| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
A peach of a man...
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:54:41 -0700, jps wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:33:04 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:28:59 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:58:39 -0700, jps wrote: snipped for brevity You must have supported Henry Hyde's investigation into Clinton's blow job. The same Henry Hyde who was concurrently cheating on his wife. Concurrently cheating on his wife? Egads! Miss Information strikes again! Wait! I think I understand. Hyde was cheating on his wife at the same time he was cheating on his wife. You Leftists are so cagey! Do you often run yourself in circles? Seems like a waste of energy and so contrary to the run-of-the-mill straight line "conservative." Oh well, to each his own. Indubitably, there are some that are lacking for insight, and often that mental impediment is set in place by political blindness. I would recommend that you either look up the standard definition of "concurrent," or else revisit the late Mr. Hyde's history. Unless, of course, you are a Moore-sian revisionist and lack the courage to subordinate yourself to intellectual honesty (that being my prognosis). -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
A peach of a man...
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:58:04 -0500, wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:54:41 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:33:04 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:28:59 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:58:39 -0700, jps wrote: snipped for brevity You must have supported Henry Hyde's investigation into Clinton's blow job. The same Henry Hyde who was concurrently cheating on his wife. Concurrently cheating on his wife? Egads! Miss Information strikes again! Wait! I think I understand. Hyde was cheating on his wife at the same time he was cheating on his wife. You Leftists are so cagey! Do you often run yourself in circles? Seems like a waste of energy and so contrary to the run-of-the-mill straight line "conservative." Oh well, to each his own. Indubitably, there are some that are lacking for insight, and often that mental impediment is set in place by political blindness. I would recommend that you either look up the standard definition of "concurrent," or else revisit the late Mr. Hyde's history. Unless, of course, you are a Moore-sian revisionist and lack the courage to subordinate yourself to intellectual honesty (that being my prognosis). Oh golly, the act wasn't concurrent. We found out about it concurrent with him sitting in judgement of Clinton. ****ing hypocritical son of a bitch. Like so many other outspoken, holier-than-thou "conservative, family values" Republicans. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
