful, and she came across as a real bitch. It he was not showing her respect, I could go along with her stopping the testimony to demand she be called Senator, but the way she handled it showed that she does have a real insecurity problem. -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects Bull... if someone in here had taken the entire Dope Army out for a trashing and lessons in proper manners, we wouldn't have half the trouble now. What? You aren't making any sense atol, young fella. Donnie is dumb and far from young. |
#55
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:25:34 -0300, "Don White"
wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:13:28 -0300, "Don White" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... In the Army, I always addressed senior females as 'ma'am'. Senior males were 'sir'. That's the way it was. Boxer's a bitch. -- John H Is she an army officer, genius? She's a Senator. Sometimes I think the folks who refer to you as 'stupid' or 'dumb' are correct. -- John H Duh! Yu'd better be looking in a clear mirror when you're calling someone stupid. You said..."In the Army, I always addressed senior females as 'ma'am'" I replied..."Is she an army officer, genius?" Go smoke some more of Looneys 'Georgia Bud'. Donnie, your question was stupid. I didn't call you anything. -- John H I once shook hands with a pudgy guy who: Sailed from San Francisco to Hawaii. Rounded Cape Horn, twice. Transited the Panama Canal. Has owned more than 20 boats in his lifetime. Sailed large boats competitively. Has been hundreds of miles from land in a powerboat under his command. And who set a new record for the most distance covered and most fish caught in the Chesapeake Bay in the shortest time! |
#56
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don White wrote:
"Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message ... JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jun 18, 12:42 pm, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryEGmkjv8R8 -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects Problem is with her, she always has that attitude with military.. It's part of her Shtick while her husband makes a fortune in the supply side of it.. ![]() He was being VERY respectful, and she came across as a real bitch. It he was not showing her respect, I could go along with her stopping the testimony to demand she be called Senator, but the way she handled it showed that she does have a real insecurity problem. -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects Bull... if someone in here had taken the entire Dope Army out for a trashing and lessons in proper manners, we wouldn't have half the trouble now. Donnie, You are getting as bad as Harry Krause is with forgetting who he is pretending he has in his filter. -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects |
#57
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "D K" wrote in message ... John H wrote: On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:02:35 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Frogwatch wrote: . Froggy, I would be VERY VERY careful providing Harry with ANY personal info. I most fervently agree with that post. -- John H If WAFA pulls any ****, he will see his personal information reposted (yes, it's available in Google)and cross posted to no less than 100 "interesting" groups. He was quiet for a week after it landed here. He'll have to move if he pushes his luck. Just do it! He claims that it's OK and even preferable to post your personal info here. Those of us that don't are just cowards. Go ahead and post it to remind him how STUPID it is, to post such personal info on the internet. --Mike |
#58
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reginald P Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryEGmkjv8R8 It was a put down. It was blatant respect for him and the Military. It wouldn't have mattered if he had said Senator the first time. she was saying I'm the important subject here. |
#59
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frog Breeches wrote:
Reginald P Smithers III, Esq. wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryEGmkjv8R8 It was a put down. It was blatant respect for him and the Military. It wouldn't have mattered if he had said Senator the first time. she was saying I'm the important subject here. In the Senate, it is the Senators who are the important ones. There are only 100 of them (99 at the moment); it is the most exclusive elected official federal government club in this country. Generals are a dime a dozen. -- "John H" wrote in message ... Please note that Interstate 90 will be closed this weekend across South Dakota. This closure will allow the Federal Government free access to haul a 200 ton piece of coal to Mt. Rushmore so that President Obama can be added to the Presidents on the monument. -- John H -- John Herring, rec.boat's resident racist and fluffer. |
#60
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message ... JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Jun 18, 12:42 pm, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryEGmkjv8R8 -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects Problem is with her, she always has that attitude with military.. It's part of her Shtick while her husband makes a fortune in the supply side of it.. ![]() He was being VERY respectful, and she came across as a real bitch. It he was not showing her respect, I could go along with her stopping the testimony to demand she be called Senator, but the way she handled it showed that she does have a real insecurity problem. -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects Bull... if someone in here had taken the entire Dope Army out for a trashing and lessons in proper manners, we wouldn't have half the trouble now. Donnie, You are getting as bad as Harry Krause is with forgetting who he is pretending he has in his filter. -- Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. Hee hee...not at all. You and Diaper Dan are always changing your info so you can climb up out of the excrement. The only difference between you and him...his first post earns his flushing back down...you take an average of three. Don't stain my porcelain on the way down. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Certainty is a bitch | General | |||
Certainty is a bitch | General | |||
Certainty is a bitch | General | |||
Wouldn't it be a bitch... | General | |||
It's a bitch, eh? | ASA |