Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 2, 9:37*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote: On Jun 30, 2:27*pm, jps wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Jun 30, 1:33*pm, HK wrote: Frogwatch wrote: In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term, he had imported ballots from Chavez. *The army which is charged by their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe keeping. *Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots. Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and unconstitutional. *This was not a coup but was legal and in accord with their constitution. Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and his illegal actions and put him back in power. *What ever happened to rule of law? *If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them by ANY means. Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means anything to him. Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras? Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. *He is simply not capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut and paste. That supposes what you've written contains reason. *Big leap.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, those pesky facts keep getting in the way... OK, DK, prove I lied then. I stand by my assertions that their supreme court acted legally and in accord with their constitution. If you cannot show I lied, then man up and admit you are wrong. |
#22
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 19:44:41 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On Jul 2, 9:37*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Jun 30, 2:27*pm, jps wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Jun 30, 1:33*pm, HK wrote: Frogwatch wrote: In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term, he had imported ballots from Chavez. *The army which is charged by their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe keeping. *Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots. Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and unconstitutional. *This was not a coup but was legal and in accord with their constitution. Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and his illegal actions and put him back in power. *What ever happened to rule of law? *If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them by ANY means. Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means anything to him. Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras? Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. *He is simply not capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut and paste. That supposes what you've written contains reason. *Big leap.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, those pesky facts keep getting in the way... OK, DK, prove I lied then. I stand by my assertions that their supreme court acted legally and in accord with their constitution. If you cannot show I lied, then man up and admit you are wrong. You didn't lie. However, your understand remains stilted. |
#23
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 2, 11:20*pm, jps wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 19:44:41 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Jul 2, 9:37*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Jun 30, 2:27*pm, jps wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Jun 30, 1:33*pm, HK wrote: Frogwatch wrote: In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term, he had imported ballots from Chavez. *The army which is charged by their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe keeping. *Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots. Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and unconstitutional. *This was not a coup but was legal and in accord with their constitution. Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and his illegal actions and put him back in power. *What ever happened to rule of law? *If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them by ANY means. Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means anything to him. Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras? Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. *He is simply not capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut and paste. That supposes what you've written contains reason. *Big leap.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, those pesky facts keep getting in the way... OK, DK, prove I lied then. *I stand by my assertions that their supreme court acted legally and in accord with their constitution. *If you cannot show I lied, then man up and admit you are wrong. You didn't lie. *However, your understand remains stilted. "stilted", meaning: "THat Damned Frogwatch is right again" |
#24
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 20:58:27 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On Jul 2, 11:20*pm, jps wrote: On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 19:44:41 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Jul 2, 9:37*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Jun 30, 2:27*pm, jps wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Jun 30, 1:33*pm, HK wrote: Frogwatch wrote: In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term, he had imported ballots from Chavez. *The army which is charged by their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe keeping. *Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots. Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and unconstitutional. *This was not a coup but was legal and in accord with their constitution. Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and his illegal actions and put him back in power. *What ever happened to rule of law? *If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them by ANY means. Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means anything to him. Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras? Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. *He is simply not capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut and paste. That supposes what you've written contains reason. *Big leap.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, those pesky facts keep getting in the way... OK, DK, prove I lied then. *I stand by my assertions that their supreme court acted legally and in accord with their constitution. *If you cannot show I lied, then man up and admit you are wrong. You didn't lie. *However, your understand remains stilted. "stilted", meaning: "THat Damned Frogwatch is right again" You may be right about some things, none of them have to do with politics. |
#25
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 19:44:41 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On Jul 2, 9:37*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Jun 30, 2:27*pm, jps wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Jun 30, 1:33*pm, HK wrote: Frogwatch wrote: In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term, he had imported ballots from Chavez. *The army which is charged by their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe keeping. *Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots. Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and unconstitutional. *This was not a coup but was legal and in accord with their constitution. Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and his illegal actions and put him back in power. *What ever happened to rule of law? *If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them by ANY means. Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means anything to him. Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras? Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. *He is simply not capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut and paste. That supposes what you've written contains reason. *Big leap.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, those pesky facts keep getting in the way... OK, DK, prove I lied then. I stand by my assertions that their supreme court acted legally and in accord with their constitution. If you cannot show I lied, then man up and admit you are wrong. Froggie, DK wasn't accusing you of lieing. He was simply adding another item to your list of Harry's skills. Your statement regarding Honduras was right on. -- John H "If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until its free!" --Anonymous |
#26
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 20:58:27 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On Jul 2, 11:20*pm, jps wrote: On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 19:44:41 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Jul 2, 9:37*pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Jun 30, 2:27*pm, jps wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Jun 30, 1:33*pm, HK wrote: Frogwatch wrote: In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term, he had imported ballots from Chavez. *The army which is charged by their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe keeping. *Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots. Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and unconstitutional. *This was not a coup but was legal and in accord with their constitution. Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and his illegal actions and put him back in power. *What ever happened to rule of law? *If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them by ANY means. Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means anything to him. Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras? Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. *He is simply not capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut and paste. That supposes what you've written contains reason. *Big leap.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, those pesky facts keep getting in the way... OK, DK, prove I lied then. *I stand by my assertions that their supreme court acted legally and in accord with their constitution. *If you cannot show I lied, then man up and admit you are wrong. You didn't lie. *However, your understand remains stilted. "stilted", meaning: "THat Damned Frogwatch is right again" Exactly. -- John H "If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait until its free!" --Anonymous |
#27
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John...same as yesterday. wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 19:44:41 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Jul 2, 9:37 pm, "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Jun 30, 2:27 pm, jps wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:48:59 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Jun 30, 1:33 pm, HK wrote: Frogwatch wrote: In Honduras where Pres Zalada was illegally trying to organize a referendum to allow himself to remain pres beyond the end of his term, he had imported ballots from Chavez. The army which is charged by their constitution with organizing elections took the ballots for safe keeping. Zalada sent his thugs to steal said ballots. Aside from the fact that the Pres of Honduras cannot organize such a referendum, it has to be done by the legislative branch, his stealing the ballots to make sure he "won" resulted in him being arrested after a court order by the Supreme Court ruled his actions illegal and unconstitutional. This was not a coup but was legal and in accord with their constitution. Now, Obama, Chavez and Castro want Honduras to ignore their law and his illegal actions and put him back in power. What ever happened to rule of law? If the constitution of a govt means nothing to these people, maybe we should not think it applies to them and remove them by ANY means. Obama needs to answer to us on whether constitutionality means anything to him. Is that your drug-induced take on Honduras? Note the total lack of reasoning on the part of HK. He is simply not capable of forming a rational idea which is why his only skill is cut and paste. That supposes what you've written contains reason. Big leap.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, those pesky facts keep getting in the way... OK, DK, prove I lied then. I stand by my assertions that their supreme court acted legally and in accord with their constitution. If you cannot show I lied, then man up and admit you are wrong. Froggie, DK wasn't accusing you of lieing. He was simply adding another item to your list of Harry's skills. Your statement regarding Honduras was right on. -- John H Bingo! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Laws of Nature aren't suspended for big boats | General | |||
If THEY can flout the laws then WE can -- and SHOULD -- too | General | |||
We don't need no stinkin' lifejackets! | General | |||
OT Florida Eminent Domain Laws | General | |||
OT--the dichotomous abortion laws | General |