On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:38:20 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
news
Frog Breeches wrote:
Reginald P Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryEGmkjv8R8


It was a put down. It was blatant respect for him and the Military. It
wouldn't have mattered if he had said Senator the first time.

she was saying I'm the important subject here.


In the Senate, it is the Senators who are the important ones. There are
only 100 of them (99 at the moment); it is the most exclusive elected
official federal government club in this country. Generals are a dime a
dozen.






Incompetant duds. They are our employees! They are not royalty. And with
an approval rating less than the former President's. You think they might
engage their brain.


Here's the problem: A year ago all those generals were working for
Bush, and they were implementing his policies. Therefore, the
Democrats had to treat them like ****, which they did.

Now we have the same generals implementing the same policies, for the
most part, and the Democrats *want* to treat them like ****. But, the
generals have a new top dog, who is also a Democrat. This puts the
Boxer's of the world in a hard place. They have to take their
satisfaction any way they can.
--
John H

I once shook hands with a pudgy guy who:

Sailed from San Francisco to Hawaii.
Rounded Cape Horn, twice.
Transited the Panama Canal.
Has owned more than 20 boats in his lifetime.
Sailed large boats competitively.
Has been hundreds of miles from land in a powerboat
under his command.

And who set a new record for the most distance covered
and most fish caught in the Chesapeake Bay in the shortest
time!

"Scott Dickson" wrote in message
...
On Jun 18, 8:01 pm, D K wrote:
John H wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:02:35 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Frogwatch wrote:
.

Froggy,
I would be VERY VERY careful providing Harry with ANY personal info.

I most fervently agree with that post.
--

John H

If WAFA pulls any ****, he will see his personal information reposted
(yes, it's available in Google)and cross posted to no less than 100
"interesting" groups. He was quiet for a week after it landed here.
He'll have to move if he pushes his luck.

Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooooooooooo

That Ditzy Dan is one 'tough character', hiding down below the Mason-Dixon
line.
Any organizations down there to handle his kind of threats?

Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
m...

Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
news In the Senate, it is the Senators who are the important ones. There are
only 100 of them (99 at the moment); it is the most exclusive elected
official federal government club in this country. Generals are a dime a
dozen.

Big whoop. Elected officials. Public servants with a dismal approval
rating.
If I were a sitting Senator right now I am not so sure I'd be so proud of
it.

Pure, unadultrated ego on her part.

Eisboch



Typical - you're no fan of democracy, but a big fan of the military. Well,
it's no easy task becoming one of 100 U.S. senators. Any idiot, and I mean
that in the fullest sense of the phrase (e.g., Herring, floridajim) can
become part of the military.



Strange way of interpreting a post .... and of thinking in general.
My post had nothing to do with democracy or the military.

Having said that however, the general deserves a compliment for maintaining
his professional demeanor and not allowing his personal feelings to overcome
it, as she did.

I am simply not a big fan of egotistical, pompous blowhards.
Haven't you noticed?

Eisboch



Really? You seem to be friends with SW Tom and D'whine.

--
"John H" wrote in message
...

Please note that Interstate 90 will be closed this weekend across
South Dakota. This closure will allow the Federal Government free
access to haul a 200 ton piece of coal to Mt. Rushmore so that
President Obama can be added to the Presidents on the monument.
--
John H

--

John Herring, rec.boat's resident racist.

"HK" wrote in message
m...

I am simply not a big fan of egotistical, pompous blowhards.
Haven't you noticed?

Eisboch

Really? You seem to be friends with SW Tom and D'whine.



To put it in marine radio terms, your transmitting section works fine but
your receiving section has lost a bunch of sensitivity.

Eisboch

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote in message
m...

I am simply not a big fan of egotistical, pompous blowhards.
Haven't you noticed?

Eisboch

Really? You seem to be friends with SW Tom and D'whine.



To put it in marine radio terms, your transmitting section works fine but
your receiving section has lost a bunch of sensitivity.

Eisboch


Definition of "sensitivity" in this context?

D.Duck wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
"HK" wrote in message
m...
I am simply not a big fan of egotistical, pompous blowhards.
Haven't you noticed?

Eisboch
Really? You seem to be friends with SW Tom and D'whine.


To put it in marine radio terms, your transmitting section works fine but
your receiving section has lost a bunch of sensitivity.

Eisboch


Definition of "sensitivity" in this context?




That's me...Mr. Sensitive. Sensitive enough to know Egotistical, Pompous
Tom, aka Mr. Scientific Certainty, and d'Whine are gasbags.



--
"John H" wrote in message
...

Please note that Interstate 90 will be closed this weekend across
South Dakota. This closure will allow the Federal Government free
access to haul a 200 ton piece of coal to Mt. Rushmore so that
President Obama can be added to the Presidents on the monument.
--
John H

--

John Herring, rec.boat's resident racist.

"HK" wrote in message
...
D.Duck wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
"HK" wrote in message
m...
I am simply not a big fan of egotistical, pompous blowhards.
Haven't you noticed?

Eisboch
Really? You seem to be friends with SW Tom and D'whine.


To put it in marine radio terms, your transmitting section works fine
but your receiving section has lost a bunch of sensitivity.

Eisboch


Definition of "sensitivity" in this context?


That's me...Mr. Sensitive. Sensitive enough to know Egotistical, Pompous
Tom, aka Mr. Scientific Certainty, and d'Whine are gasbags.



Never noticed that.

D.Duck wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
D.Duck wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
"HK" wrote in message
m...
I am simply not a big fan of egotistical, pompous blowhards.
Haven't you noticed?

Eisboch
Really? You seem to be friends with SW Tom and D'whine.

To put it in marine radio terms, your transmitting section works fine
but your receiving section has lost a bunch of sensitivity.

Eisboch

Definition of "sensitivity" in this context?

That's me...Mr. Sensitive. Sensitive enough to know Egotistical, Pompous
Tom, aka Mr. Scientific Certainty, and d'Whine are gasbags.



Never noticed that.



When you read about rec.boats gasbag, does anyone in particular come to
mind?

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

"Reginald P Smithers III, Esq." wrote in
message ...
D.Duck wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
D.Duck wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
"HK" wrote in message
m...
I am simply not a big fan of egotistical, pompous blowhards.
Haven't you noticed?

Eisboch
Really? You seem to be friends with SW Tom and D'whine.

To put it in marine radio terms, your transmitting section works fine
but your receiving section has lost a bunch of sensitivity.

Eisboch

Definition of "sensitivity" in this context?

That's me...Mr. Sensitive. Sensitive enough to know Egotistical, Pompous
Tom, aka Mr. Scientific Certainty, and d'Whine are gasbags.



Never noticed that.

When you read about rec.boats gasbag, does anyone in particular come to
mind?

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no
way are to be considered flaws or defects


Yep.

Don White wrote:
"Scott Dickson" wrote in message
...
On Jun 18, 8:01 pm, D K wrote:
John H wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:02:35 -0400, "Reginald P Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
.
Froggy,
I would be VERY VERY careful providing Harry with ANY personal info.
I most fervently agree with that post.
--
John H
If WAFA pulls any ****, he will see his personal information reposted
(yes, it's available in Google)and cross posted to no less than 100
"interesting" groups. He was quiet for a week after it landed here.
He'll have to move if he pushes his luck.

Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooooooooooo

That Ditzy Dan is one 'tough character', hiding down below the Mason-Dixon
line.
Any organizations down there to handle his kind of threats?



Nothing to "handle", dummy. It will be a public service.