The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda.
It loses $50 million a year.

The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his
conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3
billion into it and it has never been profitable.

The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further
his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year.

The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his
conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his
conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year.

Swiped from KOS

"HK" wrote in message
news

The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda.
It loses $50 million a year.

The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his
conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion
into it and it has never been profitable.

The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further
his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year.

The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his
conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his
conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year.

Swiped from KOS



And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of
bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all.

Swiped from www.Breitbart.com at
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...ow_article= 1

The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on
Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by
online competition and falling print advertising revenue.

The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third
quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million
dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago.

The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald
Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York
Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the
quarter.

Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was
lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's
Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade.

Lu Powell wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
news

The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative
agenda. It loses $50 million a year.

The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his
conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3
billion into it and it has never been profitable.

The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to
further his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year.

The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his
conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his
conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year.

Swiped from KOS



And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of
bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all.

Swiped from www.Breitbart.com at
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...ow_article= 1


The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on
Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by
online competition and falling print advertising revenue.

The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third
quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4
million dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago.

The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International
Herald Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The
New York Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent
during the quarter.

Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was
lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while
Moody's Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible
downgrade.





Whoosh. It's not about losing revenue. Most newspapers are hurting
because of the shifts in media habits. The rags I mentioned are operated
to further an individual's political agenda.

The NY Times, a moderate-to-mildly liberal newspaper, is not. It isn't
owned by an individual, as are the NY Post, the Wash Times, or the
Trib-Review.

Got it, Lu?

Probably not.

On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:36:13 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
news

The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda.
It loses $50 million a year.

The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his
conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion
into it and it has never been profitable.

The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further
his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year.

The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his
conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his
conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year.

Swiped from KOS



And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of
bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all.

Swiped from www.Breitbart.com at
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...ow_article= 1

The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on
Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by
online competition and falling print advertising revenue.

The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third
quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million
dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago.

The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald
Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York
Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the
quarter.

Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was
lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's
Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade.


What's this bit about the NY Times turning a net profit?

Something the three conservatives are lacking.

Selling liberalism must be far more profitable. Why aren't the
conservatives in that business?

jps wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:36:13 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
news
The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda.
It loses $50 million a year.

The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his
conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion
into it and it has never been profitable.

The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further
his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year.

The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his
conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his
conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year.

Swiped from KOS


And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of
bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all.

Swiped from www.Breitbart.com at
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...ow_article= 1

The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on
Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by
online competition and falling print advertising revenue.

The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third
quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million
dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago.

The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald
Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York
Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the
quarter.

Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was
lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's
Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade.


What's this bit about the NY Times turning a net profit?

Something the three conservatives are lacking.

Selling liberalism must be far more profitable. Why aren't the
conservatives in that business?


Well, they do have the Fake News Network and, of course, WorldNutCaseDaily.

On Jul 1, 4:48*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:36:13 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:







"HK" wrote in message
news

The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda.
It loses $50 million a year.

The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his
conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion
into it and it has never been profitable.

The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further
his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year.

The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his
conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his
conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year.

Swiped from KOS

And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of
bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all.

Swiped fromwww.Breitbart.com*at
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...7uwdxs&show_ar....

The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on
Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by
online competition and falling print advertising revenue.

The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third
quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million
dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago.

The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald
Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York
Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the
quarter.

Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was
lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's
Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade.

What's this bit about the NY Times turning *a net profit? *

Something the three conservatives are lacking.

Selling liberalism must be far more profitable. *Why aren't the
conservatives in that business?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Fiction sells... The New York Lies is well known for making it up as
they go along.. What a waste of resources..

HK wrote:
Lu Powell wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
news

The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative
agenda. It loses $50 million a year.

snip


Whoosh. It's not about losing revenue. Most newspapers are hurting
because of the shifts in media habits. The rags I mentioned are operated
to further an individual's political agenda.

The NY Times, a moderate-to-mildly liberal newspaper, is not. It isn't
owned by an individual, as are the NY Post, the Wash Times, or the
Trib-Review.

Got it, Lu?

Probably not.

If you talking all media, I believe the most listened talk show is Russ
Limbaugh, a strong conservative. Someone the obama would love to shut
down as people look to Russ to keep them informed of what the liberals
re up to.

JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Jul 1, 4:48 pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:36:13 -0400, "Lu Powell"
wrote:







"HK" wrote in message
news The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda.
It loses $50 million a year.
The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his
conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3 billion
into it and it has never been profitable.
The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further
his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year.
The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his
conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his
conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year.
Swiped from KOS
And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of
bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all.
Swiped fromwww.Breitbart.com at
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...7uwdxs&show_ar...
The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on
Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by
online competition and falling print advertising revenue.
The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third
quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4 million
dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago.
The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald
Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York
Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the
quarter.
Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was
lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while Moody's
Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible downgrade.
What's this bit about the NY Times turning a net profit?

Something the three conservatives are lacking.

Selling liberalism must be far more profitable. Why aren't the
conservatives in that business?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Fiction sells... The New York Lies is well known for making it up as
they go along.. What a waste of resources..


Uh...no one asked for the opinion of an uninformed, uneducated,
ignorant, and hopelessly stupid idiot like you.

Swinburne, no doubt, had one of your ancestors in mind when he wrote in
Testaments:

"An Idiote, or a naturall foole is he, who notwithstanding he bee of
lawfull age, yet he is so witlesse, that hee can not number to twentie,
nor can tell what age he is of, nor knoweth who is his father, or
mother, nor is able to answer to any such easie question."

You know, like "built any boats lately?"

Keith Nuttle wrote:
HK wrote:
Lu Powell wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
news
The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative
agenda. It loses $50 million a year.

snip


Whoosh. It's not about losing revenue. Most newspapers are hurting
because of the shifts in media habits. The rags I mentioned are
operated to further an individual's political agenda.

The NY Times, a moderate-to-mildly liberal newspaper, is not. It isn't
owned by an individual, as are the NY Post, the Wash Times, or the
Trib-Review.

Got it, Lu?

Probably not.

If you talking all media, I believe the most listened talk show is Russ
Limbaugh, a strong conservative. Someone the obama would love to shut
down as people look to Russ to keep them informed of what the liberals
re up to.


Only absolute idiots depend upon Limbaugh to stay informed, and they
vote for Republicans or klansmen. In other words, Limbaugh reaches the
audience of losers. Like you.

"HK" wrote in message
m...
Lu Powell wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
news

The NY Post is run by Rupert Murdoch to further his conservative agenda.
It loses $50 million a year.

The Washington Times is run by Rev. Sun Myung Moon to further his
conservative agenda. By some estimates Rev. Moon has sunk $2 to $3
billion into it and it has never been profitable.

The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is run by Richard Mellon Scaife to further
his conservative agenda. It loses $20 to $30 million a year.

The Weekly Standard used to be owned by Murdoch to further his
conservative agenda but is now owned by Philip Anschutz to further his
conservative agenda. Either way, it loses $5 million a year.

Swiped from KOS



And the New York Times (liberal is its middle name) is on the verge of
bankruptcy. Tell it all or don't tell it at all.

Swiped from www.Breitbart.com at
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...ow_article= 1
The New York Times Co. reported a steep drop in third-quarter profits on
Thursday, the latest gloomy earnings report in an industry battered by
online competition and falling print advertising revenue.

The New York Times Co. said net profit fell by 51.4 percent in the third
quarter to 6.5 million dollars, or five cents per share, from 13.4
million dollars, or nine cents per share, in the same period a year ago.

The company, which owns About.com, The Boston Globe, International Herald
Tribune and 16 other daily newspapers besides the flagship The New York
Times, said overall advertising revenue fell by 14.4 percent during the
quarter.

Shortly after the release of its results, Standard & Poors said it was
lowering the Times's credit rating to "BB-," or junk status, while
Moody's Investors Service said it was placing it on review for possible
downgrade.





Whoosh. It's not about losing revenue. Most newspapers are hurting because
of the shifts in media habits. The rags I mentioned are operated to
further an individual's political agenda.

The NY Times, a moderate-to-mildly liberal newspaper, is not. It isn't
owned by an individual, as are the NY Post, the Wash Times, or the
Trib-Review.

Got it, Lu?

Probably not.

I do get the difference. KOS is not exactly the most objective source for
anything. Its existence is due in part to the largesse of a billionaire with
his own agenda. That sort of makes KOS a rag like the ones you slammed. As I
said, tell it all or don't tell it at all.

Relax. Have some fun. Go boating. Show your wife how lucky she is to have a
man like you.